AzTrials
AzTrials

Hypereosinophilic SyndromePhase 3NATRONNCT04191304

A Phase III Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Benralizumab in Patients With Hypereosinophilic Syndrome (HES)

A Phase 3 study testing Benralizumab in people with Hypereosinophilic Syndrome, run by AstraZeneca at 52 sites in 17 countries.

Active, not recruiting

Under way, not looking for participants. Everyone needed has enrolled. The study is still running.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This is a multicentre, randomised, double-blind (DB), parallel-group, placebo-controlled, 24-week Phase III study to compare the efficacy and safety of benralizumab versus placebo administered by SC injection Q4W in patients with hypereosinophilic syndrome (HES). Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 12 to 130 years
Conditions the study is for
Hypereosinophilic Syndrome
What is being tested?
Benralizumab
Type of treatment
Injection or infusion
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
134 participants
Where
52 sitesin 17 countries
Study dates
20 Jul 2020to 28 Feb 2027
Phase
Phase 3
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 12 to 130 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Provision of the signed and dated written informed consent of the patient or the patient's legally authorised representative, and informed assent from the patient (per local regulations) prior to any mandatory study-specific procedures, sampling, and analyses
  • Males and females 12 years of age and older at the time of signing the ICF
  • Documented diagnosis of HES (history of persistent eosinophilia > 1500 cells/μL without secondary cause on 2 examinations [interval ≥ 1 month; Valent et al 2012] and evidence of end organ manifestations attributable to the eosinophilia)
  • Documented negative testing for the FIP1L1-PDGFRA fusion tyrosine kinase gene translocation
  • Stable HES treatment dose(s) and regimen for ≥ 4 weeks at the time of Visit 1
  • Signs or symptoms of HES worsening/flare and/or laboratory abnormalities indicative of HES worsening/flare (other than isolated eosinophilia) at Visit 1 OR a documented history of 2 or more HES worsening/flares within 12 months prior to Visit 1 requiring an escalation in therapy
Show all 17Show fewer
  • At least one flare within the past 12 months must not be related to a decrease in HES therapy during the 4 weeks prior to the flare
  • AEC ≥ 1000 cells/μL at Visit 1 (assessed by local laboratory)
  • Corticosteroid responsiveness defined as an AEC < 1000 cells/μL after a 2-day course of OCS (prednisone/prednisolone) 1 mg/kg/day at Visit 2 (assessed by local laboratory). Other OCSs in equivalent doses are permitted
  • WOCBP must agree to use a highly effective method of birth control (confirmed by the investigator) from enrolment, throughout the study duration, and within 12 weeks after last dose of IP and have a negative urine dipstick pregnancy test result on Visit 1. Highly effective methods of birth control (those that can achieve a failure rate of less than 1% per year when used consistently and correctly) include:
  • Combined (oestrogen- and progestogen-containing) hormonal contraception associated with inhibition of ovulation: oral, intravaginal, or transdermal
  • Progestogen-only hormonal contraception associated with inhibition of ovulation: oral, injectable, or implantable
  • Intrauterine device
  • Intrauterine hormone-releasing system
  • Bilateral tubal occlusion
  • Sexual abstinence, ie, refraining from heterosexual intercourse (the reliability of sexual abstinence needs to be evaluated in relation to the duration of the clinical study and the preferred and usual lifestyle of the patient)
  • Vasectomised sexual partner (provided that partner is the sole sexual partner of the WOCBP study patient and that the vasectomised partner has received medical assessment of the surgical success)

