AzTrials
AzTrials

Intravenous CannulationNCT04164862

AccuVein AV400 Device Versus Ultrasound-guided Cannulation of the Great Saphenous Vein at the Ankle in Infants

A study testing AccuVein AV400 Device Versus Ultrasound-guided Cannulation in people with Intravenous Cannulation, run by Alexandria University at 1 site in Egypt.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Establishment of venousaccess in the age group ≤12 months can be difficult and associated with repetitive punctures . Numerous techniques to facilitate peripheral venous puncture have been described such as local warming, epidermal nitrogycerine, translumination, and venous cutdown . Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Any ageHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Intravenous Cannulation
What is being tested?
AccuVein AV400 Device Versus Ultrasound-guided Cannulation
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
100 participants
Where
1 siteEgypt
Study dates
1 Sep 2019to Jan 2020
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages Any age
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Infants' ≤12 months
  • ASA physical status I and II
  • undergoing elective surgery
  • with no visible veins at the dorsum of the hands or feet

Who cannot join

  • REFUSAL

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Egypt1 site
  • Rehab A.Zayed

    Alexandria, 000000

Other trials in Egypt

About this study

Official title: Effectiveness of AccuVein AV400 Device Versus Ultrasound-guided Cannulation of the Great Saphenous Vein at the Ankle in Infants: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Establishment of venousaccess in the age group ≤12 months can be difficult and associated with repetitive punctures . Numerous techniques to facilitate peripheral venous puncture have been described such as local warming, epidermal nitrogycerine, translumination, and venous cutdown . Ultrasound guidance is reported to facilitate peripheral venous catheterisation in children and to have advantages over blind techniques, especially for challenging veins . Also The AccuVein AV400 device which detects the haemoglobin in the vessels by red and infrared light reflection and shows a vasculature map. AccuVein AV400 device (AV400) improves the success rate of intravenous cannulation in pediatric patients .

Most peripheral veins in infants are too superficial and too small for direct visualization. A promising alternative approach could be the great saphenous vein (GSV) at the level of the medial malleolus due to the adequate diameter and the relatively deep position relative to the skin.

Read the detailed description

The present study is designed to investigate the practicability of ultrasound-guided vascular access versus the AccuVein AV 400 for cannulation of the great saphenous vein at the level of the medial malleoli in infants ≤12 months. The primary outcome will be the time to successful placement of catheters. Secondary outcomes included the number of attempts, the rate of failure, technique-related pain, occurrence of movements, and occurrence of complications like haematoma or local infection.

Patient and method:

A prospective, randomized study will be conducted from May 2019 till November 2019; at least 50 patients will be allocated in each group; at the Alexandria Main University Hospital after approval of the Medical Ethics Committee. Informed written consent will be obtained from the patient's parents. Infants' ≤12 months with ASA physical status I and II, undergoing elective surgery with no visible veins at the dorsum of the hands or feet will be enrolled in the study. Infants will be randomly assigned, by using a block of four randomization provided by www.randomization.com, into two groups; an AV400 group (using the AccuVein AV400 for peripheral venous insertion) and a ultrasound guided group (using the ultrasound for peripheral venous insertion). The performers of cannulation will be done by expert anesthetists, having a minimum of 5 times experience in ultra sound guided IV cannula insertion and with the AccuVein AV400 device.

Preoperatively in all infants, both medial malleolar areas will be prepared with EMLA cream , premedication with 1 mg/ kg rectal midazolam (maximum dose 15 mg) will be done at 30 minutes preoperative. Establishment of standard monitoring (SpO2, ECG, non-invasive arterial pressure) and then induction of general anaesthesia will be done via a face mask with sevoflurane FIO2 40% - O2/air and after successful induction of general anaesthesia, the EMLA tapes will be removed .Assisted ventilation via the face mask will be done until establishment of venous access either through using Acc Vein AV400 or through ultrasound guided for the great saphenous vein. On each occasion, the observer will record the time of tourniquet application, the time of successful cannulation or four skin punctures, and the number of cannulation attempts. A cannulation attempt will be defined as any backward and forward movements of the needle, regardless of whether the needle was out of the skin. Successful cannulation will be defined by the absence of tissue swelling around the puncture point after injection of 5 ml of crystalloid solution. In both groups, a maximal number of three attempts for establishment of venous access in one GSV will be performed. If the third attempt failed, the contralateral GSV will be punctured. If successful establishment of venous access in the contralateral GSV failed, the case will be counted as failure. In these cases, the external jugular vein will be used as an alternative approach for venous access. After successful establishment of venous access, the anaesthetic procedure will be continued depending on surgical requirements. Twenty-four hours after establishment of the venous access, the puncture site will be evaluated to detect possible haematoma or local infection.

Being tested
AccuVein AV400 Device Versus Ultrasound-guided Cannulation
Keywords
AccuVein AV400 device, ultrasound-guided cannulation

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • AccuVein AV400 Device Versus Ultrasound-guided CannulationDevice

    Accuvein AV400 device versus Ultrasound guided cannulation

Study groups in NCT04164862
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
use ACCUVEIN AV400Active comparatorDevice to facilitate cannulation of the great saphenous vein at the ankle in infants
Receives: Device: AccuVein AV400 Device Versus Ultrasound-guided Cannulation
ULTRASOUND GUIDED CANNULATIONActive comparatorUltrasound cannulation of the great saphenous vein in infants
Receives: Device: AccuVein AV400 Device Versus Ultrasound-guided Cannulation

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. the time to successful placement of catheters

    the time to successful placement of catheters

    Measured: "Through operation completion, average of 2 hours"

Secondary outcomes (2)
  1. the number of attempts

    attempts for successful cannulation

    Measured: "Through operation completion, average of 2 hours"

  2. , technique-related pain, occurrence of movements, and occurrence of complications .

    complications like haematoma or local infection.

    Measured: "Through operation completion, average of 2 hours"

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted15 Nov 2019
  2. Study start1 Sep 2019
  3. Primary completionDec 2019 (estimated)
  4. Study completionJan 2020 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Participant
Enrolment
100 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04164862
Sponsor's protocol ID
00012098
Other IDs
00018699
Status last verified
Nov 2019
First submitted
5 Nov 2019
Last updated
15 Nov 2019
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing AccuVein AV400 Device Versus Ultrasound-guided Cannulation in people with Intravenous Cannulation, run by Alexandria University at 1 site in Egypt.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 15 Nov 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Egypt. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

the time to successful placement of catheters (time frame: "Through operation completion, average of 2 hours"). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 15 Nov 2019.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in