Mitral Valve RegurgitationNCT04198870
MitraClip REPAIR MR Study
A study testing MitraClip™ device implantation and Mitral Valve Repair Surgery in people with Mitral Valve Regurgitation, run by Abbott Medical Devices at 74 sites in 4 countries.
Trial summary
The objective of this randomized controlled trial (RCT) is to compare the clinical outcome of MitraClip™ device versus surgical repair in patients with severe primary MR who are at moderate surgical risk and whose mitral valve has been determined to be suitable for correction by MV repair surgery by the cardiac… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Mitral Valve Regurgitation
- What is being tested?
- MitraClip™ device implantation and Mitral Valve Repair Surgery
- Type of treatment
- Medical device, Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 500 participants
- Where
- 74 sitesin 4 countries
- Study dates
- 21 Jul 2020to Dec 2035
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Subject has severe (Grade III or greater per the ASE criteria, which includes severity grades of 3+ and 4+) primary MR (mixed etiology is acceptable provided the principal mechanism of action is a degenerative mitral valve) as assessed by the ECL.
- The cardiac surgeon of the Site Heart Team (consisting of at least one interventionalist, and one cardiac surgeon) has confirmed that the subject is a candidate for mitral valve surgery and the EC have confirmed that the subject's mitral valve anatomy is suitable for percutaneous repair with the MitraClip™ device with high certainty of achieving MR ≤ mild
- Subject is symptomatic (NYHA Class II/III/IV) or asymptomatic with LVEF ≤ 60%, pulmonary artery systolic pressure > 50 mmHg, or LVESD > 40 mm
- Subject is at moderate surgical risk defined as being at least 75 years of age at the time of EC review. If younger than 75 years, then the subject should have:
- Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) Predicted Risk of Mortality (PROM) Repair Score ≥ 2%, OR
- Presence of other comorbidities which may introduce a potential surgery-specific impediment
- Subject provides written informed consent
- Subject is ≥ 18 years of age
Who cannot join
- Subject is currently participating in another clinical investigation
- Presence of other anatomic or comorbid conditions, or other medical, social, or psychological conditions that, in the investigator's opinion, could limit the subject's ability to participate in the clinical investigation or to comply with follow-up requirements, or impact the scientific soundness of the clinical investigation results.
- Subject has ischemic or non-ischemic secondary MR
- Concomitant severe tricuspid valve regurgitation
- Ejection fraction <30%
- Severe mitral annular calcification
Show all 19Show fewer
- Acute myocardial infarction in the past 12 weeks
- Need for cardiac surgery to correct pulmonary valve disease, aortic valve disease, or tricuspid valve disease
- Subjects who have concurrent coronary artery disease that needs to be treated may be included provided the subjects are eligible for both percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and coronary artery bypass surgery. Subjects randomized to the device group, must undergo PCI before the MitraClip™ device procedure. Subjects randomized to the surgical (control) arm may undergo coronary artery revascularization during mitral valve repair surgery
- Surgical procedure performed in the past 30 days
- Femoral vein cannot accommodate a 24 F catheter or presence of IVC filter would interfere with the catheter or ipsilateral DVT
- Transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) is contraindicated.
- Hemodynamic instability: systolic pressure ≤ 90 mmHg without afterload reduction, cardiogenic shock, or the need for inotropic support or IABP
- Need for emergency surgery for any reason
- Prior mitral valve surgery, valvuloplasty, mechanical prosthetic valve or VAD
- Systolic anterior motion of the mitral valve
- Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy
- Renal insufficiency requiring dialysis
- Active infections requiring current antibiotic therapy
Trial locations and contacts
74 sites in 4 countries.
