Severe SepsisNCT04178382
Effect of PCR-CRISPR/Cas12a on the Early Anti-infective Schemes in Patients With Open Air Pneumonia
A study testing PCR-CRISPR/Cas12a detection in people with Severe Sepsis, run by Chinese Medical Association at 1 site in China.
Trial summary
This study is a multicenter randomized controlled trial. The purpose of this study is to assess the efficacy of the combination of PCR and CRISPR/Cas12a in alveolar lavage fluid for early targeted anti-infective therapy for patients with severe pneumonia. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Severe Sepsis
- What is being tested?
- PCR-CRISPR/Cas12a detection
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 146 participants
- Where
- 1 siteChina
- Study dates
- 1 Aug 2019to 30 Aug 2020
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- age ≥ 18 years
- patients with artificial airway and expected artificial airway for more than 48 hours
- patients with suspected pneumonia or clear pneumonia
- signed informed consent
- expected ICU hospitalization more than 3 days.
Who cannot join
- pregnant women
- lactating women
- considered by the doctors for bronchoscopy moderate to severe asthma
- airway stenosis
- tracheal fistula, bronchopleural fistula
- expected to die or give up treatment within 72 hours
- participate in other clinical research
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
China1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
The Affliated Drum Tower Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University
Nanjing, Jiangsu, 210008
Wenkui Yu, 02568182222 ext. 60506, yudrnj@163.com
About this study
This study is a multicenter randomized controlled trial. The purpose of this study is to assess the efficacy of the combination of PCR and CRISPR/Cas12a in alveolar lavage fluid for early targeted anti-infective therapy for patients with severe pneumonia. Hosted by the Department of Critical Care Medicine, Affiliated Drum Tower Hospital of Nanjing University Medical College, 5 adult ICU units participate in 3 hospitals. All patients are randomly assigned to the experimental group and the control group. For experimental group, the combined detection of PCR and CRISPR/Cas12a in the alveolar lavage fluid was carried out in the early stage, and the antibiotic scheme is changed base on the results of PCR-CRISPR/Cas12a.The patients in the control group were adjusted according to the traditional microbial detection methods. The types of early antibiotics, the proportion of target antibiotics, the duration of anti-infective treatment, the length of hospital stay in ICU, the mortality rate, the secondary antibiotic-associated diarrhea, and the incidence of new multidrug-resistant infections were recorded.
Read the detailed description
ICU patients have a high incidence of bacterial infection in the lower respiratory tract, mainly with severe pneumonia, often causing severe sepsis and septic shock, which is one of the main causes of death in patients. At present, the biggest difficulty faced by clinicians is the continuous increase of bacterial resistance rate and the increase of patient mortality due to the early inadequacy empirical anti-infective treatment. Studies have shown that patients with VAP(Ventilator Associated Pneumonia) have irrational drug use in the early stage, with a mortality rate of more than 50%. When the rate of appropriate drug use has dropped to 33%, while mechanical ventilation time and ICU hospitalization time have been significantly shortened. Therefore, identifying pathogenes as early as possible and shortening the time of empirical anti-infective treatment are very important for improving the prognosis of patients with severe pneumonia and reducing the incidence of bacterial resistance.
