AzTrials
AzTrials

Critical Limb IschemiaBESTNCT04191746

BEST vCLI Registry

An observational study of Critical Limb Ischemia, run by Duke University at 1 site in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

For subjects with critical limb ischemia, identify patient, physician/hospital, and geographic factors associated with variations in treatment strategies; compare treatments and outcomes, including quality of life, cost and cost effectiveness, at 6, 12 months. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Critical Limb Ischemia
How many people
1,009 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
9 Dec 2019to 25 Sep 2023
How long will I take part?
12 Months
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: Patients presenting with critical limb ischemia Phase I: While the BEST-CLI Trial is actively enrolling, the BEST-Registry will only enroll patients who first screen fail from BEST-CLI. Phase II: After BEST-CLI officially finishes enrollment, screen failure for BEST-CLI will no longer be required for enrollment into the BEST-Registry 1200 patients, across approximately 40 sites participating in BEST-CLI clinical trial.

Who may be able to join

  • Male or female
  • age 18 years or older
  • Infrainguinal peripheral artery disease (occlusive disease of the arteries below the inguinal ligament)
  • Critical limb ischemia, defined as arterial insufficiency with gangrene, non-healing ischemic ulcer, or rest pain consistent with Rutherford categories 4-6
  • Documented consideration for enrollment in the BEST-CLI Trial with documented failure to meet inclusion / exclusion criteria. Phase ll After BEST CLI official enrollment ends, this inclusion criteria will be removed.
  • Willingness to comply with vCLI protocol, attend follow-up appointments, complete all study assessments, and provide written informed consent.

Who cannot join

  • Presence of a popliteal aneurysm (> 2 cm) in the index limb
  • Life expectancy of less than 2 years due to reasons other than peripheral artery disease
  • Active vasculitis, Buerger's disease, or acute limb-threatening ischemia
  • Current chemotherapy or radiation therapy
  • Pregnancy or lactation
  • Administration of an investigational drug for peripheral artery disease within 30 days of randomization
  • Participation in a clinical trial (except observational studies) within the previous 30 days
  • Prior enrollment or randomization into the BEST-CLI trial

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • Duke University Medical Center

    Durham, North Carolina, 27710

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: BEST Critical Limb Ischemia (vCLI) Registry

For subjects with critical limb ischemia, identify patient, physician/hospital, and geographic factors associated with variations in treatment strategies; compare treatments and outcomes, including quality of life, cost and cost effectiveness, at 6, 12 months.

Read the detailed description

The study will be a prospective multicenter registry evaluating the real world therapeutic strategies, clinical outcomes, and costs associated with patients presenting with critical limb ischemia.

Population: Patients over age 18 presenting with critical limb ischemia After initial enrollment at 40 study sites throughout the US. participants will complete follow-up 6 months and 12 months via call center telephone calls.

The study plan calls for enrollment of approximately 1,200 participants throughout the US that will then have 12 month followup that includes collection of medications, hospitalizations for collection of events.Additionally, the BEST-CLI trial will be gathering quality of life data and cost data using similar instruments, thus providing an opportunity for comparison between cost and quality of life analyses in a clinical trial versus in a real-world registry and collection of Quality of Life using validated instruments: EQ-5D, VASQOL, SF-12.and bill review to determine economic impact of disease.

Medical subject headings
Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

Study groups in NCT04191746
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Participants with critical limb diseaseThis registry will collect data from participants with critical limb disease from Duke University and approximately 40 sites in North America.

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Percentage of participants with major adverse limb events (MALE) as measured by patient reports (verified by medical records)

    Number of participants in the registry with major limb events as reported by participants and confirmed by medical records

    Measured: 6 months

  2. Percentage of participants with major adverse limb events (MALE) as measured by patient reports (verified by medical records)

    Number of participants in the registry with major limb events as reported by participants and confirmed by medical records

    Measured: 12 months

Secondary outcomes (20)
  1. Number of participants that died within 30 days of index procedure

    Collect composite of MALE or perioperative death within 30 days of index procedure using patient/proxy information qualified by medical records.

