Diastasis of Muscle, Other SitePROMA1NCT04176874
Abdominal Diastasis Repair by Robotic Surgery
An observational study of Diastasis of Muscle, Other Site, run by Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris at 1 site in France.
Trial summary
The objective of the study is to evaluate the feasibility of a robot-assisted minimally invasive surgical technique for the management of diastasis of the rectus abdominis. The effectiveness of this robotic surgery will be evaluated on the intermuscular distance measurement above and under umbilicus using ultrasound… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Diastasis of Muscle, Other Site
- What is being tested?
- Robotic-assisted diastasis of the rectus abdominis muscles repair
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- How many people
- 50 participants
- Where
- 1 siteFrance
- Study dates
- 2 Jan 2020to 25 Sep 2023
- How long will I take part?
- 6 Months
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: Patient 18 years old or older with an indication for diastasis
Who may be able to join
- Patient 18 years old or older with an indication for diastasis
- Patient who has given his or her non-opposition to participation in the research
- Patient able to understand the requirements of the trial
Who cannot join
- Patients participating or having participated in the last two months in another clinical study
- Pregnant or breastfeeding patients
- Patients not using contraception
- Patients with umbilical hernia (hernia bag)
- Patients with a history of abdominal surgery by median laparotomy
- Patients with contraindications to general anesthesia
- Any other reason that, in the investigator's opinion, could interfere with the proper conduct of the study
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
France1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Hopital Henri Mondor
Créteil, Val De Marne, 94000
Barbara Hersant
About this study
Official title: Robotic-assisted Diastasis of the Rectus Abdominis Muscles Repair: Evaluation of a Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedure
The objective of the study is to evaluate the feasibility of a robot-assisted minimally invasive surgical technique for the management of diastasis of the rectus abdominis. The effectiveness of this robotic surgery will be evaluated on the intermuscular distance measurement above and under umbilicus using ultrasound or CT-scan imaging.
Read the detailed description
This is a bi-centric, prospective, regional research.
Patients will be included in the:
- Henri Mondor University Hospital in Créteil, in the plastic and reconstructive surgery department headed by Professor Meningaud.
- Tenon University Hospital in Paris in the plastic and reconstructive surgery department of Dr. Atlan.
As part of this research, subjects will be identified as follows:
center number (3 numeric positions) - person selection order number in the center (4 numeric positions) - initial last name - initial first name This reference is unique and will be kept for the duration of the search.
A recruitment of 50 subjects is planned. (The investigator and/or monitor) will gradually complete a form, "Pre-included Patient Register", which will include all patients (initial and date of birth) who were approached to enter the study, whether finally included or not, as well as the reasons for not including them.
Patients meeting the following criteria cannot be included:
- Patients participating or having participated in the last two months in another clinical study
- Pregnant or breastfeeding patients
- Patients not using contraception
- Patients with umbilical hernia (hernia bag)
- Patients with a history of abdominal surgery by median laparotomy
- Patients with contraindications to general anesthesia
- Any other reason that, in the investigator's opinion, could interfere with the proper conduct of the study
The trial includes: an inclusion visit, a surgical hospitalization and two follow-up visits
An initial inclusion visit,[VI], which allows you to:
- check the inclusion and non-inclusion criteria explain and give consent to the patient's research participation (which will be retrieved the day before the intervention)
- carry out the ultrasound or CT-scan for the diagnosis of diastasis.
Parameters collected during this visit
- Physical examination
- Patient's medical history relevant to the trial
- Verification of compliance with inclusion and exclusion criteria
- Ultrasound or CT-scan for the diagnosis of diastasis
- Preoperative photographic plate
The surgical procedure is performed in a single step, under general anesthesia with the assistance of the Intuitiv SI robot. The patient is placed in supine position, with his arms along his body, in the Trendelenburg position with his legs down.
An antibioprophylaxis with Amoxicillin/clavulanic acid 1g/200mg IV is administered at induction.
Preoperative marking is performed to identify the palpated medial edges of the rectus abdominis, semilunar lines and costal awnings.
Three trocars are placed: a 12mm trocar, 2 to 3 fingertips above the pubis, median for the optics, a 8mm trocar in the right iliac fossa and a 8mm trocar in the left iliac fossa. Dissection is started with the finger or foam tip scissors through the opening of the median trocar to ensure that it is in the preaponeurotic plane, in front of the anterior sheath of the large rectus abdominis muscles.
