AzTrials
AzTrials

End Stage Renal DiseaseNCT04163614

Blood Pressure Slopes and Ultrafiltration in Hemodialysis Patients

A study testing IBPS-Guided Ultrafiltration in people with End Stage Renal Disease and Hypertension, run by VA Office of Research and Development at 1 site in United States.

Recruiting

Looking for participants now. Contact the study team or a site below to ask about taking part.

Sites and contacts
Official record

Search all trials

Trial summary

Kidney failure has been recognized as one of the most costly chronic conditions among United States Veterans. Approximately 13,000 Veterans develop kidney failure each year, and most require hemodialysis initiation. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
What is being tested?
IBPS-Guided Ultrafiltration
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
69 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
10 Feb 2021to 1 Oct 2026
Phase
Interventional

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Hemodialysis patient
  • Pre-dialysis systolic blood pressure greater than 140 mmHg averaged over 2 weeks OR post-dialysis systolic blood pressure greater than 130 mmHg averaged over 2 weeks

Who cannot join

  • HemoDialysis Vintage Less than 2 months
  • Pregnancy
  • Mean systolic blood pressure nadir <95 mmHg in 2 weeks screening
  • Mean pre- or post-dialysis systolic blood pressure >180 mmHg
  • Mean pre to post-HD decrease in blood pressure >60 mmHg
  • Routine intradialytic clonidine use
Show all 10Show fewer
  • Routine intradialytic midodrine use
  • Documented antihypertensive medication non-adherence
  • Mean ultrafiltration rate >13 mL/kg/hr during 2 week screening
  • For bioimpedance measurements only: amputation of a major extremity, presence of cardiac defibrillator or pacemaker, presence of a metallic implant (prosthetic joint)

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.

Peter N Van Buren, MD contact

(214) 857-2214

peter.vanburen@va.gov

United States1 site, 1 recruiting
  • VA North Texas Health Care System Dallas VA Medical Center, Dallas, TX

    Dallas, Texas, 75216-7167

    Peter N Van Buren, MD, (214) 857-2214, peter.vanburen@va.gov

    Peter Noel Van Buren, MD

    Recruiting

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Using Intradialytic Blood Pressure Slopes to Guide Ultrafiltration in Hemodialysis Patients

Kidney failure has been recognized as one of the most costly chronic conditions among United States Veterans. Approximately 13,000 Veterans develop kidney failure each year, and most require hemodialysis initiation. Hemodialysis patients suffer significantly increased risk of death and hospitalizations, and excessive body fluid is a major cause of this. While empiric aggressive fluid removal during dialysis is one approach to limit fluid overload, this can cause dangerous decreases in blood pressure during dialysis that independently contribute to the high death rate. In this study, I aim to test a new strategy that prescribes fluid removal based on a patient's recent blood pressure patterns during dialysis. This clinical trial will compare my strategy to standard care and assess the outcomes of overall blood pressure change between dialysis treatments in addition to the number of times the blood pressure becomes dangerously low during dialysis. Another aim is to determine how differences in the structure and function of the heart influence blood pressure during dialysis.

