Prostate CancerPhase 3NCT04186819
Imaging Study to Investigate the Safety and Diagnostic Performance of rhPSMA 7.3 (18F) in Newly Diagnosed Prostate Cancer.
A Phase 3 study testing rhPSMA-7.3 (18F) Injection and Positron Emission Tomography scan in people with Prostate Cancer, run by Blue Earth Diagnostics at 34 sites in 4 countries.
Trial summary
A prospective, Phase 3, multi center, single-arm, imaging study investigating the safety and diagnostic performance of Radio-hybrid Prostate Specific Membrane Antigen (rhPSMA) 7.3 (18F) Positron Emission Tomography (PET) ligand in men with newly diagnosed prostate cancer. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older, men only
- Conditions the study is for
- Prostate Cancer
- What is being tested?
- rhPSMA-7.3 (18F) Injection and Positron Emission Tomography scan
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 356 participants
- Where
- 34 sitesin 4 countries
- Study dates
- 2 Mar 2020to 21 Jun 2021
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- Men only
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Patient is male and aged >18 years old.
- Histologically confirmed adenocarcinoma of the prostate.
- Patients electing to undergo Radical Prostatectomy (RP) with Pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND).
Who cannot join
- Patients who are planned to have an x-ray contrast agent or other PET radiotracer <24 hours prior to the PET scan.
- Patients currently receiving, or with a prior history of, Androgen Deprivation Therapy (ADT).
Trial locations and contacts
34 sites in 4 countries.
34 sites in 4 countries
United States29 sites
The Urologic Institute of Northeastern New York - Community
Albany, New York, 12208
University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48109
Emory University Hospital
Atlanta, Georgia, 30322
Northside Hospital
Austell, Georgia, 30342
Johns Hopkins University
Baltimore, Maryland, 21287
University of Alabama at Birmingham
Birmingham, Alabama, 35233
Brigham and Women's Hospital
Boston, Massachusetts, 02115
University of Virginia - Health Science Center
Charlottesville, Virginia, 22908
University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center
Cleveland, Ohio, 44106
Cleveland Clinic
Cleveland, Ohio, 44195
Karmanos Cancer Institute
Detroit, Michigan, 48201
Duke University Medical Center
Durham, North Carolina, 27701
NorthShore University HealthSystem
Evanston, Illinois, 60201
MD Anderson Hospital
Houston, Texas, 77054
Richard L Roudebush VA Medical Center
Indianapolis, Indiana, 46278
Queens Hospital Center (QHC) - Queens Cancer Center
Jamaica, New York, 11432
Tower Urology
Los Angeles, California, 90048
Loyola University Medical Center
Maywood, Illinois, 60153
Mount Sinai Faculty Practice Associates
New York, New York, 10029
Virginia Oncology Associates PC
Norfolk, Virginia, 23502
University of California Irvine Medical Center (UCIMC)
Orange, California, 92868
MidLantic Urology
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19004
Thomas Jefferson University
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19107
Urology San Antonio
San Antonio, Texas, 78229
John Wayne Cancer Institute
Santa Monica, California, 90403
Washington University School of Medicine
St Louis, Missouri, 63110
Stony Brook University
Stony Brook, New York, 11794
Montefiore Hospital
The Bronx, New York, 10461
Chesapeake Urology Research Associates
Towson, Maryland, 21204
Germany2 sites
Klinik und Poliklinik fur Urologie
Hamburg, 20246
TU München
Munich, 81675
About this study
Official title: A Prospective, Phase 3, Multi Center, Single-arm, Imaging Study Investigating the Safety and Diagnostic Performance of rhPSMA 7.3 (18F) Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Ligand in Men With Newly Diagnosed Prostate Cancer
A prospective, Phase 3, multi center, single-arm, imaging study investigating the safety and diagnostic performance of Radio-hybrid Prostate Specific Membrane Antigen (rhPSMA) 7.3 (18F) Positron Emission Tomography (PET) ligand in men with newly diagnosed prostate cancer.