Who cannot join

  • Life-threatening HES and/or HES complication(s) as judged by the investigator:
  • Medical intervention for HES-related life-threatening event(s) within 12 weeks prior to randomization
  • History of thrombotic complications, stroke, or significant cardiac damage related to HES, if the respective events were life threatening and currently represent a risk of life-threatening disease complications. Events that occurred in the past but considered resolved or stable, can be accepted if, as per investigator's judgment, participation in the study will not put the patient at risk
  • Disease severity that in the opinion of the investigator makes the patient inappropriate for inclusion in the study
  • Presence of FIP1L1-PDGFRA fusion tyrosine kinase gene translocation or other known imatinib-sensitive mutation
  • Definitive diagnosis of eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis
Show all 21Show fewer
  • Known, preexisting, clinically significant endocrine, autoimmune, metabolic, neurological, renal, gastrointestinal, hepatic, haematological, respiratory, or any other system abnormalities that are not associated with HES and are uncontrolled with standard treatment which, in the opinion of the investigator, may put the patient at risk because of his/her participation in the study, or may influence the results of the study, or the patient's ability to complete the entire duration of the study
  • Hypereosinophilia of unknown significance
  • Cardiovascular: Documented history of any clinically significant cardiac damage, clinically significant echocardiography (if available) or ECG findings within 12 months prior to Visit 1 or clinically significant ECG findings at screening that in the opinion of the investigator may put the patients at risk
  • Known currently active liver disease
  • Chronic stable hepatitis B and C (including positive testing for hepatitis B surface antigen or hepatitis C antibody) or other stable chronic liver disease are acceptable if patient otherwise meets eligibility criteria. Stable chronic liver disease should generally be defined by the absence of ascites, encephalopathy, coagulopathy, hypoalbuminemia, oesophageal or gastric varices, or persistent jaundice, or cirrhosis
  • ALT or AST level ≥ 3 × ULN during the screening period (AST or ALT > 5 × ULN if documented HES with liver manifestations). Transient increase of AST/ALT level that resolves by the time of randomisation is acceptable if, in the investigator's opinion, the patient does not have an active liver disease and meets other eligibility criteria
  • Current or history of malignancy within 5 years before the screening visit with the following exceptions:
  • Patients treated for in situ carcinoma of the cervix who have completed curative therapy and are in remission for at least 12 months prior to signing the informed consent and
  • Patients with basal cell or superficial squamous skin cancer
  • Patients who have had other malignancies are eligible provided that the patient is in remission and curative therapy was completed at least 5 years prior to the date informed consent was obtained
  • Diagnosis of systemic mastocytosis
  • Chronic or ongoing active infections requiring systemic treatment, as well as clinically significant viral, bacterial, or fungal infection within 4 weeks prior to Visit 1
  • A helminth parasitic infection diagnosed within 24 weeks prior to Visit 1 that has not been treated or has failed to respond to standard of care therapy. A confirmation of a complete resolution of any helminth parasitic infection prior to Visit 1 should be available
  • A history of known immunodeficiency disorder other than that explained by the use of OCS or other therapy taken for HES. Positive HIV test
  • 14. Evidence of prior benralizumab treatment failure

Trial locations and contacts

52 sites in 17 countries.