There are three traditional methods for detecting pathogenic microorganisms: 1. microbial culture method is the most traditional means of identifying pathogen. It is necessary to inoculate the patient's body fluid, blood, etc. in a suitable medium, incubate in a suitable incubator, and then pass the drug. Sensitivity tests determine the resistance of microorganisms, usually takes 3-7 days. For some specific types of pathogenic microorganisms or microorganisms with harsh growth conditions, there may be negative culture results. Therefore, the traditional culture methods have disadvantages such as poor timeliness, relatively high requirements, and low positive culture rate (30-40%). 2. time-of-flight mass spectrometry: the mass spectrometry technique is used to analyze and detect the protein components of the strain, and the characteristic peak spectrum is obtained. Compared with the bacterial map in the database, the bacteria can be judged by matching. The method can be shortened by about 6-8 hours compared with the conventional culture method, but since the detection of the colony needs to reach a certain amount, the specimen can not be directly detected after obtaining the specimen, and the preliminary microbial culture is required. Therefore, the detection time still takes 1-2 days or more, and there is also the disadvantage of low timeliness. In addition, it is necessary to compare the expansion and standardization of the database, and the inability to analyze the resistance of microorganisms is also the inadequacy of the detection technology. 3. High-throughput sequencing technology: With the rapid development of molecular biology in recent years, high-throughput sequencing technology is widely used in the early diagnosis of clinical microbiology, the principle is mainly through the connection of the universal linker to the fragmentation to be sequenced. Genomic DNA, which produces tens of millions of single-molecule polyclonal polymerase chain reaction arrays, then performs large-scale primer hybridization and enzyme extension reactions, and obtains complete DNA sequence information by computer analysis. However, this technology is difficult to effectively distinguish between pathogenic bacteria and background bacteria, technology and database to be standardized, detection time still takes about 2 days, can not obtain microbial resistance, expensive and other shortcomings At the office. In summary, the current time limit for targeted anti-infective treatment is stopped 2 days after the specimen is taken. Therefore, the search for new, pathogenic microbial detection technology that is faster, more accurate and more sensitive is a hotspot and a difficult point in the field of microbial and anti-infective research in recent years.
The PCR-CRISPR/Cas12a combination technology of alveolar lavage fluid developed by the College of Life Sciences of Nanjing University is based on PCR amplification and fluorescence signal detection twice to achieve the detection of the presence and absence of specific DNA sequences in the test sample. technology. The determination of the detection result of the clinical sample pathogen is based on the comparison of the fluorescence results of the PCR product of the sample DNAD with the fluorescence detection results of the positive control (PC) and the negative control (NC) as a standard. The specific recognition function of the CRISPR/Cas12a system relies on the specific guidance and binding of the crRNA to specific DNA, and the specificity of the crRNA is determined by detection of a positive control of a common pathogen by a single crRNA. The detection technology is highly specific and takes only 2-3 hours, which is a qualitative leap in the detection time compared to the conventional technology.
In order to verify the feasibility and accuracy of the technology, the Center and the Nanjing University of Life Sciences for the common pathogens of ICU pneumonia (Acinetobacter baumannii, MRSA, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, etc.) for alveolar A preliminary study of the PCR-CRISPR/Cas12a combined detection technique for lavage fluid. Twenty-nine specimens of lower respiratory tract alveolar lavage fluid were cultured by conventional bacterial culture method and combined with PCR-CRISPR/Cas12a. The results showed that the accuracy of detection and identification of pathogens based on PCR-Cas12a technology reached 93.10% (27/29). For the 27 specimens, the pathogens infected by the traditional isolation culture method can be detected by PCR-CRISPR/Cas12a technology. The two exceptions were the detection of Acinetobacter baumannii in the No. 6 sample by the traditional isolation culture method and the detection of Proteus mirabilis in the No. 13 sample (not within the range of pathogens detected). Moreover, the pathogens identified by the PCR-CRISPR/Cas12a combination technique were more than one or two different than the traditional culture methods, which was consistent with the PCR, suggesting that the sensitivity is much higher than that of conventional microbial culture, and the results are reliable. These preliminary results indicate that the PCR-CRISPR/Cas12a combined detection technique has good accuracy and high sensitivity.
Based on those, the research team speculated that the combination of PCR and CRISPR/Cas12a detection technology of alveolar lavage fluid to guide anti-infective treatment of pneumonia patients can achieve targeted anti-infective treatment and improve patient prognosis. To validate the above hypothesis, we designed a multicenter randomized prospective study comparing the effects of PCR-CRISPR/Cas12a combined detection with alveolar lavage fluid and traditional microbial detection techniques on antimicrobial adjustment and prognosis in patients with ICU pneumonia. It aims to find more rapid, accurate and sensitive microbial detection technology for patients with pneumonia, and to achieve earlier precision treatment.
