AzTrials
AzTrials

Diabetic Foot UlcerPhase 4FLIGHTNCT04163055

Fluorescence Image-Guided Healing Trial

A Phase 4 study testing Moleculight i:X in people with Diabetic Foot Ulcer, run by University Health Network, Toronto.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Lower extremity complications such as chronic diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) are a major risk for Type I/II diabetes patients. Minor injuries that would normally heal without consequence in non-diabetic individuals are at greater risk of bacterial infection and progression to non healing (chronic) wound status in… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Diabetic Foot Ulcer
What is being tested?
Moleculight i:X
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
294 participants
Where
No sites listed yet
Study dates
1 Jan 2021to 31 Dec 2022
Phase
Phase 4
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Diagnosed with type I or II diabetes
  • Presents with one or more chronic or acute DFUs of known or unknown infection status
  • Presents with a DFU with surface area that has reduced <25% in the last 4 weeks
  • Braden Score ≥13-14 (Moderate Risk)
  • Toe-Brachial Index > 0.5 (Mild-Normal)

Who cannot join

  • Wounds < 1 cm in diameter
  • Current or past (within 1 month) treatment of DFU with antibiotics
  • Treatment with an investigational drug within 1 month of enrolment
  • Presents with chronic (>10mg/kg for >30 days) systemic corticoids before enrolment
  • Undergoing chemotherapy or is immunocompromised
  • Diagnosed with Charcot disease or ulcers from electrical, chemical or radiation burns
Show all 12Show fewer
  • Presents with collagen vascular disease, ulcer malignancy, cellulitis, or chronic osteomyelitis (defined as a severe, persistent and sometimes incapacitating infection of bone and bone marrow).
  • Recombinant or autologous growth factors or skin/dermal substitutes within 30 days of enrollment
  • Enzymatic debridement
  • Acquired a limb-threatening infection which necessitates an amputation
  • InfectionHas a terminal illness
  • Inability to consent

Trial locations and contacts

No sites are listed yet.

Vasanth Subramanian, MS contact

4166348754

vasanth.subramanian@uhnresearch.ca

About this study

Official title: The F.L.I.G.H.T. (Fluorescence Image-Guided Healing Trial) for Diabetic Foot Ulcers: A Phase IV Trial

Lower extremity complications such as chronic diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) are a major risk for Type I/II diabetes patients. Minor injuries that would normally heal without consequence in non-diabetic individuals are at greater risk of bacterial infection and progression to non healing (chronic) wound status in diabetics, largely due to a loss of sensation in limbs (neuropathy) and decreased blood flow (vascular disease). If not treated efficiently and effectively, DFUs can have serious complications e.g. amputation, sepsis and death. The investigators propose to address this significant unmet clinical need using a novel commercial handheld fluorescence imaging product called the MolecuLight i:X (MolecuLight Inc.) which images clinically-significant wound bacteria without contrast agents or patient contact. Evidence in animal models of chronic wounds and multiple published clinical trials (mainly DFUs) have shown significant clinical potential for fluorescence imaging to detect potentially harmful bacteria in wounds otherwise invisible to doctors. The investigators have shown that clinicians can easily, objectively and more accurately determine the likelihood of bacterial infection than the standard of care. Moreover, published clinical evidence has shown fluorescence imaging enables more accurate microbial wound sampling and guides more targeted debridement of wounds to reduce bacteria levels. Our pilot data also show that when used like this, the i:X device accelerates DFU wound healing, compared with current methods. Thus, the investigators propose to expand the current pilot studies through a statistically-powered 3 y randomized controlled trial to test the therapeutic benefit of fluorescence-guided treatment for DFUs in a larger group of patients. A successful trial could help reduce DFU healing times compared with standard practice (using a new Canadian product) and improve patient quality of life, reduce amputation risk and alleviate health care costs for diabetes complications in Canada and beyond.

