AzTrials
AzTrials

Diastasis of Muscle, Other SitePROMA1NCT04176874

Abdominal Diastasis Repair by Robotic Surgery

An observational study of Diastasis of Muscle, Other Site, run by Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris at 1 site in France.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The objective of the study is to evaluate the feasibility of a robot-assisted minimally invasive surgical technique for the management of diastasis of the rectus abdominis. The effectiveness of this robotic surgery will be evaluated on the intermuscular distance measurement above and under umbilicus using ultrasound… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Diastasis of Muscle, Other Site
What is being tested?
Robotic-assisted diastasis of the rectus abdominis muscles repair
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
How many people
50 participants
Where
1 siteFrance
Study dates
2 Jan 2020to 25 Sep 2023
How long will I take part?
6 Months
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: Patient 18 years old or older with an indication for diastasis

Who may be able to join

  • Patient 18 years old or older with an indication for diastasis
  • Patient who has given his or her non-opposition to participation in the research
  • Patient able to understand the requirements of the trial

Who cannot join

  • Patients participating or having participated in the last two months in another clinical study
  • Pregnant or breastfeeding patients
  • Patients not using contraception
  • Patients with umbilical hernia (hernia bag)
  • Patients with a history of abdominal surgery by median laparotomy
  • Patients with contraindications to general anesthesia
  • Any other reason that, in the investigator's opinion, could interfere with the proper conduct of the study

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Jean-Paul MENINGEAUD, PhD contact

+33 1 49 81 45 33

meningaud@me.com

France1 site, 1 recruiting
  • Hopital Henri Mondor

    Créteil, Val De Marne, 94000

    Barbara Hersant

    Recruiting

Other trials in France

About this study

Official title: Robotic-assisted Diastasis of the Rectus Abdominis Muscles Repair: Evaluation of a Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedure

The objective of the study is to evaluate the feasibility of a robot-assisted minimally invasive surgical technique for the management of diastasis of the rectus abdominis. The effectiveness of this robotic surgery will be evaluated on the intermuscular distance measurement above and under umbilicus using ultrasound or CT-scan imaging.

Read the detailed description

This is a bi-centric, prospective, regional research.

Patients will be included in the:

  • Henri Mondor University Hospital in Créteil, in the plastic and reconstructive surgery department headed by Professor Meningaud.
  • Tenon University Hospital in Paris in the plastic and reconstructive surgery department of Dr. Atlan.

As part of this research, subjects will be identified as follows:

center number (3 numeric positions) - person selection order number in the center (4 numeric positions) - initial last name - initial first name This reference is unique and will be kept for the duration of the search.

A recruitment of 50 subjects is planned. (The investigator and/or monitor) will gradually complete a form, "Pre-included Patient Register", which will include all patients (initial and date of birth) who were approached to enter the study, whether finally included or not, as well as the reasons for not including them.

Patients meeting the following criteria cannot be included:

  • Patients participating or having participated in the last two months in another clinical study
  • Pregnant or breastfeeding patients
  • Patients not using contraception
  • Patients with umbilical hernia (hernia bag)
  • Patients with a history of abdominal surgery by median laparotomy
  • Patients with contraindications to general anesthesia
  • Any other reason that, in the investigator's opinion, could interfere with the proper conduct of the study

The trial includes: an inclusion visit, a surgical hospitalization and two follow-up visits

An initial inclusion visit,[VI], which allows you to:

  • check the inclusion and non-inclusion criteria explain and give consent to the patient's research participation (which will be retrieved the day before the intervention)
  • carry out the ultrasound or CT-scan for the diagnosis of diastasis.

Parameters collected during this visit

  • Physical examination
  • Patient's medical history relevant to the trial
  • Verification of compliance with inclusion and exclusion criteria
  • Ultrasound or CT-scan for the diagnosis of diastasis
  • Preoperative photographic plate

The surgical procedure is performed in a single step, under general anesthesia with the assistance of the Intuitiv SI robot. The patient is placed in supine position, with his arms along his body, in the Trendelenburg position with his legs down.

An antibioprophylaxis with Amoxicillin/clavulanic acid 1g/200mg IV is administered at induction.

Preoperative marking is performed to identify the palpated medial edges of the rectus abdominis, semilunar lines and costal awnings.

