Diastasis Recti and Weakness of the Linea AlbaQUEDIANCT04158180
Creation and Validation of a Questionnaire Evaluating Diastasis Recti
An observational study of Diastasis Recti and Weakness of the Linea Alba and Diastasis Recti, run by University of Valencia at 2 sites in Spain.
Trial summary
Introduction. Distasis rectus abdominis (DRA) is defined as the presence of divergence between the rectus abdominis muscles along the linea alba. Some authors describe a prevalence of 40% in women up to one year postpartum. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 65 years, women only
- Conditions the study is for
- Diastasis Recti and Weakness of the Linea Alba, Diastasis Recti
- What is being tested?
- Questionnaire
- How many people
- 125 participants
- Where
- 2 sitesSpain
- Study dates
- 27 Sep 2021to 15 Nov 2026
- How long will I take part?
- 2 Years
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 65 years
- Women only
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: Adult women with diastasis recti attending to a physiotherapist or midwive center will be proposed to participate in the study. A signed informed consent will be necessary to participate in this research.
Who may be able to join
- subjects with diastasis recti,
- adult,
- women.
Who cannot join
- cognitive disabilities that can difficult a good understanding of the questionnaire,
- lack of knowledge of Spanish language.
- ventral hernia.
- previous abdominal surgeries.
Trial locations and contacts
2 sites in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
Spain2 sites, 2 recruiting
- Recruiting
Haro&Campos Physiotherapy.
Plasencia, Cáceres, 10600
Victoria Vicente Campos, PT, 646562766, victoriavicentecampos@hotmail.com
Victoria Vicente Campos, PT
- Recruiting
Department of Physiotherapy. University of Valencia
Valencia, 46010
Laura Fuentes Aparicio, PhD, 669682391, laura.fuentes@uv.es
Laura Fuentes Aparicio, PhD
About this study
Official title: Creation and Validation of a Questionnaire on Diastasis Recti Signs and Symptoms
Introduction. Distasis rectus abdominis (DRA) is defined as the presence of divergence between the rectus abdominis muscles along the linea alba. Some authors describe a prevalence of 40% in women up to one year postpartum. Some studies suggest that the presence of DRA can be related to the appearance of low back, pelvic and abdominal pain and even urinary incontinence. These factors can significantly affect the quality of life of women with diastasis both socially, sexual and personal level. According to several studies, this pathology is related to higher rates of depression and an alteration in the self-perception of body image that makes these women to look to specialized medical care.
At present, the quantitative evaluation of DRA is performed purely anatomically. This evaluation consists in measuring the separation between the two rectus abdominis. Currently there is no consensus as to the protocol that should be used for this measurement.
Read more
So far, no instrument is able to quantitatively measure the consequences of DRA. The evaluation of symptoms and consequences should include relevant parameters such as quality of life, perception of body image and functional limitations.
The objective of this study is the creation and validation of a specific questionnaire to evaluate the symptoms and consequences of DRA.
Material and methods. A) Development of the questionnaire
- Literature review
- Online survey
- Expert panel
- Pilot test of the questionnaire
- Validation of the questionnaire. The psychometric properties of the questionnaire will be evaluated in a sample of patients with DRA. The sample will be composed of a group of adult women with DRA who attended to a physiotherapy clinic.
Read the detailed description
Introduction. Women with Diastasis rectus abdominis (DRA) often experience decreased physical health and functioning, negative body image and abdominal discomfort. These parameters have major impact on quality of life, becoming an additional barrier to physical activity during pregnancy and postnatal period. Nowadays, the most utilized method to evaluate DRA consists of measuring the separation between the two medial borders of the rectus abdominis muscles (namely inter-recti distance). Nevertheless, any specific tool has been created for the evaluation of parameters such as quality of life, body image perception, pain and secondary functional limitations. A valid and reliable instrument, with acceptable psychometric properties is necessary to specifically evaluate symptoms of DRA and to improve the evaluation of DRA and ultimately improve patient-centered care.
The main aim of this projet is the development and validation of such a tool.
Material and methods.
The current project consists of several stages:
- Development of the questionnaire.
- Literature review. A systematic review will be created to identify the relevant self-reported variables in the study of DRA in adult women. Observational studies evaluating the link between DRA and self-reported symptoms will be searched through Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases. The methodological quality will be assessed independently by two evaluators using the NIH Quality Assessment Tool for Observational Cohort and Cross-Sectional Studies. This review was registered in Prospero (Review Registration Number: PROSPERO CRD42017058089). This systematic review will be conducted in accordance with the PRISMA statement.
