AzTrials
AzTrials

Atopic DermatitisPhase 3ADvocate2NCT04178967

Evaluation of the Efficacy and Safety of Lebrikizumab (LY3650150) in Moderate to Severe Atopic Dermatitis

A Phase 3 study testing Lebrikizumab in people with Atopic Dermatitis, run by Eli Lilly and Company at 89 sites in 8 countries.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This is a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study which is 52 weeks in duration. The study is designed to confirm the safety and efficacy of lebrikizumab as monotherapy for treatment of moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis utilizing a 16-week induction treatment period and a 36-week… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 12 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Atopic Dermatitis
What is being tested?
Lebrikizumab
Type of treatment
Injection or infusion
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
445 participants
Where
89 sitesin 8 countries
Study dates
29 Oct 2019to 28 Apr 2022
Phase
Phase 3
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 12 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Male or female adults and adolescents (≥12 years and ≥40 kg)
  • Chronic atopic dermatitis (according to American Academy of Dermatology Consensus Criteria) that has been present for ≥1 year before the screening visit
  • Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) score ≥16 at the baseline visit
  • Investigator Global Assessment (IGA) score ≥3 (scale of 0 to 4) at the baseline visit
  • ≥10% body surface area (BSA) of atopic dermatitis involvement at the baseline visit
  • History of inadequate response to treatment with topical medications; or determination that topical treatments are otherwise medically inadvisable

Who cannot join

  • Prior treatment with dupilumab or tralokinumab
  • Treatment with topical corticosteroids, calcineurin inhibitors or phosphodiesterase-4 inhibitors such as crisaborole within 1 week prior to the baseline visit
  • Treatment with any of the following agents within 4 weeks prior to the baseline visit:
  • Immunosuppressive/immunomodulating drugs (e.g., systemic corticosteroids, cyclosporine, mycophenolate-mofetil, IFN-γ, Janus kinase inhibitors, azathioprine, methotrexate, etc.)
  • Phototherapy and photochemotherapy (PUVA) for AD
  • Treatment with the following prior to the baseline visit:
Show all 15Show fewer
  • An investigational drug within 8 weeks or within 5 half-lives (if known) of baseline, whichever is longer
  • Cell-depleting biologics, including to rituximab, within 6 months of baseline
  • Other biologics within 5 half-lives (if known) or 16 weeks of baseline, whichever is longer
  • Treatment with a live (attenuated) vaccine within 12 weeks of the baseline visit or planned during the study
  • Uncontrolled chronic disease that might require bursts of oral corticosteroids, e.g., co-morbid severe uncontrolled asthma
  • Evidence of active acute or chronic hepatitis
  • History of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection or positive HIV serology
  • History of malignancy, including mycosis fungoides, within 5 years before the screening visit, except completely treated in situ carcinoma of the cervix, completely treated and resolved non-metastatic squamous or basal cell carcinoma of the skin
  • Pregnant or breastfeeding women, or women planning to become pregnant or breastfeed during the study

Trial locations and contacts

89 sites in 8 countries.

89 sites in 8 countries

United States40 sites
  • Georgia Pollens Clinical Research Centers, Inc

    Albany, Georgia, 31707

  • Arlington Research Center, Inc

    Arlington, Texas, 76011

  • Bakersfield Dermatology and Skin Cancer Medical Group

    Bakersfield, California, 93309

  • Meridian Clinical Research

    Baton Rouge, Louisiana, 70808

  • Great Lakes Research Group, Inc.

    Bay City, Michigan, 48706

  • ActivMed Practices and Research

    Beverly, Massachusetts, 01915

  • Tufts Medical Center

    Boston, Massachusetts, 02111

  • Dermatology & Laser Center of Charleston

    Charleston, South Carolina, 29407

  • OnSite Clinical Solutions

    Charlotte, North Carolina, 28277

  • Clarkston Skin Research

    Clarkston, Michigan, 48346

  • Dermatology and Skin Surgery Center

    Exton, Pennsylvania, 19341

  • Clinical Physiology Associates, Clinical Study Center

    Fort Myers, Florida, 33916-9452

  • Innovate Research, LLC

    Fort Worth, Texas, 76244

  • Center For Dermatology Clinical Research, Inc.

    Fremont, California, 94538

  • Woodward Centre

    Fresno, California, 93720

  • Associated Skin Care Specialists

    Fridley, Minnesota, 55432

  • Palmetto Clinical Trial Services

    Greenville, South Carolina, 29601

  • DermDOX

    Hazleton, Pennsylvania, 18201

  • Direct Helpers Medical Center

    Hialeah, Florida, 33012

  • The Community Research of South Florida

    Hialeah, Florida, 33016

  • Solutions Through Advanced Research, Inc.

    Jacksonville, Florida, 32256

  • Forest Hills Dermatology Group

    Kew Gardens, New York, 11415

  • Dermatology Research Associates

    Los Angeles, California, 90045

  • LA Universal Research Center, INC

    Los Angeles, California, 90057

  • Marietta Dermatology Clinical Research

    Marietta, Georgia, 30060

  • University of Utah MidValley Dematology

    Murray, Utah, 84107

  • Virginia Clinical Research, Inc.

    Norfolk, Virginia, 23502

  • Kansas City Dermatology, PA

    Overland Park, Kansas, 66215

  • Austin Institute for Clinical Research

    Pflugerville, Texas, 78660

  • Northwest Arkansas Clinical Trials Center

    Rogers, Arkansas, 72758

  • Arlington Dermatology

    Rolling Meadows, Illinois, 60008

  • University Clinical Trials, Inc.

