PsoriasisNCAS-1NCT04200690
Effectiveness of Interdisciplinary Care Compared to Usual Care in Patients With Immune-Mediated Inflammatory Diseases
A study testing Interdisciplinary management and Usual-care management in people with Psoriasis and Psoriatic Arthritis, run by University of Aarhus at 1 site in Denmark.
Trial summary
The overall aim of this study is to determine the effectiveness of an interdisciplinary combined clinic intervention compared to usual care in a population of patients with two or more Immune-mediated inflammatory diseases (IMIDs). Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Psoriasis, Psoriatic Arthritis, Axial Spondyloarthritis
- What is being tested?
- Interdisciplinary management and Usual-care management
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 300 participants
- Where
- 1 siteDenmark
- Study dates
- 14 Jan 2020to 31 Jan 2024
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Written informed consent obtained from the subject prior to randomization.
- Age 18 and above.
- Diagnosis of at least two IMIDs* or diagnosis of one IMID and clinical suspicion** of another IMID*
- including and limited to: Psoriasis, HS, UC, CD, axSpA, PsA ** substantiated by e.g. clinical findings, imaging, biochemical results or histological examination at the discretion of the investigator.
Who cannot join
- Non-Danish speaking
- Expected to be unable to comply with the study protocol
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Denmark1 site
National Center for Autoimmune Diseases, Aarhus University Hospital
Aarhus, 8200
About this study
Official title: Effectiveness of Interdisciplinary Combined Dermatology-Gastroenterology-Rheumatology Clinical Care Compared to Usual Care in Patients With Immune-Mediated Inflammatory Diseases: A Parallel Group, Non-blinded, Pragmatic Randomized Trial
The overall aim of this study is to determine the effectiveness of an interdisciplinary combined clinic intervention compared to usual care in a population of patients with two or more Immune-mediated inflammatory diseases (IMIDs).
Read the detailed description
Immune-mediated inflammatory diseases (IMIDs) such as psoriasis, hidradenitis suppurative, spondyloarthritis, and inflammatory bowel disease, are associated with increased risk of somatic and psychiatric comorbidities as well as reduced socioeconomic status and a risk of further autoimmune diseases. The unmet needs in the care of patients with IMIDs are caused by a lack of patient-centricity in the usual specialized siloed approach to these diseases. The overall aim of this study is to determine the effectiveness of an interdisciplinary combined clinic intervention compared to usual care in a population of patients with the IMIDs: psoriasis, hidradenitis suppurativa, spondyloarthritis, ulcerative colitis, and Crohn's disease. This trial is designed to determine if the interdisciplinary intervention works in a real-world setting and thus has several pragmatic elements. The hypotheses will be tested in a randomized, usual care controlled, parallel-group clinical trial. Consecutively enrolled subjects are randomly assigned in a 2:1 ratio to either treatment in the interdisciplinary combined clinic or usual care in a hospital clinical setting. 300 subjects (anticipated) will be randomized to either multidisciplinary combined clinic intervention (200 subjects, anticipated) or usual care (100 subjects, anticipated). The study will consist of a 24-Week active intervention period and an additional 24-Weeks follow-up period.
- Conditions
- Psoriasis, Psoriatic Arthritis, Axial Spondyloarthritis, Hidradenitis Suppurativa, Crohn Disease, Ulcerative Colitis
- Being tested
- Interdisciplinary management, Usual-care management
- Medical subject headings
- Psoriasis, Arthritis, Psoriatic, Axial Spondyloarthritis, Hidradenitis Suppurativa, Crohn Disease, Colitis, Ulcerative
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Interdisciplinary managementOther
The intervention in this trial consists of the combined efforts of the interdisciplinary team in the combined clinic arm.
The interdisciplinary team consists of dermatologists, gastroenterologists, rheumatologists, nurses, psychologists, dieticians, social workers, physiotherapists, and secretaries. Treatment will be individualized based on clinical, biomarker, phenotypic, and psychosocial characteristics. The medical treatment will follow local, national and international guidelines.