The middle trocar is set up for the robot optics and insufflation of 13 mmHg CO2. The instrument trocars are then placed (8 or 5 mm depending on the robot : 8 mm for the Intuitiv Si robot). The preaponeurotic space is dissected in front of the anterior fascia of the rectus muscles to expose the white line to the umbilicus. The umbilicus is severed, it remains vascularized by the dermal network.
Then the dissection of the preaponeurotic space is continued to the xyphoid. Lateral dissection should not go more than 3cm beyond the semi lunar lines to maintain skin vascularization, limit dead spaces and seroma formation.
The anterior aponeuroses of the great rectus muscles are plicaturized by toothed wire (type QUILL PDO) from the suspubic region to the xyphoid. The umbilicus is attached to the fascia.
A redon or Blake drain 10 is placed through one of the 8mm holes. An abdominal compression dressing is applied at the end of the procedure.
Regarding surgical management and post-operative follow-up, the following parameters will be collect:
- Duration of the intervention
- Duration of hospitalization
- Drainage time
- Weight of skin resection in case of associated excess skin fat
- Occurrence of post-operative complications: seromas, haematomas, infections, thromboembolic complications, scarring disorders
Follow-up visits will take place at 1,3 and 6 months after the intervention:
They will consist of:
- an interrogation of the patient,
- the performing of:
- a clinical examination,
- photographs of the face and profile of the scar
- an abdominal ultrasound. Abdominal ultrasound was used to measure the intermuscular distance at three points (xyphoid, 3 cm above and below the umbilicus, 2 cm below the umbilicus). The average intermuscular distance was calculated from these three measurements
- a qualitative evaluation of the scar using the VAS and POSAS scale (secondary criteria)
- a patient satisfaction assessment using VAS scale.
The main efficacy criterion is the average intermuscular distance at 3 months post-operatively obtained by averaging ultrasound measurements at the three abdominal points defined by Beer.
The secondary efficacy criteria are:
- Duration of the procedure, duration of hospitalization, duration of post-operative drainage
- Occurrence of post-operative complications (seroma or hematoma collection, thromboembolic accident, infection, scarring disorders)
- Evaluation of the scar quality evaluated by the POSAS scale
- Overall patient satisfaction with the intervention and outcome (VAS 0 to 10)
- Conditions
- Diastasis of Muscle, Other Site
- Being tested
- Robotic-assisted diastasis of the rectus abdominis muscles repair
- Keywords
- Diastasis recti, Rectus abdominis diastasis, Robotic surgical procedure
- Medical subject headings
- Diastasis, Muscle
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Robotic-assisted diastasis of the rectus abdominis muscles repairProcedure or surgery
Diastasis of the rectus abdominis muscles repair using the Intuitiv SI robot
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Diastasis of the rectus abdominis muscles | Diastasis of the rectus abdominis muscles repair using the Intuitiv SI robot Receives: Procedure: Robotic-assisted diastasis of the rectus abdominis muscles repair |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Average intermuscular distance
Average intermuscular distance post-operatively obtained by averaging ultrasound measurements at the three abdominal points defined by Beer.
Measured: At 3 months post surgery
Secondary outcomes (12)
Surgery
Duration of the procedure
Measured: During the surgery
Hospitalization
Duration of hospitalization
Measured: Up to 4 days
Drainage
Duration of post-operative drainage
Measured: Up to 2 days
Complications at 1 month
Occurrence of post-operative complications at 1 month
Measured: At 1 month
Complications at 3 months
Occurrence of post-operative complications at 3 months
Measured: At 3 months
Complications at 6 months
Occurrence of post-operative complications at 6 months
Measured: At 6 months
Scar quality at 1 month post surgery
Evaluation of the scar quality by the POSAS scale
Measured: at 1 months
Scar quality at 3 months post surgery
Evaluation of the scar quality by the POSAS scale
Measured: at 3 months
Scar quality at 6 months post surgery
Evaluation of the scar quality by the POSAS scale
Measured: at 6 months
Patient satisfaction at 1 month post surgery
Overall patient satisfaction with the intervention and outcome
Measured: At 1 month
Patient satisfaction at 3 months post surgery
Overall patient satisfaction with the intervention and outcome
Measured: At 3 months
Patient satisfaction at 6 months post surgery
Overall patient satisfaction with the intervention and outcome
Measured: At 6 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted25 Nov 2019
- Study start2 Jan 2020
- Primary completion2 Oct 2022
- Study completion25 Sep 2023 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (9)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Diastasis of Muscle, Other SiteStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de ParisThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 50 participants (estimated)
- Target duration
- 6 Months
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Barbara HERSANT, Principal investigator, APHP
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04176874
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- APHP190484
- Acronym
- PROMA1
- Status last verified
- Mar 2023
- First submitted
- 3 Oct 2019
- Last updated
- 3 Mar 2023
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Mommers EHH, Ponten JEH, Al Omar AK, de Vries Reilingh TS, Bouvy ND, Nienhuijs SW. The general surgeon's perspective of rectus diastasis. A systematic review of treatment options. Surg Endosc. 2017 Dec;31(12):4934-4949. doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5607-9. Epub 2017 Jun 8.
