AzTrials
AzTrials

Recurrent Plasma Cell MyelomaPhase 2NCT04205240

Reduce Intensity Conditioning Donor Stem Cell Transplant for the Treatment of Relapsed Multiple Myeloma

A Phase 2 study testing Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation, Cyclophosphamide and Daratumumab in people with Recurrent Plasma Cell Myeloma, run by Srinivas Devarakonda at 1 site in United States.

Terminated

Stopped early. The study ended before it was planned to and will not resume.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This phase II trial studies how well a reduced intensity conditioning regimen after donor stem cell transplant works in treating patients with multiple myeloma that has come back (relapsed). Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 75 years
Conditions the study is for
Recurrent Plasma Cell Myeloma
What is being tested?
Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation, Cyclophosphamide and Daratumumab
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
1 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
22 Dec 2020to 22 Nov 2021
Phase
Phase 2
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 75 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Patients with a partial response (PR) or better prior to allo-transplantation
  • Relapsed MM with chemo sensitivity disease, with or without prior autologous HSCT
  • First allogenic transplant
  • Donors can be haploidentical, mismatch or matched related or unrelated. Stem cell source will be peripheral blood except for haploidentical where stem cell source will be bone marrow
  • Ejection fraction >= 45%
  • Estimated creatinine clearance greater than 40 mL/minute
Show all 11Show fewer
  • Diffusion capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide (DLCO) >= 40% (adjusted for hemoglobin)
  • Forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) >= 50%
  • Total bilirubin < 2 x the upper limit of normal
  • Alanine aminotransferase (ALT)/aspartate aminotransferase (AST) < 2.5 x the upper normal limit
  • Signed informed consent

Who cannot join

  • Patients with polyneuropathy, organomegaly, endocrinopathy, monoclonal gammopathy, and skin change (POEMS), Waldenstrom macroglobulinemia
  • Uncontrolled bacterial, viral or fungal infection
  • Patients with prior malignancies < 3 years except resected basal cell/squamous cell carcinoma, treated carcinoma in-situ. Other cancers treated with curative intent < 3 years previously will not be allowed unless approved by the principal investigator
  • Female patients who are pregnant or breastfeeding. A negative pregnancy test will be required for all women of child bearing potential

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center

    Columbus, Ohio, 43210

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Reduce Intensity Conditioning (RIC) Allogenic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation (Allo HSCT) for Patients With Relapsed Multiple Myeloma: A Pilot Study

This phase II trial studies how well a reduced intensity conditioning regimen after donor stem cell transplant works in treating patients with multiple myeloma that has come back (relapsed). Drugs used in chemotherapy, such as cyclophosphamide, tacrolimus, and mycophenolate mofetil, work in different ways to stop the growth of cancer cells, either by killing the cells, by stopping them from dividing, or by stopping them from spreading. Immunotherapy with monoclonal antibodies, such as daratumumab, may help the body's immune system attack the cancer, and may interfere with the ability of tumor cells to grow and spread. Giving a reduce intensity conditioning regimen consisting of cyclophosphamide, tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, and daratumumab after donor stem cell transplant may improve survival and reduce the risk of multiple myeloma coming back.

Read the detailed description

PRIMARY OBJECTIVE:

  1. To determine the 2-year progression-free survival (PFS) for haploidentical, matched or mismatched, related or unrelated reduce intensity allogenic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo HSCT) in relapsed multiple myeloma (MM) patients.

SECONDARY OBJECTIVES:

  1. To determine 2 year overall survival (OS). II. To determine the cumulative incidence of grade II-IV acute-graft-versushost-disease (aGVHD) at day 100 and 180.

III. To determine the 100 days, 1 year and 2 year cumulative incidence of treatment-related mortality (TRM).

IV. To assess one-year GVHD-free relapse-free survival (GRFS). V. To determine the cumulative incidence of chronic graft-versus-hostdisease (cGVHD) Va. To assess overall and best response rates 100 days after allo HCT, 3 months, 6 months and every 6 months thereafter until end of daratumumab maintenance.

VI. To determine rate of relapse after allo HSCT followed by maintenance. VII. To determine rate of minimal residual disease (MRD) negativity using next generation sequencing (Food and Drug Administration [FDA] approved) in patients achieving a very good partial response (VGPR) or better.

CORRELATIVE OBJECTIVE:

  1. To determine immune reconstitution pattern on days +30, +100, +180 and +365 following allo HSCT.

OUTLINE:

Patients receive fludarabine intravenously (IV) on days -5 to -2 and melphalan IV on days -3 to -2, then undergo stem cell transplantation on day 0. Patients receive cyclophosphamide on days 3 and 4, tacrolimus orally (PO) or twice daily (BID) or IV starting on day 5, and mycophenolate mofetil IV or PO three times daily (TID) on days 5 to 35. Patients also receive daratumumab IV starting between day 90-150 for up to 1 year. Treatment continues in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.

After completion of study treatment, patients are followed up periodically for up to 2 years post stem cell transplantation.