74 sites in 4 countries
United States63 sites
Albany Medical Center
Albany, New York, 12208
University of Michigan Medical Center
Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48104
Mission Health & Hospitals
Asheville, North Carolina, 28801
Piedmont Heart Institute
Atlanta, Georgia, 30309
Ascension Texas Cardiovascular Research
Austin, Texas, 78705
South Shore University Hospital
Bay Shore, New York, 11706
University Hospital - Univ. of Alabama at Birmingham (UAB)
Birmingham, Alabama, 35249
Massachusetts General Hospital
Boston, Massachusetts, 02114
Brigham and Women's Hospital
Boston, Massachusetts, 02115
Cooper University Hospital
Camden, New Jersey, 08103
Carolinas Medical Center
Charlotte, North Carolina, 28203
University of Virginia Medical Center
Charlottesville, Virginia, 22908
Northwestern Memorial Hospital
Chicago, Illinois, 60611
Christ Hospital
Cincinnati, Ohio, 45219
University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center
Cleveland, Ohio, 44106
Mt. Carmel East
Columbus, Ohio, 43213
Saint Joseph Hospital
Denver, Colorado, 80218
Henry Ford Health
Detroit, Michigan, 48202
Duke University Medical Center
Durham, North Carolina, 27705
Pinnacle Health Cardiovascular Institute, Inc.
Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, 17105
HCA Houston Healthcare Medical Center
Houston, Texas, 77004
UTHealth Memorial Hermann
Houston, Texas, 77008
Houston Methodist
Houston, Texas, 77030
Ascension St. Vincent
Indianapolis, Indiana, 46240
Baptist Medical Center
Jacksonville, Florida, 32207
Kansas University Medical Center
Kansas City, Kansas, 66160
Scripps Health
La Jolla, California, 92037
Abbott Northwestern Hospital
Minneapolis, Minnesota, 55407
Cardiology Associates of Mobile, Inc.
Mobile, Alabama, 36608
West Virginia University Hospital
Morgantown, West Virginia, 26506
Morristown Medical Center
Morristown, New Jersey, 07962
Intermountain Medical Center
Murray, Utah, 84157
NCH Healthcare System
Naples, Florida, 34102
TriStar Centennial Medical Center
Nashville, Tennessee, 37203
Ascension Saint Thomas
Nashville, Tennessee, 37205
Vanderbilt Heart & Vascular Institute
Nashville, Tennessee, 37232
Jersey Shore University Medical Center
Neptune City, New Jersey, 07753
Yale New Haven Hospital
New Haven, Connecticut, 06510
NYU Langone Health
New York, New York, 10016
New York-Presbyterian/Columbia University Medical Center
New York, New York, 10032
Sentara Norfolk General Hospital
Norfolk, Virginia, 23507
Integris Baptist Medical Center
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, 73112
Banner-University Medical Center Phoenix
Phoenix, Arizona, 85006
St. Josephs Hospital and Medical Center
Phoenix, Arizona, 85013
Arizona Cardiovascular Research Center
Phoenix, Arizona, 85016
Allegheny General Hospital - ASRI
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15212
UPMC
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15213
Rochester Regional Health
Rochester, New York, 14617
St. Francis Hospital
Roslyn, New York, 11576
Beaumont Hospital, Royal Oak
Royal Oak, Michigan, 48073
Sutter Medical Center, Sacramento
Sacramento, California, 95816
University of California - Davis Medical Center
Sacramento, California, 95817
Mercy General Hospital
Sacramento, California, 95819
University of California at San Francisco
San Francisco, California, 94143
Swedish Medical Center
Seattle, Washington, 98107
The Heart Institute at Virginia Mason
Seattle, Washington, 98111
Prairie Education & Research Cooperative
Springfield, Illinois, 62701
Stanford University Medical Center
Stanford, California, 94305
Los Robles Regional Medical Center
Thousand Oaks, California, 91360
Tucson Medical Center
Tucson, Arizona, 85712
Via Christi Regional Medical Center - St. Francis Campus
Wichita, Kansas, 67214
Cardiovascular Research Institute of Kansas
Wichita, Kansas, 67226
Lankenau Institute for Medical Research
Wynnewood, Pennsylvania, 19096
Germany6 sites
Herz-und Diabetes Zentrum NRW
Bad Oeynhausen, North Rhine-Westphalia, 32545
Klinikum der Johann Wolfgang Goethe-Universität Frankfurt
Frankfurt am Main, Hesse, 60590
Universitätsmedizin der Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz
Mainz, Rhinela, 55131
Deutsches Herzzentrum München des Freistaates Bayern
München, 80636
Universitätsklinikum Rostock (AöR)
Rostock, 18057
Universitätsklinikum Ulm
Ulm, Bad-wur, 89081
Canada4 sites
Institut de Cardiologie de Montreal (Montreal Heart Inst.)
