AzTrials
AzTrials

Myocardial InfarctionPIpELINeNCT04183465

Physical Activity Intervention in ELderly Patients With Myocardial INfarction

A study testing Health Education and Multi-domain lifestyle intervention in people with Myocardial Infarction and Aging, run by University Hospital of Ferrara at 7 sites in Italy.

Active, not recruiting

Under way, not looking for participants. Everyone needed has enrolled. The study is still running.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Elderly patients presenting with myocardial infarction (MI) are the highest risk population with the worst prognosis. No trial has ever been designed to optimize their outcome through a systematic improvement of their physical performance. Cardiac rehabilitation demonstrated to improve prognosis of patients after MI. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 65 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Myocardial Infarction, Aging
What is being tested?
Health Education and Multi-domain lifestyle intervention
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
512 participants
Where
7 sitesItaly
Study dates
27 Mar 2020to 30 Nov 2026
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 65 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Patients ≥65 years
  • Hospital admission for myocardial infarction
  • Invasive management during index hospitalization including coronary artery angiography (± percutaneous coronary revascularization)
  • SPPB value 4-9 at 1-month visit after hospital discharge
  • Informed consent

Who cannot join

  • Multivessel coronary artery disease or left main coronary artery disease candidate to surgical revascularization
  • Planned staged percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI)
  • Non-cardiovascular co-morbidity reducing life expectancy to < 1 year
  • Any factor precluding 1-year follow-up
  • Severe aortic or mitral disease
  • Ejection fraction <30%
Show all 9Show fewer
  • Chronic heart failure New York Heart Association (NYHA) III-IV
  • Severe cognitive impairment (SPMSQ <4)
  • Impossibility to do physical activity due to physical impairment

Trial locations and contacts

7 sites in 1 country.

7 sites in 1 country

Italy7 sites
  • Medicina dello Sport SSD

    Bologna, BO

  • UO Cardiologia, Ospedale Maggiore

    Bologna

  • Centro Studi Biomedici applicati allo Sport, Ferrara

    Ferrara, FE

  • Cardiology Unit

    Ferrara

  • Cardiologia Riabilitativa, AUSL d Ferrara

    Lagosanto

  • Ospedale Guglielmo da Saliceto, Piacenza

    Piacenza, PC

  • Medicina dello Sport, AUSL Piacenza

    Piacenza

Other trials in Italy

About this study

Official title: Effectiveness of an Early, Tailored, Physical Activity Intervention in ELderly Patients With Myocardial INfarction: the PIpELINe Randomized Clinical Trial

Elderly patients presenting with myocardial infarction (MI) are the highest risk population with the worst prognosis. No trial has ever been designed to optimize their outcome through a systematic improvement of their physical performance. Cardiac rehabilitation demonstrated to improve prognosis of patients after MI. However, real-life data shows that older patients are not referred to rehabilitation centers or they have low rate of attendance because of the high number of rehabilitation sessions and of logistic problems. So, data about effectiveness of rehabilitation programs in older MI patients is lacking.

The "Physical Activity Intervention for Elderly Patients with Reduced Physical Performance after acute coronary syndrome (HULK)" pilot study (NCT03021044) enrolled older MI patients and it demonstrated the feasibility and effectiveness of an early, tailored and low-cost physical activity intervention in terms of physical performance assessed by Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) score, that is strongly related to prognosis. The HULK study was focused on exercise training and not powered for hard endpoints. If a multi-domain lifestyle intervention in an adequately powered study may further improve prognosis is unknown. Thus, the investigator's hypothesis for the PIpELINe trial is that an early, tailored and low-cost multi-domain lifestyle intervention may improve prognosis of older MI patients compared to health education alone. The primary outcome is a composite of 1-year cardiovascular death and hospital readmission for cardiovascular cause.

