AzTrials
AzTrials

Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma (mRCC)NCT04175262

Clinical Outcomes For Patients With Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma (mRCC) Who Received Sunitinib After 1st Line Immune-oncology (IO) Treatments

An observational study of Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma (mRCC), run by Pfizer at 1 site in Canada.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The study aims to assess clinical outcomes in mRCC patients treated with sunitinib in second-line following IO therapy in real world clinical practices. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma (mRCC)
What is being tested?
sunitinib
How many people
102 participants
Where
1 siteCanada
Study dates
31 Oct 2019to 9 Mar 2020
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: patients with diagnosis of mRCC who initiated sunitinib as 2nd line treatment

Who may be able to join

  • Patients must meet all of the following inclusion criteria to be eligible for inclusion in the study:
  • Diagnosed with mRCC
  • Received IO therapy as 1L therapy
  • Received sunitinib as 2L therapy
  • Age 18 years or over at the time of mRCC diagnosis
  • Actively treated at an IMDC clinical center (to avoid incomplete data)

Who cannot join

  • None

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Canada1 site
  • University of Calgary

    Calgary, Alberta, p2n 4n2

Other trials in Canada

About this study

Official title: Clinical Effectiveness of Second-Line Sunitinib Following Immune-oncologic (IO) Therapy in Patients With Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma in the International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database (IMDC)

The study aims to assess clinical outcomes in mRCC patients treated with sunitinib in second-line following IO therapy in real world clinical practices.

Being tested
sunitinib
Medical subject headings
Carcinoma, Renal Cell

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • sunitinibDrug

    Patients to receive sunitinib as second line therapy for mRCC

Study groups in NCT04175262
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Patients with mRCCPatients diagnosed with metastatic RCC receiving first line (1L) combination of IOs therapies followed by Sunitinib as a second line (2L) treatment
Receives: Drug: sunitinib

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Overall Survival (OS) After Initiation of Second Line Sunitinib Therapy

    Overall survival was defined as the time (in months) from second line sunitinib initiation to death. Participants were censored at their date of last follow-up. Kaplan-Meier method was used for analysis.

    Measured: From the date of initiation of second line sunitinib to the date of death or censored date, up to a maximum of approximately 5.5 years (from the data collected and observed retrospectively for approximately 4 months)

  2. Time to Treatment Discontinuation (TTD) of Second Line Sunitinib Therapy

    TTD was defined as the time (in months) between initiation of second line sunitinib therapy and discontinuation of therapy for any reason including progression, death, and toxicity. Participants were censored at their date of last follow-up. As per response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (RECIST) 1.1 criteria: disease progression was at least a 20% increase in sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as a reference smallest sum on treatment, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 millimeter (mm), or the appearance of at least 1 new lesion. Unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions. Kaplan-Meier method was used for analysis.

    Measured: From the date of initiation of second line sunitinib to discontinuation or censored date, up to a maximum of approximately 5.5 years (from the data collected and observed retrospectively for approximately 4 months)

  3. Time to Treatment Discontinuation (TTD) of First Line Immune-Oncologic Therapy

    TTD was defined as the time (in months) between initiation of first line Immune-Oncologic therapy and discontinuation of therapy for any reason including progression, death, and toxicity. Participants were censored at their date of last follow-up. As per RECIST 1.1 criteria: disease progression was at least a 20% increase in sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as a reference smallest sum on treatment, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 mm, or the appearance of at least 1 new lesion. Unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions. Kaplan-Meier method was used for analysis.

    Measured: From the initiation of immune-oncologic therapy to discontinuation of immune-oncologic therapy (approximately up to 2 years)

  4. Number of Participants Classified According to Reasons for Second-Line Sunitinib Treatment Discontinuation

    Reasons for treatment discontinuation included disease progression, death, toxicity and other reasons including urosepsis, nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, comorbidity, and other unspecified. As per RECIST v1.1. criteria, disease progression was at least a 20% increase in sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as a reference smallest sum on treatment, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 mm, or the appearance of at least 1 new lesion. Unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions.