- Conditions
- Severe Sepsis
- Being tested
- PCR-CRISPR/Cas12a detection
- Keywords
- rapid diagnosis, severe pneumonia
- Medical subject headings
- Sepsis, Pneumonia
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
PCR-CRISPR/Cas12a detectionDiagnostic test
Evaluate whether the combination of PCR and CRISPR/Cas12a detection of alveolar lavage fluid changes the choice of early antibiotics in patients with pneumonia in artificial airways, and whether it changes the prognosis compared with traditional pathogenic microbial detection techniques.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| experiment group | Experimental | Combined detection of PCR and CRISPR/Cas12a in alveolar lavage fluid to guide early target adjustment of antibiotics Receives: Diagnostic Test: PCR-CRISPR/Cas12a detection |
| control group | No intervention | Guide the target adjustment of antibiotics according to traditional microbiological detection methods |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
mortality
The patient's 28-day mortality rate is the survival rate from the onset to the disease at 28 days, compared with the total number of illnesses, to assess the severity of the disease.
Measured: up to 28 days after hospitalized.
the duration of intensive care unit
time for patients treatment in intensive care unit is patient total treated days in intensive care unit.
Measured: Up to 8 weeks
the length of hospital stay
time for patients treatment in hospital is patient total treated days in hosiptal. Index of treat effective and severity of disease.
Measured: Up to 8 weeks
the day of mechanical ventilation
time for patients need mechanical ventilation is the total days that patient need mechanical ventilation.
Measured: Up to 8 weeks
the duration of septic shock
The more severity patients had a long time during septic shock
Measured: up to 8 weeks
the incidence of antibiotic-associated diarrhea
The incidence of antibiotic-associated diarrhea is the index of side effects of anti-infective treatment. The time frame started after the use of antibiotics, during the total hospitalized.
Measured: up to 8 weeks
the incidence of new multi-drug resistant bacteria colonization or infection
rate of multi-drug resistant bacteria colonization or infection is the index of side effects of anti-infective treatment. The time frame started after the use of antibiotics, during the total hospitalized.
Measured: up to 8 weeks.
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted26 Nov 2019
- Study start1 Aug 2019
- Primary completion30 Jul 2020 (estimated)
- Study completion30 Aug 2020 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (5)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Severe SepsisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Diagnosis
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 146 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Chinese Medical Association
- Sponsor type
- Research network
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- kui w yu, phd, Study chair, The Affiliated Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital of Nanjing University Medical School
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04178382
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 2019-195-01
- Status last verified
- Nov 2019
- First submitted
- 1 Nov 2019
- Last updated
- 26 Nov 2019
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Almirall J, Bolibar I, Vidal J, Sauca G, Coll P, Niklasson B, Bartolome M, Balanzo X. Epidemiology of community-acquired pneumonia in adults: a population-based study. Eur Respir J. 2000 Apr;15(4):757-63. doi: 10.1034/j.1399-3003.2000.15d21.x.
PubMed 10780770Pletz MW, Wellinghausen N, Welte T. Will polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based diagnostics improve outcome in septic patients? A clinical view. Intensive Care Med. 2011 Jul;37(7):1069-76. doi: 10.1007/s00134-011-2245-x. Epub 2011 May 15.
PubMed 21573947Langelier C, Zinter MS, Kalantar K, Yanik GA, Christenson S, O'Donovan B, White C, Wilson M, Sapru A, Dvorak CC, Miller S, Chiu CY, DeRisi JL. Metagenomic Sequencing Detects Respiratory Pathogens in Hematopoietic Cellular Transplant Patients. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2018 Feb 15;197(4):524-528. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201706-1097LE. No abstract available.
PubMed 28686513Kuti EL, Patel AA, Coleman CI. Impact of inappropriate antibiotic therapy on mortality in patients with ventilator-associated pneumonia and blood stream infection: a meta-analysis. J Crit Care. 2008 Mar;23(1):91-100. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2007.08.007.
PubMed 18359426Wang Y, Liang X, Jiang Y, Dong D, Zhang C, Song T, Chen M, You Y, Liu H, Ge M, Dai H, Xi F, Zhou W, Chen JQ, Wang Q, Chen Q, Yu W. Novel fast pathogen diagnosis method for severe pneumonia patients in the intensive care unit: randomized clinical trial. Elife. 2022 Oct 7;11:e79014. doi: 10.7554/eLife.79014.
