Focal Brain InjuryLESCOGNCT04182087
Cognitive Function Assessment in Patients With Focal Brain Injury
An observational study of Focal Brain Injury and Cognition, run by University Hospital, Grenoble at 1 site in France.
Trial summary
This research relates to the study of cognitive deficits related to various focal brain lesions and their localizations in the brain. it involves building a large database of behavioural responses measured during the performance of cognitive tasks in patients with focal brain injury, to allow to better understand… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 70 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Focal Brain Injury, Cognition
- What is being tested?
- Cognitive tasks
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- How many people
- 400 participants
- Where
- 1 siteFrance
- Study dates
- 7 Feb 2020to 6 Feb 2030
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 70 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: Adult (Age between 18 and 70 years) patients with focal brain injury (post-stroke or post-cortical resection)
Who may be able to join
- Male and female patients, 18-70 years old
- A single, focal anatomical lesion of a given cerebral territory (post vascular, post surgical resection) documented by MRI
- Intellectual ability and understanding of instructions compatible with the cognitive tasks to be performed
Who cannot join
- Patient deprived of liberty
- Somatic disorder likely to affect cognitive abilities
- Pregnant or nursing woman
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
France1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
University Hospital, Grenoble
Grenoble, 38043
Philippe Kahane, MD/PhD, +33 476 765 488, pkahane@chu-grenoble.fr
Julien Bastin, PhD, +33 456 520 627, julien.bastin@univ-grenoble-alpes.fr
About this study
This research relates to the study of cognitive deficits related to various focal brain lesions and their localizations in the brain.
it involves building a large database of behavioural responses measured during the performance of cognitive tasks in patients with focal brain injury, to allow to better understand function of brain.
Read the detailed description
The study of patients with focal lesions is at the origin of many key discoveries in the field of neurology and cognitive neuroscience.
There are many mechanisms of injury in the brain. The investigators focus on delineated lesions (as opposed to panencephalic, infectious or traumatic lesions), including stroke, excision of intracranial expansive processes or cortectomies of epileptogenic foci.
At the CHUGA, several hundred patients are hospitalized each year for stroke, several dozen patients are operated on brain tumor and about thirty patients benefit from surgical treatment for their epilepsy.
Post-injury cognitive disorders represent a large heterogeneous class of neurological disorders. They are differentiated by various clinical and neuropsychological profiles involving different higher functions such as attention, language, memory, decision-making or executive functions. This variability observed in these disorders complicates their characterization. Especially, there is no, on a sufficiently large scale, data collection to establish whether cognitive deficits are explained by the relative contribution of the type of test used, the location of the lesion, the nature of the pathology and the post-injury delay. This requires a large cohort of patients.
The objective of this project is precisely to build a structure-function database in patients with focal brain injury (post-stroke or post-cortical resection), with the aim of conducting a transnosographic and longitudinal study of brain functions in these patients. To the knowledge of the investigators, this type of approach has not yet been proposed. Such a project should eventually lead to a better understanding of the nature of the cognitive deficits observed in different types of lesions, and to refine the correlations between structures and functions. This project is in line with the objectives set by the University Hospital Federation NeuroPsyNov, which was labeled in 2015 (Dir P. Kahane, fhu-neuropsynov.chu-grenoble.fr) and aims to encourage transnosographic and translational studies of neurological and psychiatric diseases.
- Conditions
- Focal Brain Injury, Cognition
- Being tested
- Cognitive tasks
- Keywords
- Behavioral performance, Cortical resection, Stroke
- Medical subject headings
- Brain Injuries, Stroke
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Cognitive tasksBehavioural
Attention, language, memory, decision-making or executive functions
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Focal Brain Injury | Patients with focal brain injury (post-stroke or post-cortical resection) Receives: Behavioral: Cognitive tasks |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Behavioral performance during cognitive tasks: Exploratory
Behavioral performance during cognitive tasks evaluating attention, memory, language, executive functions and decision-making (reaction time, error rate, modeling parameters): Aggregated data depending of patient disorders linked to the localization of brain lesion and susceptible to evolve in the time (next 10 years).