    Measured: From the date of initiation of second line sunitinib to discontinuation or censored date, up to a maximum of approximately 5.5 years (from the data collected and observed retrospectively for approximately 4 months)

  5. Objective Response Rate (ORR) After Initiation of Second Line Sunitinib Therapy

    The objective response rate was defined as the percentage of participants with partial response (PR) and complete response (CR). As per RECIST 1.1 criteria: CR = disappearance of all target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to <10 mm. Disappearance of all non-target lesions and normalisation of tumour marker level. All lymph nodes must be non-pathological in size (<10 mm short axis); PR = at least 30% decrease in sum of diameters of target lesions taking as reference baseline sum diameters.

    Measured: From the date of initiation of second line sunitinib to the date of PR and CR or censored date, up to a maximum of approximately 5.5 years (from the data collected and observed retrospectively for approximately 4 months)

  6. Percentage of Participants With Progressive Disease (PD) After Initiation of Second Line Sunitinib Therapy

    Progressive disease (PD) was defined as an increase in visible disease. According to RECIST 1.1; PD = at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions taking as reference the smallest sum on the study. This includes the baseline sum if that is the smallest on study. In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum also demonstrated an absolute increase of at least 5 mm or the appearance of at least 1 new lesion. Unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions.

    Measured: From the date of initiation of second line sunitinib to occurrence of disease progression, up to a maximum of approximately 5.5 years (from the data collected and observed retrospectively for approximately 4 months)

  7. Percentage of Participants With Stable Disease (SD) After Initiation of Second Line Sunitinib Therapy

    Stable disease was defined as no change in size of visible disease. According to RECIST 1.1, stable disease: neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for progressive disease , taking as reference the smallest sum diameters while on study; PD = at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions taking as reference the smallest sum on the study. This includes the baseline sum if that is the smallest on study. In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum also demonstrated an absolute increase of at least 5 mm or the appearance of at least 1 new lesion. Unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions. PR = at least 30% decrease in sum of diameters of target lesions taking as reference baseline sum diameters.

    Measured: From the date of initiation of second line sunitinib to the date stable disease or censored date, up to a maximum of approximately 5.5 years (from the data collected and observed retrospectively for approximately 4 months)

  8. Time From First Line Immune-Oncologic Therapy Discontinuation to Initiation of Second Line Sunitinib Therapy

    Measured: From the discontinuation of immune-oncologic therapy to the initiation of sunitinib therapy (approximately up to 2 years)

  9. Number of Participants Classified According to Reasons for First-Line Immune-Oncologic Treatment Discontinuation

    Reasons for treatment discontinuation included disease progression, toxicity and other reasons including itchiness, mouth dryness, comorbidity, and other unspecified. As per RECIST 1.1 criteria: disease progression was at least a 20% increase in sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as a reference smallest sum on treatment, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 mm, or the appearance of at least 1 new lesion. Unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions.

    Measured: From the date of initiation of first line Immune-Oncologic to discontinuation or follow-up (approximately up to 2 years)

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted25 Nov 2019
  2. Study start31 Oct 2019
  3. Primary completion9 Mar 2020
  4. Study completion9 Mar 2020

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrolment
102 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04175262
Sponsor's protocol ID
A6181233
Status last verified
Mar 2021
First submitted
21 Nov 2019
Last updated
3 May 2023
Individual data sharing
No: Pfizer will provide access to individual de-identified participant data and related study documents (e.g. protocol, Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP), Clinical Study Report (CSR)) upon request from qualified researchers, and subject to certain criteria, conditions, and exceptions. Further details on Pfizer's data sharing criteria and process for requesting access can be found at: https://www.pfizer.com/science/clinical\_trials/trial\_data\_and\_results/data\_requests.

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma (mRCC), run by Pfizer at 1 site in Canada.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 3 May 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 2 Apr 2021). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Overall Survival (OS) After Initiation of Second Line Sunitinib Therapy (time frame: From the date of initiation of second line sunitinib to the date of death or censored date, up to a maximum of approximately 5.5 years (from the data collected and observed retrospectively for approximately 4 months)). The study lists 9 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 3 May 2023.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in