Read the detailed description

Wound care is a major clinical challenge and presents an enormous burden to health care worldwide. Wounds Canada describes chronic wounds as "a Canadian healthcare crisis." According to Wounds Canada and Diabetes Canada, approximately 15% of the 2.3 million diabetic Canadians will develop a diabetic foot ulcer (DFU) and every 30 seconds someone in the world loses a toe or limb to diabetes. Diabetics are about 23x more likely to be hospitalized for amputations, approximately 85% of which are due to a previous DFU. Delayed wound healing has been linked to a variety of factors including infection, which disrupts key biological changes at the tissue and cellular level that are associated with the wound healing process. Standard of care (SoC) of DFU infections involves visual inspection of the wound under white light (WL) and identification of common signs of infection using the Clinical Signs and Symptoms Checklist. However, SoC is limited by inconsistent guidelines and subjective assessment. In addition, visual inspection and WL-guided sampling are inaccurate and currently, no point-of-care technologies exist to assist the unaided eye. In response to this gap, Dr. DaCosta (PI) and colleagues at University Health Network developed a handheld fluorescence imaging platform (MolecuLight i:X) that detects bacterial autofluorescence in wounds in real-time, at the point-of-care, and without the use of exogenous contrast agents. The investigators propose a 3-year randomized control trial to test the therapeutic benefit of AF-image guided intervention on DFU management using the i:X. The research questions are Q1). Does AF-guided diagnosis and wound bed preparation improve wound healing in DFUs relative to SoC alone? Q2). Does AF-guided intervention decrease the bioburden in DFUs relative to SoC alone? Q3). Does AF-guided intervention improve patient quality of life relative to SoC alone? Q4). Is AF-guided intervention associated with reduced treatment cost? Primary objective: is to determine if AF-guided diagnosis and wound bed preparation improve wound healing in DFUs compared to SoC alone. To measure this, the investigators will compare between study arms i) the frequency of complete wound healing (CWH) at 12 weeks; ii) the frequency of partial wound healing (PWH) at 6 and 12 weeks, CWH at 6 weeks, and mean time-to-CWH (days); iii) the reduction in wound size at 12 weeks; and iv) the rate of wound healing over 12 weeks. Secondary objective: is to determine if AF-guided intervention decreases the bioburden in DFUs compared to SoC alone by evaluating bacterial diversity and measuring bacteria load at specified regular intervals over 12 weeks. Tertiary objective: is to determine if AF-guided intervention is associated with improved quality of life (QoL) and with reduced treatment costs, which will be measured by using patient questionnaires and the Canadian Institute for Health Information database.

If successful, this Randomized Control Trial (RCT) will demonstrate that AF image-guided wound care improves time to CWH or PWH among Ontarians with DFUs by increasing wound healing rates and reducing bioburden. If our technology can improve CWH by our target of >= 16% (absolute), an additional 55,000 Canadians could reach CWH by 12 weeks, resulting in reduced wound care costs and improved QoL. The average cost of treating a DFU is $5000-8000/patient. Improving the number of patients that achieve CWH by >= 16% will substantially reduce costs associated with treating DFUs in Canada. The results of this study may inform health policy decisions and recommendations for changes to current SoC DFU practice guidelines. Health economic and QoL comparison of AF-guided wound care vs SoC in the proposed RCT will help define the overall value proposition of the new approach. If the investigators fail to demonstrate improved wound healing rates, this will also be of value to physicians, patients and the Canadian health care system. Knowing not to further pursue this line of research is important in an era of limited funding.

Being tested
Moleculight i:X
Keywords
Diabetes, Foot Ulcer, Non-healing wound, Targeted debridement
Medical subject headings
Diabetic Foot, Diabetes Mellitus, Foot Ulcer

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Moleculight i:XDevice

    This device is used to visualize the bacteria in the wound. Patients do not need consume any contrast agent prior to imaging. The device does not come in contact with the wound.

Study groups in NCT04163055
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Standard of CareNo interventionWounds will be assessed using the Clinical Signs and Symptoms Checklist (CSSC). After initial assessment, a white-light (WL) photo will be taken of the wound. The wound bed will be prepared as indicated by clinical staff based on standard of care (SoC), including irrigation and debridement. A second WL image will be taken and a swab/biopsy will be obtained from the wound. Wounds will be dressed based on SoC.
Autofluorescence guided Standard of CareExperimentalWounds will be assessed by autofluorescence (AF)-guided SoC. A baseline WL and AF photo will be taken of the wound. AF images will guide SoC including targeted debridement of areas of bacterial growth (AF+) and targeted sampling in areas of residual bacterial growth post-debridement. If no bacterial AF is detected, sample will be obtained from the wound center by curettage technique. If AF is detected, AF-guided debridement will be repeated and additional images will be obtained until 1) no AF is detected or 2) further debridement is not medically advised. After wound bed preparation, a second set of WL and AF images will be taken. Wounds will be dressed as per SoC. At all visits, samples will be sent for microbiology analysis. At 6- and 12-week visits (or any other scheduled visits in between), microbiology reports will be shared with clinicians if they were not collected outside of SoC.
Receives: Device: Moleculight i:X

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. The rate of CWH of DFUs will be estimated as a proportion and compared between the two groups using a chi square test. The superiority of AF-guided intervention (Arm 2) will be established if the null hypothesis is rejected.