    San Diego, California, 92123

  • San Luis Dermatology & Laser Clinic

    San Luis Obispo, California, 93405

  • Advanced Medical Research

    Sandy Springs, Georgia, 30328

  • Investigate MD

    Scottsdale, Arizona, 85255

  • Dermatology Associates

    Seattle, Washington, 98101

  • NorthShore University HealthSystem

    Skokie, Illinois, 60077

  • Central Dermatology PC

    St Louis, Missouri, 63117

  • Peak Research LLC

    Upper Saint Clair, Pennsylvania, 15241

  • Wilmington Dermatology Center

    Wilmington, North Carolina, 28405

Other trials in United States

Germany20 sites
  • licca Fachklinik

    Augsburg, Bavaria, 86179

  • Praxis Dr. Michael Dietlen

    Augsburg, 86150

  • Fachklinik Bad Bentheim

    Bad Bentheim, North Rhine-Westphalia, 48455

  • Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin Campus Buch

    Berlin, 10117

  • ISA GmbH

    Berlin, 10789

  • Praxis für Ganzheitliche Dermatologie im Ärztehaus

    Berlin, 13055

  • Hautzentrum im Jahrhunderthaus

    Bochum, North Rhine-Westphalia, 44793

  • Elbe Klinikum Buxtehude

    Buxtehude, Lower Saxony, 21614

  • Rosenpark Research Geschäftsbereich der Rosenparkklinik GmbH

    Darmstadt, Hesse, 64283

  • Klinikum der Johann Wolfgang Goethe-Universität Frankfurt

    Frankfurt am Main, Hesse, 60590

  • Derma-Study-Center Friedrichshafen GmbH

    Friedrichshafen, Baden-Wurttemberg, 88045

  • Universitätsklinikum Hamburg

    Hamburg, 20246

  • TFS Trial Form Support GmbH

    Hamburg, 20537

  • Studienzentrum Dr.Beate Schwarz

    Langenau, Baden-Wurttemberg, 89129

  • SIBAmed Studienzentrum GmbH & Co. KG

    Leipzig, Saxony, 04103

  • Universität Leipzig - Universitätsklinikum

    Leipzig, Saxony, 04103

  • Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein

    Lübeck, Schleswig-Holstein, 23538

  • Universitätsklinikum Münster

    Münster, North Rhine-Westphalia, 48149

  • Klinische Forschung Osnabrück

    Osnabrück, Lower Saxony, 49074

  • Hautarztpraxis am Löwenmarkt

    Stuttgart, Baden-Wurttemberg, 70499

Other trials in Germany

Taiwan7 sites
  • Kaohsiung Medical University Chung-Ho Institutional Review B

    Kaohsiung City, 807

  • Taipei Medical University- Shuang Ho Hospital

    New Taipei City, 235

  • Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital

    Niaosong Dist, Kaohsiung City, 833

  • Chung Shan Medical University Hospital

    Taichung, 402

  • China Medical University Hospital

    Taichung, 40447

  • National Taiwan University Hospital

    Taipei, 10002

  • Chang Gung Memorial Hospital - Linkou

    Taoyuan City, 33305

Other trials in Taiwan

Bulgaria6 sites
  • DCC Sveti Georgi

    Plovdiv, 4000

  • Diagnostic and Consultation Center 14

    Sofia, 1408

  • Alexandrovska University Hospital

    Sofia, 1432

  • Euro Derma clinic

    Sofia, 1606

  • Military Medical Academy

    Sofia, 1606

  • Medical centre Alitera-Med EOOD

    Sofia, 1618

Other trials in Bulgaria

Canada6 sites
  • Simcoderm Medical & Surgical Dermatology Centre

    Barrie, Ontario, L4M 7G1

  • Lynderm Research Inc.

    Markham, Ontario, L3P1X2

  • North York Research Inc.

    North York, Ontario, M2M4J5

  • Ottawa Allergy Research Corp

    Ottawa, Ontario, K1G 6C6

  • Dr. Chih-ho Hong Medical Inc.

    Surrey, British Columbia, V3R 6A7

  • K. Papp Clinical Research

    Waterloo, Ontario, N2J 1C4

Other trials in Canada

Singapore4 sites
  • National University Hospital

    Singapore, 119074

  • Singapore General Hospital

    Singapore, 169078

  • Kk Women'S and Childrens Hospital

    Singapore, 229899

  • National Skin Centre NSC

    Singapore, 308205

Other trials in Singapore

Ukraine4 sites
  • Municipal Healthcare Institution Kharkiv City Dermatoverenologic Dispensary N2

    Kharkiv, 61038

  • Rivne Regional Dermatology and Venereology Dispensary

    Rivne, 39028

  • Treatment-diagnostic center PE "Asclepius"

    Uzhhorod, 88002

  • Community Institution Zaporizhzhya Regional Dermatovenereology Clinical Hospital of Zaporizhzhya Regional Council

    Zaporizhzhya, 69000

Other trials in Ukraine

Mexico2 sites
  • Derma Norte del Bajío, S.C.

    Aguascalientes, 20130

  • Clinica De Enfermedades Cronicas y Procedimientos Especiales

    Morelia, Michoacan Morelia, CP 58249

Other trials in Mexico

About this study

Official title: A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo Controlled Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Lebrikizumab in Patients With Moderate to Severe Atopic Dermatitis.

This is a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study which is 52 weeks in duration. The study is designed to confirm the safety and efficacy of lebrikizumab as monotherapy for treatment of moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis utilizing a 16-week induction treatment period and a 36-week long-term maintenance treatment period.