Usual-care managementOther
Usual care will be carried out by HCPs that are not otherwise involved in the trial. In usual care the patients will not be offered an interdisciplinary patient-centered care as described, but only attend their usual disease-specific departments at the usual appointments.Treatment will be prescribed as felt appropriate according to local, national and international guidelines by the treating physicians with no set protocol and no restrictions.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Interdisciplinary management | Experimental | Interdisciplinary combined clinical care Receives: Other: Interdisciplinary management |
| Usual-care management | Active comparator | Usual-care Receives: Other: Usual-care management |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change From Baseline on the Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Physical Component Summary (PCS)
SF-36 is a patient-reported outcome (PRO) measure evaluating a participant's health status. It comprises 36 items covering 8 domains: physical functioning, role physical, role emotional, bodily pain, vitality, social functioning, mental health, and general health. Items are answered on Likert scales of varying lengths. Items from 8 domains contribute to the PCS. The summary scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better levels of function and/or better health.
Measured: 24 Weeks
Change From Baseline on the Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Mental Component Summary (MCS)
SF-36 is a patient-reported outcome measure evaluating a participant's health status. It comprises 36 items covering 8 domains: physical functioning, role physical, role emotional, bodily pain, vitality, social functioning, mental health, and general health. Items are answered on Likert scales of varying lengths. Items from 8 domains contribute to the MCS. The summary scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better levels of function and/or better health.
Measured: 24 Weeks
Secondary outcomes (6)
Proportion of subjects achieving Minimal Clinical Important Difference (MCID) on the Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Physical Component Summary (PCS)
SF-36 is a patient-reported outcome (PRO) measure evaluating a participant's health status. It comprises 36 items covering 8 domains: physical functioning, role physical, role emotional, bodily pain, vitality, social functioning, mental health, and general health. Items are answered on Likert scales of varying lengths. Items from 8 domains contribute to the PCS. The summary scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better levels of function and/or better health.
Measured: 24 Weeks
Change From Baseline in the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue (FACIT-Fatigue) Score
The FACIT-Fatigue scale is a 13-item self-administered questionnaire that assesses both the physical and functional consequences of fatigue. Each question is answered on a 5-point scale, where 0 means "not at all," and 4 means "very much." The FACIT-Fatigue scale score ranges from 0 to 52, with higher scores denoting lower levels of fatigue. A positive change from Baseline score indicates an improvement.
Measured: Week 24
Change from baseline in the Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire (WPAI:GH) Percentage of Overall Work Impairment
The WPAI assess the impact of disease on work productivity and daily activities during the past seven days, using 6 questions regarding: 1 (if currently employed); 2 (hours missed due to disease); 3 (hours missed other reasons); 4 (hours actually worked); 5 (degree disease affected productivity while working); 6 (degree disease affected regular activities). WPAI generates four main outcomes: 1 percentage of work time missed (absenteeism); percentage of impairment while working (presentisms); percentage of overall work impairment (absenteeism and presentisms combined); and percentage of activity impairment. Scores for WPAI range from 0% to 100%, where 0 % indicates no impairment and 100% is total loss of work productivity/activity.
Measured: Week 24
Change in mean General Self-Efficacy scale scores
The General Self-Efficacy Scale is a 10-item psychometric scale that is designed to assess optimistic self-beliefs to cope with a variety of difficult demands in life.
Measured: Week 24
Change in the mean Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale - Anxiety (HADS-A)
14-item measure designed to assess anxiety and depression symptoms in medical patients, with emphasis on reducing the impact of physical illness on the total score. The depression items tend to focus on the anhedonic symptoms of depression. Items are rated on a 4-point severity scale. The HADS produces two scales, one for anxiety (HADS-A) and one for depression (HADS-D), differentiating the two states.
Measured: Week 24
Change in the mean Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale - Anxiety (HADS-D)
14-item measure designed to assess anxiety and depression symptoms in medical patients, with emphasis on reducing the impact of physical illness on the total score. The depression items tend to focus on the anhedonic symptoms of depression. Items are rated on a 4-point severity scale. The HADS produces two scales, one for anxiety (HADS-A) and one for depression (HADS-D), differentiating the two states.