PubMed 36205312
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 26 Nov 2019. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Effect of PCR-CRISPR/Cas12a on the Early Anti-infective Schemes in Patients With Open Air Pneumonia
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04178382
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 2019-195-01
- Conditions
- Severe Sepsis
- Keywords
- rapid diagnosis, severe pneumonia
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 146 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Chinese Medical AssociationResearch network
- Study start
- 1 Aug 2019 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 30 Jul 2020 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 30 Aug 2020 (estimated)
- First posted
- 26 Nov 2019 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study is a multicenter randomized controlled trial. The purpose of this study is to assess the efficacy of the combination of PCR and CRISPR/Cas12a in alveolar lavage fluid for early targeted anti-infective therapy for patients with severe pneumonia. Hosted by the Department of Critical Care Medicine, Affiliated Drum Tower Hospital of Nanjing University Medical College, 5 adult ICU units participate in 3 hospitals. All patients are randomly assigned to the experimental group and the control group. For experimental group, the combined detection of PCR and CRISPR/Cas12a in the alveolar lavage fluid was carried out in the early stage, and the antibiotic scheme is changed base on the results of PCR-CRISPR/Cas12a.The patients in the control group were adjusted according to the traditional microbial detection methods. The types of early antibiotics, the proportion of target antibiotics, the duration of anti-infective treatment, the length of hospital stay in ICU, the mortality rate, the secondary antibiotic-associated diarrhea, and the incidence of new multidrug-resistant infections were recorded.
Detailed description
ICU patients have a high incidence of bacterial infection in the lower respiratory tract, mainly with severe pneumonia, often causing severe sepsis and septic shock, which is one of the main causes of death in patients. At present, the biggest difficulty faced by clinicians is the continuous increase of bacterial resistance rate and the increase of patient mortality due to the early inadequacy empirical anti-infective treatment. Studies have shown that patients with VAP(Ventilator Associated Pneumonia) have irrational drug use in the early stage, with a mortality rate of more than 50%. When the rate of appropriate drug use has dropped to 33%, while mechanical ventilation time and ICU hospitalization time have been significantly shortened. Therefore, identifying pathogenes as early as possible and shortening the time of empirical anti-infective treatment are very important for improving the prognosis of patients with severe pneumonia and reducing the incidence of bacterial resistance.
There are three traditional methods for detecting pathogenic microorganisms: 1. microbial culture method is the most traditional means of identifying pathogen. It is necessary to inoculate the patient's body fluid, blood, etc. in a suitable medium, incubate in a suitable incubator, and then pass the drug. Sensitivity tests determine the resistance of microorganisms, usually takes 3-7 days. For some specific types of pathogenic microorganisms or microorganisms with harsh growth conditions, there may be negative culture results. Therefore, the traditional culture methods have disadvantages such as poor timeliness, relatively high requirements, and low positive culture rate (30-40%). 2. time-of-flight mass spectrometry: the mass spectrometry technique is used to analyze and detect the protein components of the strain, and the characteristic peak spectrum is obtained. Compared with the bacterial map in the database, the bacteria can be judged by matching. The method can be shortened by about 6-8 hours compared with the conventional culture method, but since the detection of the colony needs to reach a certain amount, the specimen can not be directly detected after obtaining the specimen, and the preliminary microbial culture is required. Therefore, the detection time still takes 1-2 days or more, and there is also the disadvantage of low timeliness. In addition, it is necessary to compare the expansion and standardization of the database, and the inability to analyze the resistance of microorganisms is also the inadequacy of the detection technology. 3. High-throughput sequencing technology: With the rapid development of molecular biology in recent years, high-throughput sequencing technology is widely used in the early diagnosis of clinical microbiology, the principle is mainly through the connection of the universal linker to the fragmentation to be sequenced. Genomic DNA, which produces tens of millions of single-molecule polyclonal polymerase chain reaction arrays, then performs large-scale primer hybridization and enzyme extension reactions, and obtains complete DNA sequence information by computer analysis. However, this technology is difficult to effectively distinguish between pathogenic bacteria and background bacteria, technology and database to be standardized, detection time still takes about 2 days, can not obtain microbial resistance, expensive and other shortcomings At the office. In summary, the current time limit for targeted anti-infective treatment is stopped 2 days after the specimen is taken. Therefore, the search for new, pathogenic microbial detection technology that is faster, more accurate and more sensitive is a hotspot and a difficult point in the field of microbial and anti-infective research in recent years.