Read the detailed description

United States Veterans have disproportionately higher risk for end stage renal disease (ESRD) compared to the general population. Veterans with ESRD on maintenance hemodialysis (HD) suffer from alarmingly high mortality rates and hospitalizations mainly related to cardiovascular disease. Extracellular volume (ECV) excess is a primary contributing factor to cardiovascular disease and the heightened mortality rate in HD patients. Extracellular volume excess remains difficult to identify in clinical practice, and the standard approach to fluid management in the clinical setting involves arbitrary trial and error attempts to remove fluid without invoking hemodynamic instability such as intradialytic hypotension. Bioimpedance spectroscopy (BIS) is a useful research tool for assessing ECV; however, it is not feasible in routine practice, and there is little data on how its use affects intermediate and hard clinical outcomes. There is an unmet need for an approach to guide ultrafiltration in clinical practice that addresses both reduction of ECV and other mortality outcomes as well as minimization of intradialytic hypotension. The long-term goal of this study is to develop a more precise, patient-specific fluid management approach to be tested in a large clinical trial aimed at reducing mortality in Veterans on HD. The overall objective of this project is to utilize the investigators' novel, patient-specific ultrafiltration algorithm as an intervention in a clinical trial using mortality risk factors as the primary outcomes. The central hypothesis is that prescribing ultrafiltration prospectively based on an individual patient's intradialytic blood pressure slopes (IBPS) from recent treatments is superior to standard care at reducing ambulatory blood pressure and ECV without increasing risk for intradialytic hypotension. Aim 1 will use an un-blinded, controlled randomized clinical trial to demonstrate the effects of an IBPS-based ultrafiltration prescription compared to standard clinical practice. Each month, updated ultrafiltration prescriptions for the IBPS group will be determined based on the most recent treatment data. The primary outcome will be change in mean systolic 44-hour ambulatory blood pressure after 4 months. Other outcomes will include 1) change in post-HD ECV/body weight using multifrequency bioimpedance spectroscopy, 2) change in post-HD total peripheral resistance index using a non-invasive cardiac output monitor, and 3) between-group comparison of the frequency of intradialytic hypotension and intradialytic symptoms. Aim 2 will involve a cross sectional analysis of baseline data of subjects from Aim 1 in addition to consecutive enrollment of additional hypertensive HD patients. In addition to Aim 1 measurements, subjects will undergo transthoracic echocardiograms on a non-HD day to obtain measurements of left ventricular ejection fraction as a metric of systolic function, mitral inflow and mitral annulus velocities as a metric of diastolic function, and left ventricular mass index. Mixed linear models will be used to determine how these metrics independently influence the association between ECV/body weight and IBPS. The strength of the association between IBPS and ECV/body weight will then be determined within each tertile of the distributions of systolic and diastolic dysfunction. Finally, there will be an assessment of how the echocardiogram based metrics influence the likelihood of intradialytic hypotension with prospective follow up while controlling for ECV/body weight. If successful, this study will provide nephrologists with an easily-implemented, individualized approach to fluid management in Veterans on HD that safely reduces ECV excess and related mortality risk factors. Because no approach currently exits, this could immediately change clinical practice of managing Veterans with ESRD. The long term impact will be the opportunity to utilize the data generated to design a large, multi-center trial directly evaluating this intervention's effect on mortality in Veterans with ESRD on HD. The observed reduction in blood pressure can be used to determine expected mortality, while the echocardiogram data can be used to determine phenotypes of patients that may need to be considered for inclusion/exclusion criteria.

Being tested
IBPS-Guided Ultrafiltration
Keywords
End Stage Renal Disease, Hypertension, Extracellular Volume, Intradialytic Hypotension, Bioimpedance Spectroscopy
Medical subject headings
Kidney Failure, Chronic, Hypertension

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • IBPS-Guided UltrafiltrationOther

    Each month, the study investigator will review the average intradialytic blood pressure slope from the prior two weeks. A prespecified algorithm will be used to prescribe additional fluid removal/weight reduction based on this slope.

Study groups in NCT04163614
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
ControlNo interventionParticipants in the control group will have their blood pressure, fluid status, as well as all other aspects of clinical care managed in entirety by their treating nephrologists.
IBPS (Intradialytic Blood Pressure Slope) ArmExperimentalIBPS participants will have their target weight adjusted each month by the study investigator based on recent assessment of intradialytic blood pressure slopes.
Receives: Other: IBPS-Guided Ultrafiltration

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Ambulatory Systolic Blood Pressure

    Will compare between-group difference in change in ambulatory systolic blood pressure from baseline to 4-month follow up

    Measured: 4 months

Secondary outcomes (4)
  1. Extracellular Volume

    Will compare the between-group difference in change in post-dialysis extracellular water/body weight measured with multifrequency bioimpedance spectroscopy.

    Measured: 4 months

  2. Total Peripheral Resistance Index

    Will compare the between-group difference in change in post-dialysis total peripheral resistance index measured with a non-invasive cardiac output monitor.

    Measured: 4 months

  3. Intradialytic Hypotension

    The investigators will compare the between-group difference in the occurrence of intradialytic systolic blood pressure nadir less than 90 and 95 mmHg.

    Measured: 4 months

  4. Association Between intradialytic blood pressure slope with systolic and diastolic dysfunction

    The investigators will analyze the correlation between intradialytic blood pressure slopes with both ejection fraction and mitral inflow/mitral annuls velocities measured with transthoracic echocardiograms

    Measured: 3 days

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted15 Nov 2019
  2. Study start10 Feb 2021
  3. Primary completion1 Oct 2026 (estimated)
  4. Study completion1 Oct 2026 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
Active Control Participants will be managed in entirety by their treating nephrologists. The intradialytic blood pressure slope (IBPS) group will have their target weight adjusted each month by study investigator based on recent intradialytic blood pressure slopes
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
69 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04163614
Sponsor's protocol ID
NEPH-020-19S
Status last verified
Jul 2026
First submitted
12 Nov 2019
Last updated
20 Jul 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in