AzTrials
AzTrials

Pulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveERTETNCT04201522

The Effect of Respiratory Training on Exercise Tolerance in COPD

A study testing Normocapnic hyperpnoea intervention in people with Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive, run by Laval University at 1 site in Canada.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Exercise intolerance is one of the key disabling factors in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Although multifactorial, exercise intolerance involves physiological interactions between respiratory and locomotor muscles that may contribute to further reducing exercise tolerance in COPD. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 40 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive
What is being tested?
Normocapnic hyperpnoea intervention
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
40 participants
Where
1 siteCanada
Study dates
14 Mar 2017to Feb 2021
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 40 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Age ≥ 40 years;
  • Chronic airflow obstruction : FEV1/FVC < 0.7, FEV1 of 30 to 80% predicted, after bronchodilation;

Who cannot join

  • Inability to perform a cycling exercise;
  • Diagnosed of one of more comorbidities that may limit exercise tolerance : cardiovascular, metabolic, endocrine, gastrointestinal, renal, neurological or rheumatologically disease;
  • Recent COPD exacerbation (< 3 months);
  • Recent cancer;
  • A daily dose of Prednisone > 10 mg;
  • Hypoxemia at rest or during exercise: PaO2 < 60 mmHg or SpO2 ≤ 88%;
Show all 9Show fewer
  • Body mass index > 30 kg/m²;
  • Pregnancy;
  • Skinfold at intercostal or vastus lateralis muscle > 1.5 cm.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Canada1 site, 1 recruiting
  • Institut universitaire de cardiologie et de pneumologie de Québec

    Québec, G1V 4G5

    Ferid Oueslati, PhD, +14186568711 ext. 3012, ferid.oueslati@criucpq.ulaval.ca

    François Maltais, MD

    Recruiting

Other trials in Canada

About this study

Official title: The Effect of Respiratory Training With Normocapnic Hyperpnea on Exercise Tolerance in COPD

Exercise intolerance is one of the key disabling factors in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Although multifactorial, exercise intolerance involves physiological interactions between respiratory and locomotor muscles that may contribute to further reducing exercise tolerance in COPD. The respiratory muscle work during exercise is closely related to breathing and could induce respiratory muscle fatigue in patients with COPD.

Respiratory muscle training is an intervention strategy that is sometimes proposed for some patients with COPD, especially whose with inspiratory muscle weakness. It was reported that inspiratory muscle training improves inspiratory muscle endurance and strength, dyspnea and exercise tolerance. There are two types of inspiratory muscle training, inspiratory muscle training against a resistive loading and normocapnic hyperpnoea. The advantage of normocapnic hyperpnoea compared to resistive training is the possibility to simulate the exercise ventilation level while maintaining stable the partial pressure of arterial carbon dioxide and end-tidal pressure of carbon dioxide and to solicit the inspiratory and expiratory muscles together, which could increase respiratory muscle tolerance and avoid their fatigue during whole-body exercise.

Read more

Therefore, the aim of this project is to study the effect of normocapnic hyperpnoea training on exercise tolerance in patients with COPD.

We hypothesize that greater improvement in cycling exercise tolerance will be observed following 6-weeks normocapnic hyperpnoea training compared to a sham intervention in patients with COPD.

Being tested
Normocapnic hyperpnoea intervention, Sham intervention
Keywords
Respiratory training, COPD, Muscle oxygenation, Muscle fatigue, Oxygen kinetic, Exercise tolerance
Medical subject headings
Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Normocapnic hyperpnoea interventionOther

    Patients will perform for 6-weeks, 15 min twice daily, 5 days a week at 60% of the peak of minute ventilation, at home by means of a respiratory device (SpiroTiger, Idiag, Fehraltorf, CH).

  • Sham interventionOther

    Patients will perform for 6-weeks, 15 min twice daily, 5 days a week at rest's minute ventilation, at home by means of a respiratory device (SpiroTiger, Idiag, Fehraltorf, CH).

Study groups in NCT04201522
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Training interventionActive comparatorThe effect of 6-weeks of respiratory training with normocapnic hyperpnoea on exercise tolerance
Receives: Other: Normocapnic hyperpnoea intervention
Sham interventionSham comparatorThe effect of 6-weeks of respiratory training with normocapnic hyperpnoea on exercise tolerance in the training group compared to the sham group.
Receives: Other: Sham intervention

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Change in exercise tolerance (time [seconds])

    Constant workrate cycling exercise time at 75% of power peak.

    Measured: Baseline (week 0), 7 weeks

Secondary outcomes (5)
  1. Minute ventilation responses (flow [L/min])

    Minute ventilation during the constant workrate cycling exercise will be determined using a portable gas analysis system.

    Measured: Baseline (week 0), 7 weeks

  2. Change in respiratory muscle strength (pressure [cm H2O])

    Maximal inspiratory and expiratory pressures will be assessed with a portable manometer before and at end the constant workrate cycling exercise.

    Measured: Baseline (week 0), 7 weeks

  3. Change in muscle oxygenation (from baseline [%])

    Deoxyhemoglobin/myoglobin concentrations measured by near-infrared spectroscopy of intercostal and vastus lateralis muscle during the constant workrate cycling exercise

    Measured: Baseline (week 0), 7 weeks

  4. Change in cardiac output (flow [L/min])

    Arterial blood pressures and cardiac output will be non-invasively measured by a finger photoplethysmography device during the constant workrate cycling exercise

    Measured: Baseline (week 0), 7 weeks

  5. Isometric muscle strength (force [Kg])

    Maximum voluntary isometric contraction with twitch tension induced by supramaximal magnetic stimulation of the femoral nerve will be realized before and 15 minutes after the constant workrate cycling exercise.

    Measured: Baseline (week 0), 7 weeks

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted17 Dec 2019
  2. Study start14 Mar 2017
  3. Primary completionDec 2020 (estimated)
  4. Study completionFeb 2021 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
The study is a randomized, controlled, parallel-group trial.
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Participant
Enrolment
40 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04201522
Sponsor's protocol ID
CER 21411
Acronym
ERTET
Status last verified
Dec 2019
First submitted
26 Nov 2019
Last updated
17 Dec 2019
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Normocapnic hyperpnoea intervention in people with Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive, run by Laval University at 1 site in Canada.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 9 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 17 Dec 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Ferid Oueslati, PhD (+1 (418) 656-8711 ext. 3012, ferid.oueslati@criucpq.ulaval.ca), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Change in exercise tolerance (time [seconds]) (time frame: Baseline (week 0), 7 weeks). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 17 Dec 2019.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in