Measured: Data collection will be done on one or more routine visits at 3, 6, 12 or 24 months post lesion (so a maximum of four two-hour sessions)
Secondary outcomes (1)
Behavioral performance (reaction time, error rate, modeling parameters): Exploratory
Behavioral performance (reaction time, error rate, modeling parameters) for a given localization according to the pathology and the delay relative to the initial event (lesion) (3, 6, 12, 24 months).
Measured: Data collection will be done on one or more routine visits at 3, 6, 12 or 24 months post lesion (so a maximum of four two-hour sessions)
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted2 Dec 2019
- Study start7 Feb 2020
- Primary completion6 Feb 2030 (estimated)
- Study completion6 Feb 2030 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (10)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Focal Brain InjuryStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University Hospital, GrenobleThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Case only
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 400 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University Hospital, Grenoble
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Grenoble Institut des Neurosciences
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Philippe Kahane, MD, PhD, Principal investigator, University Hospital, GrenobleJulien Bastin, PhD, Study chair, Grenoble Institute of Neurosciences
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04182087
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 38RC19.036
- Other IDs
- 2019-A01094-53
- Acronym
- LESCOG
- Status last verified
- Jan 2024
- First submitted
- 4 Oct 2019
- Last updated
- 17 Jan 2024
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Publications
Adolphs R. Human Lesion Studies in the 21st Century. Neuron. 2016 Jun 15;90(6):1151-1153. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2016.05.014.
PubMed 27311080Barbey AK, Colom R, Solomon J, Krueger F, Forbes C, Grafman J. An integrative architecture for general intelligence and executive function revealed by lesion mapping. Brain. 2012 Apr;135(Pt 4):1154-64. doi: 10.1093/brain/aws021. Epub 2012 Mar 6.
PubMed 22396393Clark L, Bechara A, Damasio H, Aitken MR, Sahakian BJ, Robbins TW. Differential effects of insular and ventromedial prefrontal cortex lesions on risky decision-making. Brain. 2008 May;131(Pt 5):1311-22. doi: 10.1093/brain/awn066. Epub 2008 Apr 3.
PubMed 18390562Deman P, Bhattacharjee M, Tadel F, Job AS, Riviere D, Cointepas Y, Kahane P, David O. IntrAnat Electrodes: A Free Database and Visualization Software for Intracranial Electroencephalographic Data Processed for Case and Group Studies. Front Neuroinform. 2018 Jul 6;12:40. doi: 10.3389/fninf.2018.00040. eCollection 2018.
PubMed 30034332Dronkers NF, Wilkins DP, Van Valin RD Jr, Redfern BB, Jaeger JJ. Lesion analysis of the brain areas involved in language comprehension. Cognition. 2004 May-Jun;92(1-2):145-77. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2003.11.002.
PubMed 15037129Kos C, van Tol MJ, Marsman JB, Knegtering H, Aleman A. Neural correlates of apathy in patients with neurodegenerative disorders, acquired brain injury, and psychiatric disorders. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2016 Oct;69:381-401. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2016.08.012. Epub 2016 Aug 12.
PubMed 27527825Muller NG, Knight RT. The functional neuroanatomy of working memory: contributions of human brain lesion studies. Neuroscience. 2006 Apr 28;139(1):51-8. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2005.09.018. Epub 2005 Dec 15.
PubMed 16352402Petersen SE, Posner MI. The attention system of the human brain: 20 years after. Annu Rev Neurosci. 2012;35:73-89. doi: 10.1146/annurev-neuro-062111-150525. Epub 2012 Apr 12.
PubMed 22524787Rorden C, Karnath HO. Using human brain lesions to infer function: a relic from a past era in the fMRI age? Nat Rev Neurosci. 2004 Oct;5(10):813-9. doi: 10.1038/nrn1521.
PubMed 15378041Sperber C, Karnath HO. On the validity of lesion-behaviour mapping methods. Neuropsychologia. 2018 Jul 1;115:17-24. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2017.07.035. Epub 2017 Aug 3.