Being tested
Lebrikizumab, Placebo
Keywords
Eczema, Dermatitis, Dermatitis, Atopic, Skin Diseases
Medical subject headings
Dermatitis, Atopic, Eczema, Dermatitis, Skin Diseases

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • LebrikizumabBiological

    Also called LY3650150, DRM06

    Subcutaneous injection

  • PlaceboOther

    Subcutaneous Injection

Study groups in NCT04178967
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
PlaceboPlacebo comparatorInduction Period (Baseline-Week 16): Two subcutaneous (SC) injections of Placebo as a loading dose at Baseline and Week 2 followed by a single injection every 2 weeks (Q2W) from Week 4 until Week 14. Maintenance Period (Week 16-Week 52): Two placebo SC injections as loading dose on Week 16 and Week 18. One placebo SC injection Q2W until Week 50.
Receives: Other: Placebo
Lebrikizumab Q2WExperimentalInduction Period (Baseline-Week 16): 500 milligram (mg) Lebrikizumab (2 x 250 mg) SC injections as a loading dose at Baseline and Week 2 visits followed by a single 250 mg Lebrikizumab injection Q2W from Week 4 until Week 14. Maintenance Period (Week 16-Week 52): One 250 mg Lebrikizumab SC injection and one placebo SC injection as maintenance loading dose on Week 16 and Week 18. One 250 mg Lebrikizumab SC injection Q2W until Week 50.
Receives: Biological: Lebrikizumab
Lebrikizumab Q4WExperimentalMaintenance Period (Week 16-Week 52): One 250 mg Lebrikizumab SC injection and one placebo SC injection as maintenance loading dose on Week 16 and two placebo SC injections on Week 18. One 250 mg Lebrikizumab SC injection Every 4 weeks (Q4W) on Weeks 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, and 48. One placebo SC injection Q4W on Weeks 22, 26, 30, 34, 38, 42, 46, and 50.
Receives: Biological: Lebrikizumab; Other: Placebo
Escape Arm (Lebrikizumab Q2W)ExperimentalMaintenance Period (Week 16-Week 52): Participants who require topical or systemic rescue treatment for atopic dermatitis during the Induction Period, or are non-responders at Week 16, will be eligible for treatment in an Escape Arm where participants will receive open-label lebrikizumab Q2W from Week 16 through Week 52. In addition, participants who do not maintain an acceptable response during the Maintenance Period (have an EASI score <50% of baseline), will be eligible for the Escape Arm.
Receives: Biological: Lebrikizumab

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Percentage of Participants With an Investigator Global Assessment (IGA) Score of 0 or 1 and a Reduction ≥2 Points From Baseline to Week 16

    The IGA measures the investigator's global assessment of the participant's overall severity of their atopic dermatitis (AD), based on a static, numeric 5-point scale from 0 (clear skin) to 4 (severe disease). The score is based on an overall assessment of the degree of erythema, papulation/induration, oozing/crusting, and lichenification.

    Measured: Baseline to Week 16

  2. Percentage of Participants Achieving Eczema Area And Severity Index (EASI-75) (≥75% Reduction in EASI Score) From Baseline to Week 16

    The EASI assesses objective physician estimates of 2 dimensions of AD - disease extent and clinical signs affected: 0 = 0%; 1 = 1-9%; 2 = 10-29%; 3 = 30-49%; 4 = 50-69%; 5 = 70-89%; 6 = 90-100% and the severity of 4 clinical signs: (1) erythema, (2) edema/papulation, (3) excoriation, and (4) lichenification each on a scale of 0 to 3 (0 = none, absent; 1 = mild; 2 = moderate; 3 = severe) at 4 body sites (head/neck, trunk, upper limbs, and lower limbs). Half scores are allowed between severities 1, 2, and 3. The final EASI score was obtained by weight-averaging these 4 scores and will range from 0 to 72 (severe).

    The EASI-75 responder is defined as a participant who achieves a ≥ 75% reduction from baseline in the EASI score.

    Measured: Baseline to Week 16

Secondary outcomes (38)
  1. Percentage of Participants With an IGA Score of 0 or 1 and a Reduction ≥2 Points From Baseline to Week 2

    The IGA measures the investigator's global assessment of the participant's overall severity of their AD, based on a static, numeric 5-point scale from 0 (clear skin) to 4 (severe disease). The score is based on an overall assessment of the degree of erythema, papulation/induration, oozing/crusting, and lichenification.

    Measured: Baseline to Week 2

  2. Percentage of Participants With an IGA Score of 0 or 1 and a Reduction ≥2 Points From Baseline to Week 4

    The IGA measures the investigator's global assessment of the participant's overall severity of their AD, based on a static, numeric 5-point scale from 0 (clear skin) to 4 (severe disease). The score is based on an overall assessment of the degree of erythema, papulation/induration, oozing/crusting, and lichenification.

    Measured: Baseline to Week 4

  3. Percentage of Participants With an IGA Score of 0 or 1 and a Reduction ≥2 Points From Baseline to Week 16

    The IGA measures the investigator's global assessment of the participant's overall severity of their AD, based on a static, numeric 5-point scale from 0 (clear skin) to 4 (severe disease). The score is based on an overall assessment of the degree of erythema, papulation/induration, oozing/crusting, and lichenification.

    Measured: Baseline to Week 16

  4. Percentage of Participants Achieving EASI-90 (≥90% Reduction in EASI Score) From Baseline to Week 16

    The EASI assesses objective physician estimates of 2 dimensions of AD - disease extent and clinical signs affected: 0 = 0%; 1 = 1-9%; 2 = 10-29%; 3 = 30-49%; 4 = 50-69%; 5 = 70-89%; 6 = 90-100% and the severity of 4 clinical signs: (1) erythema, (2) edema/papulation, (3) excoriation, and (4) lichenification each on a scale of 0 to 3 (0 = none, absent; 1 = mild; 2 = moderate; 3 = severe) at 4 body sites (head/neck, trunk, upper limbs, and lower limbs). Half scores are allowed between severities 1, 2, and 3. The final EASI score was obtained by weight-averaging these 4 scores and will range from 0 to 72 (severe).

    The EASI-90 responder is defined as a participant who achieves a ≥ 90% reduction from baseline in the EASI score.