Read the detailed description
Main objective is to assess the sensitivity and specificity of rhPSMA-7.3 (18F) positron emission tomography (PET) in detecting N1 disease (as determined by the central blinded image evaluation [BIE]) on a patient level compared to the histopathology of pelvic lymphatic tissue removed during radical prostatectomy (RP) and pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND). At least one positive pelvic LN on PET (N1) and one positive lymph node (LN) as determined by histopathology (pN1) on the same side of the pelvis (left or right) will be deemed a True Positive (TP) at the patient level.
- Conditions
- Prostate Cancer
- Being tested
- rhPSMA-7.3 (18F) Injection, Positron Emission Tomography scan
- Keywords
- Primary Prostate Cancer, Diagnostic, Prostate Specific Membrane Antigen (PSMA), Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Scan
- Medical subject headings
- Prostatic Neoplasms, Disease
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
rhPSMA-7.3 (18F) InjectionDrug
Also called No other interventions
Radioligand for PET CT scanning
Positron Emission Tomography scanDiagnostic test
Also called PET scan
imaging test with radioligand
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Patients | Experimental | Single intravenous administration of rhPSMA-7.3 (18F) for PET Scan Receives: Drug: rhPSMA-7.3 (18F) Injection; Diagnostic Test: Positron Emission Tomography scan |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Specificity
The primary objective of the study is to assess the sensitivity and specificity of rhPSMA-7.3 (18F) positron emission tomography (PET) in detecting N1 disease (as determined by the central BIE) on a patient level compared to the histopathology of pelvic lymphatic tissue removed during RP and PLND.
Measured: Conventional images within 60 days or at least 24 hours prior to rhPSMA-7.3 (18F) PET, followed by treatment within 60 days post IMP administration
Sensitivity
The primary objective of the study is to assess the sensitivity and specificity of rhPSMA-7.3 (18F) positron emission tomography (PET) in detecting N1 disease (as determined by the central BIE) on a patient level compared to the histopathology of pelvic lymphatic tissue removed during RP and PLND.
Measured: Conventional images within 60 days or at least 24 hours prior to rhPSMA-7.3 (18F) PET, followed by treatment within 60 days post IMP administration
Secondary outcomes (8)
Verified Detection Rate (VDR) for M1 Lesions - Percentage of Patients in Whom rhPSMA-7.3 (18F) Imaging Detected at Least One Verified M1 Metastasis, as Determined by Central BIE and Confirmed by SoT (Biopsy or Imaging) (Objective 1)
This was a key secondary endpoint in this study and included patients in the EEP with rhPSMA-7.3 (18F) imaging.
Measured: Conventional images within 60 days or at least 24 hours prior to rhPSMA-7.3 (18F) PET. followed by treatment within 60 days post IMP administration
Percentage of Patients With Negative Conventional Imaging for M1 Disease in Whom rhPSMA-7.3 (18F) PET Detected at Least One Verified M1 Metastasis, as Determined by Central BIE (Objective 2)
Patients counted in this variable were a subset of those in Point 1 above, where both the numerator and denominator were only counting patients with negative conventional imaging (according to investigator assessment) for M1 disease.
Measured: Conventional images within 60 days or at least 24 hours prior to rhPSMA-7.3 (18F) PET, followed by treatment within 60 days post IMP administration
Patient-level PPV of rhPSMA-7.3 (18F) PET BIE for N1 and M1 Lesions Compared to Histopathology or Confirmatory Imaging (M1 Lesions Only) (Objective 3)
This analysis included patients with rhPSMA-7.3 (18F) imaging and either N1 or M1 lesions detected, where PPV=TP/(TP+FP).
