AzTrials
AzTrials

Bullous PemphigoidPhase 2/3LIBERTY-BPNCT04206553

A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Dupilumab in Adult Patients With Bullous Pemphigoid

A Phase 2/3 study testing dupilumab and Oral corticosteroids (OCS) in people with Bullous Pemphigoid, run by Regeneron Pharmaceuticals at 53 sites in 9 countries.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The main purpose of this study is to investigate whether dupilumab is effective and safe for the treatment of bullous pemphigoid. Dupilumab is a type of drug called a "monoclonal antibody". An antibody is a special kind of protein that the immune (defense) system normally makes to fight bacteria and viruses. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 90 years
Conditions the study is for
Bullous Pemphigoid
What is being tested?
dupilumab and Oral corticosteroids (OCS)
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
106 participants
Where
53 sitesin 9 countries
Study dates
28 Oct 2020to 5 Jan 2025
Phase
Phase 2/3
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 90 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Patients must have characteristic clinical features of bullous pemphigoid (BP) (eg, urticarial or eczematous or erythematous plaques, bullae, pruritus) at the screening and baseline visits.
  • Study participants are required to have a confirmed diagnosis of BP based on histopathology, immunopathology, and serology at the baseline visit, as defined in the protocol.
  • Bullous Pemphigoid Disease Area Index (BPDAI) activity score ≥24 at baseline and screening visits.
  • Baseline peak pruritus NRS score for maximum itch intensity ≥4
  • Karnofsky performance status score ≥50% at the screening visit.

Who cannot join

  • Forms of pemphigoid other than classic BP (eg, Brunsting-Perry cicatricial pemphigoid, anti-p200 pemphigoid, epidermolysis bullosa acquisita, or BP with concomitant pemphigus vulgaris)
  • Patients who are receiving treatments known to cause or exacerbate BP (eg, angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors, penicillamine, furosemide, phenacetin, dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitor) who have not been on a stable dose of these medications for at least 4 weeks prior to the screening visit
  • Have ever received treatment with an IL-4 or IL-13 antagonist such as dupilumab, tralokinumab, or lebrikizumab.
  • Treatment with systemic corticosteroids within 7 days before the baseline visit
  • Treatment with topical corticosteroids of medium potency or higher, topical calcineurin inhibitor, or topical crisaborole within 7 days before the baseline visit
  • Treatment with non-steroidal immunosuppressive/immunomodulating drug(s) (eg, mycophenolate mofetil, azathioprine, or methotrexate) within 4 weeks before the baseline visit.
Show all 11Show fewer
  • Treatment with BP-directed biologics as follows:
  • Any cell-depleting agents including but not limited to rituximab: within 12 months before the baseline visit, or until lymphocyte and CD 19+ lymphocyte count returns to normal, whichever is longer
  • Other biologics (such as IL-5 inhibitors benralizumab or mepolizumab): within 5 half-lives (if known) or 16 weeks prior to the baseline visit, whichever is longer
  • Intravenous immunoglobulin within 16 weeks prior to the baseline visit
  • NOTE: Other Protocol Defined Inclusion/Exclusion Criteria Apply

Trial locations and contacts

53 sites in 9 countries.

53 sites in 9 countries

United States15 sites
  • Regeneron study Site

    Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48109-5314

  • Regeneron study Site

    Birmingham, Alabama, 35233

  • Regeneron Study Site

    Boston, Massachusetts, 02116

  • Regeneron Study Site

    Chapel Hill, North Carolina, 27516

  • Regeneron study Site

    Charlottesville, Virginia, 22903

  • Regeneron Study Site

    Farmington, Connecticut, 06030

  • Regeneron Study Site

    Iowa City, Iowa, 52242

  • Regeneron Study Site

    Miami, Florida, 33125

  • Regeneron Study Site

    Murray, Utah, 84107

  • Regeneron study Site

    Orlando, Florida, 32827

  • Regeneron Study Site

    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19104

  • Regeneron Study Site

    Portland, Oregon, 97239

  • Regeneron study Site

    Providence, Rhode Island, 02908

  • Regeneron Study Site

    Redwood City, California, 94063

  • Regeneron Study Site

    Scottsdale, Arizona, 85259

Other trials in United States

Germany12 sites
  • Regeneron Study Site

    Berlin, 10117

  • Regeneron Study Site

    Buxtehude, 21614

  • Regeneron Study Site 2

    Dresden, Saxony, 01307

  • Regeneron Study Site

    Erlangen, 91054

  • Regeneron Study Site

    Freiburg im Breisgau, 79104

  • Regeneron Study Site

    Lübeck, Schleswig-Holstein, 23538

  • Regeneron Study site'

