Cardioplegia Solution Adverse ReactionEarly Phase 1NCT04203680
Histidine-Tryptophan-Ketoglutarate Solution Versus Blood Cardioplegia in CABG
A Early Phase 1 study testing HTK cardioplegic solution and blood cardioplegia in people with Cardioplegia Solution Adverse Reaction, run by Ain Shams University at 2 sites in Egypt.
Trial summary
Background: In cardiac surgery, myocardial protection is mandatory during cross clamp time followed by reperfusion. Use of cardioplegic solutions preserves myocardial energy stores, hindering electrolyte disturbances and acidosis during periods of myocardial ischemia. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 60 to 80 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Cardioplegia Solution Adverse Reaction
- What is being tested?
- HTK cardioplegic solution and blood cardioplegia
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 320 participants
- Where
- 2 sitesEgypt
- Study dates
- 25 Dec 2019to 25 Apr 2020
- Phase
- Early Phase 1
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 60 to 80 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- age from 60-80 years old
- elective CABG
- no comorbidities
Who cannot join
- patients with Unstable angina
- Poor left ventricular function
- Patient with acute myocardial infarction
- previous renal failure
- Preoperative Aortic valve or Mitral valve disease requiring replacement
Trial locations and contacts
2 sites in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Efficacy of Histidine-Tryptophan-Ketoglutarate Solution Versus Blood Cardioplegia in Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery: A Randomized Double Blinded Study
Background: In cardiac surgery, myocardial protection is mandatory during cross clamp time followed by reperfusion. Use of cardioplegic solutions preserves myocardial energy stores, hindering electrolyte disturbances and acidosis during periods of myocardial ischemia. This study was designed to compare the efficacy and safety of Histidine-tryptophan-ketoglutarate (HTK) solution versus blood cardioplegia in coronary artery bypass graft surgery.
Methods: Three hundred and twenty patients were randomized into Histidine-tryptophan-ketoglutarate (HTK) group and blood cardioplegia group. Ventilation time, total bypass time, cross clamp time, length of ICU or hospital stay and the early postoperative outcomes were analysed.
Read the detailed description
The Ethics Committee of Ain Shams university approved this randomized prospective double-blinded controlled parallel group study to be held in Cardiothoracic Academy for three months from December 2019 to April 2020. The study was conducted on three hundred and twenty older patients aged from 60-80 years old posted for elective coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). Written informed consents were signed by all patients. Exclusion criteria included (1) patients with Unstable angina (class III or IV); (2) Poor left ventricular function (LVEF <40%) ;(3) Patient with acute myocardial infarction; (4) Previous CABG; (5) Previous renal failure; (6) Preoperative Aortic valve or Mitral valve disease requiring replacement ;(7) Urgent CABG operation.
A detailed medical history, including medications used, symptoms and risk factors for ischemic heart disease (smoking, DM, hypertension), NYHA classification and full investigations were assessed on the night of the surgical procedure. Anesthesia management was standardized for all patients. Premedication with midazolam was limited to a maximum of 0.05 mg/kg. Anesthesia was done with 12 μg/kg fentanyl, 5-7 mg/kg thiopental sodium, and 0.15 mg/kg pancuronium and was maintained with 1-2.0% isoflurane. Heart rate and blood pressure were maintained within 20% of the baseline values. Anticoagulation was achieved with heparin 300 U/kg administered into the right atrium to maintain an activated clotting time above 480 s. Cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) was established by non-occlusive roller pumps, membrane oxygenators and arterial line filtration. The CPB circuit was primed with 1.8 l lactated Ringer's solution and 50 ml of 20% mannitol. Management of CPB included systemic hypothermia during aortic cross-clamping, targeted mean perfusion pressure between 60 and 80 mmHg, and pump flow rates of 2.2 l/min/m2.Intraoperatively the patients were monitored using ECG, pulse oximetry, Invasive blood pressure monitoring, arterial blood gases, central venous line catheter and temperature probe. Surgical approach was performed by median sternotomy.
Patients were randomly allocated into 2 groups either HTK group and blood cardioplegia group according to a computer-generated randomization code, with allocation ratio 1:1. Opaque sealed envelopes were prepared according to the randomization schedule, and were opened by a clinician not involved in any part of the study.
In the HTK group, patients received 30 ml/kg of HTK cardioplegic solution at 4°C through an antegrade fashion at an initial perfusion pressure of 80-100 mmHg. In blood cardioplegia group, patients received one liter of blood cardioplegia was given with the antegrade route at 30°C, or lower. Blood maintenance cardioplegia was repeated every 30-45mins. The study medications were calculated and prepared by ICU residents who were not a part of the research team. To ensure blinding of study drug administration, the medication vials were kept in opaque bags. Trial bags were blinded and marked with a unique number. The allocation of trial drugs was determined by the web-based randomization system by the allocation of the bag number. The end-point assessor of the outcomes was blinded to the study drugs.