Measured: Week 24
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted16 Dec 2019
- Study start14 Jan 2020
- Primary completion31 Jan 2023
- Study completion31 Jan 2024 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for PsoriasisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University of AarhusThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Health services research
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 300 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Aarhus
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Aarhus University Hospital
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Kasper F Hjuler, MD PhD, Principal investigator, Aarhus University HospitalLars Iversen, MD PhD DMSc, Study chair, University of Aarhus
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04200690
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- NCAS-1
- Acronym
- NCAS-1
- Status last verified
- May 2023
- First submitted
- 10 Dec 2019
- Last updated
- 2 Jun 2023
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Publications
Hjuler KF, Dige A, Agnholt J, Laurberg TB, Loft AG, Moller LF, Christensen R, Iversen L. Effectiveness of interdisciplinary combined dermatology-gastroenterology-rheumatology clinical care compared to usual care in patients with immune-mediated inflammatory diseases: a parallel group, non-blinded, pragmatic randomised trial. BMJ Open. 2021 Apr 28;11(4):e041871. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-041871.
PubMed 33910945
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 2 Jun 2023. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Effectiveness of Interdisciplinary Combined Dermatology-Gastroenterology-Rheumatology Clinical Care Compared to Usual Care in Patients With Immune-Mediated Inflammatory Diseases: A Parallel Group, Non-blinded, Pragmatic Randomized Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04200690
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- NCAS-1 / NCAS-1
- Conditions
- Psoriasis, Psoriatic Arthritis, Axial Spondyloarthritis, Hidradenitis Suppurativa, Crohn Disease, Ulcerative Colitis
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 300 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- University of AarhusUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Aarhus University Hospital
- Study start
- 14 Jan 2020 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 31 Jan 2023 (actual)
- Study completion
- 31 Jan 2024 (estimated)
- First posted
- 16 Dec 2019 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The overall aim of this study is to determine the effectiveness of an interdisciplinary combined clinic intervention compared to usual care in a population of patients with two or more Immune-mediated inflammatory diseases (IMIDs).
Detailed description
Immune-mediated inflammatory diseases (IMIDs) such as psoriasis, hidradenitis suppurative, spondyloarthritis, and inflammatory bowel disease, are associated with increased risk of somatic and psychiatric comorbidities as well as reduced socioeconomic status and a risk of further autoimmune diseases. The unmet needs in the care of patients with IMIDs are caused by a lack of patient-centricity in the usual specialized siloed approach to these diseases. The overall aim of this study is to determine the effectiveness of an interdisciplinary combined clinic intervention compared to usual care in a population of patients with the IMIDs: psoriasis, hidradenitis suppurativa, spondyloarthritis, ulcerative colitis, and Crohn's disease. This trial is designed to determine if the interdisciplinary intervention works in a real-world setting and thus has several pragmatic elements. The hypotheses will be tested in a randomized, usual care controlled, parallel-group clinical trial. Consecutively enrolled subjects are randomly assigned in a 2:1 ratio to either treatment in the interdisciplinary combined clinic or usual care in a hospital clinical setting. 300 subjects (anticipated) will be randomized to either multidisciplinary combined clinic intervention (200 subjects, anticipated) or usual care (100 subjects, anticipated). The study will consist of a 24-Week active intervention period and an additional 24-Weeks follow-up period.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Health services research
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Interdisciplinary management | Experimental | Other: Interdisciplinary managementInterdisciplinary combined clinical care |
| Usual-care management | Active comparator | Other: Usual-care managementUsual-care |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Written informed consent obtained from the subject prior to randomization.
- Age 18 and above.