Read the detailed description

The PIpELINe trial will include older MI patients. All patients aged 65 years and older undergoing coronary angiography because of MI must be screened for eligibility. Patient's eligibility must be assessed after percutaneous revascularization of all lesions considered susceptible of treatment. After verifying inclusion and exclusion criteria and after eligibility is confirmed, written informed consent must be obtained prior to randomization. At the time of the discharge (T0) SPPB test will be performed; in case of a score between 4 and 9, the patient will be evaluated 1-month after discharge at the inclusion visit (T1). If SPPB value is confirmed to be between 4 and 9, randomization will be performed. Key baseline patient characteristics (i.e., inclusion/exclusion criteria, demographics, medical history, details of cardiovascular anatomy and of revascularization, ECG and laboratory test results, echocardiographic data during the index hospitalization) will be recorded on the electronic Case Report Forms (eCRF). All angiographic and echocardiographic data will be collected and forwarded to a core lab for further assessment.

Randomization will be performed during the inclusion visit (T1), 30 days after discharge. Randomization will be performed centrally using an internet-based system. The patient identification number (Patient ID) and the treatment allocation will be assigned by the central randomization system. Patients will be randomized to physical activity group or health education group by a 2:1 allocation. Treatment allocation will be assigned according to a computer-generated randomization list stratified by center. All randomized patients are irrevocably in the study, whether or not they are subsequently found to be eligible, or actually receiving the allocated treatment. Therefore, all patients must be followed until the pre-specified study end date.

The aim of the study is to demonstrate that the proposed multi-domain lifestyle intervention reduces the composite endpoint of cardiovascular death and hospital readmission for cardiovascular cause. The primary endpoint is at 1 year. The follow-up will be extended up to 2 and 3 years.

The protocol includes 3 pre-specified substudies. The possibility to participate in the substudy is left to patient's decision and doesn't preclude the procedures of the main protocol.

  • Anxiety and depression: previous studies reported an association between cardiovascular events and a subsequent appearance of mood disorders which could determine a lack in following secondary prevention recommendations. No data is available about these disorders in older adults. In order to assess depression after MI in older patients and the effect of physical activity intervention on mood disorders, this sub-study will be performed.
  • Mitochondrial function: in both study groups the mitochondrial functional are investigated starting from blood samples and skin biopsy. Skin biopsy is performed to obtain fibroblasts. In-vitro assessment of the mitochondrial function is done on the fibroblasts of patients. The parameters obtained are related with the effectiveness of physical intervention and with the benefit obtained. A total of at least 30 patients is required.
  • Lymphocyte and miRNA activity: taking into account the immunosenescence and the benefits of physical activity on the immune system, this sub-study aims to obtain data regarding T-lymphocyte function in older adults and to assess the effect of physical activity intervention on the function of the different groups of T-lymphocyte. Analyses of physical activity effects on micro ribonucleic acids (miRNAs) are also performed.
Being tested
Health Education, Multi-domain lifestyle intervention
Medical subject headings
Myocardial Infarction

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Health EducationOther

    Current gold standard in older patients admitted to hospital for MI. The group will receive a 20-minute session with one of the study physicians. Both the patient and relatives will attend these sessions. The study physician will stress the major issues related to a heart-healthy lifestyle and will explain the importance of PA as a powerful and independent factor to improve cardiovascular health and minimize cardiovascular risk. A detailed brochure explaining the benefits of physical activity will be provided to all patients

  • Multi-domain lifestyle interventionOther

    The intervention includes diet counselling, smoke cessation program, aggressive CV risk control and PA intervention. The PA intervention consisted of supervised sessions combined with an individualized home-based PA program. Centre-based sessions will be supervised by a sports physician and a nurse, and will take approximately 30 to 40 minutes, including a moderate standardized treadmill-walk, and strength and balance exercises. Based on the practice sessions, patients will receive a walking program to perform at home, unsupervised. The PA programs will be individualized, and consistent with current international recommendations. A selection of calisthenic exercises will be prescribed. Participants will be encouraged to perform the exercises three times per week (approximately 20 minutes). Adjustment of the type and intensity of the home-based PA regimen will be made at each visit. The PA program will be extensively described to the patient and family members.