Before separation from CPB, patients were rewarmed to 36-37°C. After separation from CPB, heparin was neutralized with protamine sulfate 1 mg/100 U heparin to reach an activated clotting time within 10% of baseline. All patients were then transferred to the ICU after surgery.
The primary end-point of the study included early postoperative outcomes including cardiac enzymes preoperatively, 8 \& 24 hour post-operatively, 30-day mortality, wall motion abnormalities and pericardial effusion. The secondary end-points included ventilation time, cross clamp and total bypass time, length of ICU stay, length of hospital stay, need for inotropic support, 30-day readmission, the incidence of late postoperative complications as renal dysfunction.
- Conditions
- Cardioplegia Solution Adverse Reaction
- Being tested
- HTK cardioplegic solution, blood cardioplegia
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
HTK cardioplegic solutionDrug
Also called Histidine-tryptophan-ketoglutarate solution
30 ml/kg of HTK cardioplegic solution at 4°C through an antegrade fashion at an initial perfusion pressure of 80-100 mmHg
blood cardioplegiaDrug
one liter of blood cardioplegia was given with the antegrade route at 30°C, or lower. Blood maintenance cardioplegia was repeated every 30-45mins
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| HTK group | Sham comparator | Patients received 30 ml/kg of HTK cardioplegic solution at 4°C through an antegrade fashion at an initial perfusion pressure of 80-100 mmHg Receives: Drug: HTK cardioplegic solution |
| blood cardioplegia group | Active comparator | patients received one liter of blood cardioplegia was given with the antegrade route at 30°C, or lower. Blood maintenance cardioplegia was repeated every 30-45mins Receives: Drug: blood cardioplegia |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
mortality rate
mortality rate
Measured: up to 30 days postoperative
Secondary outcomes (3)
Troponin I level
level of troponin in the blood
Measured: Up to 24 hours postoperative
length of ICU stay
ICU stay duration
Measured: up to 3 days postoperative
length of hospital stay
hospital stay duration
Measured: up to 7 days postoperative
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted18 Dec 2019
- Study start25 Dec 2019
- Primary completion31 Mar 2020
- Study completion25 Apr 2020
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Cardioplegia Solution Adverse ReactionStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Ain Shams UniversityThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Early Phase 1
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 320 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Ain Shams University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Hoda Shokri, Ain Shams University
- Investigators
- Ayman shoeb, Study chair, Ain Shams University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04203680
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- FMASU R 61/ 2019
- Status last verified
- May 2020
- First submitted
- 16 Dec 2019
- Last updated
- 7 May 2020
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: study protocol
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 7 May 2020. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Efficacy of Histidine-Tryptophan-Ketoglutarate Solution Versus Blood Cardioplegia in Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery: A Randomized Double Blinded Study
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04203680
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- FMASU R 61/ 2019
- Conditions
- Cardioplegia Solution Adverse Reaction
- Phase
- Early Phase 1
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 320 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Ain Shams UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 25 Dec 2019 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 31 Mar 2020 (actual)
- Study completion
- 25 Apr 2020 (actual)
- First posted
- 18 Dec 2019 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Background: In cardiac surgery, myocardial protection is mandatory during cross clamp time followed by reperfusion. Use of cardioplegic solutions preserves myocardial energy stores, hindering electrolyte disturbances and acidosis during periods of myocardial ischemia. This study was designed to compare the efficacy and safety of Histidine-tryptophan-ketoglutarate (HTK) solution versus blood cardioplegia in coronary artery bypass graft surgery.
Methods: Three hundred and twenty patients were randomized into Histidine-tryptophan-ketoglutarate (HTK) group and blood cardioplegia group. Ventilation time, total bypass time, cross clamp time, length of ICU or hospital stay and the early postoperative outcomes were analysed.
Detailed description
The Ethics Committee of Ain Shams university approved this randomized prospective double-blinded controlled parallel group study to be held in Cardiothoracic Academy for three months from December 2019 to April 2020. The study was conducted on three hundred and twenty older patients aged from 60-80 years old posted for elective coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). Written informed consents were signed by all patients. Exclusion criteria included (1) patients with Unstable angina (class III or IV); (2) Poor left ventricular function (LVEF <40%) ;(3) Patient with acute myocardial infarction; (4) Previous CABG; (5) Previous renal failure; (6) Preoperative Aortic valve or Mitral valve disease requiring replacement ;(7) Urgent CABG operation.
