Spinal Cord InjuriesNCT04194099
Effects of Paired Associative Nerve Stimulation on Spinal Cord Injury Subjects
A study testing 20 Hz rTMS (Brain), iTBS rTMS (Brain) and Anode tsDCS (Spinal) in people with Spinal Cord Injuries, run by Taipei Medical University Hospital at 1 site in Taiwan.
Trial summary
This study is to investigate the effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) combined with trans-spinal electrical stimulation (tsES) intervention on cortical excitability, brain structure, motor ability of lower limb in individuals with incomplete spinal cord injury. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 20 to 65 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Spinal Cord Injuries
- What is being tested?
- 20 Hz rTMS (Brain), iTBS rTMS (Brain) and Anode tsDCS (Spinal)
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 12 participants
- Where
- 1 siteTaiwan
- Study dates
- 9 Dec 2019to 31 Dec 2023
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 20 to 65 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Age 20 to 65 years incomplete SCI (American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale (ASIA) B to D)
- Lesion area above the tenth thoracic vertebra (T10)
- Injury time more than one year
- Without range of motion (ROM) limitation
- Medical condition stable
Who cannot join
- Having pacemaker, cochlear implants, metal in the brain or skull, open wound of brain, or history of epilepsy.
- Having seizure history
- Having other neurological, mental, medical problems affect this study
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Taiwan1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Taipei Medical university Hospital
Taipei
Chien-Hung Lai
About this study
Official title: Development and Application of a Novel Neurorehabilitation Technology With Paired Associative Nerve Stimulation in Spinal Cord Injured Subjects
This study is to investigate the effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) combined with trans-spinal electrical stimulation (tsES) intervention on cortical excitability, brain structure, motor ability of lower limb in individuals with incomplete spinal cord injury. Twelve participants will be recruited in this study.
Read the detailed description
Spinal cord injury (SCI) impairs motor and sensory function and affects numerous body functions and daily activities. Insufficient central nervous system plasticity can result in maladaptive changes that prevent full recovery. It's a challenge to guide this plasticity to optimize the functional outcome for individuals with SCI.
Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and trans-spinal electric stimulation (tsES) may modulate cortical excitability, corticospinal output and spinal circuit. However, few studies investigated the effectiveness of paired nerve stimulation (PNS) on neuroplasticity and functional outcome in persons with SCI. Therefore, this study aim to examine the effects of the combination of these two different non-invasive nerve stimulation with the cycling exercise on the motor cortex and corticospinal circuit excitability as well as functional recovery.
Present study clarifies the effects of five different settings of combined with TMS and tsES intervention and then undergo cycling exercise after PNS on spinal cord and cortical excitability in SCI participants.
It is expected that this project will successfully establish a new neuromodulation technology to enhance cortical, corticospinal and spinal circuit excitability as well as to improve the outcome of lower-limb function and quality of life in persons with SCI. Therefore, this project can not only publish scientific papers, but also can enhance the neuroplasticity and improve function in persons with SCI.
- Conditions
- Spinal Cord Injuries
- Being tested
- 20 Hz rTMS (Brain), iTBS rTMS (Brain), Anode tsDCS (Spinal), 20 Hz current square-wave pulses (Spinal), iTBS (Spinal)
- Keywords
- Spinal Cord Injuries, Trans-cranial magnetic stimulation, Trans-spinal direct current stimulation
- Medical subject headings
- Spinal Cord Injuries
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
20 Hz rTMS (Brain)Device
Higher frequency (>5 Hz) trains increase cortical excitability.
iTBS rTMS (Brain)Device
Intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS) is a newer rTMS approach.
Anode tsDCS (Spinal)Device
Anodal tsDCS increased the spinal reflex amplitude, as well as corticospinal excitability.