Study groups in NCT04183465
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Health EducationActive comparatorAll patients randomized to health education received a single in-person visit, one month post discharge, which included a 30-minute counselling session, supported by educational materials and tailoring of the medical treatment. The educational material provided standardized recommendations on diet, smoking cessation, and physical activity. Quality of life, functional capacity and home physical activity are assessed by proper tools.
Receives: Other: Health Education
Multi-domain lifestyle interventionExperimentalAll patients randomized to experimental arm will receive diet counselling, aggressive control of CV risk factors, smoke cessation program and exercise training. The physical activity (PA) intervention will start the program with a supervised PA session immediately after the inclusion visit. Quality of life, functional capacity and daily activities will be assessed by proper tools. The program provides 6 supervised PA sessions (30, 60, 90, 180, 270 and 360 days after hospital discharge [T0]). At the end of each supervised session, calisthenics exercises derived from Otago Exercise Program are prescribed.
Receives: Other: Multi-domain lifestyle intervention

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Cumulative occurrence of cardiovascular death and hospital readmission for cardiovascular cause

    To assess the superiority of the early and tailored physical activity intervention over health education alone in terms of 1-year composite endpoint of cardiovascular death plus hospital readmission for cardiovascular cause.

    Measured: 1-year

Secondary outcomes (21)
  1. Cumulative occurrence of all-cause death

    To test the superiority of the early and tailored physical activity intervention over the health education alone in terms of all-cause death

    Measured: 1-year

  2. Cumulative occurrence of all-cause death

    To test the superiority of the early and tailored physical activity intervention over the health education alone in terms of all-cause death

    Measured: 3-year

  3. Cumulative occurrence of cardiovascular death

    To test the superiority of the early and tailored physical activity intervention over the health education alone in terms of cardiovascular death

    Measured: 1-year

  4. Cumulative occurrence of cardiovascular death

    To test the superiority of the early and tailored physical activity intervention over the health education alone in terms of cardiovascular death

    Measured: 3-year

  5. Cumulative occurrence of hospital readmission for cardiovascular cause

    To assess the superiority of the early and tailored physical activity intervention over health education alone in terms of hospital readmission for cardiovascular cause.

    Measured: 1-year

  6. Cumulative occurrence of hospital readmission for cardiovascular cause

    To assess the superiority of the early and tailored physical activity intervention over health education alone in terms of composite endpoint of hospital readmission for cardiovascular cause.

    Measured: 3-year

  7. Cumulative occurrence of cardiovascular death and hospital readmission for cardiovascular cause

    To assess the superiority of the early and tailored physical activity intervention over health education alone in terms of composite endpoint of cardiovascular death plus hospital readmission for cardiovascular cause.

    Measured: 3-year

  8. Cumulative occurrence of hospital readmission for heart failure

    To assess the superiority of the early and tailored physical activity intervention over health education alone in terms of hospital readmission for heart failure

    Measured: 1-year

  9. Cumulative occurrence of hospital readmission for heart failure

    To assess the superiority of the early and tailored physical activity intervention over health education alone in terms of hospital readmission for heart failure

    Measured: 3-year

  10. Cumulative occurrence of hospital readmission for myocardial infarction

    To assess the superiority of the early and tailored physical activity intervention over health education alone in terms of hospital readmission for myocardial infarction

    Measured: 1-year

  11. Cumulative occurrence of hospital readmission for myocardial infarction

    To assess the superiority of the early and tailored physical activity intervention over health education alone in terms of hospital readmission for myocardial infarction

    Measured: 3-year

  12. Cumulative occurrence of hospital readmission for coronary revascularization

    To assess the superiority of the early and tailored physical activity intervention over health education alone in terms of hospital readmission for coronary revascularization

    Measured: 1-year

  13. Cumulative occurrence of hospital readmission for coronary revascularization

    To assess the superiority of the early and tailored physical activity intervention over health education alone in terms of hospital readmission for coronary revascularization

    Measured: 3-year

  14. Cumulative occurrence of cerebrovascular accident

    To assess the superiority of the early and tailored physical activity intervention over health education alone in terms of cerebrovascular accident

    Measured: 1-year

  15. Cumulative occurrence of cerebrovascular accident

    To assess the superiority of the early and tailored physical activity intervention over health education alone in terms of cerebrovascular accident