- Online survey. A mixed observational study will be performed through a semi-structured online survey in order to identify relevant variables in women with DRA. The Ethics Committee of the University of Valencia (June 5, 2019, 13.49.17) approved the implementation of this study. Women will sign an informed consent. The study will be carried out in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. The analysis of the perception of the symptoms of DRA and its repercussion at a physical, psychological and social level in women affected by this condition will be assessed. The data will be analyzed quantitatively and qualitative. Key concepts will be categorized according to their dimension through the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF).The CHERRIES publication guideline will be used to report the survey data.
- Expert panel. Taking in account the results of both, the systematic review and the online survey, a first generation of items will be performed by the main authors. These items will be presented in a panel composed by various experts in this field (with prominent academic background or an extended work experience related with DRA management and/or research methods) and a patient. Experts will rate the comprehensiveness, relevance, and coherence of each item in a 4-points numerical scale. They will categorized each item in the dimension to which they believed it appertained. Aiken´s V index will be calculated. A preliminary version of the Questionnaire will be then created.
- Pilot test of the questionnaire. The preliminary version of the Questionnaire will be tested in a pilot sample composed of 30 females with DRA. The Ethics Committee of the University of Valencia (June 5, 2019, 13.49.17) and the Committee at Canterbury Christ Church University (10/08/2021 ETH2021-0362) approved the implementation of this study. Women will sign an informed consent. The study will be carried out in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. Women will complete a set of questions including demographic data, the preliminary questionnaire and an evaluation of the preliminary questionnaire. An evaluation of the comprehensibility, comprehensiveness and relevance of each item will be performed using a 4-point Likert scale. Participants will be able to include their comments and remarks, individually for each item, as well as for the whole questionnaire and the questionnaire structure. Final version of the questionnaire will be then created. After the completion of the study, the dataset will be published. The COSMIN Study Design checklist for Patient-reported outcome measurement instruments will be used to report and design this study.
- Validation of the questionnaire. The psychometric properties of the questionnaire will be evaluated in a sample of patients with DRA. The sample will be composed of a group of adult women with DRA who attended to a physiotherapy clinic. Participants will complete a series of questions including sociodemographic variables and the final version of the questionnaire. In order to calculate convergent validity, participants will be asked to complete five comparative questionnaires: Whoqol-bref overall quality of life and general health" subscale, GIQLI "Symptoms" subscale, Whoqol-bref "social relationships" subscale, WHODAS-36 "mobility" and "life activities" subscales and Body Image States Scale (BISS).Internal consistency, the type error, the ceiling floor effect, the convergent validity, the validity of the construct, the discriminatory capacity and the minimum detectable change of the questionnaire will be calculated. Seven to 10 days after the completion of the online survey, participants will be asked to fill in the final questionnaire again in order to evaluate test-retest reliability. The standard error of the measurement, the minimum detectable change and the intraclass correlation coefficient will be calculated. After the completion of the study, the dataset will be published. The COSMIN Study Design checklist for Patient-reported outcome measurement instruments will be used to report and design this study.
- Being tested
- Questionnaire
- Medical subject headings
- Diastasis Recti And Weakness Of The Linea Alba
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
QuestionnaireDiagnostic test
A battery of questionnaires will be propose to the participants
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Diastasis abdominal consequences
Diastasis rectus abdominis consequences will be measured using the Diastasis rectus abdominis questionnaire
Measured: 7 to 10 days after initial assessment
Secondary outcomes (7)
Inter-recti distance
The distance between the two medial borders of rectus abdominis muscles will be measured using ultrasound
Measured: Initial assessment
Subjective well-being
Subjective well-being will be measured using the World Health Organization Quality-of-Life Scale (WHOQOL-Bref) "overall quality of life and general health" subscale (2-10 points). Domain scores are scaled in a positive direction, higher scores denote higher quality of life.
Measured: Initial assessment
Gastrointestinal symptoms
Gastrointestinal symptoms will be measured using the Gastrointestinal Quality of Life Index (GIQLI) "Symptoms" subscale (0-36 points). 4-likert scale ( 0 points being the worst punctuation and 4 points the best)
Measured: Initial assessment
Functioning
Functioning will be measured using the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule-36 (WHODAS-36) "mobility" and "life activities"subscales (0-36points). 5- point Likert scale. Higher scores indicate lower quality of life.
Measured: Initial assessment
Body image
Body image will be measured using the Body Image States Scale (BISS) (6-54points). The scale was presented in a negative-to-positive direction for half of the items and a positive-to-negative direction for the other half.
Measured: Initial assessment
Social relationships-related quality of life
Social relationships-related quality of life will be measured using the World Health Organization Quality-of-Life Scale (WHOQOL-bref) "social relationships" subscale (3-15 points). Domain scores are scaled in a positive direction, higher scores denote higher quality of life.