    Measured: Baseline to Week 16

  5. Percentage Change in Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Score From Baseline to Week 16

    Pruritus NRS is an 11-point scale used by participants to rate their worst itch severity over the past 24 hours with 0 indicating "No itch" and 10 indicating "Worst itch imaginable." Least Squares (LS) Mean was calculated using analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model with treatment and randomization strata (region, disease severity, age) as fixed factors and baseline value as covariate.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 16

  6. Percentage of Participants With a Pruritus NRS Score of ≥4-points at Baseline Who Achieve a ≥4-point Reduction in Pruritus NRS Score From Baseline to Week 16

    Pruritus NRS is an 11-point scale used by participants to rate their worst itch severity over the past 24 hours with 0 indicating "No itch" and 10 indicating "Worst itch imaginable."

    Measured: Baseline to Week 16

  7. Percentage of Participants With a Pruritus NRS Score of ≥5-points at Baseline Who Achieve a ≥4-point Reduction in Pruritus NRS Score From Baseline to Week 16

    Pruritus NRS is an 11-point scale used by participants to rate their worst itch severity over the past 24 hours with 0 indicating "No itch" and 10 indicating "Worst itch imaginable."

    Measured: Baseline to Week 16

  8. Percentage Change in EASI Score From Baseline to Week 16

    The EASI assesses objective physician estimates of 2 dimensions of AD - disease extent and clinical signs affected: 0 = 0%; 1 = 1-9%; 2 = 10-29%; 3 = 30-49%; 4 = 50-69%; 5 = 70-89%; 6 = 90-100% and the severity of 4 clinical signs: (1) erythema, (2) edema/papulation, (3) excoriation, and (4) lichenification each on a scale of 0 to 3 (0 = none, absent; 1 = mild; 2 = moderate; 3 = severe) at 4 body sites (head/neck, trunk, upper limbs, and lower limbs). Half scores are allowed between severities 1, 2, and 3. The final EASI score was obtained by weight-averaging these 4 scores and will range from 0 to 72 (severe).

    LS Mean was calculated using ANCOVA model with treatment, stratification factors of geographic region, age group, baseline IGA score (IGA 3 versus 4) as fixed factors baseline value as covariate.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 16

  9. Change From Baseline in Percent Body Surface Area (BSA) at Week 16

    The BSA affected by AD will be assessed for 4 separate body regions: head and neck, trunk (including genital region), upper extremities, and lower extremities (including the buttocks). Each body region will be assessed for disease extent ranging from 0% to 100% involvement. BSA was calculated using the participant's palm using the 1% rule, 1 palm was equivalent to 1% with estimates of the number of palms it takes to cover the affected AD area. Maximum number of palms were 10 palms for head and neck (10%), 20 palms for upper extremities (20%), 30 palms for trunk, including axilla and groin (30%), 40 palms for lower extremities, including buttocks (40%). Percent of BSA for a body region was calculated as = total number of palms in a body region * % surface area equivalent to 1 palm. Overall percent BSA of all 4 body regions ranges from 0% to 100 % with higher values representing greater severity of AD.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 16

  10. Percentage of Participants Achieving EASI-90 From Baseline to Week 4

    The EASI assesses objective physician estimates of 2 dimensions of AD - disease extent and clinical signs affected: 0 = 0%; 1 = 1-9%; 2 = 10-29%; 3 = 30-49%; 4 = 50-69%; 5 = 70-89%; 6 = 90-100% and the severity of 4 clinical signs: (1) erythema, (2) edema/papulation, (3) excoriation, and (4) lichenification each on a scale of 0 to 3 (0 = none, absent; 1 = mild; 2 = moderate; 3 = severe) at 4 body sites (head/neck, trunk, upper limbs, and lower limbs). Half scores are allowed between severities 1, 2, and 3. The final EASI score was obtained by weight-averaging these 4 scores and will range from 0 to 72 (severe).

    The EASI-90 responder is defined as a participant who achieves a ≥ 90% reduction from baseline in the EASI score.

    Measured: Baseline to Week 4

  11. Change From Baseline in Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) at Week 16

    The DLQI is a 10-item, validated questionnaire used to assess the impact of skin disease on the quality of life of an affected person. The 10 questions cover the following topics: symptoms, embarrassment, shopping and home care, clothes, social and leisure, sport, work or study, close relationships, sex, and treatment, over the previous week. Response categories include "Not at all," "A little," "A lot," and "Very much," with corresponding scores of 0, 1, 2, and 3 respectively. Questions 3-10 also have an additional response category of "Not relevant" which is scored as "0". Questions are scored from 0 to 3, giving a possible total score range from 0 (no impact of skin disease on quality of life) to 30 (maximum impact on quality of life). A high score is indicative of a poor quality of life.

    LS Mean was calculated using the ANCOVA model with treatment, baseline value, and stratification factors of geographic region, age group, baseline IGA (3 versus 4) score as fixed factors.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 16

  12. Percentage of Participants Achieving ≥4-point Improvement in DLQI From Baseline to Week 16

    The DLQI is a 10-item, validated questionnaire used to assess the impact of skin disease on the quality of life of an affected person. The 10 questions cover the following topics: symptoms, embarrassment, shopping and home care, clothes, social and leisure, sport, work or study, close relationships, sex, and treatment, over the previous week. Response categories include "Not at all," "A little," "A lot," and "Very much," with corresponding scores of 0, 1, 2, and 3 respectively. Questions 3-10 also have an additional response category of "Not relevant" which is scored as "0". Questions are scored from 0 to 3, giving a possible total score range from 0 (no impact of skin disease on quality of life) to 30 (maximum impact on quality of life). A high score is indicative of a poor quality of life.

    Measured: Baseline to Week 16

  13. Percentage of Participants With a DLQI Total Score of ≥4-point at Baseline Achieving ≥4-point Improvement in DLQI From Baseline to Week 16

    The DLQI is a 10-item, validated questionnaire used to assess the impact of skin disease on the quality of life of an affected person. The 10 questions cover the following topics: symptoms, embarrassment, shopping and home care, clothes, social and leisure, sport, work or study, close relationships, sex, and treatment, over the previous week. Response categories include "Not at all," "A little," "A lot," and "Very much," with corresponding scores of 0, 1, 2, and 3 respectively. Questions 3-10 also have an additional response category of "Not relevant" which is scored as "0". Questions are scored from 0 to 3, giving a possible total score range from 0 (no impact of skin disease on quality of life) to 30 (maximum impact on quality of life). A high score is indicative of a poor quality of life.