    Measured: 3-year

  16. Cumulative occurrence of hospital readmission for any cause

    To assess the superiority of the early and tailored physical activity intervention over health education alone in terms of hospital readmission for any cause

    Measured: 1-year

  17. Cumulative occurrence of hospital readmission for any cause

    To assess the superiority of the early and tailored physical activity intervention over health education alone in terms of hospital readmission for any cause

    Measured: 3-year

  18. Cumulative occurrence of hospital readmission for any non-cardiovascular cause

    To assess the superiority of the early and tailored physical activity intervention over health education alone in terms of hospital readmission for any non-cardiovascular cause

    Measured: 1-year

  19. Cumulative occurrence of hospital readmission for any non-cardiovascular cause

    To assess the superiority of the early and tailored physical activity intervention over health education alone in terms of hospital readmission for any non-cardiovascular cause

    Measured: 3-year

  20. Cumulative occurrence of bleeding adverse events

    To assess the superiority of the early and tailored physical activity intervention over health education alone in terms of bleeding adverse events

    Measured: 1-year

  21. Cumulative occurrence of bleeding adverse events

    To assess the superiority of the early and tailored physical activity intervention over health education alone in terms of bleeding adverse events

    Measured: 3-year

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted3 Dec 2019
  2. Study start27 Mar 2020
  3. Primary completion30 Nov 2024
  4. Study completion30 Nov 2026 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
512 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04183465
Sponsor's protocol ID
376/2019/Sper/AOUFe
Acronym
PIpELINe
Status last verified
Jul 2025
First submitted
27 Nov 2019
Last updated
23 Jul 2025
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Yes

Publications

  • Tonet E, Raisi A, Zagnoni S, Chiaranda G, Pavasini R, Vitali F, Gibiino F, Campana R, Boccadoro A, Scala A, Canovi L, Amantea V, Matese C, Berloni ML, Piva T, Zerbini V, Cardelli LS, Pasanisi G, Mazzoni G, Casella G, Grazzi G, Campo G. Multi-domain lifestyle intervention in older adults after myocardial infarction: rationale and design of the PIpELINe randomized clinical trial. Aging Clin Exp Res. 2023 May;35(5):1107-1115. doi: 10.1007/s40520-023-02389-9. Epub 2023 Mar 25.

    PubMed 36964866
  • Dal Passo B, Tonet E, Raisi A, Zagnoni S, Chiaranda G, Pasanisi G, Pavasini R, Cimaglia P, Piva T, Casella G, Caglioni S, Zerbini V, Cocco M, Menegatti E, Mandini S, Mazzoni G, Biscaglia S, Volpato S, Grazzi G, Campo G. Effectiveness of Multidomain Cardiac Rehabilitation After Myocardial Infarction by Patient Frailty: Prespecified Subgroup Analysis of the PIpELINe Trial. Circ Popul Health Outcomes. 2026 Aug 17:e013410. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.126.013410. Online ahead of print.

    PubMed 42605666
  • Tonet E, Raisi A, Zagnoni S, Chiaranda G, Pasanisi G, Aschieri D, D'Intino PE, Pavasini R, Cimaglia P, Campana R, Vitali F, Piva T, Casella G, Caglioni S, Zerbini V, Bugani G, Cocco M, Menegatti E, De Raffele M, Mandini S, Martella D, Pesenti N, Mazzoni G, Biscaglia S, Volpato S, Grazzi G, Campo G; PIpELINe Trial Investigators. Multidomain Rehabilitation for Older Patients with Myocardial Infarction. N Engl J Med. 2025 Sep 11;393(10):973-982. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2502799. Epub 2025 Aug 29.

    PubMed 40879431

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Health Education and Multi-domain lifestyle intervention in people with Myocardial Infarction and Aging, run by University Hospital of Ferrara at 7 sites in Italy.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 9 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: under way, not looking for participants, as of the sponsor's last update on 23 Jul 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 7 sites in Italy. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Cumulative occurrence of cardiovascular death and hospital readmission for cardiovascular cause (time frame: 1-year). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04183465, which also lists 3 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 23 Jul 2025.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in