Three trocars are placed: a 12mm trocar, 2 to 3 fingertips above the pubis, median for the optics, a 8mm trocar in the right iliac fossa and a 8mm trocar in the left iliac fossa. Dissection is started with the finger or foam tip scissors through the opening of the median trocar to ensure that it is in the preaponeurotic plane, in front of the anterior sheath of the large rectus abdominis muscles.

The middle trocar is set up for the robot optics and insufflation of 13 mmHg CO2. The instrument trocars are then placed (8 or 5 mm depending on the robot : 8 mm for the Intuitiv Si robot). The preaponeurotic space is dissected in front of the anterior fascia of the rectus muscles to expose the white line to the umbilicus. The umbilicus is severed, it remains vascularized by the dermal network.

Then the dissection of the preaponeurotic space is continued to the xyphoid. Lateral dissection should not go more than 3cm beyond the semi lunar lines to maintain skin vascularization, limit dead spaces and seroma formation.

The anterior aponeuroses of the great rectus muscles are plicaturized by toothed wire (type QUILL PDO) from the suspubic region to the xyphoid. The umbilicus is attached to the fascia.

A redon or Blake drain 10 is placed through one of the 8mm holes. An abdominal compression dressing is applied at the end of the procedure.

Regarding surgical management and post-operative follow-up, the following parameters will be collect:

  • Duration of the intervention
  • Duration of hospitalization
  • Drainage time
  • Weight of skin resection in case of associated excess skin fat
  • Occurrence of post-operative complications: seromas, haematomas, infections, thromboembolic complications, scarring disorders

Follow-up visits will take place at 1,3 and 6 months after the intervention:

They will consist of:

  • an interrogation of the patient,
  • the performing of:
  • a clinical examination,
  • photographs of the face and profile of the scar
  • an abdominal ultrasound. Abdominal ultrasound was used to measure the intermuscular distance at three points (xyphoid, 3 cm above and below the umbilicus, 2 cm below the umbilicus). The average intermuscular distance was calculated from these three measurements
  • a qualitative evaluation of the scar using the VAS and POSAS scale (secondary criteria)
  • a patient satisfaction assessment using VAS scale.

The main efficacy criterion is the average intermuscular distance at 3 months post-operatively obtained by averaging ultrasound measurements at the three abdominal points defined by Beer.

The secondary efficacy criteria are:

  • Duration of the procedure, duration of hospitalization, duration of post-operative drainage
  • Occurrence of post-operative complications (seroma or hematoma collection, thromboembolic accident, infection, scarring disorders)
  • Evaluation of the scar quality evaluated by the POSAS scale
  • Overall patient satisfaction with the intervention and outcome (VAS 0 to 10)
Being tested
Robotic-assisted diastasis of the rectus abdominis muscles repair
Keywords
Diastasis recti, Rectus abdominis diastasis, Robotic surgical procedure
Medical subject headings
Diastasis, Muscle

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Robotic-assisted diastasis of the rectus abdominis muscles repairProcedure or surgery

    Diastasis of the rectus abdominis muscles repair using the Intuitiv SI robot

Study groups in NCT04176874
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Diastasis of the rectus abdominis musclesDiastasis of the rectus abdominis muscles repair using the Intuitiv SI robot
Receives: Procedure: Robotic-assisted diastasis of the rectus abdominis muscles repair

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Average intermuscular distance

    Average intermuscular distance post-operatively obtained by averaging ultrasound measurements at the three abdominal points defined by Beer.