52 sites in 17 countries

United States8 sites
  • Research Site

    Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48105

  • Research Site

    Atlanta, Georgia, 30324

  • Research Site

    Bethesda, Maryland, 20892

  • Research Site

    Cleveland, Ohio, 44106

  • Research Site

    Columbus, Ohio, 43212

  • Research Site

    Durham, North Carolina, 27705

  • Research Site

    La Jolla, California, 92037

  • Research Site

    Salt Lake City, Utah, 84112

Other trials in United States

Israel8 sites
  • Research Site

    Haifa, 34362

  • Research Site

    Holon, 58100

  • Research Site

    Jerusalem, 91120

  • Research Site

    Kfar Saba, 44218

  • Research Site

    Petah Tikva, 49100

  • Research Site

    Ramat Gan, 5265601

  • Research Site

    Rehovot, 76100

  • Research Site

    Tel Aviv, 64239

Other trials in Israel

Japan7 sites
  • Research Site

    Chiba, 260-0852

  • Research Site

    Hamamatsu, 431-3192

  • Research Site

    Ichikawa-shi, 272-8516

  • Research Site

    Kawasaki-shi, 211-8510

  • Research Site

    Nishinomiya-shi, 663-8501

  • Research Site

    Osaka, 530-8480

  • Research Site

    Sendai, 980-8574

Other trials in Japan

China5 sites
  • Research Site

    Chengdu, 610041

  • Research Site

    Shanghai, 200040

  • Research Site

    Tianjin, 300020

  • Research Site

    Xiamen, 361015

  • Research Site

    Zhengzhou, 450008

Other trials in China

France5 sites
  • Research Site

    Lille, 59037

  • Research Site

    Pessac, 33604

  • Research Site

    Strasbourg, 67091

  • Research Site

    Suresnes, 92151

  • Research Site

    Toulouse, 31059

Other trials in France

Germany3 sites
  • Research Site

    Hanover, 30625

  • Research Site

    Kirchheim, 73230

  • Research Site

    Mannheim, 68167

Other trials in Germany

India3 sites
  • Research Site

    Ahmedabad, 380013

  • Research Site

    Ajmer, 305001

  • Research Site

    Delhi, 110029

Other trials in India

Poland3 sites
  • Research Site

    Chęciny, 26-060

  • Research Site

    Gdansk, 80-214

  • Research Site

    Lodz, 90-153

Other trials in Poland

Belgium2 sites
  • Research Site

    Brussels, 1070

  • Research Site

    Edegem, 2650

Other trials in Belgium

Argentina1 site
  • Research Site

    Rosario, 2000

Other trials in Argentina

Austria1 site
  • Research Site

    Innsbruck, 6020

Other trials in Austria

Denmark1 site
  • Research Site

    København Ø, 2100

Other trials in Denmark

Italy1 site
  • Research Site

    Bologna, 40138

Other trials in Italy

Netherlands1 site
  • Research Site

    Rotterdam, 3015 GD

Other trials in Netherlands

South Korea1 site
  • Research Site

    Seoul, 5505

Other trials in South Korea

Spain1 site
  • Research Site

    Santander, 39010

Other trials in Spain

United Kingdom1 site
  • Research Site

    London, W2 1NY

Other trials in United Kingdom

About this study

Official title: A Multicentre, Randomised, Double-blind, Parallel-group, Placebo-controlled, 24-Week Phase III Study With an Open-label Extension to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Benralizumab in Patients With Hypereosinophilic Syndrome (HES)

This is a multicentre, randomised, double-blind (DB), parallel-group, placebo-controlled, 24-week Phase III study to compare the efficacy and safety of benralizumab versus placebo administered by SC injection Q4W in patients with hypereosinophilic syndrome (HES). This study comprises 2 distinct periods (together defined as the 'main study'): A 24-week, DB treatment period, during which patients will be randomised to receive either benralizumab or placebo, in addition to their prior stable HES background therapy, and an open-label extension (OLE) period, during which all patients will receive benralizumab.

The primary database lock (DBL) will occur when approximately 38 patients have had their first HES worsening/flare event during the DB treatment period and all randomised patients have had the opportunity to be followed up for the 24-week DB treatment period.

A patient must complete the 24-week DB treatment period on investigational product (IP) to be eligible to enter the OLE treatment period. The final DBL will occur after the last patient completes the OLE.

Read the detailed description

This is a multicentre, randomised, DB, parallel-group, placebo-controlled, 24-week Phase III study to compare the efficacy and safety of benralizumab 30 mg versus placebo administered by SC injection Q4W in patients with HES. This study will be conducted at approximately 68 sites in 18 countries.

The target patient population is male and female patients 12 years of age and older with symptomatic active HES. Eligible patients must be negative for the FIP1L1-PDGFRA fusion tyrosine kinase gene translocation.

Potentially eligible patients will enter a 3-day screening period and will be required to have documented stable HES therapy for at least 4 weeks prior to Visit 1 and AEC ≥ 1000 cells/μL at local laboratory testing to proceed to the second day of the screening period. Patients will be assessed for corticosteroid responsiveness (defined as an AEC < 1000 cells/μL after 2 days of OCS [prednisone/prednisolone] 1 mg/kg/day given on top of the patient's background therapy for HES) prior to randomisation; other OCSs in equivalent doses are permitted. Patients who are not corticosteroid responsive or fail any other eligibility criteria will be screen failed.