    Magdeburg, 39120

  • Regeneron Study Site

    Mainz, Rhineland-Palatinate, 55131

  • Regeneron Study site

    Marburg, 35043

  • Regeneron Study Site

    Munich, 80802

  • Regeneron Study Site

    Münster, North Rhine-Westphal, 48149

  • Regeneron Study Site

    Stuttgart, 70178

Other trials in Germany

France6 sites
  • Regeneron Study Site

    Bobigny, 93009

  • Regeneron Study Site

    Bordeaux, 33000

  • Regeneron Study Site

    Lille, 59037

  • Regeneron Study Site

    Nice, 06200

  • Regeneron Study Site

    Paris, 75010

  • Regeneron Study Site

    Rouen, 76031

Other trials in France

Japan6 sites
  • Regeneron Study Site

    Hirosaki, 036-8563

  • Regeneron Study Site

    Ichinomiya, 491-8558

  • Regeneron Study site

    Kurume, Hukuoka, 830-0011

  • Regeneron Study Site

    Osaka, 545-8586

  • Regeneron Study Site

    Sapporo, 060-8648

  • Regeneron Study Site

    Tokyo, 160-8582

Other trials in Japan

Spain4 sites
  • Regeneron Study Site

    Badalona, Barcelona, 08916

  • Regeneron Study Site

    Madrid, 28034

  • Regeneron study Site

    Madrid, 28046

  • Regeneron study Site

    Pamplona, 31008

Other trials in Spain

Israel3 sites
  • Regeneron study Site

    Afula, 1834111

  • Regeneron study Site

    Petah Tikva, 49100

  • Regeneron study Site

    Tel Aviv, 6423906

Other trials in Israel

Poland3 sites
  • Regeneron Study Site

    Krakow, Lesser Poland Voivodeship, 31-147

  • Regeneron Study site'

    Ossy, 42-624

  • Regeneron Study site'

    Wroclaw, 50566

Other trials in Poland

Australia2 sites
  • Regeneron Study Site

    Box Hill, Victoria, 3128

  • Regeneron Study Site

    Kogarah, New South Wales, 2217

Other trials in Australia

Taiwan2 sites
  • Regeneron study Site

    Taipei, Zhongzheng District, 10002

  • Regeneron study Site

    Taoyuan City, 33305

Other trials in Taiwan

About this study

Official title: A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Parallel Group Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Dupilumab in Adult Patients With Bullous Pemphigoid

The main purpose of this study is to investigate whether dupilumab is effective and safe for the treatment of bullous pemphigoid. Dupilumab is a type of drug called a "monoclonal antibody". An antibody is a special kind of protein that the immune (defense) system normally makes to fight bacteria and viruses. Bullous pemphigoid is an autoimmune subepidermal blistering disease, predominately affecting the elderly (typical onset after age 60).

The study is looking at several other research questions, including:

  • Side effects that may be experienced by people taking dupilumab
  • How dupilumab works in the body and affects the body
  • How dupilumab affects quality of life
  • How much dupilumab is present in the blood
  • To see if dupilumab works to wean the patient off oral corticosteroids
Being tested
dupilumab, Matching Placebo, Oral corticosteroids (OCS)
Medical subject headings
Pemphigoid, Bullous

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • dupilumabDrug

    Also called Dupixent®, REGN668, SAR231893

    Loading dose administered subcutaneous (SC), followed by SC once every 2 weeks (Q2W) dosing.

  • Matching PlaceboDrug

    Matching dupilumab without active substance

  • Oral corticosteroids (OCS)Drug

    Prednisone or prednisolone per standard of care to obtain control of disease activity.

Study groups in NCT04206553
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
dupilumabExperimentalNot described
Receives: Drug: dupilumab; Drug: Oral corticosteroids (OCS)
Matching placeboExperimentalNot described
Receives: Drug: Matching Placebo; Drug: Oral corticosteroids (OCS)

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Percent of Participants Achieving Sustained Remission at Week 36

    Sustained remission at week 36, defined as: (1) Complete remission (absence of new lesions \& epithelialization of old lesions) \& off oral corticosteroids (OCS) no later than week 16 \& (2) Absence of disease relapse (appearance of ≥3 new lesions a month [blisters, eczematous lesions, or urticarial plaques] or at least 1 large eczematous lesion or urticarial plaque that does not heal within 1 week) after completion of OCS taper, no later than week 16, to week 36 \& (3) Absence of need for rescue therapy during 36 weeks (rescue therapy includes increase of OCS dose during the taper, re-initiation of OCS after completion of the OCS taper, or initiation of any BP-directed therapy). Participants with missing sustained remission data at week 36 due to discontinuation due to lack of efficacy, treatment-related AE, or death were considered non-responders \& those with missing data due to other reasons were handled using multiple imputation.

