AzTrials
AzTrials

Rib Fracture MultipleRF-AdvantageNCT04163224

Minimal Invasive Approach for Surgical Repair of Rib Fractures With a Novel Intrathoracic Device

An observational study of Rib Fracture Multiple, run by Zimmer Biomet.

Withdrawn

Withdrawn. The study stopped before anyone enrolled.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

A retrospective review of demographics and adverse events from cases completed with the RibFix Advantage System. Evaluation of device integrity, and performance by a prospective CT scan with a minimum of 3 months post-implantation. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Rib Fracture Multiple
What is being tested?
RibFix Advantage
Type of treatment
Medical device
How many people
0 participants
Where
No sites listed yet
Study dates
1 Apr 2020to 30 Dec 2020
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: Patients treated for rib fracture repair using RibFix Advantage System alone or in combination with other methods for rib fracture repair

Who may be able to join

  • Male or Female
  • ≥ 18 years old (no upper limit)
  • Underwent surgical repair of rib fracture(s) with the RibFix Advantage System alone or in combination with other systems for fracture repair
  • Signed Informed Consent Form for participation in a clinical trial
  • Willing and able to return for a follow-up visit (includes a computed tomography (CT) scan of the chest)

Who cannot join

  • Off label use of RibFix Advantage (e.g., active or latent infection at the time of implantation, sepsis, metal sensitivity)

About this study

Official title: Minimal Invasive Approach for Surgical Repair of Rib Fractures With a Novel Intrathoracic Device. Case Series

A retrospective review of demographics and adverse events from cases completed with the RibFix Advantage System. Evaluation of device integrity, and performance by a prospective CT scan with a minimum of 3 months post-implantation.

Read the detailed description

The RibFix Advantage System is a novel intrathoracic titanium plating system that is FDA-cleared for the treatment of rib fractures. The RibFix Advantage System is designed to be implanted in a less invasive procedure where plates are introduced and placed on the pleural cortex of the rib during video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery. Intrathoracic plate placement allows for smaller cutaneous incisions and less muscle disruption, which may aid in patient recovery compared to traditional open reduction internal fixation systems that are currently available.

The purpose of this study is to gather the first clinical data on this novel device in the context of a case series of patients with radiologic and quality-of-life follow-up.

Being tested
RibFix Advantage
Keywords
multiple rib fractures, chest stabilization, rib plates

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • RibFix AdvantageDevice

    Class II device in the United States; consists of bridges (with locking posts) and locking caps for the thoracoscopic fixation and stabilization of ribs. These implants are manufactured from commercially pure titanium and titanium alloys. When fully assembled, the bridge plate is placed on the underside of the rib (pleural cortex); the threaded locking posts extend through pre-drilled holes in the rib, and the locking caps are fixed to the locking post on the anterior (cutaneous) side of the rib. The combined threaded locking post and cap provides for fixation of the bridge and stabilization of the fracture.

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Fracture stability

    Evaluated by a computed tomography (CT) scan. Rib fractures repaired with RibFix Advantage should demonstrate continuity without overlap

    Measured: 3 months post-implantation

  2. Device integrity

    Evaluated by a computed tomography (CT) scan. Images should demonstrate no plate migration, no post/cap migration and no plate fracture

    Measured: 3 months post-implantation

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. Adverse Events of Interest

    Includes: Chest infections, Empyema, Mediastinitis. Wound infection, Wound dehiscence, Chest wall deformity related to the device, Pleural effusion related to the device, Hemothorax related to the device, Pneumothorax related to the device and Hemo-pneumothorax related to the device

    Measured: From the the date of implantation until the day of hospital discharge, or up to 10 days post-implantation, whichever occurs first; 30 days post surgery; 3 month post-implantation

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted14 Nov 2019
  2. Study start1 Apr 2020 (estimated)
  3. Primary completion30 Aug 2020 (estimated)
  4. Study completion30 Dec 2020 (estimated)

Why it stopped: Sponsor strategy change

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrolment
0 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04163224
Sponsor's protocol ID
0719-2
Acronym
RF-Advantage
Status last verified
Aug 2020
First submitted
8 Nov 2019
Last updated
1 Sep 2020
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Granetzny A, Abd El-Aal M, Emam E, Shalaby A, Boseila A. Surgical versus conservative treatment of flail chest. Evaluation of the pulmonary status. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2005 Dec;4(6):583-7. doi: 10.1510/icvts.2005.111807. Epub 2005 Sep 15.

    PubMed 17670487
  • Majercik S, Wilson E, Gardner S, Granger S, VanBoerum DH, White TW. In-hospital outcomes and costs of surgical stabilization versus nonoperative management of severe rib fractures. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2015 Oct;79(4):533-8; discussion 538-9. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000000820.