It is expected that approximately 120 patients will be randomised at a 1:1 ratio at the randomisation/baseline visit (Visit 3) to receive either benralizumab or matching placeboQ4W for a 24-week DB treatment period. Recruitment may continue beyond 120 patients if required to achieve the target number of HES worsening/flares. Recruitment of adolescent patients is targeted to be broadly in line with expected prevalence rates of adolescents in the overall population. Approximately 4 to 6 adolescent patients (aged 12 to 17) are targeted to be randomised. Randomisation will be stratified. Approximately 40 patients will participate in a noninterventional interview to collect data on HRQoL and the patients' experience during the DB portion of the study.

All patients will remain on stable dose(s) and regimen of background HES therapy during the screening period and throughout 36 weeks of treatment (until Visit 12/Week 36 when the therapy can be adjusted). During this time, background HES therapy may only be modified if a patient has an HES clinical worsening/flare or an AE thought to be due to background therapy.

AstraZeneca, sites, and patients will be blinded to the absolute eosinophil, basophil, and monocyte counts, differential blood counts (percentages) for all WBCs (eosinophils, basophils, monocytes, neutrophils, and lymphocytes), and biopsy cell counts (if applicable) after randomisation/baseline (Visit 3/Week 0), during the entire DB treatment period, and for the first 4 weeks of the OLE treatment period (until Visit 10/Week 28) after which no blinding to WBC counts or biopsy cell counts is required. After the primary DBL, AstraZeneca will become unblinded to all patients' blood and biopsy cell counts obtained during DB treatment period.

The final dose of the DB treatment period will be given at Week 20, and the DB treatment period will complete at Week 24.

All patients who complete the DB treatment period on IP may be eligible to continue into an OLE treatment period on benralizumab (30 mg SC Q4W). The OLE is intended to allow treatment with open-label benralizumab for at least 1 year for adults and at least 2 years for adolescents after completion of the DB treatment period of the study (earlier enrolled patients may therefore be in the OLE for longer than 1 year). AstraZeneca may choose to extend the study depending on the overall development program. Moreover, AstraZeneca reserves the right of terminating the OLE early (eg, if development of the asset is terminated or marketing authorisation is obtained).

The primary DBL will occur when approximately 38 patients have had their first HES worsening/flare event during the DB treatment period and all randomised patients have had the opportunity to be followed up for the 24-week DB treatment period. Treatment allocation will remain blinded until the primary DBL. A patient must complete the 24-week DB treatment period on IP to be eligible to enter the OLE treatment period. The final DBL will occur after the last patient completes the OLE. Data from the OLE treatment period of the study will be presented in an addendum to the primary analysis CSR and/or a separate OLE treatment period CSR.

Being tested
Benralizumab, Placebo
Keywords
benralizumab, Hypereosinophilic Syndrome (HES)
Medical subject headings
Hypereosinophilic Syndrome

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • BenralizumabBiological

    Benralizumab solution for injection in an accessorised prefilled syringe (APFS) will be administered subcutaneously (SC) every 4 weeks

  • PlaceboBiological

    Matching placebo solution for injection in an APFS will be administered SC every 4 weeks

Study groups in NCT04191304
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Benralizumab armExperimental1x Benralizumab SC injection
Receives: Biological: Benralizumab
Placebo armPlacebo comparator1x Benralizumab matching placebo SC injection
Receives: Biological: Placebo

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Time to First HES Worsening/Flare During the DB Treatment Period

    The time to first HES worsening/flare is calculated as: start date of the first HES worsening - date of randomisation + 1. For participants who do not experience a HES worsening/flare, the time to first HES worsening/flare is right censored at the end of the DB period corresponding to the earliest date (date of the first of Benra open label dose, study day 183, date of last contact, and data cut-off date).

    The number of participants with events and censored observations is presented.