    Measured: Baseline to Week 16

  14. Percentage Change in Sleep-loss Score From Baseline to Week 16

    Sleep Loss due to interference of itch will be assessed by the participant. Participants rate their interference of itch on sleep based on a 5-point Likert scale [0 (not at all) to 4 (unable to sleep at all)]. Higher scores indicated a greater impact and worse outcome. Assessments will be recorded daily by the participant using an electronic diary. LS Mean was calculated using ANCOVA model with treatment, baseline value, and stratification factors of geographic region, age group, baseline IGA (3 versus 4) score as fixed factors.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 16

  15. Change From Baseline in Sleep-loss Score at Week 16

    Sleep Loss due to interference of itch will be assessed by the participant. Participants rate their interference of itch on sleep based on a 5-point Likert scale [0 (not at all) to 4 (unable to sleep at all)]. Higher scores indicated a greater impact and worse outcome. Assessments will be recorded daily by the participant using an electronic diary. LS Mean was calculated using ANCOVA model with treatment, baseline value, and stratification factors of geographic region, age group, baseline IGA (3 versus 4) score as fixed factors.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 16

  16. Percentage of Participants With a Sleep-loss Score ≥2 Points at Baseline Who Achieve a ≥2 Points Reduction From Baseline to Week 16

    Sleep Loss due to interference of itch will be assessed by the participant. Participants rate their interference of itch on sleep based on a 5-point Likert scale [0 (not at all) to 4 (unable to sleep at all)]. Higher scores indicated a greater impact and worse outcome. Assessments will be recorded daily by the participant using an electronic diary.

    Measured: Baseline to Week 16

  17. Percentage of Participants With a Pruritus NRS Score of ≥4 Points at Baseline Who Achieve a ≥4-point Reduction From Baseline to Week 1

    Pruritus NRS is an 11-point scale used by participants to rate their worst itch severity over the past 24 hours with 0 indicating "No itch" and 10 indicating "Worst itch imaginable."

    Measured: Baseline to Week 1

  18. Percentage of Participants With a Pruritus NRS Score of ≥4 Points at Baseline Who Achieve a ≥4-point Reduction From Baseline to Week 2

    Pruritus NRS is an 11-point scale used by participants to rate their worst itch severity over the past 24 hours with 0 indicating "No itch" and 10 indicating "Worst itch imaginable."

    Measured: Baseline to Week 2

  19. Percentage of Participants With a Pruritus NRS Score of ≥4 Points at Baseline Who Achieve a ≥4-point Reduction From Baseline to Week 4

    Pruritus NRS is an 11-point scale used by participants to rate their worst itch severity over the past 24 hours with 0 indicating "No itch" and 10 indicating "Worst itch imaginable."

    Measured: Baseline to Week 4

  20. Percentage of Participants With a Pruritus NRS Score of ≥5 Points at Baseline Who Achieve a ≥4-point Reduction From Baseline to Week 1

    Pruritus NRS is an 11-point scale used by participants to rate their worst itch severity over the past 24 hours with 0 indicating "No itch" and 10 indicating "Worst itch imaginable."

    Measured: Baseline to Week 1

  21. Percentage of Participants With a Pruritus NRS Score of ≥5 Points at Baseline Who Achieve a ≥4-point Reduction From Baseline to Week 2

    Pruritus NRS is an 11-point scale used by participants to rate their worst itch severity over the past 24 hours with 0 indicating "No itch" and 10 indicating "Worst itch imaginable."

    Measured: Baseline to Week 2

  22. Percentage of Participants With a Pruritus NRS Score of ≥5 Points at Baseline Who Achieve a ≥4-point Reduction From Baseline to Week 4

    Pruritus NRS is an 11-point scale used by participants to rate their worst itch severity over the past 24 hours with 0 indicating "No itch" and 10 indicating "Worst itch imaginable."

    Measured: Baseline to Week 4

  23. Percentage Change in SCORing Atopic Dermatitis (SCORAD) From Baseline to Week 16

    SCORAD is validated tool for assessing the extent and intensity of AD, it consists of 3 components: A=extent of AD as a percentage of each defined body area and reported as sum of all areas, with maximum score of 100%. B=severity of 6 specific symptoms of AD (redness, swelling, oozing/crusting, excoriation, skin thickening/lichenification, dryness) assessed using following scale: none=0, mild=1, moderate=2, or severe=3 for maximum of 18 total points. C=subjective assessment of itch and sleeplessness recorded by participant on visual analog scale (VAS), where 0=no itch/no sleeplessness and 10=worst imaginable itch/sleeplessness with maximum score of 20. SCORAD total score is calculated: A/5+7*B/2+ C to give total score range of 0 to 103, where 0=no disease to 103=severe disease. LS Mean was calculated using ANCOVA model with treatment group and stratification factors of geographic region, age group, baseline IGA (3 versus 4) score as fixed factors and baseline value as covariate.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 16

  24. Pharmacokinetics (PK): Trough Serum Concentrations of Lebrikizumab in Maintenance Period (C-trough)

    C-trough was the concentration of study drug in the blood immediately before the next dose was administered. Trough serum concentration of Lebrikizumab was assessed at predose week 52.