Measured: Initial assessment
Psychological distress
Psychological distress will be measured using Kessler psychological distress scale (K10). Low scores indicate low levels of psychological distress and high scores indicate high levels of psychological distress. (10-50 points)
Measured: Initial assessment
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted8 Nov 2019
- Study start27 Sep 2021
- Primary completion28 Sep 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion15 Nov 2026 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Diastasis Recti and Weakness of the Linea AlbaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University of ValenciaThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Other
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 125 participants (estimated)
- Target duration
- 2 Years
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Valencia
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- University Hospital, Caen
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Laura Fuentes Aparicio, University of Valencia
- Investigators
- Montserrat Rejano Campo, PhD(c), Principal investigator
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04158180
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- QUEDIA
- Acronym
- QUEDIA
- Status last verified
- May 2026
- First submitted
- 4 Nov 2019
- Last updated
- 22 May 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 22 May 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Creation and Validation of a Questionnaire on Diastasis Recti Signs and Symptoms
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04158180
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- QUEDIA / QUEDIA
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Recruiting
- Enrolment
- 125 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- University of ValenciaUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- University Hospital, Caen
- Study start
- 27 Sep 2021 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 28 Sep 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 15 Nov 2026 (estimated)
- First posted
- 8 Nov 2019 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Introduction. Distasis rectus abdominis (DRA) is defined as the presence of divergence between the rectus abdominis muscles along the linea alba. Some authors describe a prevalence of 40% in women up to one year postpartum. Some studies suggest that the presence of DRA can be related to the appearance of low back, pelvic and abdominal pain and even urinary incontinence. These factors can significantly affect the quality of life of women with diastasis both socially, sexual and personal level. According to several studies, this pathology is related to higher rates of depression and an alteration in the self-perception of body image that makes these women to look to specialized medical care.
At present, the quantitative evaluation of DRA is performed purely anatomically. This evaluation consists in measuring the separation between the two rectus abdominis. Currently there is no consensus as to the protocol that should be used for this measurement.
So far, no instrument is able to quantitatively measure the consequences of DRA. The evaluation of symptoms and consequences should include relevant parameters such as quality of life, perception of body image and functional limitations.
The objective of this study is the creation and validation of a specific questionnaire to evaluate the symptoms and consequences of DRA.
Material and methods. A) Development of the questionnaire
- Literature review
- Online survey
- Expert panel
- Pilot test of the questionnaire
- Validation of the questionnaire. The psychometric properties of the questionnaire will be evaluated in a sample of patients with DRA. The sample will be composed of a group of adult women with DRA who attended to a physiotherapy clinic.
Detailed description
Introduction. Women with Diastasis rectus abdominis (DRA) often experience decreased physical health and functioning, negative body image and abdominal discomfort. These parameters have major impact on quality of life, becoming an additional barrier to physical activity during pregnancy and postnatal period. Nowadays, the most utilized method to evaluate DRA consists of measuring the separation between the two medial borders of the rectus abdominis muscles (namely inter-recti distance). Nevertheless, any specific tool has been created for the evaluation of parameters such as quality of life, body image perception, pain and secondary functional limitations. A valid and reliable instrument, with acceptable psychometric properties is necessary to specifically evaluate symptoms of DRA and to improve the evaluation of DRA and ultimately improve patient-centered care.
The main aim of this projet is the development and validation of such a tool.
Material and methods.
The current project consists of several stages:
- Development of the questionnaire.
- Literature review. A systematic review will be created to identify the relevant self-reported variables in the study of DRA in adult women. Observational studies evaluating the link between DRA and self-reported symptoms will be searched through Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases. The methodological quality will be assessed independently by two evaluators using the NIH Quality Assessment Tool for Observational Cohort and Cross-Sectional Studies. This review was registered in Prospero (Review Registration Number: PROSPERO CRD42017058089). This systematic review will be conducted in accordance with the PRISMA statement.
- Online survey. A mixed observational study will be performed through a semi-structured online survey in order to identify relevant variables in women with DRA. The Ethics Committee of the University of Valencia (June 5, 2019, 13.49.17) approved the implementation of this study. Women will sign an informed consent. The study will be carried out in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. The analysis of the perception of the symptoms of DRA and its repercussion at a physical, psychological and social level in women affected by this condition will be assessed. The data will be analyzed quantitatively and qualitative. Key concepts will be categorized according to their dimension through the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF).The CHERRIES publication guideline will be used to report the survey data.
- Expert panel. Taking in account the results of both, the systematic review and the online survey, a first generation of items will be performed by the main authors. These items will be presented in a panel composed by various experts in this field (with prominent academic background or an extended work experience related with DRA management and/or research methods) and a patient. Experts will rate the comprehensiveness, relevance, and coherence of each item in a 4-points numerical scale. They will categorized each item in the dimension to which they believed it appertained. Aiken´s V index will be calculated. A preliminary version of the Questionnaire will be then created.