PubMed 28782546
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 17 Jan 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Cognitive Function Assessment in Patients With Focal Brain Injury
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04182087
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- LESCOG / 38RC19.036
- Conditions
- Focal Brain Injury, Cognition
- Keywords
- Behavioral performance, Cortical resection, Stroke
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Recruiting
- Enrolment
- 400 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- University Hospital, GrenobleUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Grenoble Institut des Neurosciences
- Study start
- 7 Feb 2020 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 6 Feb 2030 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 6 Feb 2030 (estimated)
- First posted
- 2 Dec 2019 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This research relates to the study of cognitive deficits related to various focal brain lesions and their localizations in the brain.
it involves building a large database of behavioural responses measured during the performance of cognitive tasks in patients with focal brain injury, to allow to better understand function of brain.
Detailed description
The study of patients with focal lesions is at the origin of many key discoveries in the field of neurology and cognitive neuroscience.
There are many mechanisms of injury in the brain. The investigators focus on delineated lesions (as opposed to panencephalic, infectious or traumatic lesions), including stroke, excision of intracranial expansive processes or cortectomies of epileptogenic foci.
At the CHUGA, several hundred patients are hospitalized each year for stroke, several dozen patients are operated on brain tumor and about thirty patients benefit from surgical treatment for their epilepsy.
Post-injury cognitive disorders represent a large heterogeneous class of neurological disorders. They are differentiated by various clinical and neuropsychological profiles involving different higher functions such as attention, language, memory, decision-making or executive functions. This variability observed in these disorders complicates their characterization. Especially, there is no, on a sufficiently large scale, data collection to establish whether cognitive deficits are explained by the relative contribution of the type of test used, the location of the lesion, the nature of the pathology and the post-injury delay. This requires a large cohort of patients.
The objective of this project is precisely to build a structure-function database in patients with focal brain injury (post-stroke or post-cortical resection), with the aim of conducting a transnosographic and longitudinal study of brain functions in these patients. To the knowledge of the investigators, this type of approach has not yet been proposed. Such a project should eventually lead to a better understanding of the nature of the cognitive deficits observed in different types of lesions, and to refine the correlations between structures and functions. This project is in line with the objectives set by the University Hospital Federation NeuroPsyNov, which was labeled in 2015 (Dir P. Kahane, fhu-neuropsynov.chu-grenoble.fr) and aims to encourage transnosographic and translational studies of neurological and psychiatric diseases.
Study design
- Observational model
- Case only
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Focal Brain Injury | – | Behavioral: Cognitive tasksPatients with focal brain injury (post-stroke or post-cortical resection) |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 70 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Adult (Age between 18 and 70 years) patients with focal brain injury (post-stroke or post-cortical resection)
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Male and female patients, 18-70 years old
- A single, focal anatomical lesion of a given cerebral territory (post vascular, post surgical resection) documented by MRI
- Intellectual ability and understanding of instructions compatible with the cognitive tasks to be performed
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Patient deprived of liberty
- Somatic disorder likely to affect cognitive abilities
- Pregnant or nursing woman
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Cognitive tasksAttention, language, memory, decision-making or executive functions | Behavioural | Focal Brain Injury |
Primary outcome
Behavioral performance during cognitive tasks: Exploratory
Time frame: Data collection will be done on one or more routine visits at 3, 6, 12 or 24 months post lesion (so a maximum of four two-hour sessions)
Behavioral performance during cognitive tasks evaluating attention, memory, language, executive functions and decision-making (reaction time, error rate, modeling parameters): Aggregated data depending of patient disorders linked to the localization of brain lesion and susceptible to evolve in the time (next 10 years).
1 secondary outcome
Behavioral performance (reaction time, error rate, modeling parameters): Exploratory
Time frame: Data collection will be done on one or more routine visits at 3, 6, 12 or 24 months post lesion (so a maximum of four two-hour sessions)
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 17 Jan 2024.
- Results publication: PubMed 27311080Adolphs R. Human Lesion Studies in the 21st Century. Neuron. 2016 Jun 15;90(6):1151-1153. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2016.05.014.