    Measured: Predose at Week 52

  25. Percentage of Participants From Those Re-randomized Having Achieved EASI-75 at Week 16 Who Continue to Exhibit EASI-75 at Week 52 (EASI-75 Calculated Relative to Baseline EASI Score)

    The EASI assesses objective physician estimates of 2 dimensions of AD - disease extent, i.e., percentage of skin affected: 0 = 0%; 1 = 1-9%; 2 = 10-29%; 3 = 30-49%; 4 = 50-69%; 5 = 70-89%; 6 = 90-100% and the severity of 4 clinical signs: (1) erythema, (2) edema/papulation, (3) excoriation, and (4) lichenification each on a scale of 0 to 3 (0 = none, absent; 1 = mild; 2 = moderate; 3 = severe) at 4 body sites (head/neck, trunk, upper limbs, and lower limbs). Half scores are allowed between severities 1, 2, and 3. The final EASI-75 score was obtained by weight-averaging these 4 scores and will range from 0 (none) to 72 (severe).

    The EASI-75 responder is defined as a participant who achieves a ≥ 75% reduction from baseline in the EASI score.

    Measured: Baseline to Week 52

  26. Percentage of Participants From Those Re-randomized Having Achieved IGA 0 or 1 and a ≥2-point Improvement From Baseline at Week 16 Who Continue to Exhibit an IGA 0 or 1 and a ≥2-point Improvement From Baseline at Week 52

    The IGA measures the investigator's global assessment of the participant's overall severity of their AD, based on a static, numeric 5-point scale from 0 (clear skin) to 4 (severe disease). The score is based on an overall assessment of the degree of erythema, papulation/induration, oozing/crusting, and lichenification.

    Measured: Baseline to Week 52

  27. Percentage of Participants From Those With a Pruritus NRS of ≥4-points at Baseline Re-randomized Having Achieved ≥4-point Reduction From Baseline at Week 16 Who Continue to Exhibit ≥4-point Reduction From Baseline at Week 52

    Pruritus NRS is an 11-point scale used by participants to rate their worst itch severity over the past 24 hours with 0 indicating "No itch" and 10 indicating "Worst itch imaginable."

    Measured: Baseline to Week 52

  28. Percentage of Participants From Those With a Pruritus NRS of ≥5-points at Baseline Re-randomized Having Achieved ≥4-point Reduction From Baseline at Week 16 Who Continue to Exhibit ≥4-point Reduction From Baseline at Week 52

    Pruritus NRS is an 11-point scale used by participants to rate their worst itch severity over the past 24 hours with 0 indicating "No itch" and 10 indicating "Worst itch imaginable."

    Measured: Baseline to Week 52

  29. Percentage Change in SCORAD (From Those Re-randomized Having Achieved EASI-75 at Week 16) From Baseline at Week 52

    SCORAD is a validated tool for assessing the extent and intensity of AD, it consists of 3 components: A=extent of AD as a percentage of each defined body area and reported as sum of all areas, with maximum score of 100%. B=severity of 6 specific symptoms of AD (redness, swelling, oozing/crusting, excoriation, skin thickening/lichenification, dryness) assessed using following scale: none=0, mild=1, moderate=2, or severe=3 for maximum of 18 total points. C=subjective assessment of itch and sleeplessness recorded by participant on VAS, where 0=no itch/no sleeplessness and 10=worst imaginable itch/sleeplessness with maximum score of 20. SCORAD total score is calculated: A/5+7*B/2+ C to give total score range of 0 to 103, where 0=no disease to 103=severe disease. LS Mean was calculated using ANCOVA model with treatment group and stratification factors of geographic region, age group, baseline IGA (3 versus 4) score as fixed factors and baseline value as covariate.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 52

  30. Change From Baseline in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions-5 Levels (EQ-5D-5L) at Week 16 - Health State Index

    The European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions-5 Level (EQ-5D-5L) is a is a 2-part questionnaire which measure health status of the participant. The first component (Health state) is a descriptive system of the respondent's health comprised of the following 5 participant-reported dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has 5 levels: no problems, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems, and extreme problems. The responses are used to derive the health state index scores using the United Kingdom (UK) algorithm, with scores ranging from -0.594 to 1, and the United States (US) algorithm, with scores ranging from -0.109 to 1. A higher score indicates better health state.

    LS Mean was calculated using the ANCOVA model with treatment and stratification factors of geographic region, age group, baseline IGA (3 versus 4) score as fixed factors and baseline value as covariate.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 16

  31. Change From Baseline in EQ-5D-5L at Week 16 - Visual Analog Scale (VAS)

    The EQ-5D-5L is a 2-part measurement. The second part is assessed using a VAS that ranged from 0 to 100 millimeter (mm), where 0 is the worst health you can imagine and 100 is the best health you can imagine. LS Mean was calculated using the ANCOVA model with treatment and stratification factors of geographic region, age group, baseline IGA (3 versus 4) score as fixed factors and baseline value as covariate.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 16

  32. Change From Baseline in Patient Oriented Eczema Measure (POEM) at Week 16

    POEM is a 7-item, validated, questionnaire used by the participant to assess disease symptoms over the last week. The participant is asked to respond to 7 questions on skin dryness, itching, flaking, cracking, sleep loss, bleeding and weeping. All 7 answers carry equal weight with a total possible score from 0 to 28 (answers scored as: No days=0; 1-2 days = 1; 3-4 days = 2; 5-6 days = 3; everyday = 4). A high score is indicative of a poor quality of life. POEM responses will be captured using an electronic diary and transferred into the clinical database. LS Mean was calculated using MMRM model using treatment, baseline value, visit, the interaction of the baseline value-by-visit, the interaction of treatment by-visit as covariates, geographic region, age group, baseline IGA (3 versus 4) score as fixed.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 16

  33. Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Anxiety at Week 16-Adolescents

    PROMIS® is a set of person-centered measures that evaluates and monitors physical, mental, and social health in adults and children. Participants ≤17 years will complete pediatric versions for the duration of the study. PROMIS anxiety has 8 questions on Emotion Distress-Anxiety (or Pediatric Anxiety Symptom). Each question has 5 response options with values from 1 to 5. Total raw scores were converted to T-Scores (mean = 50 and a standard deviation = 10) with higher scores representing greater anxiety. LS Mean was calculated using the ANCOVA model with treatment and stratification factors of geographic region, age group, baseline IGA (3 versus 4) score as fixed factors and baseline value as covariate.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 16