The PCR-CRISPR/Cas12a combination technology of alveolar lavage fluid developed by the College of Life Sciences of Nanjing University is based on PCR amplification and fluorescence signal detection twice to achieve the detection of the presence and absence of specific DNA sequences in the test sample. technology. The determination of the detection result of the clinical sample pathogen is based on the comparison of the fluorescence results of the PCR product of the sample DNAD with the fluorescence detection results of the positive control (PC) and the negative control (NC) as a standard. The specific recognition function of the CRISPR/Cas12a system relies on the specific guidance and binding of the crRNA to specific DNA, and the specificity of the crRNA is determined by detection of a positive control of a common pathogen by a single crRNA. The detection technology is highly specific and takes only 2-3 hours, which is a qualitative leap in the detection time compared to the conventional technology.
In order to verify the feasibility and accuracy of the technology, the Center and the Nanjing University of Life Sciences for the common pathogens of ICU pneumonia (Acinetobacter baumannii, MRSA, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, etc.) for alveolar A preliminary study of the PCR-CRISPR/Cas12a combined detection technique for lavage fluid. Twenty-nine specimens of lower respiratory tract alveolar lavage fluid were cultured by conventional bacterial culture method and combined with PCR-CRISPR/Cas12a. The results showed that the accuracy of detection and identification of pathogens based on PCR-Cas12a technology reached 93.10% (27/29). For the 27 specimens, the pathogens infected by the traditional isolation culture method can be detected by PCR-CRISPR/Cas12a technology. The two exceptions were the detection of Acinetobacter baumannii in the No. 6 sample by the traditional isolation culture method and the detection of Proteus mirabilis in the No. 13 sample (not within the range of pathogens detected). Moreover, the pathogens identified by the PCR-CRISPR/Cas12a combination technique were more than one or two different than the traditional culture methods, which was consistent with the PCR, suggesting that the sensitivity is much higher than that of conventional microbial culture, and the results are reliable. These preliminary results indicate that the PCR-CRISPR/Cas12a combined detection technique has good accuracy and high sensitivity.
Based on those, the research team speculated that the combination of PCR and CRISPR/Cas12a detection technology of alveolar lavage fluid to guide anti-infective treatment of pneumonia patients can achieve targeted anti-infective treatment and improve patient prognosis. To validate the above hypothesis, we designed a multicenter randomized prospective study comparing the effects of PCR-CRISPR/Cas12a combined detection with alveolar lavage fluid and traditional microbial detection techniques on antimicrobial adjustment and prognosis in patients with ICU pneumonia. It aims to find more rapid, accurate and sensitive microbial detection technology for patients with pneumonia, and to achieve earlier precision treatment.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Diagnosis
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind (participant, care provider, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| experiment group | Experimental | Diagnostic Test: PCR-CRISPR/Cas12a detectionCombined detection of PCR and CRISPR/Cas12a in alveolar lavage fluid to guide early target adjustment of antibiotics |
| control group | No intervention | –Guide the target adjustment of antibiotics according to traditional microbiological detection methods |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- age ≥ 18 years
- patients with artificial airway and expected artificial airway for more than 48 hours
- patients with suspected pneumonia or clear pneumonia
- signed informed consent
- expected ICU hospitalization more than 3 days.
Key exclusion criteria (7 listed)
- pregnant women
- lactating women
- considered by the doctors for bronchoscopy moderate to severe asthma
- airway stenosis
- tracheal fistula, bronchopleural fistula
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| PCR-CRISPR/Cas12a detectionEvaluate whether the combination of PCR and CRISPR/Cas12a detection of alveolar lavage fluid changes the choice of early antibiotics in patients with pneumonia in artificial airways, and whether it changes the prognosis compared with traditional pathogenic microbial detection techniques. | Diagnostic test | experiment group |
Primary outcome
mortality
Time frame: up to 28 days after hospitalized.