Measured: Conventional images within 60 days or at least 24 hours prior to rhPSMA-7.3 (18F) PET, followed by treatment within 60 days post IMP administration
PPV of rhPSMA-7.3 (18F) PET for Detecting PLN Metastases Compared to Surgical Pathology on a Patient-level, in Which a FP Patient is Defined as Having at Least One FP Region (Right or Left Pelvis), Regardless of Any Coexisting TP Findings (Objective 4)
This analysis included patients in the EAP where rhPSMA-7.3 (18F) imaging detected PLN metastasis. Regions where rhPSMA7.3 (18F) imaging detected no LN metastasis were not included (by definition of PPV), hence only TP and FP regions were considered. TPs were all patients with a surgical pathology confirmed positive region and without a FP region. FP patients were those patients with any rhPSMA7.3 (18F) PETpositive region with negative or no surgical pathology.
Measured: Conventional images within 60 days or at least 24 hours prior to rhPSMA-7.3 (18F) PET, followed by treatment within 60 days post IMP administration
NPV of rhPSMA-7.3 (18F) PET for Detecting PLN Metastases Compared to Surgical Pathology on a Patient-level, in Which a FN Patient is Defined as Having at Least One FN Region (Right or Left Pelvis), Regardless of Any Coexisting TN Findings (Objective 5)
This analysis included patients in the EAP with rhPSMA-7.3 (18F) imaging where no LN metastases were detected and LN surgical pathology was available; where NPV=TN/(TN+FN).
Measured: Conventional images within 60 days or at least 24 hours prior to rhPSMA-7.3 (18F) PET, followed by treatment within 60 days post IMP administration
The Percentage of Patients Being Upstaged to N1 or M1 Disease. (Objective 6a)
TP [confirmed by SoT] central BIE PET finding and negative conventional imaging finding from the local reading
Measured: Conventional images within 60 days or at least 24 hours prior to rhPSMA-7.3 (18F) PET, followed by treatment within 60 days post IMP administration
The Percentage of Patients in Whom Planned RP Was Converted to EBRT. (Objective 6b)
Measured: Conventional images within 60 days or at least 24 hours prior to rhPSMA-7.3 (18F) PET, followed by treatment within 60 days post IMP administration
Kappa Statistic for the Agreement Between and Within Blinded Independent Readers on the Interpretation of rhPSMA-7.3 (18F) Scans (Objective 7)
Pairwise agreement between any 2 of the 3 readers (Kappa statistic could not be calculated for 2 of the pairwise agreements), and within readers between the initial read and re-read (Kappa statistics could not be calculated for 2 of the within-reader agreements)
Measured: PET/CT scans on Day 1
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted5 Dec 2019
- Study start2 Mar 2020
- Primary completion21 Jun 2021
- Study completion21 Jun 2021
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Prostate CancerStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Diagnosis
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Model description
- Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Imaging study
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 356 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Blue Earth Diagnostics
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Collaborators
- Parexel
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04186819
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- BED-PSMA-301
- Status last verified
- Feb 2025
- First submitted
- 22 Nov 2019
- Last updated
- 26 Feb 2025
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- Yes
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Surasi DS, Eiber M, Maurer T, Preston MA, Helfand BT, Josephson D, Tewari AK, Somford DM, Rais-Bahrami S, Koontz BF, Bostrom PJ, Chau A, Davis P, Schuster DM, Chapin BF; LIGHTHOUSE Study Group. Diagnostic Performance and Safety of Positron Emission Tomography with 18F-rhPSMA-7.3 in Patients with Newly Diagnosed Unfavourable Intermediate- to Very-high-risk Prostate Cancer: Results from a Phase 3, Prospective, Multicentre Study (LIGHTHOUSE). Eur Urol. 2023 Oct;84(4):361-370. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2023.06.018. Epub 2023 Jul 5.