  34. Change From Baseline in PROMIS Anxiety at Week 16 - Adults

    PROMIS® is a set of person-centered measures that evaluates and monitors physical, mental, and social health in adults and children. Participants ≤17 years will complete pediatric versions for the duration of the study. PROMIS anxiety has 8 questions on Emotion Distress-Anxiety (or Pediatric Anxiety Symptom). Each question has 5 response options with values from 1 to 5. Total raw scores were converted to T-Scores (mean = 50 and a standard deviation = 10) with higher scores representing greater anxiety. LS Mean was calculated using the ANCOVA model with treatment and stratification factors of geographic region, age group, baseline IGA (3 versus 4) score as fixed factors and baseline value as covariate.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 16

  35. Change From Baseline in PROMIS Depression at Week 16- Adolescents

    PROMIS® is a set of person-centered measures that evaluates and monitors physical, mental, and social health in adults and children. Participants ≤17 years will complete pediatric versions for the duration of the study. PROMIS anxiety has 8 questions on Emotion Distress-Anxiety (or Pediatric Anxiety Symptom). Each question has 5 response options with values from 1 to 5. Total raw scores were converted to T-Scores (mean = 50 and a standard deviation = 10) with higher scores representing greater anxiety. LS Mean was calculated using the ANCOVA model with treatment and stratification factors of geographic region, age group, baseline IGA (3 versus 4) score as fixed factors and baseline value as covariate.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 16

  36. Change From Baseline in PROMIS Depression at Week 16- Adults

    PROMIS® is a set of person-centered measures that evaluates and monitors physical, mental, and social health in adults and children. Participants ≤17 years will complete pediatric versions for the duration of the study. PROMIS anxiety has 8 questions on Emotion Distress-Anxiety (or Pediatric Anxiety Symptom). Each question has 5 response options with values from 1 to 5. Total raw scores were converted to T-Scores (mean = 50 and a standard deviation = 10) with higher scores representing greater anxiety. LS Mean was calculated using the ANCOVA model with treatment and stratification factors of geographic region, age group, baseline IGA (3 versus 4) score as fixed factors and baseline value as covariate.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 16

  37. Change From Baseline in Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ-5) Score at Week 16 in Participants Who Have Self-reported Comorbid Asthma

    The ACQ-5 is a five-item, self-completed questionnaire, which is used as a measure of asthma control of a participant. The five questions (concerning nocturnal awakening, waking in the morning, activity limitation, shortness of breath and wheeze) enquire about the frequency and/or severity of symptoms over the previous week. The response options for all these questions range from zero (no impairment/limitation) to six (total impairment/ limitation) scale. The ACQ-5 score is the average of the individual item scores and ranges from 0 (totally controlled) to 6 (severely uncontrolled). Higher scores indicate lower asthma control.

    LS Mean was calculated using ANCOVA with treatment, geographic region, age group, baseline IGA (3 versus 4) score as fixed factors and baseline value as covariate.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 16

  38. Change From Baseline in Children's Dermatology Life Quality Index (CDLQI) at Week 16

    The CDLQI questionnaire is designed for use in children (4 to 16 years of age). It consists of 10 items that are grouped into 6 domains: symptoms \& feelings, leisure, school or holidays, personal relationships, sleep, \& treatment. The scoring of each question is: Very much =3; Quite a lot = 2; Only a little = 1; Not at all = 0. CDLQI total score is calculated by summing all 10 items responses, and has a range of 0 to 30 (higher scores are indicative of greater impairment).

    LS Mean was calculated using MMRM model which includes treatment, baseline value, visit, the interaction of the baseline value-by-visit as covariates, the interaction of treatment by-visit, geographic region, age group, and baseline IGA (3 versus 4) score as fixed factors.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 16

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted26 Nov 2019
  2. Study start29 Oct 2019
  3. Primary completion12 Jul 2021
  4. Study completion28 Apr 2022

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
Randomized, double-blind, parallel group, placebo controlled
Masking
Quadruple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
445 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04178967
Sponsor's protocol ID
17802
Other IDs
2019-002933-12, J2T-DM-KGAC, DRM06-AD05, 2019
Acronym
ADvocate2
Status last verified
Apr 2023
First submitted
25 Nov 2019
Last updated
24 May 2023
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Yes: Anonymized individual patient level data will be provided in a secure access environment upon approval of a research proposal and a signed data sharing agreement.

Publications

  • Gold LS, Wollenberg A, Lio P, Carrascosa JM, Del Rosso J, Igawa K, Hong HC, Merola J, Kircik L, Gallo G, Ding Y, Yang C, Wolf E, Agell H, Vestergaard C. Lebrikizumab Provides Stable and Deep Long-Term Response with No/Minimal Fluctuations up to 3 Years in Patients with Moderate-to-Severe Atopic Dermatitis. Dermatol Ther (Heidelb). 2026 Oct 21. doi: 10.1007/s13555-026-01962-0. Online ahead of print.

    PubMed 42905233
  • Sher ER, Golant A, de Bruin-Weller M, Carrascosa JM, Mehta V, Bieber T, Dawson Z, Atwater AR, Zhong J, Rodriguez Calleja L, Boguniewicz M. Lebrikizumab is efficacious in adults and adolescents with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis regardless of atopic comorbidities. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2026 May;136(5):565-571. doi: 10.1016/j.anai.2025.12.017. Epub 2025 Dec 21.

    PubMed 41435984
  • Silverberg JI, Wollenberg A, Stein Gold L, Yosipovitch G, Lio P, Vestergaard C, Stander S, Carrascosa JM, Gallo G, Casillas M, Ding Y, Yang FE, Pierce E, Agell H, Del Rosso J. Lebrikizumab provides stable skin response with no or minimal fluctuations for up to 2 years in patients with atopic dermatitis. Clin Exp Dermatol. 2026 May 26;51(6):1012-1019. doi: 10.1093/ced/llaf490.