    Measured: 30 days

  2. Number of participants with amputation free survival as measured by patient report/verified by medical record review

    Interviews completed at 6 months with participants that note no hospitalization for amputation and verified by medical records

    Measured: 6 months

  3. Number of participants with amputation free survival as measured by patient report/verified by medical record review

    Interviews completed at 12 months with participants that note no hospitalization for amputation and verified by medical records

    Measured: 12 months

  4. Number of participants that did not have secondary interventions in index leg as measured by patient report/verified by medical record review

    At 6 month visit, the number of participants that did not report additional procedures such as surgery or angiography.in the affected leg

    Measured: 6 months

  5. Number of participants that did not have secondary interventions in index leg as measured by patient report/verified by medical record review

    At 12 month visit, the number of participants that did not report additional procedures such as surgery or angiography.in the affected leg

    Measured: 12 months

  6. Number of interventions per limb as measured by patient report/verified by medical record review

    Interventions consist of need to be hospitalized for a form of revascularization

    Measured: 6 months

  7. Number of interventions per limb as measured by patient report/verified by medical record review

    Interventions consist of need to be hospitalized for a form of revascularization

    Measured: 12 months

  8. Number of participants that did not have limb revascularization failure as measured by patient report/verified by medical record review

    Limb revascularization failure is loss of circulation to the limb that has procedural revascularization previously performed that is non functioning

    Measured: 6 months

  9. Number of participants that did not have limb revascularization failure as measured by patient report/verified by medical record review

    Limb revascularization failure is loss of circulation to the limb that has procedural revascularization previously performed that is non functioning

    Measured: 12 months

  10. Number of participants who did not have a myocardial infarction as measured by patient report/verified by medical record review

    Number of participants that answered no to the question "Was your hospitalization for a Heart Attack(MI) at 6 months verified by medical record.

    Measured: 6 months

  11. Number of participants who did not have a myocardial infarction as measured by patient report/verified by medical record review

    Number of participants that answered no to the question "Was your hospitalization for a Heart Attack(MI) at 12 months verified by medical record.

    Measured: 12 months

  12. Number of participants who did not have a stroke while in the registry as measured by patient report/verified by medical record review

    Stroke is inclusive of a cerebral vascular including a ischemic, hemorrhagic or a TIA event.

    Measured: 6 months

  13. Number of participants who did not have a stroke while in the registry as measured by patient report/verified by medical record review

    Stroke is inclusive of a cerebral vascular including a ischemic, hemorhagic or a TIA event.

    Measured: 12 months

  14. Number of participants that did not have a periprocedural (30 day) major adverse cardiac events as measured by patient report/verified by medical record review

    Events that occur during a revascularization procedure including cardiovascular events such as Myocardial Infarction and stoke.

    Measured: 6 months

  15. Quality of life as measure by the validated QOL tool called the EuroQol that will be administered throughout the study

    The EuroQol is a 6 question validated instrument that asks questions regarding mobility, self care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety and depression. I also includes a 0-100 scale regarding participants assessment of health.

    Measured: Baseline

  16. Quality of life as measure by the validated QOL tool called the EuroQol that will be administered throughout the study

    The EuroQol is a 6 question validated instrument that asks questions regarding mobility, self care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety and depression. I also includes a 0-100 scale regarding participants assessment of health.

    Measured: 6 month

  17. Quality of life as measure by the validated QOL tool (EuroQol) that will be administered throughout the study

    The EuroQol is a 6 question validated instrument that asks questions regarding mobility, self care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety and depression with a range of 5 answers. I also includes a 0-100 scale regarding participants assessment of health.

    Measured: 12 month

  18. Quality of life as measured by the the SF-12 instrument that will be administered throughout the study

    The SF-12 Health Survey is a shorter version of the SF-36 Health Survey that uses 12 questions to measure functional health and well-being from the patient's point of view

    Measured: Baseline

  19. Quality of life as measured by the the SF-12 instrument that will be administered throughout the study

    The SF-12 Health Survey is a shorter version of the SF-36 Health Survey that uses 12 questions to measure functional health and well-being from the patient's point of view

    Measured: 6 months

  20. Quality of life as measured by the the SF-12 instrument that will be administered throughout the study

    The SF-12 Health Survey is a shorter version of the SF-36 Health Survey that uses 12 questions to measure functional health and well-being from the patient's point of view

    Measured: 12 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted10 Dec 2019
  2. Study start9 Dec 2019
  3. Primary completion30 Jun 2023
  4. Study completion25 Sep 2023

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Other
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
1,009 participants (actual)
Target duration
12 Months
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04191746
Sponsor's protocol ID
Pro00102178
Other IDs
1R01HL141213-01
Acronym
BEST
Status last verified
Jun 2025
First submitted
16 Apr 2019
Last updated
3 Jul 2025
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Critical Limb Ischemia, run by Duke University at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 3 Jul 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Percentage of participants with major adverse limb events (MALE) as measured by patient reports (verified by medical records) (time frame: 6 months). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 3 Jul 2025.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in