AzTrials
AzTrials

Rheumatoid ArthritisPhase 2NCT04192617

A Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of SM03 in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis Receiving Methotrexate

A Phase 2 study testing SM03 and Methotrexate in people with Rheumatoid Arthritis, run by SinoMab BioScience Ltd at 1 site in China.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This study evaluated the safety and efficacy of SM03 compared to placebo in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis(RA) receiving methotrexate Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 75 years
Conditions the study is for
Rheumatoid Arthritis
What is being tested?
SM03 and Methotrexate
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
156 participants
Where
1 siteChina
Study dates
31 Dec 2014to 3 Feb 2016
Phase
Phase 2
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 75 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Adult patients 18-75 years of age.
  • Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) for ≥ 12 months, diagnosed according to the revised 1987 American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria for the classification of rheumatoid arthritis.
  • Moderate to severe active RA with swollen joint count (SJC) ≥ 8 (66 joint count), and tender joint count (TJC) ≥ 8 (68 joint count) at screening and baseline.
  • At screening, either C-reactive protein (CRP) ≥ 0.6 mg/dL (6 mg/L), or Erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) ≥ 28 mm/hour, or Morning stiffness of joint for ≥ 45 minutes
  • Inadequate response to methotrexate, having received and tolerated at a dose of 7.5-20 mg/week for ≥ 12 weeks, at a stable dose over the past 4 weeks.

Who cannot join

  • Rheumatic autoimmune disease other than RA.
  • Use of any biological DMARDs for RA within past 6 months.
  • Concurrent treatment with any Disease Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drug (DMARD) other than methotrexate
  • Active infection, or history of serious or chronic infection

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

China1 site
  • Peking Union Medical College Hostipal

    Beijing, 100032

Other trials in China

About this study

Official title: A Randomized,Placebo Controlled, Double-blind, Parallel Group, Phase II Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of SM03, Compared to Placebo, in Patients With Moderate-to-Severe Active Rheumatoid Arthritis Receiving Methotrexate

This study evaluated the safety and efficacy of SM03 compared to placebo in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis(RA) receiving methotrexate

Being tested
SM03, Placebo, Methotrexate
Medical subject headings
Arthritis, Rheumatoid

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • SM03Drug

    SM03: 600 mg intravenous (IV)

  • PlaceboDrug

    Placebo: 600 mg intravenous (IV)

  • MethotrexateDrug

    methotrexate: 7.5-20 mg/week oral

Study groups in NCT04192617
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
SM03 600 mg*2ExperimentalSM03: 600 mg intravenous (IV) on week 0,2, and week 12,14; placebo: 600 mg intravenous (IV) on week 4 and16; Methotrexate: 7.5-20 mg/wk oral.
Receives: Drug: SM03; Drug: Placebo; Drug: Methotrexate
SM03 600 mg*3ExperimentalSM03: 600 mg intravenous (IV) on week 0,2, 4, and week 12,14,16; Methotrexate: 7.5-20 mg/wk oral.
Receives: Drug: SM03; Drug: Methotrexate
placebo*3Placebo comparatorplacebo: 600 mg intravenous (IV) on week 0,2, 4, and week 12,14,16; Methotrexate: 7.5-20 mg/wk oral.
Receives: Drug: Placebo; Drug: Methotrexate

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Percentage of Participants With American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20 Response at Week 24

    To achieve an ACR20 required at least a 20% improvement compared with Baseline in both tender joint counts (68 joints assessed for tenderness) and swollen joint counts (66 joints assessed for swelling), as well as a 20% improvement in three of the following five additional measurements:

    • Physician's global assessment of disease activity (assessed using a 10 cm Visual Analog Scale [VAS]);
    • Patient's global assessment of disease activity (assessed using a 10 cm VAS);
    • Patient's assessment of pain (assessed using a 10 cm VAS);
    • Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ; a patient completed questionnaire consisting of 20 questions, scored from 0-3);
    • Acute phase reactant: C-reactive protein (CRP)

    Measured: Week 24

Secondary outcomes (6)
  1. Percentage of Participants With American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20 Response at Week 4,8,12, 16

    To achieve an ACR20 required at least a 20% improvement compared with Baseline in both tender joint counts (68 joints assessed for tenderness) and swollen joint counts (66 joints assessed for swelling), as well as a 20% improvement in three of the following five additional measurements:

    • Physician's global assessment of disease activity (assessed using a 10 cm Visual Analog Scale [VAS]);
    • Patient's global assessment of disease activity (assessed using a 10 cm VAS);
    • Patient's assessment of pain (assessed using a 10 cm VAS);
    • Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ; a patient completed questionnaire consisting of 20 questions, scored from 0-3);
    • Acute phase reactant: C-reactive protein (CRP)

    Measured: Week 4,8,12,16

  2. Percentage of Participants With an ACR50 Response at Week 24

    To achieve an ACR50 required at least a 50% improvement compared with Baseline in both tender joint counts (68 joints assessed for tenderness) and swollen joint counts (66 joints assessed for swelling), as well as a 50% improvement in three of the following five additional measurements:

    • Physician's global assessment of disease activity (assessed using a 10 cm Visual Analog Scale [VAS]);
    • Patient's global assessment of disease activity (assessed using a 10 cm VAS);
    • Patient's assessment of pain (assessed using a 10 cm VAS);
    • Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ; a patient completed questionnaire consisting of 20 questions, scored from 0-3);
    • Acute phase reactant: C-reactive protein (CRP)

    Measured: Week 24

  3. Percentage of Participants With an ACR70 Response at Week 24

    To achieve an ACR70 required at least a 70% improvement compared with Baseline in both tender joint counts (68 joints assessed for tenderness) and swollen joint counts (66 joints assessed for swelling), as well as a 70% improvement in three of the following five additional measurements:

    • Physician's global assessment of disease activity (assessed using a 10 cm Visual Analog Scale [VAS]);
    • Patient's global assessment of disease activity (assessed using a 10 cm VAS);
    • Patient's assessment of pain (assessed using a 10 cm VAS);
    • Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ; a patient completed questionnaire consisting of 20 questions, scored from 0-3);
    • Acute phase reactant: C-reactive protein (CRP)

    Measured: Week 24

  4. Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score (DAS28-ESR) at Week 24

    The DAS28 is a composite score to measure disease activity in patients with rheumatoid arthritis, derived from the following variables:

    • The number of swollen and tender joints assessed using the 28-joint count;
    • Erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR);
    • Patient's global assessment of disease activity measured on a 10 cm visual analog scale.

    The DAS28 score ranges from zero to ten. A DAS28 score above 5.1 means high disease activity whereas a DAS28 less than or equal to 3.2 indicates low disease activity. Remission is achieved by a DAS28 lower than 2.6.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 24

  5. Percentage of Participants With European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Response at Week 24

    A EULAR response reflects an improvement in disease activity and an attainment of a lower degree of disease activity based on the DAS28 score. The DAS28 score ranges from 0-10, with higher scores indicating more disease activity.

    A Good Response is defined as an improvement (decrease) in the DAS28 of more than 1.2 compared with Baseline and attainment of a DAS28 score of less than or equal to 3.2.

    A Moderate Response is defined as either:

    an improvement (decrease) in the DAS28 of greater than 0.6 and less than or equal to 1.2 from Baseline and attainment of a DAS28 score of less than or equal to 5.1 or, an improvement (decrease) in the DAS28 of more than 1.2 from Baseline and attainment of a DAS28 score of greater than 3.2.

    No Response is defined as either an improvement (decrease) in the DAS28 of less than or equal to 0.6, or an improvement (decrease) in the DAS28 of greater than 0.6 and less than or equal to 1.2 and attainment of a DAS28 of more than 5.1.

    Measured: Week 24

  6. Percentage of Participants With Adverse Events

    Percentage of participants who reported an AE or SAE, a drug-related AE, who had an acute infusion reaction, an AE leading to study drug discontinuation, with an infection or serious infection, or who died.

    Measured: Week 0 to 24

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted10 Dec 2019
  2. Study start31 Dec 2014
  3. Primary completion3 Feb 2016
  4. Study completion3 Feb 2016

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Quadruple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
156 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04192617
Sponsor's protocol ID
SM03-RA-II-V3.3
Status last verified
Dec 2019
First submitted
5 Dec 2019
Last updated
10 Dec 2019
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Publications

  • Li J, Li M, Wu D, Zhou J, Leung SO, Zhang F. SM03, an anti-human CD22 monoclonal antibody, for active rheumatoid arthritis: a phase II, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2022 May 5;61(5):1841-1848. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keab699.

    PubMed 34508557

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 2 study testing SM03 and Methotrexate in people with Rheumatoid Arthritis, run by SinoMab BioScience Ltd at 1 site in China.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 10 Dec 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Percentage of Participants With American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20 Response at Week 24 (time frame: Week 24). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04192617, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 10 Dec 2019.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in