Montreal, Quebec, H1T 1C8
St. Michael's Hospital
Toronto, Ontario, M5B 1W8
Toronto General Hospital
Toronto, Ontario, M5G 2C4
Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre
Toronto, Ontario, M5N 3M5
About this study
Official title: Percutaneous MitraClip Device or Surgical Mitral Valve REpair in PAtients With PrImaRy MItral Regurgitation Who Are Candidates for Surgery (REPAIR MR)
The objective of this randomized controlled trial (RCT) is to compare the clinical outcome of MitraClip™ device versus surgical repair in patients with severe primary MR who are at moderate surgical risk and whose mitral valve has been determined to be suitable for correction by MV repair surgery by the cardiac surgeon on the local site heart team.
- Conditions
- Mitral Valve Regurgitation
- Being tested
- MitraClip™ device implantation, Mitral Valve Repair Surgery
- Keywords
- MitraClip
- Medical subject headings
- Mitral Valve Insufficiency
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
MitraClip™ device implantationDevice
Transcatheter repair of the mitral valve using MitraClip™ device
Mitral Valve Repair SurgeryProcedure or surgery
Surgical repair of the mitral valve
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Control Arm | Other | Mitral Valve Repair Surgery Receives: Procedure: Mitral Valve Repair Surgery |
| Device Arm | Experimental | MitraClip™ device implantation Receives: Device: MitraClip™ device implantation |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
All-cause mortality, stroke, cardiac hospitalization, or acute kidney injury requiring renal replacement therapy at 2 years (any cardiac hospitalizations in the first 30 days post treatment will be excluded)
The proportion of subjects who are alive, without stroke, CV hospitalization or acute kidney injury requiring renal replacement therapy at 2 years in the Device and Control groups, respectively
Measured: 2 Years
Proportion of subjects with moderate or less MR (≤2+), without mitral valve replacement, and without recurrent mitral valve intervention (surgical or percutaneous)
Proportion of subjects with moderate or less MR (≤2+), without mitral valve replacement, and without recurrent mitral valve intervention (surgical or percutaneous) from the time of index procedure through 2 years in the Device and Control groups, respectively
Measured: 2 Years
Secondary outcomes (5)
Proportion of subjects with MR ≤ mild at 30 days post index procedure among survivors
The proportion of subjects with MR ≤ mild at 30 days post index procedure among survivors will be compared between the Device and Control groups
Measured: 30 Days
Number of days at hospital from index procedure to home discharge
Hospital length of stay from index procedure to home discharge (days) in Device group compared to the Control group
Measured: At Discharge (≤ 14 days following index procedure)
Proportion of subjects discharged to home post index hospitalization
The proportion of subjects who are discharged to home post index hospitalization will be compared between the Device and Control groups
Measured: At Discharge (≤ 14 days following index procedure)
Quality of life improvement assessed using the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) of at least 10 points at 2 years compared to baseline among survivors.
The proportion of subjects who have at least a 10 point improvement in KCCQ at 2 years post index procedure from baseline among survivors will be compared between the Device and Control groups for non-inferiority.
The Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire is a 23-item, self-administered questionnaire used for quantifying patient's health status including the symptoms (frequency and burden), physical and social limitations, and quality of life impact due to the heart failure syndrome. Validity, reproducibility, responsiveness and interpretability of the scores have been independently established for each of these health status domains, and overall summary scores are reported in a range of 0-100, in which higher scores reflect better health status.
Measured: 2 Years
Severe symptomatic mitral stenosis at 1 year
The proportion of subjects who have severe symptomatic mitral stenosis at 1 year post index procedure will be compared between the Device and Control groups
Measured: 1 Year
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted13 Dec 2019
- Study start21 Jul 2020
- Primary completionDec 2027 (estimated)
- Study completionDec 2035 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (2)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Mitral Valve RegurgitationStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Abbott Medical DevicesThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 500 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Abbott Medical Devices
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Patrick McCarthy, MD, Principal investigator, Northwestern Memorial HospitalSaibal Kar, MD, Principal investigator, Los Robles Regional Medical Center
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04198870
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- ABT-CIP-10304
- Status last verified
- Nov 2025
- First submitted
- 11 Dec 2019
- Last updated
- 15 May 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- Yes
Publications
McCarthy PM, Whisenant B, Asgar AW, Ailawadi G, Hermiller J, Williams M, Morse A, Rinaldi M, Grayburn P, Thomas JD, Martin R, Asch FM, Shu Y, Sundareswaran K, Moat N, Kar S. Percutaneous MitraClip Device or Surgical Mitral Valve Repair in Patients With Primary Mitral Regurgitation Who Are Candidates for Surgery: Design and Rationale of the REPAIR MR Trial. J Am Heart Assoc. 2023 Feb 21;12(4):e027504. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.122.027504. Epub 2023 Feb 8.