Medical subject headings
Multiple Myeloma

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell TransplantationProcedure or surgery

    Also called Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation, Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation, HSC, HSCT

    Undergo allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

  • CyclophosphamideDrug

    Also called (-)-Cyclophosphamide, 2H-1,3,2-Oxazaphosphorine, 2-[bis(2-chloroethyl)amino]tetrahydro-, 2-oxide, monohydrate, Carloxan, Ciclofosfamida

    Given IV

  • DaratumumabBiological

    Also called Anti-CD38 Monoclonal Antibody, Darzalex, HuMax-CD38, JNJ-54767414

    Given IV

  • FludarabineDrug

    Also called Fluradosa

    Given IV

  • MelphalanDrug

    Also called Alanine Nitrogen Mustard, CB-3025, L-PAM, L-Phenylalanine mustard

    Given IV

  • Mycophenolate MofetilDrug

    Also called Cellcept, MMF

    Given IV or PO

  • TacrolimusDrug

    Also called FK 506, Fujimycin, Hecoria, Prograf

    Given PO or IV

Study groups in NCT04205240
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Treatment (conditioning regimen, stem cell transplant)ExperimentalPatients receive fludarabine IV on days -5 to -2 and melphalan IV on days -3 to -2, then undergo stem cell transplantation on day 0. Patients receive cyclophosphamide on days 3 and 4, tacrolimus PO BID or IV starting on day 5, and mycophenolate mofetil IV or PO TID on days 5 to 35. Patients also receive daratumumab IV starting between days 90-150 for up to 1 year. Treatment continues in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
Receives: Procedure: Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation; Drug: Cyclophosphamide; Biological: Daratumumab; Drug: Fludarabine; Drug: Melphalan; Drug: Mycophenolate Mofetil; Drug: Tacrolimus

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. 2-year Progression-free Survival (PFS)

    Patients who do not relapse or die will be censored at the date of last clinical assessment. Kaplan-Meier curves will be generated to estimate the PFS rates at 2 years posttransplant. To evaluate the potential association between patient characteristics and PFS, the log-rank test will be used to compare the PFS curves and Cox proportional hazard regression model will be used to estimate the hazard ratio.

    Measured: From the date of transplant until the date of relapse or date of death from any cause, assessed at 2 years

Secondary outcomes (10)
  1. Incidence of Adverse Events

    Adverse events by grade will be summarized. The occurrence of grade 3+ adverse events according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) will be summarized as well. Adverse events will initially be reviewed regardless of attribution, but also according to whether adverse events are possibly, probably, or definitely related to treatment.

    Measured: Up to 2 years post-transplant

  2. Number of Patients With Grade II-IV Acute Graft-versus Host Disease (GvHD (aGVHD)

    The event will be onset of grade II-IV aGvHD and time to aGvHD will be defined as the period of time from transplantation to the event of aGvHD. Death and early relapse without aGvHD will be competing risks. Cumulative incidence rate of aGVHD with 95% confidence intervals will be estimated from the cumulative incidence curves. To evaluate the association between patient characteristics and aGVHD, the Gray's test accounting for competing risks will be used to compare the cumulative incidence curves and a proportional hazards model for the sub distribution of competing risks will be used to estimate the hazard ratio. The cumulative incidence of chronic GVHD (cGVHD) will be similarly analyzed.

    Measured: Up to 6 weeks

  3. Rate of Relapse

    Patients without relapse or death will be censored at last clinical assessment date. The similar analysis approach used for outcome of aGVHD will be applied.

    Measured: From the date of transplant to relapse treating death from any cause as a competing risk, assessed up to 2 years

  4. Overall Survival (OS)

    A similar analysis approach described above for PFS will be applied for the OS analysis.

    Measured: From the date of transplant to death or last contact date if no death, assessed up to 2 years

  5. 1- Year GVHD-free Relapse-free Survival (GRFS)

    Patients who do not experience an event will be censored at the date of last clinical assessment. A similar analysis approach described above for PFS will be applied for the GRFS analysis.

    Measured: From the date of transplant until the date of grade II-IV acute GVHD, chronic GVHD, disease relapse or progression, or death from any cause, whichever occurs first, assessed at 1 year

  6. 100-day Cumulative Incidence of Treatment-related Mortality (TRM)

    The event will be death due to reasons other than disease. The competing risk for non relapsed mortality (NRM) will be death due to disease. The cumulative incidence curve accounting competing risks will be generated to estimate the cumulative incidence rate at various time points.

    Measured: From the date of transplant to date of death, assessed up to 100 days

  7. 1-year Cumulative Incidence TRM

    The event will be death due to reasons other than disease. The competing risk for NRM will be death due to disease. The cumulative incidence curve accounting competing risks will be generated to estimate the cumulative incidence rate at various time points.

    Measured: From the date of transplant to date of death, assessed at 1 year

  8. 2-year Cumulative Incidence of TRM

    The event will be death due to reasons other than disease. The competing risk for NRM will be death due to disease. The cumulative incidence curve accounting competing risks will be generated to estimate the cumulative incidence rate at various time points.

    Measured: From the date of transplant to date of death, assessed at 2 years

  9. Overall Response Rate

    The proportion of each type of response with a 95% confidence interval (CI) will be reported for all evaluable patients, assuming a binomial distribution.

    Measured: Up to 2 years post-transplant

  10. Number of Patients With a Partial Response

    The proportion of each type of response with a 95% CI will be reported for all evaluable patients, assuming a binomial distribution.

    Measured: Approximately 11 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted19 Dec 2019
  2. Study start22 Dec 2020
  3. Primary completion8 May 2021
  4. Study completion22 Nov 2021

Why it stopped: Poor accrual

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
1 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04205240
Sponsor's protocol ID
OSU-19190
Other IDs
NCI-2019-07892
Status last verified
Sep 2023
First submitted
17 Dec 2019
Last updated
28 Sep 2023
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 2 study testing Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation, Cyclophosphamide and Daratumumab in people with Recurrent Plasma Cell Myeloma, run by Srinivas Devarakonda at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 11 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 28 Sep 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 28 Sep 2023). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

2-year Progression-free Survival (PFS) (time frame: From the date of transplant until the date of relapse or date of death from any cause, assessed at 2 years). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 28 Sep 2023.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in