20 Hz current square-wave pulses (Spinal)Device
Higher frequency (>5 Hz) of current increase cortical excitability.
iTBS (Spinal)Device
Intermittent theta-burst stimulation (iTBS) is a newer approach. it may increase corticospinal excitability.
shamDevice
with sham stimulation on brain and spinal.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| rTMS (Brain) + tsES (Spinal) | Experimental | First part 20 Hz rTMS (Brain) + Anode tsDCS (Spinal)
Brain:
1. Train pulse: 2 sec
2. Inter-train: 28 sec
3. Total time: 1200 sec
Spinal:
Continuous direct current (DC): 1200 sec
Second part iTBS rTMS(Brain) + 2.5-mA tsDCS (Spinal)
Brain:
1. Train pulse: 2 sec
2. Inter-train: 8 sec
3. Total time: 200 sec
Spinal:
Continuous direct current (DC): 600 sec Receives: Device: 20 Hz rTMS (Brain); Device: Anode tsDCS (Spinal) |
| rTMS (Brain) + tsES (Spinal) or sham stimulation | Experimental | First part 20 Hz rTMS (Brain) + 20 Hz current square-wave pulses (Spinal)
Brain and spinal:
1. Train pulse: 2 sec
2. Inter-train: 28 sec
3. Total time: 1200 sec
Second part iTBS rTMS(Brain) + sham 2.5-mA tsDCS (Spinal)
Brain:
1. Train pulse: 2 sec
2. Inter-train: 8 sec
3. Total time: 200 sec
Spinal:
Sham direct current (DC) stimulation Receives: Device: 20 Hz rTMS (Brain); Device: 20 Hz current square-wave pulses (Spinal) |
| iTBS rTMS or sham (Brain) + tsES or sham (Spinal) | Experimental | First part
Brain:
1. Train pulse: 2 sec
2. Inter-train: 8 sec
3. Total time: 200 sec
Spinal:
Continuous direct current (DC): 190 sec
Second part Sham iTBS rTMS (Brain) + 2.5-mA tsDCS (Spinal)
Sham iTBS rTMS Brain:
Spinal:
Continuous direct current (DC): 600 sec Receives: Device: iTBS rTMS (Brain); Device: Anode tsDCS (Spinal) |
| iTBS rTMS or sham (Brain) + iTBS or sham (Spinal) | Experimental | First part
Brain and spinal:
1. Train pulse: 2 sec
2. Inter-train: 8 sec
3. Total time: 200 sec
Second part Sham iTBS rTMS (Brain) + Sham 2.5-mA tsDCS (Spinal)
Brain:
Sham iTBS rTMS
Spinal:
Sham direct current (DC) stimulation Receives: Device: iTBS rTMS (Brain); Device: iTBS (Spinal) |
| sham (no stimulation on brain nor spinal) | Sham comparator | First part Sham stimulation.
No second part Receives: Device: sham |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change of Motor evoked potentials (MEP)
Motor evoked potential (MEP) is recorded from tibialis anterior muscles following direct transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) of motor cortex. All TMS is delivered with the participant seated upright on the chair. Both passive and active conditions, participants are instructed to relax their one hand in the seated position. TMS is delivered over the motor cortex (M1) using a concave double cone coil (Magstim Co., United Kingdom) attached to a BiStim magnetic stimulator (Magstim Co., United Kingdom). To locate the optimized site, stimuli are delivered over various points around the Cz (approximate 1 cm distance from Cz). The optimal site is the location around the Cz that evoked the greatest MEP amplitude in tibialis anterior muscles. The onset latency and onset to peak amplitude will be assessed.
Measured: Just before the intervention start and immediately after the intervention finished.
Change of resting motor threshold (RMT)
Resting motor threshold (RMT) is recorded from tibialis anterior muscles following transcranial magnetic stimulation. TMS is delivered over the motor cortex (M1) using a concave double cone coil (Magstim Co., United Kingdom) attached to a BiStim magnetic stimulator (Magstim Co., United Kingdom). To locate the optimal site, stimuli are delivered over various points around the Cz (the distance approximate 1 cm from Cz) to get the hot spot point. And then measure the RMT using the minimum stimulus intensity that produced a minimal motor evoked response (about 50 micro-volts (µV) in at least 5 of 10 trials) at rest.
Measured: Just before the intervention start and immediately after the intervention finished.