- Pilot test of the questionnaire. The preliminary version of the Questionnaire will be tested in a pilot sample composed of 30 females with DRA. The Ethics Committee of the University of Valencia (June 5, 2019, 13.49.17) and the Committee at Canterbury Christ Church University (10/08/2021 ETH2021-0362) approved the implementation of this study. Women will sign an informed consent. The study will be carried out in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. Women will complete a set of questions including demographic data, the preliminary questionnaire and an evaluation of the preliminary questionnaire. An evaluation of the comprehensibility, comprehensiveness and relevance of each item will be performed using a 4-point Likert scale. Participants will be able to include their comments and remarks, individually for each item, as well as for the whole questionnaire and the questionnaire structure. Final version of the questionnaire will be then created. After the completion of the study, the dataset will be published. The COSMIN Study Design checklist for Patient-reported outcome measurement instruments will be used to report and design this study.
- Validation of the questionnaire. The psychometric properties of the questionnaire will be evaluated in a sample of patients with DRA. The sample will be composed of a group of adult women with DRA who attended to a physiotherapy clinic. Participants will complete a series of questions including sociodemographic variables and the final version of the questionnaire. In order to calculate convergent validity, participants will be asked to complete five comparative questionnaires: Whoqol-bref overall quality of life and general health" subscale, GIQLI "Symptoms" subscale, Whoqol-bref "social relationships" subscale, WHODAS-36 "mobility" and "life activities" subscales and Body Image States Scale (BISS).Internal consistency, the type error, the ceiling floor effect, the convergent validity, the validity of the construct, the discriminatory capacity and the minimum detectable change of the questionnaire will be calculated. Seven to 10 days after the completion of the online survey, participants will be asked to fill in the final questionnaire again in order to evaluate test-retest reliability. The standard error of the measurement, the minimum detectable change and the intraclass correlation coefficient will be calculated. After the completion of the study, the dataset will be published. The COSMIN Study Design checklist for Patient-reported outcome measurement instruments will be used to report and design this study.
Study design
- Observational model
- Other
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Target follow-up
- 2 Years
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 65 years
- Sex
- Female only
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Adult women with diastasis recti attending to a physiotherapist or midwive center will be proposed to participate in the study. A signed informed consent will be necessary to participate in this research.
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- subjects with diastasis recti,
- adult,
- women.
Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)
- cognitive disabilities that can difficult a good understanding of the questionnaire,
- lack of knowledge of Spanish language.
- ventral hernia.
- previous abdominal surgeries.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| QuestionnaireA battery of questionnaires will be propose to the participants | Diagnostic test | – |
Primary outcome
Diastasis abdominal consequences
Time frame: 7 to 10 days after initial assessment
Diastasis rectus abdominis consequences will be measured using the Diastasis rectus abdominis questionnaire
7 secondary outcomes
Inter-recti distance
Time frame: Initial assessment
Subjective well-being
Time frame: Initial assessment
Gastrointestinal symptoms
Time frame: Initial assessment
Functioning
Time frame: Initial assessment
Body image
Time frame: Initial assessment
Social relationships-related quality of life
Time frame: Initial assessment
Psychological distress
Time frame: Initial assessment
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 22 May 2026.
Related trials for Diastasis Recti and Weakness of the Linea Alba
Not yet recruiting
Effect of Exercise on the Width and Stiffness of the Linea Alba in Postpartum Women With Diastasis
Diastasis Recti And Weakness Of The Linea Alba
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Patient-Reported Outcomes in Women With Postpartum Abdominal Wall Insufficiency (PPAWIS)
Diastasis Recti and Weakness of the Linea Alba, Abdominal Wall Defect
Recruiting
Rehabilitation of Abdominal Diastasis After Childbirth: Trunk and Inspiratory Muscle Training
Diastasis Recti And Weakness Of The Linea Alba, Diastasis, Muscle
Not yet recruiting
Diastasis Recti Abdominis and a Combined Treatment With Abdominal Exercise and Radiofrequency
Diastasis, Diastasis Recti
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
Montserrat Rejano Campo, PhD(c) principal investigator
2 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Diastasis Recti and Weakness of the Linea Alba and Diastasis Recti, run by University of Valencia at 2 sites in Spain.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 22 May 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 2 sites in Spain. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Montserrat Rejano Campo, PhD(c) (0033627083914, montserejano@gmail.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Diastasis abdominal consequences (time frame: 7 to 10 days after initial assessment). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 22 May 2026; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 1 Nov 2026.