- Diagnosis of at least two IMIDs* or diagnosis of one IMID and clinical suspicion** of another IMID*
Key exclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Non-Danish speaking
- Expected to be unable to comply with the study protocol
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Interdisciplinary managementThe intervention in this trial consists of the combined efforts of the interdisciplinary team in the combined clinic arm. The interdisciplinary team consists of dermatologists, gastroenterologists, rheumatologists, nurses, psychologists, dieticians, social workers, physiotherapists, and secretaries. Treatment will be individualized based on clinical, biomarker, phenotypic, and psychosocial characteristics. The medical treatment will follow local, national and international guidelines. | Other | Interdisciplinary management |
| Usual-care managementUsual care will be carried out by HCPs that are not otherwise involved in the trial. In usual care the patients will not be offered an interdisciplinary patient-centered care as described, but only attend their usual disease-specific departments at the usual appointments.Treatment will be prescribed as felt appropriate according to local, national and international guidelines by the treating physicians with no set protocol and no restrictions. | Other | Usual-care management |
Primary outcome
Change From Baseline on the Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Physical Component Summary (PCS)
Time frame: 24 Weeks
SF-36 is a patient-reported outcome (PRO) measure evaluating a participant's health status. It comprises 36 items covering 8 domains: physical functioning, role physical, role emotional, bodily pain, vitality, social functioning, mental health, and general health. Items are answered on Likert scales of varying lengths. Items from 8 domains contribute to the PCS. The summary scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better levels of function and/or better health.
Change From Baseline on the Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Mental Component Summary (MCS)
Time frame: 24 Weeks
SF-36 is a patient-reported outcome measure evaluating a participant's health status. It comprises 36 items covering 8 domains: physical functioning, role physical, role emotional, bodily pain, vitality, social functioning, mental health, and general health. Items are answered on Likert scales of varying lengths. Items from 8 domains contribute to the MCS. The summary scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better levels of function and/or better health.
6 secondary outcomes
Proportion of subjects achieving Minimal Clinical Important Difference (MCID) on the Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Physical Component Summary (PCS)
Time frame: 24 Weeks
Change From Baseline in the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue (FACIT-Fatigue) Score
Time frame: Week 24
Change from baseline in the Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire (WPAI:GH) Percentage of Overall Work Impairment
Time frame: Week 24
Change in mean General Self-Efficacy scale scores
Time frame: Week 24
Change in the mean Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale - Anxiety (HADS-A)
Time frame: Week 24
Change in the mean Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale - Anxiety (HADS-D)
Time frame: Week 24
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 2 Jun 2023.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 33910945Hjuler KF, Dige A, Agnholt J, Laurberg TB, Loft AG, Moller LF, Christensen R, Iversen L. Effectiveness of interdisciplinary combined dermatology-gastroenterology-rheumatology clinical care compared to usual care in patients with immune-mediated inflammatory diseases: a parallel group, non-blinded, pragmatic randomised trial. BMJ Open. 2021 Apr 28;11(4):e041871. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-041871.
Related trials for Psoriasis
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
Extension Study of Safety and Tolerability of DDY391 in Participants With Moderate to Severe Psoriatic Arthritis (CDDY391A12201-extension)
Moderate to Severe Psoriatic Arthritis
Recruiting
Efficacy of a Self-Management Smartphone App to Improve Safety Skills in Patients With Inflammatory Arthritis
Rhumatoid Arthisis, Spondyloarthritis (SA)
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
Dose Ranging Study of ORKA-001 in Patients With Moderate-to-Severe Plaque Psoriasis
Plaque Psoriasis
RecruitingPhase 1
A Study of HB0017 Injection in Healthy Volunteers to Evaluate Safety and Tolerability of a Single Subcutaneous Injection in Low-Body-Weight Subjects; and Pharmacokinetics at Different Subcutaneous Injection Sites at the Same Dose
Psoriasis, Ankylosing Spondylitis
RecruitingPhase 1
A Study to Learn if Bimekizumab Given in Different Ways is Safe and Moves Similarly Throughout the Body Over Time in Adults
Psoriatic Arthritis, Axial Spondyloarthritis
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Kasper F Hjuler, MD PhD principal investigator
Aarhus University Hospital
Lars Iversen, MD PhD DMSc study chair
University of Aarhus
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Interdisciplinary management and Usual-care management in people with Psoriasis and Psoriatic Arthritis, run by University of Aarhus at 1 site in Denmark.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 2 Jun 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Denmark. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change From Baseline on the Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Physical Component Summary (PCS) (time frame: 24 Weeks). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04200690, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 2 Jun 2023.