Secondary outcomes (4)
Change of Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS)
Modified Ashworth scale (MAS) measures resistance during passive soft-tissue stretching and is used as a simple measure of spasticity. Scoring is recorded as follows:
0: No increase in muscle tone
- Slight increase in muscle tone, manifested by a catch and release or by minimal resistance at the end of the range of motion when the affected part(s) is moved in flexion or extension 1+: Slight increase in muscle tone, manifested by a catch, followed by minimal resistance throughout the remainder (less than half) of the Range of motion (ROM)
- More marked increase in muscle tone through most of the ROM, but affected part(s) easily moved
- Considerable increase in muscle tone, passive movement difficult
- Affected part(s) rigid in flexion or extension
Measured: Just before the intervention start and immediately after the intervention finished.
Change of Lower Extremities Motor Score (LEMS)
The voluntary muscle strength of five key muscles (hip flexors, knee extensors, ankle dorsiflexors, long toe extensors and ankle plantarflexors) of both lower extremities was tested.
Each muscle was given a value between 0 and 5 according to the strength of voluntary muscle contraction.
Maximum and minimum LEMS were 50 and 0, respectively.
Measured: Just before the intervention start and immediately after the intervention finished.
Change of functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI)
Our study will use 3 Tesla (T) magnetic resonance imaging[GE DISCOVERY MR750w system (GE Healthcare, Milwaukee, Wisconsin)] for functional magnetic resonance imaging. Resting-state functional MRI image is an echo-planar Image (EPI) technique, using a parameter time of repetition of 2500 milliseconds, time of echo is 30 milliseconds, 43 axial slices, slice thickness is 3 mm, flip angle is 80 degrees, field of view is 192 × 192 mm, and vixen size is 3 × 3 × 3 mm. The EPI scan for 525 seconds. All subjects are asked to close their eyes and supine. Our study uses the fractional amplitude of low-frequency fluctuations analysis to confirm abnormal brain function.
Measured: Immediately after the intervention finished.
Change of Surface Electromyography (sEMG)
sEMG recordings using pairs of 1 cm-diameter silver/silver chloride recessed sEMG electrodes placed over the muscle bellies 3 cm apart were made from the right and left quadriceps (mainly rectus femoris) and hamstrings.
Electrodes were centered on the long axis over muscle bellies for recording during voluntary motor tasks performed by 30 min cycling exercise.
The 4 sEMG channels were recorded with a bandwidth of 30 to 500 Hz and a gain of 1,000. Movement sensor and event cue marker outputs were also recorded and, along with the sEMG, were continually digitized at a rate of 2,000 samples/s for the duration of the protocol.
Measured: Just before the intervention start and immediately after the intervention finished.
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted11 Dec 2019
- Study start9 Dec 2019
- Primary completion30 Sep 2023 (estimated)
- Study completion31 Dec 2023 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Spinal Cord InjuriesStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 12 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Taipei Medical University Hospital
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Lai chien hung, Taipei Medical University Hospital
- Investigators
- Chien-Hung Lai, MD PhD, Principal investigator, Taipei Medical University Hospital
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04194099
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- N201905031
- Status last verified
- Jan 2023
- First submitted
- 5 Dec 2019
- Last updated
- 31 Jan 2023
- Results posted
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 31 Jan 2023. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Development and Application of a Novel Neurorehabilitation Technology With Paired Associative Nerve Stimulation in Spinal Cord Injured Subjects
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04194099
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- N201905031
- Conditions
- Spinal Cord Injuries
- Keywords
- Spinal Cord Injuries, Trans-cranial magnetic stimulation, Trans-spinal direct current stimulation
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 12 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Taipei Medical University HospitalUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 9 Dec 2019 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 30 Sep 2023 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 31 Dec 2023 (estimated)
- First posted
- 11 Dec 2019 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study is to investigate the effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) combined with trans-spinal electrical stimulation (tsES) intervention on cortical excitability, brain structure, motor ability of lower limb in individuals with incomplete spinal cord injury. Twelve participants will be recruited in this study.
Detailed description
Spinal cord injury (SCI) impairs motor and sensory function and affects numerous body functions and daily activities. Insufficient central nervous system plasticity can result in maladaptive changes that prevent full recovery. It's a challenge to guide this plasticity to optimize the functional outcome for individuals with SCI.
Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and trans-spinal electric stimulation (tsES) may modulate cortical excitability, corticospinal output and spinal circuit. However, few studies investigated the effectiveness of paired nerve stimulation (PNS) on neuroplasticity and functional outcome in persons with SCI. Therefore, this study aim to examine the effects of the combination of these two different non-invasive nerve stimulation with the cycling exercise on the motor cortex and corticospinal circuit excitability as well as functional recovery.
Present study clarifies the effects of five different settings of combined with TMS and tsES intervention and then undergo cycling exercise after PNS on spinal cord and cortical excitability in SCI participants.
It is expected that this project will successfully establish a new neuromodulation technology to enhance cortical, corticospinal and spinal circuit excitability as well as to improve the outcome of lower-limb function and quality of life in persons with SCI. Therefore, this project can not only publish scientific papers, but also can enhance the neuroplasticity and improve function in persons with SCI.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 5
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| rTMS (Brain) + tsES (Spinal) | Experimental | Device: 20 Hz rTMS (Brain), Device: Anode tsDCS (Spinal)First part 20 Hz rTMS (Brain) + Anode tsDCS (Spinal) Brain: 1. Train pulse: 2 sec 2. Inter-train: 28 sec 3. Total time: 1200 sec Spinal: Continuous direct current (DC): 1200 sec Second part iTBS rTMS(Brain) + 2.5-mA tsDCS (Spinal) Brain: 1. Train pulse: 2 sec 2. Inter-train: 8 sec 3. Total time: 200 sec Spinal: Continuous direct current (DC): 600 sec |
| rTMS (Brain) + tsES (Spinal) or sham stimulation | Experimental | Device: 20 Hz rTMS (Brain), Device: 20 Hz current square-wave pulses (Spinal)First part 20 Hz rTMS (Brain) + 20 Hz current square-wave pulses (Spinal) Brain and spinal: 1. Train pulse: 2 sec 2. Inter-train: 28 sec 3. Total time: 1200 sec Second part iTBS rTMS(Brain) + sham 2.5-mA tsDCS (Spinal) Brain: 1. Train pulse: 2 sec 2. Inter-train: 8 sec 3. Total time: 200 sec Spinal: Sham direct current (DC) stimulation |
| iTBS rTMS or sham (Brain) + tsES or sham (Spinal) | Experimental | Device: iTBS rTMS (Brain), Device: Anode tsDCS (Spinal)First part Brain: 1. Train pulse: 2 sec 2. Inter-train: 8 sec 3. Total time: 200 sec Spinal: Continuous direct current (DC): 190 sec Second part Sham iTBS rTMS (Brain) + 2.5-mA tsDCS (Spinal) Sham iTBS rTMS Brain: Spinal: Continuous direct current (DC): 600 sec |
| iTBS rTMS or sham (Brain) + iTBS or sham (Spinal) | Experimental | Device: iTBS rTMS (Brain), Device: iTBS (Spinal)First part Brain and spinal: 1. Train pulse: 2 sec 2. Inter-train: 8 sec 3. Total time: 200 sec Second part Sham iTBS rTMS (Brain) + Sham 2.5-mA tsDCS (Spinal) Brain: Sham iTBS rTMS Spinal: Sham direct current (DC) stimulation |
| sham (no stimulation on brain nor spinal) | Sham comparator | Device: shamFirst part Sham stimulation. No second part |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 20 to 65 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Age 20 to 65 years incomplete SCI (American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale (ASIA) B to D)
- Lesion area above the tenth thoracic vertebra (T10)
- Injury time more than one year
- Without range of motion (ROM) limitation
- Medical condition stable
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Having pacemaker, cochlear implants, metal in the brain or skull, open wound of brain, or history of epilepsy.