    Measured: DB period (Baseline to Week 24)

Secondary outcomes (12)
  1. Proportion of Patients Who Experience an HES Worsening/Flare During the DB Treatment Period

    The proportion of participants who experience an HES worsening/flare or who withdraw from the study prior to completing the 24-week DB treatment period. The proportion is calculated as the number of participants with an HES worsening/flare or withdrawal divided by the total number of participants in the analysis population.

    The number and proportion (expressed as percentage) or participants who experienced HES worsening/flare is presented.

    Measured: DB period (Baseline to Week 24)

  2. Number of HES Worsenings/Flares (Annualised Rate) During the DB Period

    The annualised rate of HES worsening/flare events was analysed using a negative binomial regression model adjusted for region, with the logarithm of follow-up time included as an offset variable. Annualized flare rates are model estimated marginal rates.

    A separate HES worsening/flare is considered if the start date of an HES worsening/flare is at least 14 days apart from the stop date of a preceding HES worsening/flare.

    Measured: DB period (Baseline to Week 24)

  3. Time to First Haematologic Relapse (AEC ≥ 1000 Cells/μL) During the DB Period

    Time to first haematologic relapse is calculated as start date of the first haematologic relapse - date of randomisation + 1. Haematologic relapse is defined as the first occurrence of an absolute eosinophil count (AEC) ≥ 1000 cells/μL post-baseline.

    For participants who do not experience haematologic relapse, the time to first haematologic relapse is right censored at the end of the DB period corresponding to the earliest date of (date of the first of Benra open label dose, study day 183, date of last contact, and data cut-off date).

    The number of participants with events and censored observations is presented.

    Measured: DB period (Baseline to Week 24)

  4. Fatigue Severity (PROMIS Fatigue Short Form 7a) at Week 24

    Fatigue severity was assessed using the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Fatigue Short Form 7a questionnaire. Each item is scored on a 5-point Likert scale (1 to 5), and the total raw score is converted to a T-score.

    T-scores are standardized such that 50 represents the population mean with a standard deviation of 10. Standardized T-score range is from 29.4 to 83.2, with higher scores indicating more severe fatigue. A reduction in T-score indicates an improvement in fatigue severity.

    The least squares (LS) mean (95% CI) change from baseline in T-score at Week 24 is presented.

    Measured: Week 24

  5. Proportion of Patients Who Have Haematologic Relapse During the DB Treatment Period

    The proportion of patients who have a haematologic relapse or withdraw from the study over the DB treatment period is defined as the number of participants who have a first haematologic relapse or withdraw prior to completing in the DB period divided by the number of participants in the the analysis. Haematologic relapse is defined when AEC post baseline is ≥ 1,000 cells/Ul for the first time.

    The number and proportion (expressed as percentage) of participants who experienced haematologic relapse is presented.

    Measured: DB period (Baseline to Week 24)

  6. Proportion of Patients Who Have AEC < 500 Cells/μL for 24 Weeks

    The proportion of participants who maintained an AEC of < 500 cells/µL throughout the 24-week DB treatment period. The proportion is defined as the number of participants who maintained AEC < 500 cells/µL divided by the total number of participants in the analysis population.

    The number and proportion (expressed as percentage) of participants who maintained AEC < 500 cells/µL is presented.

    Measured: DB period (Baseline to Week 24)

  7. Proportion of Patients Who Require an Increase in Corticosteroid Dose From Baseline at Any Point in the DB Treatment Period

    The proportion of patients who required an increase in systemic corticosteroids (SCS) from baseline during the 24-week DB treatment period. An increase in SCS includes an increase of at least 1 mg prednisone equivalent for participants receiving oral corticosteroids at baseline, or initiation of a new or additional course of systemic corticosteroids for treatment of HES or a closely related condition. Baseline is defined as the last valid value on or prior to randomisation.

    The number and proportion (expressed as percentage) of participants who require an increase in SCS from baseline.