PubMed 28597282Sperstad JB, Tennfjord MK, Hilde G, Ellstrom-Engh M, Bo K. Diastasis recti abdominis during pregnancy and 12 months after childbirth: prevalence, risk factors and report of lumbopelvic pain. Br J Sports Med. 2016 Sep;50(17):1092-6. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2016-096065. Epub 2016 Jun 20.
PubMed 27324871Akram J, Matzen SH. Rectus abdominis diastasis. J Plast Surg Hand Surg. 2014 Jun;48(3):163-9. doi: 10.3109/2000656X.2013.859145. Epub 2013 Nov 21.
PubMed 24256310Orthopoulos G, Kudsi OY. Feasibility of Robotic-Assisted Transabdominal Preperitoneal Ventral Hernia Repair. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2018 Apr;28(4):434-438. doi: 10.1089/lap.2017.0595. Epub 2018 Jan 2.
PubMed 29293068Sugiyama G, Chivukula S, Chung PJ, Alfonso A. Robot-Assisted Transabdominal Preperitoneal Ventral Hernia Repair. JSLS. 2015 Oct-Dec;19(4):e2015.00092. doi: 10.4293/JSLS.2015.00092.
PubMed 26941547Nahabedian MY. Management Strategies for Diastasis Recti. Semin Plast Surg. 2018 Aug;32(3):147-154. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1661380. Epub 2018 Jul 24.
PubMed 30046291Beer GM, Schuster A, Seifert B, Manestar M, Mihic-Probst D, Weber SA. The normal width of the linea alba in nulliparous women. Clin Anat. 2009 Sep;22(6):706-11. doi: 10.1002/ca.20836.
PubMed 19637295Bellido Luque J, Bellido Luque A, Valdivia J, Suarez Grau JM, Gomez Menchero J, Garcia Moreno J, Guadalajara Jurado J. Totally endoscopic surgery on diastasis recti associated with midline hernias. The advantages of a minimally invasive approach. Prospective cohort study. Hernia. 2015 Jun;19(3):493-501. doi: 10.1007/s10029-014-1300-2. Epub 2014 Aug 21.
PubMed 25142493Driver VR, Hanft J, Fylling CP, Beriou JM; Autologel Diabetic Foot Ulcer Study Group. A prospective, randomized, controlled trial of autologous platelet-rich plasma gel for the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers. Ostomy Wound Manage. 2006 Jun;52(6):68-70, 72, 74 passim.
PubMed 16799184
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 3 Mar 2023. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Robotic-assisted Diastasis of the Rectus Abdominis Muscles Repair: Evaluation of a Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedure
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04176874
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- PROMA1 / APHP190484
- Conditions
- Diastasis of Muscle, Other Site
- Keywords
- Diastasis recti, Rectus abdominis diastasis, Robotic surgical procedure
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 50 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de ParisUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 2 Jan 2020 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 2 Oct 2022 (actual)
- Study completion
- 25 Sep 2023 (estimated)
- First posted
- 25 Nov 2019 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The objective of the study is to evaluate the feasibility of a robot-assisted minimally invasive surgical technique for the management of diastasis of the rectus abdominis. The effectiveness of this robotic surgery will be evaluated on the intermuscular distance measurement above and under umbilicus using ultrasound or CT-scan imaging.
Detailed description
This is a bi-centric, prospective, regional research.
Patients will be included in the:
- Henri Mondor University Hospital in Créteil, in the plastic and reconstructive surgery department headed by Professor Meningaud.
- Tenon University Hospital in Paris in the plastic and reconstructive surgery department of Dr. Atlan.
As part of this research, subjects will be identified as follows:
center number (3 numeric positions) - person selection order number in the center (4 numeric positions) - initial last name - initial first name This reference is unique and will be kept for the duration of the search.
A recruitment of 50 subjects is planned. (The investigator and/or monitor) will gradually complete a form, "Pre-included Patient Register", which will include all patients (initial and date of birth) who were approached to enter the study, whether finally included or not, as well as the reasons for not including them.