The patient's 28-day mortality rate is the survival rate from the onset to the disease at 28 days, compared with the total number of illnesses, to assess the severity of the disease.
the duration of intensive care unit
Time frame: Up to 8 weeks
time for patients treatment in intensive care unit is patient total treated days in intensive care unit.
the length of hospital stay
Time frame: Up to 8 weeks
time for patients treatment in hospital is patient total treated days in hosiptal. Index of treat effective and severity of disease.
the day of mechanical ventilation
Time frame: Up to 8 weeks
time for patients need mechanical ventilation is the total days that patient need mechanical ventilation.
the duration of septic shock
Time frame: up to 8 weeks
The more severity patients had a long time during septic shock
the incidence of antibiotic-associated diarrhea
Time frame: up to 8 weeks
The incidence of antibiotic-associated diarrhea is the index of side effects of anti-infective treatment. The time frame started after the use of antibiotics, during the total hospitalized.
the incidence of new multi-drug resistant bacteria colonization or infection
Time frame: up to 8 weeks.
rate of multi-drug resistant bacteria colonization or infection is the index of side effects of anti-infective treatment. The time frame started after the use of antibiotics, during the total hospitalized.
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 26 Nov 2019.
- Results publication: PubMed 10780770Almirall J, Bolibar I, Vidal J, Sauca G, Coll P, Niklasson B, Bartolome M, Balanzo X. Epidemiology of community-acquired pneumonia in adults: a population-based study. Eur Respir J. 2000 Apr;15(4):757-63. doi: 10.1034/j.1399-3003.2000.15d21.x.
- Results publication: PubMed 21573947Pletz MW, Wellinghausen N, Welte T. Will polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based diagnostics improve outcome in septic patients? A clinical view. Intensive Care Med. 2011 Jul;37(7):1069-76. doi: 10.1007/s00134-011-2245-x. Epub 2011 May 15.
- Results publication: PubMed 28686513Langelier C, Zinter MS, Kalantar K, Yanik GA, Christenson S, O'Donovan B, White C, Wilson M, Sapru A, Dvorak CC, Miller S, Chiu CY, DeRisi JL. Metagenomic Sequencing Detects Respiratory Pathogens in Hematopoietic Cellular Transplant Patients. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2018 Feb 15;197(4):524-528. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201706-1097LE. No abstract available.
- Results publication: PubMed 18359426Kuti EL, Patel AA, Coleman CI. Impact of inappropriate antibiotic therapy on mortality in patients with ventilator-associated pneumonia and blood stream infection: a meta-analysis. J Crit Care. 2008 Mar;23(1):91-100. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2007.08.007.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 36205312Wang Y, Liang X, Jiang Y, Dong D, Zhang C, Song T, Chen M, You Y, Liu H, Ge M, Dai H, Xi F, Zhou W, Chen JQ, Wang Q, Chen Q, Yu W. Novel fast pathogen diagnosis method for severe pneumonia patients in the intensive care unit: randomized clinical trial. Elife. 2022 Oct 7;11:e79014. doi: 10.7554/eLife.79014.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Severe Sepsis
RecruitingObservational study
Early Detection and Kinetics of Sepsis-Induced Coagulopathy in Severe Burn Patients
Sepsis, Sepsis-induced Coagulopathy
RecruitingObservational study
Early Detection and Kinetics of Sepsis-Induced Coagulopathy in Severe Burn Patients
Peer Bullying Intervention, Vodcast
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Blood Pressure Goal in Preterm Preeclampsia
Hypertensive Disorder of Pregnancy, Preeclampsia
Not yet recruitingEarly Phase 1
25BT056: Basket Study of Viral Cytotoxic T Lymphocytes
EBV Viremia, CMV Viremia
Recruiting
Efficacy and Safety of Methylene Blue in the Treatment of Severe Septic Shock
Septic Shock, Methylene Blue
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
kui w yu, phd study chair
The Affiliated Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital of Nanjing University Medical School
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing PCR-CRISPR/Cas12a detection in people with Severe Sepsis, run by Chinese Medical Association at 1 site in China.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 26 Nov 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact yan wang, MD (+86-025-83106666-40400, yudrnj2@163.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
mortality (time frame: up to 28 days after hospitalized.). The study lists 7 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04178382, which also lists 5 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 26 Nov 2019.