    Measured: DB period (Baseline to Week 24)

  8. Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) (Short Form-36 Version 2 [SF-36v2])

    HRQoL was assessed using the 36 Item Short Form Health Survey, version 2 (SF 36v2). Change from baseline in HRQoL was evaluated using the Physical Component Summary (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS) scores at Week 12 and Week 24 during the DB treatment period.

    PCS and MCS scores are norm-based and standardized to a general population with a mean of 50 and a standard deviation of 10, with higher scores indicating better HRQoL. Scores generally range from 0 to 100.

    PCS and MCS scores are derived from weighted combinations of domain scores using standard scoring algorithms. An increase in score indicates an improvement.

    LS mean (95% CI) changes from baseline for PCS and MCS scores are presented.

    Measured: DB period (Baseline to Week 24)

  9. Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGI-S)

    Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGI-S) is a single-item, participant-reported assessment of disease severity during the DB treatment period. PGI-S captures the participant's perception of overall symptom severity at the time of assessment using categorical response options ranging from "No symptoms" to "Very severe".

    The number and percentage of participants in each response category are presented at each timepoint.

    Measured: DB period (Baseline to Week 24)

  10. Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C)

    Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) is a single-item, participant-reported assessment that captures the participant's overall evaluation of response to treatment during the DB treatment period. PGI-C reflects the participant's perception of change in disease status compared with baseline using categorical response options ranging from "Much better" to "Much worse." The number and percentage of participants in each response category are presented at each time point.

    Measured: DB period (Baseline to Week 24)

  11. Serum Benralizumab Concentrations

    Serum concentrations of benralizumab measured over time during the DB period to characterise the pharmacokinetics of benralizumab in participants with HES.

    Baseline is defined as the last valid value on or prior to the date of randomisation.

    Measured: DB period (Baseline to Week 24)

  12. Anti-Benralizumab Antibodies and Neutralizing Antibodies (nAbs)

    Immunogenicity of benralizumab, as assessed by the incidence and prevalence of anti-drug antibodies (ADA), including nAbs, measured from baseline through the 24-week DB treatment period in participants with HES.

    Measured: DB period (Baseline to Week 24)

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted9 Dec 2019
  2. Study start20 Jul 2020
  3. Primary completion7 May 2025
  4. Study completion28 Feb 2027 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Quadruple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
134 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04191304
Sponsor's protocol ID
D3254C00001
Other IDs
2023-510455-28-00, 2019-002039-27, 2019, 2023
Acronym
NATRON
Status last verified
Jul 2026
First submitted
20 Nov 2019
Last updated
10 Jul 2026
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Yes: Qualified researchers can request access to anonymized individual patient-level data from AstraZeneca group of companies sponsored clinical trials via the request portal. All requests will be evaluated as per the AZ disclosure commitment: https://astrazenecagrouptrials.pharmacm.com/ST/Submission/Disclosure.

Publications

  • Ogbogu PU, Roufosse F, Akuthota P, Kuna P, Groh M, Reiter A, Yokota A, Siddiqui SH, Mutsaers PGNJ, Li B, Khoury P, Bahadori LM, Bednarczyk A, Bouma G, Brooks LG, Ferreira J, Grindebacke H, Ho CN, Jain P, Palmer RL, Jison ML, Klion AD; NATRON study group. Benralizumab versus placebo for hypereosinophilic syndrome: a randomized, placebo-controlled phase 3 trial. Nat Med. 2026 Jun;32(6):2017-2025. doi: 10.1038/s41591-026-04315-8. Epub 2026 Mar 31.

    PubMed 41917160

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 3 study testing Benralizumab in people with Hypereosinophilic Syndrome, run by AstraZeneca at 52 sites in 17 countries.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 17 inclusion and 21 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: under way, not looking for participants, as of the sponsor's last update on 10 Jul 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 52 sites in United States, Israel, Japan, China, France and 12 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 10 Jul 2026). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Time to First HES Worsening/Flare During the DB Treatment Period (time frame: DB period (Baseline to Week 24)). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04191304, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 10 Jul 2026.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in