PubMed 37414702
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 26 Feb 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Prospective, Phase 3, Multi Center, Single-arm, Imaging Study Investigating the Safety and Diagnostic Performance of rhPSMA 7.3 (18F) Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Ligand in Men With Newly Diagnosed Prostate Cancer
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04186819
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- BED-PSMA-301
- Conditions
- Prostate Cancer
- Keywords
- Primary Prostate Cancer, Diagnostic, Prostate Specific Membrane Antigen (PSMA), Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Scan
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 356 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Blue Earth DiagnosticsIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Collaborators
- Parexel
- Study start
- 2 Mar 2020 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 21 Jun 2021 (actual)
- Study completion
- 21 Jun 2021 (actual)
- First posted
- 5 Dec 2019 (actual)
- Results
- Posted 26 Feb 2025
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
A prospective, Phase 3, multi center, single-arm, imaging study investigating the safety and diagnostic performance of Radio-hybrid Prostate Specific Membrane Antigen (rhPSMA) 7.3 (18F) Positron Emission Tomography (PET) ligand in men with newly diagnosed prostate cancer.
Detailed description
Main objective is to assess the sensitivity and specificity of rhPSMA-7.3 (18F) positron emission tomography (PET) in detecting N1 disease (as determined by the central blinded image evaluation [BIE]) on a patient level compared to the histopathology of pelvic lymphatic tissue removed during radical prostatectomy (RP) and pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND). At least one positive pelvic LN on PET (N1) and one positive lymph node (LN) as determined by histopathology (pN1) on the same side of the pelvis (left or right) will be deemed a True Positive (TP) at the patient level.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Diagnosis
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
- Model description
- Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Imaging study
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Patients | Experimental | Drug: rhPSMA-7.3 (18F) Injection, Diagnostic Test: Positron Emission Tomography scanSingle intravenous administration of rhPSMA-7.3 (18F) for PET Scan |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- Male only
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Patient is male and aged >18 years old.
- Histologically confirmed adenocarcinoma of the prostate.
- Patients electing to undergo Radical Prostatectomy (RP) with Pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND).
Key exclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Patients who are planned to have an x-ray contrast agent or other PET radiotracer <24 hours prior to the PET scan.
- Patients currently receiving, or with a prior history of, Androgen Deprivation Therapy (ADT).
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| rhPSMA-7.3 (18F) InjectionAlso: No other interventionsRadioligand for PET CT scanning | Drug | Patients |
| Positron Emission Tomography scanAlso: PET scanimaging test with radioligand | Diagnostic test | Patients |
Primary outcome
Specificity
Time frame: Conventional images within 60 days or at least 24 hours prior to rhPSMA-7.3 (18F) PET, followed by treatment within 60 days post IMP administration
The primary objective of the study is to assess the sensitivity and specificity of rhPSMA-7.3 (18F) positron emission tomography (PET) in detecting N1 disease (as determined by the central BIE) on a patient level compared to the histopathology of pelvic lymphatic tissue removed during RP and PLND.
Sensitivity
Time frame: Conventional images within 60 days or at least 24 hours prior to rhPSMA-7.3 (18F) PET, followed by treatment within 60 days post IMP administration
The primary objective of the study is to assess the sensitivity and specificity of rhPSMA-7.3 (18F) positron emission tomography (PET) in detecting N1 disease (as determined by the central BIE) on a patient level compared to the histopathology of pelvic lymphatic tissue removed during RP and PLND.