Patients meeting the following criteria cannot be included:
- Patients participating or having participated in the last two months in another clinical study
- Pregnant or breastfeeding patients
- Patients not using contraception
- Patients with umbilical hernia (hernia bag)
- Patients with a history of abdominal surgery by median laparotomy
- Patients with contraindications to general anesthesia
- Any other reason that, in the investigator's opinion, could interfere with the proper conduct of the study
The trial includes: an inclusion visit, a surgical hospitalization and two follow-up visits
An initial inclusion visit,[VI], which allows you to:
- check the inclusion and non-inclusion criteria explain and give consent to the patient's research participation (which will be retrieved the day before the intervention)
- carry out the ultrasound or CT-scan for the diagnosis of diastasis.
Parameters collected during this visit
- Physical examination
- Patient's medical history relevant to the trial
- Verification of compliance with inclusion and exclusion criteria
- Ultrasound or CT-scan for the diagnosis of diastasis
- Preoperative photographic plate
The surgical procedure is performed in a single step, under general anesthesia with the assistance of the Intuitiv SI robot. The patient is placed in supine position, with his arms along his body, in the Trendelenburg position with his legs down.
An antibioprophylaxis with Amoxicillin/clavulanic acid 1g/200mg IV is administered at induction.
Preoperative marking is performed to identify the palpated medial edges of the rectus abdominis, semilunar lines and costal awnings.
Three trocars are placed: a 12mm trocar, 2 to 3 fingertips above the pubis, median for the optics, a 8mm trocar in the right iliac fossa and a 8mm trocar in the left iliac fossa. Dissection is started with the finger or foam tip scissors through the opening of the median trocar to ensure that it is in the preaponeurotic plane, in front of the anterior sheath of the large rectus abdominis muscles.
The middle trocar is set up for the robot optics and insufflation of 13 mmHg CO2. The instrument trocars are then placed (8 or 5 mm depending on the robot : 8 mm for the Intuitiv Si robot). The preaponeurotic space is dissected in front of the anterior fascia of the rectus muscles to expose the white line to the umbilicus. The umbilicus is severed, it remains vascularized by the dermal network.
Then the dissection of the preaponeurotic space is continued to the xyphoid. Lateral dissection should not go more than 3cm beyond the semi lunar lines to maintain skin vascularization, limit dead spaces and seroma formation.
The anterior aponeuroses of the great rectus muscles are plicaturized by toothed wire (type QUILL PDO) from the suspubic region to the xyphoid. The umbilicus is attached to the fascia.
A redon or Blake drain 10 is placed through one of the 8mm holes. An abdominal compression dressing is applied at the end of the procedure.
Regarding surgical management and post-operative follow-up, the following parameters will be collect:
- Duration of the intervention
- Duration of hospitalization
- Drainage time
- Weight of skin resection in case of associated excess skin fat
- Occurrence of post-operative complications: seromas, haematomas, infections, thromboembolic complications, scarring disorders
Follow-up visits will take place at 1,3 and 6 months after the intervention:
They will consist of:
- an interrogation of the patient,
- the performing of:
- a clinical examination,
- photographs of the face and profile of the scar
- an abdominal ultrasound. Abdominal ultrasound was used to measure the intermuscular distance at three points (xyphoid, 3 cm above and below the umbilicus, 2 cm below the umbilicus). The average intermuscular distance was calculated from these three measurements
- a qualitative evaluation of the scar using the VAS and POSAS scale (secondary criteria)
- a patient satisfaction assessment using VAS scale.
The main efficacy criterion is the average intermuscular distance at 3 months post-operatively obtained by averaging ultrasound measurements at the three abdominal points defined by Beer.
The secondary efficacy criteria are:
- Duration of the procedure, duration of hospitalization, duration of post-operative drainage
- Occurrence of post-operative complications (seroma or hematoma collection, thromboembolic accident, infection, scarring disorders)
- Evaluation of the scar quality evaluated by the POSAS scale
- Overall patient satisfaction with the intervention and outcome (VAS 0 to 10)
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Target follow-up
- 6 Months
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Diastasis of the rectus abdominis muscles | – | Procedure: Robotic-assisted diastasis of the rectus abdominis muscles repairDiastasis of the rectus abdominis muscles repair using the Intuitiv SI robot |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Patient 18 years old or older with an indication for diastasis
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Patient 18 years old or older with an indication for diastasis
- Patient who has given his or her non-opposition to participation in the research
- Patient able to understand the requirements of the trial
Key exclusion criteria (7 listed)
- Patients participating or having participated in the last two months in another clinical study
- Pregnant or breastfeeding patients
- Patients not using contraception
- Patients with umbilical hernia (hernia bag)
- Patients with a history of abdominal surgery by median laparotomy
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Robotic-assisted diastasis of the rectus abdominis muscles repairDiastasis of the rectus abdominis muscles repair using the Intuitiv SI robot | Procedure or surgery | Diastasis of the rectus abdominis muscles |
Primary outcome
Average intermuscular distance
Time frame: At 3 months post surgery
Average intermuscular distance post-operatively obtained by averaging ultrasound measurements at the three abdominal points defined by Beer.