A detailed medical history, including medications used, symptoms and risk factors for ischemic heart disease (smoking, DM, hypertension), NYHA classification and full investigations were assessed on the night of the surgical procedure. Anesthesia management was standardized for all patients. Premedication with midazolam was limited to a maximum of 0.05 mg/kg. Anesthesia was done with 12 μg/kg fentanyl, 5-7 mg/kg thiopental sodium, and 0.15 mg/kg pancuronium and was maintained with 1-2.0% isoflurane. Heart rate and blood pressure were maintained within 20% of the baseline values. Anticoagulation was achieved with heparin 300 U/kg administered into the right atrium to maintain an activated clotting time above 480 s. Cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) was established by non-occlusive roller pumps, membrane oxygenators and arterial line filtration. The CPB circuit was primed with 1.8 l lactated Ringer's solution and 50 ml of 20% mannitol. Management of CPB included systemic hypothermia during aortic cross-clamping, targeted mean perfusion pressure between 60 and 80 mmHg, and pump flow rates of 2.2 l/min/m2.Intraoperatively the patients were monitored using ECG, pulse oximetry, Invasive blood pressure monitoring, arterial blood gases, central venous line catheter and temperature probe. Surgical approach was performed by median sternotomy.
Patients were randomly allocated into 2 groups either HTK group and blood cardioplegia group according to a computer-generated randomization code, with allocation ratio 1:1. Opaque sealed envelopes were prepared according to the randomization schedule, and were opened by a clinician not involved in any part of the study.
In the HTK group, patients received 30 ml/kg of HTK cardioplegic solution at 4°C through an antegrade fashion at an initial perfusion pressure of 80-100 mmHg. In blood cardioplegia group, patients received one liter of blood cardioplegia was given with the antegrade route at 30°C, or lower. Blood maintenance cardioplegia was repeated every 30-45mins. The study medications were calculated and prepared by ICU residents who were not a part of the research team. To ensure blinding of study drug administration, the medication vials were kept in opaque bags. Trial bags were blinded and marked with a unique number. The allocation of trial drugs was determined by the web-based randomization system by the allocation of the bag number. The end-point assessor of the outcomes was blinded to the study drugs.
Before separation from CPB, patients were rewarmed to 36-37°C. After separation from CPB, heparin was neutralized with protamine sulfate 1 mg/100 U heparin to reach an activated clotting time within 10% of baseline. All patients were then transferred to the ICU after surgery.
The primary end-point of the study included early postoperative outcomes including cardiac enzymes preoperatively, 8 \& 24 hour post-operatively, 30-day mortality, wall motion abnormalities and pericardial effusion. The secondary end-points included ventilation time, cross clamp and total bypass time, length of ICU stay, length of hospital stay, need for inotropic support, 30-day readmission, the incidence of late postoperative complications as renal dysfunction.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| HTK group | Sham comparator | Drug: HTK cardioplegic solutionPatients received 30 ml/kg of HTK cardioplegic solution at 4°C through an antegrade fashion at an initial perfusion pressure of 80-100 mmHg |
| blood cardioplegia group | Active comparator | Drug: blood cardioplegiapatients received one liter of blood cardioplegia was given with the antegrade route at 30°C, or lower. Blood maintenance cardioplegia was repeated every 30-45mins |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 60 to 80 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- age from 60-80 years old
- elective CABG
- no comorbidities
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- patients with Unstable angina
- Poor left ventricular function
- Patient with acute myocardial infarction
- previous renal failure
- Preoperative Aortic valve or Mitral valve disease requiring replacement
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| HTK cardioplegic solutionAlso: Histidine-tryptophan-ketoglutarate solution30 ml/kg of HTK cardioplegic solution at 4°C through an antegrade fashion at an initial perfusion pressure of 80-100 mmHg | Drug | HTK group |
| blood cardioplegiaone liter of blood cardioplegia was given with the antegrade route at 30°C, or lower. Blood maintenance cardioplegia was repeated every 30-45mins | Drug | blood cardioplegia group |
Primary outcome
mortality rate
Time frame: up to 30 days postoperative
mortality rate
3 secondary outcomes
Troponin I level
Time frame: Up to 24 hours postoperative
length of ICU stay
Time frame: up to 3 days postoperative
length of hospital stay
Time frame: up to 7 days postoperative
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 7 May 2020.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. study protocol
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Ayman shoeb study chair
Ain Shams University
2 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Early Phase 1 study testing HTK cardioplegic solution and blood cardioplegia in people with Cardioplegia Solution Adverse Reaction, run by Ain Shams University at 2 sites in Egypt.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 7 May 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 2 sites in Egypt. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Early Phase 1 (sometimes called Phase 0) studies give a very small amount of a treatment to a few people, mainly to see how the body handles it.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
mortality rate (time frame: up to 30 days postoperative). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 7 May 2020; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 7 Nov 2026.