PubMed 36752231Kaneko T, Hirji S, Zaid S, Lange R, Kempfert J, Conradi L, Hagl C, Borger MA, Taramasso M, Nguyen TC, Ailawadi G, Shah AS, Smith RL, Anselmi A, Romano MA, Ben Ali W, Ramlawi B, Grubb KJ, Robinson NB, Pirelli L, Chu MWA, Andreas M, Obadia JF, Gennari M, Garatti A, Tchetche D, Nazif TM, Bapat VN, Modine T, Denti P, Tang GHL; CUTTING-EDGE Investigators. Mitral Valve Surgery After Transcatheter Edge-to-Edge Repair: Mid-Term Outcomes From the CUTTING-EDGE International Registry. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2021 Sep 27;14(18):2010-2021. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2021.07.029.
PubMed 34556275
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 15 May 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Percutaneous MitraClip Device or Surgical Mitral Valve REpair in PAtients With PrImaRy MItral Regurgitation Who Are Candidates for Surgery (REPAIR MR)
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04198870
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- ABT-CIP-10304
- Conditions
- Mitral Valve Regurgitation
- Keywords
- MitraClip
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Active, not recruiting
- Enrolment
- 500 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Abbott Medical DevicesIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- 21 Jul 2020 (actual)
- Primary completion
- Dec 2027 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Dec 2035 (estimated)
- First posted
- 13 Dec 2019 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The objective of this randomized controlled trial (RCT) is to compare the clinical outcome of MitraClip™ device versus surgical repair in patients with severe primary MR who are at moderate surgical risk and whose mitral valve has been determined to be suitable for correction by MV repair surgery by the cardiac surgeon on the local site heart team.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Control Arm | Other | Procedure: Mitral Valve Repair SurgeryMitral Valve Repair Surgery |
| Device Arm | Experimental | Device: MitraClip™ device implantationMitraClip™ device implantation |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (8 listed)
- Subject has severe (Grade III or greater per the ASE criteria, which includes severity grades of 3+ and 4+) primary MR (mixed etiology is acceptable provided the principal mechanism of action is a degenerative mitral valve) as assessed by the ECL.
- The cardiac surgeon of the Site Heart Team (consisting of at least one interventionalist, and one cardiac surgeon) has confirmed that the subject is a candidate for mitral valve surgery and the EC have confirmed that the subject's mitral valve anatomy is suitable for percutaneous repair with the MitraClip™ device with high certainty of achieving MR ≤ mild
- Subject is symptomatic (NYHA Class II/III/IV) or asymptomatic with LVEF ≤ 60%, pulmonary artery systolic pressure > 50 mmHg, or LVESD > 40 mm
- Subject is at moderate surgical risk defined as being at least 75 years of age at the time of EC review. If younger than 75 years, then the subject should have:
- Subject provides written informed consent
Key exclusion criteria (19 listed)
- Subject is currently participating in another clinical investigation
- Presence of other anatomic or comorbid conditions, or other medical, social, or psychological conditions that, in the investigator's opinion, could limit the subject's ability to participate in the clinical investigation or to comply with follow-up requirements, or impact the scientific soundness of the clinical investigation results.