12 secondary outcomes
Surgery
Time frame: During the surgery
Hospitalization
Time frame: Up to 4 days
Drainage
Time frame: Up to 2 days
Complications at 1 month
Time frame: At 1 month
Complications at 3 months
Time frame: At 3 months
Complications at 6 months
Time frame: At 6 months
Scar quality at 1 month post surgery
Time frame: at 1 months
Scar quality at 3 months post surgery
Time frame: at 3 months
Scar quality at 6 months post surgery
Time frame: at 6 months
Patient satisfaction at 1 month post surgery
Time frame: At 1 month
Patient satisfaction at 3 months post surgery
Time frame: At 3 months
Patient satisfaction at 6 months post surgery
Time frame: At 6 months
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 3 Mar 2023.
- Background: PubMed 28597282Mommers EHH, Ponten JEH, Al Omar AK, de Vries Reilingh TS, Bouvy ND, Nienhuijs SW. The general surgeon's perspective of rectus diastasis. A systematic review of treatment options. Surg Endosc. 2017 Dec;31(12):4934-4949. doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5607-9. Epub 2017 Jun 8.
- Background: PubMed 27324871Sperstad JB, Tennfjord MK, Hilde G, Ellstrom-Engh M, Bo K. Diastasis recti abdominis during pregnancy and 12 months after childbirth: prevalence, risk factors and report of lumbopelvic pain. Br J Sports Med. 2016 Sep;50(17):1092-6. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2016-096065. Epub 2016 Jun 20.
- Background: PubMed 24256310Akram J, Matzen SH. Rectus abdominis diastasis. J Plast Surg Hand Surg. 2014 Jun;48(3):163-9. doi: 10.3109/2000656X.2013.859145. Epub 2013 Nov 21.
- Background: PubMed 29293068Orthopoulos G, Kudsi OY. Feasibility of Robotic-Assisted Transabdominal Preperitoneal Ventral Hernia Repair. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2018 Apr;28(4):434-438. doi: 10.1089/lap.2017.0595. Epub 2018 Jan 2.
- Background: PubMed 26941547Sugiyama G, Chivukula S, Chung PJ, Alfonso A. Robot-Assisted Transabdominal Preperitoneal Ventral Hernia Repair. JSLS. 2015 Oct-Dec;19(4):e2015.00092. doi: 10.4293/JSLS.2015.00092.
- Background: PubMed 30046291Nahabedian MY. Management Strategies for Diastasis Recti. Semin Plast Surg. 2018 Aug;32(3):147-154. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1661380. Epub 2018 Jul 24.
- Background: PubMed 19637295Beer GM, Schuster A, Seifert B, Manestar M, Mihic-Probst D, Weber SA. The normal width of the linea alba in nulliparous women. Clin Anat. 2009 Sep;22(6):706-11. doi: 10.1002/ca.20836.
- Background: PubMed 25142493Bellido Luque J, Bellido Luque A, Valdivia J, Suarez Grau JM, Gomez Menchero J, Garcia Moreno J, Guadalajara Jurado J. Totally endoscopic surgery on diastasis recti associated with midline hernias. The advantages of a minimally invasive approach. Prospective cohort study. Hernia. 2015 Jun;19(3):493-501. doi: 10.1007/s10029-014-1300-2. Epub 2014 Aug 21.
- Background: PubMed 16799184Driver VR, Hanft J, Fylling CP, Beriou JM; Autologel Diabetic Foot Ulcer Study Group. A prospective, randomized, controlled trial of autologous platelet-rich plasma gel for the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers. Ostomy Wound Manage. 2006 Jun;52(6):68-70, 72, 74 passim.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Barbara HERSANT principal investigator
APHP
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Diastasis of Muscle, Other Site, run by Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris at 1 site in France.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 3 Mar 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Barbara HERSANT, PhD (+ 33 1 49 81 45 33, barbara.hersant@gmail.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Average intermuscular distance (time frame: At 3 months post surgery). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04176874, which also lists 9 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 3 Mar 2023.