    CWH is defined as 100% re-epithelialization, and will be recorded and validated by independent review. The % of patients achieving CWH will be evaluated at 6- and 12-wk and compared between study arms (time point based on previously published data regarding wound healing in DFUs). Time to CWH will also be recorded and compared between study arms. PWH is defined as a reduction in wound area (WA) of ≥50% relative to baseline, but not meeting criteria of CWH. The % of patients achieving PWH will be evaluated at 6 and 12-wk and compared between study arms. To validate CWH, images of wounds identified as having reached 100% re-epithelialization by the wound care clinician will be photographed under WL and sent for review by at least 2 independent blinded researchers.

    Measured: 12 weeks

Secondary outcomes (7)
  1. Rate of Wound Healing

    The rate of PWH of DFUs at 6 and 12 weeks and CWH at 6 weeks will be estimated as a proportion and compared between the two groups using chi-square analysis

    Measured: 12 weeks

  2. The percent reduction in wound area

    Wound area reduction at 6 and 12 weeks will be estimated as an average percent wound area reduction relative to baseline and will be compared between the two groups using Student's t-test and linear regression (adjusting for risk factors related to change in wound area).

    Measured: 12 weeks

  3. The bioburden of the wound identified and quantified

    Clinical microbiology reports (from curettage samples) will be used to determine wound bioburden, defined as the diversity of species and semi-quantitative bacterial load.

    Measured: 12 weeks

  4. To evaluate cost effectiveness and cost utility of the device on treatment

    An economic analysis will be conducted to evaluate the cost-effectiveness and cost-utility of the i:X intervention relative to standard of care (SoC) for patients with diabetic foot ulcers.

    Measured: 12 weeks

  5. Quality of Life improvement due to the device as assessed by EuroQol-5D-5L

    The health outcome for the cost-effectiveness analysis will be the proportion of patients with complete wound healing at 12 weeks post initial intervention (same as the primary study end-point).The health outcome for the cost-utility analysis will be quality adjusted life years (QALYs). Quality of life will be measured throughout the trial using the EuroQoL Five Dimensions (EQ-5D-5L) instrument (Scale is between 0-100, with 100 being the best health you can imaging and 0 being the worst health you can imagine) .

    Measured: 12 weeks

  6. Quality of Life improvement due to the device as assessed by Short Form -12 Health Questionnaire

    The health outcome for the cost-effectiveness analysis will be the proportion of patients with complete wound healing at 12 weeks post initial intervention (same as the primary study end-point).The health outcome for the cost-utility analysis will be quality adjusted life years (QALYs). Quality of life will be measured throughout the trial using the Short Form -12 Health questionnaire instrument (On a scale of 1(all the time) - 6(none of the time) and 1(yes limited a lot) -3 (no not limited at all)).

    Measured: 12 weeks

  7. Quality of Life improvement due to the device as assessed Diabetic Foot Ulcer Scale

    The health outcome for the cost-effectiveness analysis will be the proportion of patients with complete wound healing at 12 weeks post initial intervention (same as the primary study end-point).The health outcome for the cost-utility analysis will be quality adjusted life years (QALYs). Quality of life will be measured throughout the trial using the Diabetic Foot Ulcer Scale instrument (The scale for this instrument is 1 to 5 with 1 being not likely to 5 being extremely likely).

    Measured: 12 weeks

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted14 Nov 2019
  2. Study start1 Jan 2021 (estimated)
  3. Primary completion30 Dec 2022 (estimated)
  4. Study completion31 Dec 2022 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
294 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04163055
Sponsor's protocol ID
18-6034
Acronym
FLIGHT
Status last verified
Nov 2020
First submitted
7 Nov 2019
Last updated
3 Nov 2020
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 4 study testing Moleculight i:X in people with Diabetic Foot Ulcer, run by University Health Network, Toronto.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 12 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 3 Nov 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Vasanth Subramanian, MS (4166348754, vasanth.subramanian@uhnresearch.ca), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

The rate of CWH of DFUs will be estimated as a proportion and compared between the two groups using a chi square test. The superiority of AF-guided intervention (Arm 2) will be established if the null hypothesis is rejected. (time frame: 12 weeks). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 3 Nov 2020; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 30 Oct 2026.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in