8 secondary outcomes
Verified Detection Rate (VDR) for M1 Lesions - Percentage of Patients in Whom rhPSMA-7.3 (18F) Imaging Detected at Least One Verified M1 Metastasis, as Determined by Central BIE and Confirmed by SoT (Biopsy or Imaging) (Objective 1)
Time frame: Conventional images within 60 days or at least 24 hours prior to rhPSMA-7.3 (18F) PET. followed by treatment within 60 days post IMP administration
Percentage of Patients With Negative Conventional Imaging for M1 Disease in Whom rhPSMA-7.3 (18F) PET Detected at Least One Verified M1 Metastasis, as Determined by Central BIE (Objective 2)
Time frame: Conventional images within 60 days or at least 24 hours prior to rhPSMA-7.3 (18F) PET, followed by treatment within 60 days post IMP administration
Patient-level PPV of rhPSMA-7.3 (18F) PET BIE for N1 and M1 Lesions Compared to Histopathology or Confirmatory Imaging (M1 Lesions Only) (Objective 3)
Time frame: Conventional images within 60 days or at least 24 hours prior to rhPSMA-7.3 (18F) PET, followed by treatment within 60 days post IMP administration
PPV of rhPSMA-7.3 (18F) PET for Detecting PLN Metastases Compared to Surgical Pathology on a Patient-level, in Which a FP Patient is Defined as Having at Least One FP Region (Right or Left Pelvis), Regardless of Any Coexisting TP Findings (Objective 4)
Time frame: Conventional images within 60 days or at least 24 hours prior to rhPSMA-7.3 (18F) PET, followed by treatment within 60 days post IMP administration
NPV of rhPSMA-7.3 (18F) PET for Detecting PLN Metastases Compared to Surgical Pathology on a Patient-level, in Which a FN Patient is Defined as Having at Least One FN Region (Right or Left Pelvis), Regardless of Any Coexisting TN Findings (Objective 5)
Time frame: Conventional images within 60 days or at least 24 hours prior to rhPSMA-7.3 (18F) PET, followed by treatment within 60 days post IMP administration
The Percentage of Patients Being Upstaged to N1 or M1 Disease. (Objective 6a)
Time frame: Conventional images within 60 days or at least 24 hours prior to rhPSMA-7.3 (18F) PET, followed by treatment within 60 days post IMP administration
The Percentage of Patients in Whom Planned RP Was Converted to EBRT. (Objective 6b)
Time frame: Conventional images within 60 days or at least 24 hours prior to rhPSMA-7.3 (18F) PET, followed by treatment within 60 days post IMP administration
Kappa Statistic for the Agreement Between and Within Blinded Independent Readers on the Interpretation of rhPSMA-7.3 (18F) Scans (Objective 7)
Time frame: PET/CT scans on Day 1
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 26 Feb 2025.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 37414702Surasi DS, Eiber M, Maurer T, Preston MA, Helfand BT, Josephson D, Tewari AK, Somford DM, Rais-Bahrami S, Koontz BF, Bostrom PJ, Chau A, Davis P, Schuster DM, Chapin BF; LIGHTHOUSE Study Group. Diagnostic Performance and Safety of Positron Emission Tomography with 18F-rhPSMA-7.3 in Patients with Newly Diagnosed Unfavourable Intermediate- to Very-high-risk Prostate Cancer: Results from a Phase 3, Prospective, Multicentre Study (LIGHTHOUSE). Eur Urol. 2023 Oct;84(4):361-370. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2023.06.018. Epub 2023 Jul 5.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Prostate Cancer
Not yet recruiting
Remote Screening and Navigation to Increase Trial Enrollment, INVITE Trial
Bladder Carcinoma, Prostate Carcinoma
RecruitingObservational study
Collection of Blood From Patients With Cancer
Prostate Cancer, Breast Cancer
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Agriculture Health Study
Prostate Cancer, Pesticide Exposures
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
177Lu Radiolabeled Monoclonal Antibody HuJ591 (177Lu-J591) and Ketoconazole in Patients With Prostate Cancer
Prostate Cancer
RecruitingObservational study
Collection of Blood From Patients With Prostate Cancer
Cancer Of Prostate, Prostate Cancer
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
34 sites in 4 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing rhPSMA-7.3 (18F) Injection and Positron Emission Tomography scan in people with Prostate Cancer, run by Blue Earth Diagnostics at 34 sites in 4 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 26 Feb 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 34 sites in United States, Germany, Netherlands, Finland. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 26 Feb 2025). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Specificity (time frame: Conventional images within 60 days or at least 24 hours prior to rhPSMA-7.3 (18F) PET, followed by treatment within 60 days post IMP administration). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04186819, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 26 Feb 2025; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 6 Nov 2026.