    Measured: At 3 months post surgery

Secondary outcomes (12)
  1. Surgery

    Duration of the procedure

    Measured: During the surgery

  2. Hospitalization

    Duration of hospitalization

    Measured: Up to 4 days

  3. Drainage

    Duration of post-operative drainage

    Measured: Up to 2 days

  4. Complications at 1 month

    Occurrence of post-operative complications at 1 month

    Measured: At 1 month

  5. Complications at 3 months

    Occurrence of post-operative complications at 3 months

    Measured: At 3 months

  6. Complications at 6 months

    Occurrence of post-operative complications at 6 months

    Measured: At 6 months

  7. Scar quality at 1 month post surgery

    Evaluation of the scar quality by the POSAS scale

    Measured: at 1 months

  8. Scar quality at 3 months post surgery

    Evaluation of the scar quality by the POSAS scale

    Measured: at 3 months

  9. Scar quality at 6 months post surgery

    Evaluation of the scar quality by the POSAS scale

    Measured: at 6 months

  10. Patient satisfaction at 1 month post surgery

    Overall patient satisfaction with the intervention and outcome

    Measured: At 1 month

  11. Patient satisfaction at 3 months post surgery

    Overall patient satisfaction with the intervention and outcome

    Measured: At 3 months

  12. Patient satisfaction at 6 months post surgery

    Overall patient satisfaction with the intervention and outcome

    Measured: At 6 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted25 Nov 2019
  2. Study start2 Jan 2020
  3. Primary completion2 Oct 2022
  4. Study completion25 Sep 2023 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
50 participants (estimated)
Target duration
6 Months
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04176874
Sponsor's protocol ID
APHP190484
Acronym
PROMA1
Status last verified
Mar 2023
First submitted
3 Oct 2019
Last updated
3 Mar 2023
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Mommers EHH, Ponten JEH, Al Omar AK, de Vries Reilingh TS, Bouvy ND, Nienhuijs SW. The general surgeon's perspective of rectus diastasis. A systematic review of treatment options. Surg Endosc. 2017 Dec;31(12):4934-4949. doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5607-9. Epub 2017 Jun 8.

    PubMed 28597282
  • Sperstad JB, Tennfjord MK, Hilde G, Ellstrom-Engh M, Bo K. Diastasis recti abdominis during pregnancy and 12 months after childbirth: prevalence, risk factors and report of lumbopelvic pain. Br J Sports Med. 2016 Sep;50(17):1092-6. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2016-096065. Epub 2016 Jun 20.

    PubMed 27324871
  • Akram J, Matzen SH. Rectus abdominis diastasis. J Plast Surg Hand Surg. 2014 Jun;48(3):163-9. doi: 10.3109/2000656X.2013.859145. Epub 2013 Nov 21.

    PubMed 24256310
  • Orthopoulos G, Kudsi OY. Feasibility of Robotic-Assisted Transabdominal Preperitoneal Ventral Hernia Repair. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2018 Apr;28(4):434-438. doi: 10.1089/lap.2017.0595. Epub 2018 Jan 2.

    PubMed 29293068
  • Sugiyama G, Chivukula S, Chung PJ, Alfonso A. Robot-Assisted Transabdominal Preperitoneal Ventral Hernia Repair. JSLS. 2015 Oct-Dec;19(4):e2015.00092. doi: 10.4293/JSLS.2015.00092.

    PubMed 26941547
  • Nahabedian MY. Management Strategies for Diastasis Recti. Semin Plast Surg. 2018 Aug;32(3):147-154. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1661380. Epub 2018 Jul 24.

    PubMed 30046291
  • Beer GM, Schuster A, Seifert B, Manestar M, Mihic-Probst D, Weber SA. The normal width of the linea alba in nulliparous women. Clin Anat. 2009 Sep;22(6):706-11. doi: 10.1002/ca.20836.

    PubMed 19637295
  • Bellido Luque J, Bellido Luque A, Valdivia J, Suarez Grau JM, Gomez Menchero J, Garcia Moreno J, Guadalajara Jurado J. Totally endoscopic surgery on diastasis recti associated with midline hernias. The advantages of a minimally invasive approach. Prospective cohort study. Hernia. 2015 Jun;19(3):493-501. doi: 10.1007/s10029-014-1300-2. Epub 2014 Aug 21.

    PubMed 25142493
  • Driver VR, Hanft J, Fylling CP, Beriou JM; Autologel Diabetic Foot Ulcer Study Group. A prospective, randomized, controlled trial of autologous platelet-rich plasma gel for the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers. Ostomy Wound Manage. 2006 Jun;52(6):68-70, 72, 74 passim.

    PubMed 16799184

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Diastasis of Muscle, Other Site, run by Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris at 1 site in France.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 3 Mar 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Barbara HERSANT, PhD (+ 33 1 49 81 45 33, barbara.hersant@gmail.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Average intermuscular distance (time frame: At 3 months post surgery). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04176874, which also lists 9 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 3 Mar 2023.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in