- Subject has ischemic or non-ischemic secondary MR
- Concomitant severe tricuspid valve regurgitation
- Ejection fraction <30%
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| MitraClip™ device implantationTranscatheter repair of the mitral valve using MitraClip™ device | Device | Device Arm |
| Mitral Valve Repair SurgerySurgical repair of the mitral valve | Procedure or surgery | Control Arm |
Primary outcome
All-cause mortality, stroke, cardiac hospitalization, or acute kidney injury requiring renal replacement therapy at 2 years (any cardiac hospitalizations in the first 30 days post treatment will be excluded)
Time frame: 2 Years
The proportion of subjects who are alive, without stroke, CV hospitalization or acute kidney injury requiring renal replacement therapy at 2 years in the Device and Control groups, respectively
Proportion of subjects with moderate or less MR (≤2+), without mitral valve replacement, and without recurrent mitral valve intervention (surgical or percutaneous)
Time frame: 2 Years
Proportion of subjects with moderate or less MR (≤2+), without mitral valve replacement, and without recurrent mitral valve intervention (surgical or percutaneous) from the time of index procedure through 2 years in the Device and Control groups, respectively
5 secondary outcomes
Proportion of subjects with MR ≤ mild at 30 days post index procedure among survivors
Time frame: 30 Days
Number of days at hospital from index procedure to home discharge
Time frame: At Discharge (≤ 14 days following index procedure)
Proportion of subjects discharged to home post index hospitalization
Time frame: At Discharge (≤ 14 days following index procedure)
Quality of life improvement assessed using the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) of at least 10 points at 2 years compared to baseline among survivors.
Time frame: 2 Years
Severe symptomatic mitral stenosis at 1 year
Time frame: 1 Year
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 15 May 2026.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 36752231McCarthy PM, Whisenant B, Asgar AW, Ailawadi G, Hermiller J, Williams M, Morse A, Rinaldi M, Grayburn P, Thomas JD, Martin R, Asch FM, Shu Y, Sundareswaran K, Moat N, Kar S. Percutaneous MitraClip Device or Surgical Mitral Valve Repair in Patients With Primary Mitral Regurgitation Who Are Candidates for Surgery: Design and Rationale of the REPAIR MR Trial. J Am Heart Assoc. 2023 Feb 21;12(4):e027504. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.122.027504. Epub 2023 Feb 8.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 34556275Kaneko T, Hirji S, Zaid S, Lange R, Kempfert J, Conradi L, Hagl C, Borger MA, Taramasso M, Nguyen TC, Ailawadi G, Shah AS, Smith RL, Anselmi A, Romano MA, Ben Ali W, Ramlawi B, Grubb KJ, Robinson NB, Pirelli L, Chu MWA, Andreas M, Obadia JF, Gennari M, Garatti A, Tchetche D, Nazif TM, Bapat VN, Modine T, Denti P, Tang GHL; CUTTING-EDGE Investigators. Mitral Valve Surgery After Transcatheter Edge-to-Edge Repair: Mid-Term Outcomes From the CUTTING-EDGE International Registry. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2021 Sep 27;14(18):2010-2021. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2021.07.029.
Related trials for Mitral Valve Regurgitation
Recruiting
PRECISE-AFMR I: Transcatheter Mitral Valve Edge-to-Edge Repair for Atrial Functional Mitral Regurgitation in Patients at High Surgical Risk
Atrial Functional, Mitral Regurgitation (MR)
Active, not recruiting
A Feasibility Study of the Millipede Transcatheter Annuloplasty Ring System in Patients With Functional Mitral Regurgitation
Mitral Regurgitation Functional, Mitral Valve Disease
Not yet recruiting
The PALMETTO Study
Mitral Regurgitation
RecruitingObservational study
Continuous Dual Aspiration Technique With Zoom System for Stroke
Ischemic Stroke, Acute Stroke
Recruiting
Edge-to-edge Mitral Valve Repair in ATTR-CM
Mitral Regurgitation, ATTR-Cardiomyopathy
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Patrick McCarthy, MD principal investigator
Northwestern Memorial Hospital
Saibal Kar, MD principal investigator
Los Robles Regional Medical Center
74 sites in 4 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing MitraClip™ device implantation and Mitral Valve Repair Surgery in people with Mitral Valve Regurgitation, run by Abbott Medical Devices at 74 sites in 4 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 8 inclusion and 19 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: under way, not looking for participants, as of the sponsor's last update on 15 May 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 74 sites in United States, Germany, Canada, Switzerland. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
All-cause mortality, stroke, cardiac hospitalization, or acute kidney injury requiring renal replacement therapy at 2 years (any cardiac hospitalizations in the first 30 days post treatment will be excluded) (time frame: 2 Years). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04198870, which also lists 2 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 15 May 2026.