    PubMed 41206702
  • Guttman-Yassky E, Sun Z, Mena LR, Hahn N, Nickoloff BJ, Preuss C, Siu K, Natalie CR, Gallo G, Wolf E, Eyerich K, Aparici M, Benschop RJ, Okragly A. Lebrikizumab Rapidly Lowers Inflammatory Biomarkers with Clinical Correlations in Moderate-to-Severe Atopic Dermatitis. Dermatol Ther (Heidelb). 2025 Sep;15(9):2595-2614. doi: 10.1007/s13555-025-01481-4. Epub 2025 Jul 15.

    PubMed 40663228
  • Simpson E, Fernandez-Penas P, de Bruin-Weller M, Lio PA, Chu CY, Ezzedine K, Agell H, Casillas M, Ding Y, Yang FE, Pierce E, Bieber T. Improvement Across Dimensions of Disease with Lebrikizumab Use in Atopic Dermatitis: Two Phase 3, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Monotherapy Trials (ADvocate1 and ADvocate2). Adv Ther. 2025 Jan;42(1):132-143. doi: 10.1007/s12325-024-02974-y. Epub 2024 Sep 9.

    PubMed 39249591
  • Silverberg JI, Wollenberg A, Stein Gold L, Del Rosso J, Yosipovitch G, Lio P, Carrascosa JM, Gallo G, Ding Y, Xu Z, Casillas M, Pierce E, Agell H, Stander S. Patients with Moderate-to-Severe Atopic Dermatitis Maintain Stable Response with No or Minimal Fluctuations with 1 Year of Lebrikizumab Treatment. Dermatol Ther (Heidelb). 2024 Aug;14(8):2249-2260. doi: 10.1007/s13555-024-01226-9. Epub 2024 Aug 10.

    PubMed 39123054
  • Yosipovitch G, Lio P, Legat FJ, Chovatiya R, Deleuran M, Pierce E, Casillas M, Ding Y, Yang FE, Bardolet L, Stander S. Stable Response and Sustained Improvement of Itch and Sleep Symptoms in Patients with Atopic Dermatitis Treated with Lebrikizumab over 52 Weeks. Dermatol Ther (Heidelb). 2024 Aug;14(8):2171-2180. doi: 10.1007/s13555-024-01225-w. Epub 2024 Jul 13.

    PubMed 39002092
  • Lio PA, Armstrong A, Gutermuth J, Nosbaum A, Sofen H, Gil EG, Casillas M, Chen S, Sun L, Pierce E, Elmaraghy H, Dawson Z, Torres T. Lebrikizumab Improves Quality of Life and Patient-Reported Symptoms of Anxiety and Depression in Patients with Moderate-to-Severe Atopic Dermatitis. Dermatol Ther (Heidelb). 2024 Jul;14(7):1929-1943. doi: 10.1007/s13555-024-01199-9. Epub 2024 Jun 26.

    PubMed 38922484
  • Simpson EL, de Bruin-Weller M, Hong HC, Staumont-Salle D, Blauvelt A, Eyerich K, Gooderham M, Shahriari M, Mallbris L, Atwater AR, Rueda MJ, Ding Y, Liu Z, Agell H, Silverberg JI. Lebrikizumab Provides Rapid Clinical Responses Across All Eczema Area and Severity Index Body Regions and Clinical Signs in Adolescents and Adults with Moderate-to-Severe Atopic Dermatitis. Dermatol Ther (Heidelb). 2024 May;14(5):1145-1160. doi: 10.1007/s13555-024-01158-4. Epub 2024 May 3.

    PubMed 38700646
  • Soung J, Stander S, Gutermuth J, Pau-Charles I, Dawson Z, Yang FE, Sun L, Pierce E, Elmaraghy H, Stein-Gold L. Lebrikizumab monotherapy impacts on quality of life scores through improved itch and sleep interference in two Phase 3 trials. J Dermatolog Treat. 2024 Dec;35(1):2329240. doi: 10.1080/09546634.2024.2329240. Epub 2024 Apr 28.

    PubMed 38679419
  • Blauvelt A, Thyssen JP, Guttman-Yassky E, Bieber T, Serra-Baldrich E, Simpson E, Rosmarin D, Elmaraghy H, Meskimen E, Natalie CR, Liu Z, Xu C, Pierce E, Morgan-Cox M, Garcia Gil E, Silverberg JI. Efficacy and safety of lebrikizumab in moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis: 52-week results of two randomized double-blinded placebo-controlled phase III trials. Br J Dermatol. 2023 May 24;188(6):740-748. doi: 10.1093/bjd/ljad022.

    PubMed 36994947
  • Silverberg JI, Guttman-Yassky E, Thaci D, Irvine AD, Stein Gold L, Blauvelt A, Simpson EL, Chu CY, Liu Z, Gontijo Lima R, Pillai SG, Seneschal J; ADvocate1 and ADvocate2 Investigators. Two Phase 3 Trials of Lebrikizumab for Moderate-to-Severe Atopic Dermatitis. N Engl J Med. 2023 Mar 23;388(12):1080-1091. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2206714. Epub 2023 Mar 15.

    PubMed 36920778

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 3 study testing Lebrikizumab in people with Atopic Dermatitis, run by Eli Lilly and Company at 89 sites in 8 countries.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 15 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 24 May 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 89 sites in United States, Germany, Taiwan, Bulgaria, Canada and 3 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 16 Sep 2022). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Percentage of Participants With an Investigator Global Assessment (IGA) Score of 0 or 1 and a Reduction ≥2 Points From Baseline to Week 16 (time frame: Baseline to Week 16). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04178967, which also lists 12 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 24 May 2023.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in