- Results publication: PubMed 22396393Barbey AK, Colom R, Solomon J, Krueger F, Forbes C, Grafman J. An integrative architecture for general intelligence and executive function revealed by lesion mapping. Brain. 2012 Apr;135(Pt 4):1154-64. doi: 10.1093/brain/aws021. Epub 2012 Mar 6.
- Results publication: PubMed 18390562Clark L, Bechara A, Damasio H, Aitken MR, Sahakian BJ, Robbins TW. Differential effects of insular and ventromedial prefrontal cortex lesions on risky decision-making. Brain. 2008 May;131(Pt 5):1311-22. doi: 10.1093/brain/awn066. Epub 2008 Apr 3.
- Results publication: PubMed 30034332Deman P, Bhattacharjee M, Tadel F, Job AS, Riviere D, Cointepas Y, Kahane P, David O. IntrAnat Electrodes: A Free Database and Visualization Software for Intracranial Electroencephalographic Data Processed for Case and Group Studies. Front Neuroinform. 2018 Jul 6;12:40. doi: 10.3389/fninf.2018.00040. eCollection 2018.
- Results publication: PubMed 15037129Dronkers NF, Wilkins DP, Van Valin RD Jr, Redfern BB, Jaeger JJ. Lesion analysis of the brain areas involved in language comprehension. Cognition. 2004 May-Jun;92(1-2):145-77. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2003.11.002.
- Results publication: PubMed 27527825Kos C, van Tol MJ, Marsman JB, Knegtering H, Aleman A. Neural correlates of apathy in patients with neurodegenerative disorders, acquired brain injury, and psychiatric disorders. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2016 Oct;69:381-401. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2016.08.012. Epub 2016 Aug 12.
- Results publication: PubMed 16352402Muller NG, Knight RT. The functional neuroanatomy of working memory: contributions of human brain lesion studies. Neuroscience. 2006 Apr 28;139(1):51-8. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2005.09.018. Epub 2005 Dec 15.
- Results publication: PubMed 22524787Petersen SE, Posner MI. The attention system of the human brain: 20 years after. Annu Rev Neurosci. 2012;35:73-89. doi: 10.1146/annurev-neuro-062111-150525. Epub 2012 Apr 12.
- Results publication: PubMed 15378041Rorden C, Karnath HO. Using human brain lesions to infer function: a relic from a past era in the fMRI age? Nat Rev Neurosci. 2004 Oct;5(10):813-9. doi: 10.1038/nrn1521.
- Results publication: PubMed 28782546Sperber C, Karnath HO. On the validity of lesion-behaviour mapping methods. Neuropsychologia. 2018 Jul 1;115:17-24. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2017.07.035. Epub 2017 Aug 3.
Related trials for Focal Brain Injury
Recruiting
The Impact of Self-processing on Mental Time Travel
Brain Injuries, Focal
Recruiting
Advanced Space-time Resolved Techniques for Functional Neuroimaging at 7 Tesla MRI
Neurological Disorders, Neuroscience
Recruiting
Deep Brain Reorienting for Posttraumatic Stress Disorder
Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD), Posttraumatic Stress Symptom
Not yet recruiting
VR Versus Task-Oriented Circuit Training on UL Sensorimotor in Children With Immature Brain Injury
Brain Injuries, Focal
Not yet recruiting
Development of Low-Intensity Focused Ultrasound for Post Traumatic Brain Injury Depression
Post-traumatic Brain Injury Depression, Veteran Health
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
Philippe Kahane, MD, PhD principal investigator
University Hospital, Grenoble
Julien Bastin, PhD study chair
Grenoble Institute of Neurosciences
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Focal Brain Injury and Cognition, run by University Hospital, Grenoble at 1 site in France.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 17 Jan 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Philippe Kahane, MD, PhD (+33 476 765 488, pkahane@chu-grenoble.fr), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Behavioral performance during cognitive tasks: Exploratory (time frame: Data collection will be done on one or more routine visits at 3, 6, 12 or 24 months post lesion (so a maximum of four two-hour sessions)). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04182087, which also lists 10 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 17 Jan 2024.