    PubMed 26402525
  • Pieracci FM, Agarwal S, Doben A, Shiroff A, Lottenberg L, Whitbeck SA, White TW. Indications for surgical stabilization of rib fractures in patients without flail chest: surveyed opinions of members of the Chest Wall Injury Society. Int Orthop. 2018 Feb;42(2):401-408. doi: 10.1007/s00264-017-3612-1. Epub 2017 Aug 29.

    PubMed 28852836
  • Sarani B, Allen R, Pieracci FM, Doben AR, Eriksson E, Bauman ZM, Gupta P, Semon G, Greiffenstein P, Chapman AJ, Kim BD, Lottenberg L, Gardner S, Marasco S, White T. Characteristics of hardware failure in patients undergoing surgical stabilization of rib fractures: A Chest Wall Injury Society multicenter study. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2019 Dec;87(6):1277-1281. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000002373.

    PubMed 31107433
  • Edwards JG, Clarke P, Pieracci FM, Bemelman M, Black EA, Doben A, Gasparri M, Gross R, Jun W, Long WB, Lottenberg L, Majercik S, Marasco S, Mayberry J, Sarani B, Schulz-Drost S, Van Boerum D, Whitbeck S, White T; Chest Wall Injury Society collaborators. Taxonomy of multiple rib fractures: Results of the chest wall injury society international consensus survey. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2020 Feb;88(2):e40-e45. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000002282. No abstract available.

    PubMed 31590175
  • Leinicke JA, Elmore L, Freeman BD, Colditz GA. Operative management of rib fractures in the setting of flail chest: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Surg. 2013 Dec;258(6):914-21. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3182895bb0.

    PubMed 23511840
  • Majercik S, Cannon Q, Granger SR, Van Boerum DH, White TW. Regarding: Long-term patient outcomes after surgical stabilization of rib fractures. Am J Surg. 2015 Jul;210(1):199-200. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2015.03.020. Epub 2015 May 21. No abstract available.

    PubMed 26072282
  • Majercik S, Cannon Q, Granger SR, VanBoerum DH, White TW. Long-term patient outcomes after surgical stabilization of rib fractures. Am J Surg. 2014 Jul;208(1):88-92. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2013.08.051. Epub 2014 Jan 4.

    PubMed 24507379
  • Majercik S, Vijayakumar S, Olsen G, Wilson E, Gardner S, Granger SR, Van Boerum DH, White TW. Surgical stabilization of severe rib fractures decreases incidence of retained hemothorax and empyema. Am J Surg. 2015 Dec;210(6):1112-6; discussion 1116-7. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2015.08.008. Epub 2015 Sep 18.

    PubMed 26454653
  • Marasco SF, Davies AR, Cooper J, Varma D, Bennett V, Nevill R, Lee G, Bailey M, Fitzgerald M. Prospective randomized controlled trial of operative rib fixation in traumatic flail chest. J Am Coll Surg. 2013 May;216(5):924-32. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2012.12.024. Epub 2013 Feb 13.

    PubMed 23415550
  • Pieracci FM. Completely thoracoscopic surgical stabilization of rib fractures: can it be done and is it worth it? J Thorac Dis. 2019 May;11(Suppl 8):S1061-S1069. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2019.01.70.

    PubMed 31205763
  • Pieracci FM, Lin Y, Rodil M, Synder M, Herbert B, Tran DK, Stoval RT, Johnson JL, Biffl WL, Barnett CC, Cothren-Burlew C, Fox C, Jurkovich GJ, Moore EE. A prospective, controlled clinical evaluation of surgical stabilization of severe rib fractures. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2016 Feb;80(2):187-94. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000000925.

    PubMed 26595710
  • Pieracci FM, Majercik S, Ali-Osman F, Ang D, Doben A, Edwards JG, French B, Gasparri M, Marasco S, Minshall C, Sarani B, Tisol W, VanBoerum DH, White TW. Consensus statement: Surgical stabilization of rib fractures rib fracture colloquium clinical practice guidelines. Injury. 2017 Feb;48(2):307-321. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2016.11.026. Epub 2016 Nov 27. No abstract available.

    PubMed 27912931
  • Slobogean GP, MacPherson CA, Sun T, Pelletier ME, Hameed SM. Surgical fixation vs nonoperative management of flail chest: a meta-analysis. J Am Coll Surg. 2013 Feb;216(2):302-11.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2012.10.010. Epub 2012 Dec 5.

    PubMed 23219148
  • Tanaka H, Yukioka T, Yamaguti Y, Shimizu S, Goto H, Matsuda H, Shimazaki S. Surgical stabilization of internal pneumatic stabilization? A prospective randomized study of management of severe flail chest patients. J Trauma. 2002 Apr;52(4):727-32; discussion 732. doi: 10.1097/00005373-200204000-00020.

    PubMed 11956391

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Rib Fracture Multiple, run by Zimmer Biomet.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: withdrawn, as of the sponsor's last update on 1 Sep 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study was withdrawn before enrolling participants, so there are no results.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Fracture stability (time frame: 3 months post-implantation). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04163224, which also lists 15 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 1 Sep 2020.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in