- Having seizure history
- Having other neurological, mental, medical problems affect this study
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| 20 Hz rTMS (Brain)Higher frequency (>5 Hz) trains increase cortical excitability. | Device | rTMS (Brain) + tsES (Spinal), rTMS (Brain) + tsES (Spinal) or sham stimulation |
| iTBS rTMS (Brain)Intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS) is a newer rTMS approach. | Device | iTBS rTMS or sham (Brain) + iTBS or sham (Spinal), iTBS rTMS or sham (Brain) + tsES or sham (Spinal) |
| Anode tsDCS (Spinal)Anodal tsDCS increased the spinal reflex amplitude, as well as corticospinal excitability. | Device | iTBS rTMS or sham (Brain) + tsES or sham (Spinal), rTMS (Brain) + tsES (Spinal) |
| 20 Hz current square-wave pulses (Spinal)Higher frequency (>5 Hz) of current increase cortical excitability. | Device | rTMS (Brain) + tsES (Spinal) or sham stimulation |
| iTBS (Spinal)Intermittent theta-burst stimulation (iTBS) is a newer approach. it may increase corticospinal excitability. | Device | iTBS rTMS or sham (Brain) + iTBS or sham (Spinal) |
| shamwith sham stimulation on brain and spinal. | Device | sham (no stimulation on brain nor spinal) |
Primary outcome
Change of Motor evoked potentials (MEP)
Time frame: Just before the intervention start and immediately after the intervention finished.
Motor evoked potential (MEP) is recorded from tibialis anterior muscles following direct transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) of motor cortex. All TMS is delivered with the participant seated upright on the chair. Both passive and active conditions, participants are instructed to relax their one hand in the seated position. TMS is delivered over the motor cortex (M1) using a concave double cone coil (Magstim Co., United Kingdom) attached to a BiStim magnetic stimulator (Magstim Co., United Kingdom). To locate the optimized site, stimuli are delivered over various points around the Cz (approximate 1 cm distance from Cz). The optimal site is the location around the Cz that evoked the greatest MEP amplitude in tibialis anterior muscles. The onset latency and onset to peak amplitude will be assessed.
Change of resting motor threshold (RMT)
Time frame: Just before the intervention start and immediately after the intervention finished.
Resting motor threshold (RMT) is recorded from tibialis anterior muscles following transcranial magnetic stimulation. TMS is delivered over the motor cortex (M1) using a concave double cone coil (Magstim Co., United Kingdom) attached to a BiStim magnetic stimulator (Magstim Co., United Kingdom). To locate the optimal site, stimuli are delivered over various points around the Cz (the distance approximate 1 cm from Cz) to get the hot spot point. And then measure the RMT using the minimum stimulus intensity that produced a minimal motor evoked response (about 50 micro-volts (µV) in at least 5 of 10 trials) at rest.
4 secondary outcomes
Change of Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS)
Time frame: Just before the intervention start and immediately after the intervention finished.
Change of Lower Extremities Motor Score (LEMS)
Time frame: Just before the intervention start and immediately after the intervention finished.
Change of functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI)
Time frame: Immediately after the intervention finished.
Change of Surface Electromyography (sEMG)
Time frame: Just before the intervention start and immediately after the intervention finished.
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 31 Jan 2023.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Spinal Cord Injuries
Recruiting
MyHand-SCI: An Active Hand Orthosis for Spinal Cord Injury
Spinal Cord Injuries, Tetraplegia
Recruiting
Clinical Outcome Assessment for AT & BCI
Spinal Cord Injury, ALS (Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis)
Recruiting
Transcutaneous Spinal Cord Stimulation Combined With 4-Aminopyridine and Intensive Rehabilitation in SCI
Spinal Cord Injuries
Not yet recruiting
Evaluating the Effect of the Zeen Mobility Device on Clinical Practicality, Safety, and Impact (Via Assessments of Walking, Standing Tolerance, Balance, Endurance, Effort, and Participation in Daily Tasks) in an Outpatient Rehabilitation Setting for Individuals With Mobility Impairments.
Stroke, Parkinson's Disease (PD)
RecruitingPhase 3
A Trial Investigating the Efficacy and Safety of NVG-291 in Subjects With Chronic Spinal Cord Injury
Chronic Spinal Cord Injury
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Chien-Hung Lai, MD PhD principal investigator
Taipei Medical University Hospital
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing 20 Hz rTMS (Brain), iTBS rTMS (Brain) and Anode tsDCS (Spinal) in people with Spinal Cord Injuries, run by Taipei Medical University Hospital at 1 site in Taiwan.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 31 Jan 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Taiwan. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Chien-Hung Lai, MD PhD (886-2-27372181 ext. 3538, chlai@tmu.edu.tw), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change of Motor evoked potentials (MEP) (time frame: Just before the intervention start and immediately after the intervention finished.). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 31 Jan 2023.