    Measured: At Week 36

Secondary outcomes (47)
  1. Total Cumulative Dose of Oral Corticosteroids (OCS) From Baseline to Week 36

    All participants in both treatment groups were started on OCS at randomization (day 1) with taper beginning no later than week 6 with the objective to taper off by week 16. OCS could be used as rescue treatment for loss of disease control/ disease relapse during the study. Days after non-OCS systemic rescue treatment use were imputed by the worst observation carried forward (WOCF) method (i.e., the highest daily OCS dose prior to any non-OCS systemic rescue treatment use). Missing data after study discontinuation were imputed with the average daily OCS dose among week 36 completers in each treatment group.

    Measured: Week 36

  2. Percent Change in Weekly Average of Daily Peak Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Score From Baseline to Week 36

    Peak pruritus NRS was used by participants to rate the intensity of pruritus during the past 24 hours, with 0 indicating no itch and 10 indicating worst itch possible. Participants were required to have a baseline peak pruritus NRS maximum intensity average of ≥4 during the 7 days prior to randomization for eligibility. Values after first rescue treatment were set to missing and were imputed with the worst value from the closest visit on or prior to rescue medication use and afterwards up to and including week 36. Missing values caused by discontinuation from the study due to lack of efficacy, treatment-related AE, or death were imputed by the WOCF method. Missing values due to other reasons were imputed by multiple imputation.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 36

  3. Percent of Participants With Improvement (Reduction) of Weekly Average of Daily Peak Pruritus NRS ≥4 From Baseline to Week 36

    Peak pruritus NRS was used by participants to rate the intensity of pruritus during the past 24 hours, with 0 indicating no itch and 10 indicating worst itch possible. Participants were required to have a baseline peak pruritus NRS maximum intensity average of ≥4 during the 7 days prior to randomization for eligibility. Participants were considered non-responders after rescue treatment use. Participants with missing values caused by discontinuation from the study before week 36 due to lack of efficacy, treatment-related AE, or death were considered non-responders. Missing values due to other reasons were imputed using multiple imputation of the continuous data of the weekly average of daily peak pruritus NRS.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 36

  4. Percent Change in Bullous Pemphigoid Disease Area Index (BPDAI) Activity Score From Baseline to Week 36

    BPDAI activity score is the arithmetic sum of 3 subcomponents: cutaneous blisters/erosions, cutaneous urticaria/erythema, and mucosal blisters/erosions. Scores can range from 0 to 360 for BPDAI total activity (maximum 240 for total skin activity and 120 for mucosal activity), with higher scores indicating greater disease activity. Participants were required to have a BPDAI activity score of ≥24 at the screening and baseline visits for eligibility. Values after first rescue treatment were set to missing and were imputed with the worst value from the closest visit on or prior to rescue medication use and afterwards up to and including week 36. Missing values caused by discontinuation from the study due to lack of efficacy, treatment-related AE, or death were imputed by the WOCF method. Missing values due to other reasons were imputed by multiple imputation.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 36

  5. Time to First Use of Rescue Medication Up to Week 36

    Participants were considered to have used rescue treatment at the time of discontinuation from the study due to lack of efficacy, treatment-related AE, or death. Participants were censored at the time of discontinuation from the study due to other reasons. Restricted mean event time and corresponding standard error (SE) are based on the Kaplan-Meier method. The restricted mean event time was calculated up to study day 253 (i.e., week 36).

    Measured: Up to Week 36

  6. Duration of Complete Remission While Not Requiring OCS Up to Week 36

    Complete remission was defined as absence of new lesions and epithelialization of old lesions. Participants were considered as not achieving complete remission after rescue treatment use. Participants with missing assessment of complete remission caused by discontinuation from the study before week 36 due to lack of efficacy, treatment-related AE, or death were considered as not achieving complete remission. Participants with missing assessment of complete remission due to other reasons were imputed using multiple imputation.

    Measured: Up to Week 36

  7. Percent of Participants Who Did Not Achieve Control of Disease Activity Before Week 36

    Control of disease activity was defined as absence of new lesions and existing lesions beginning to heal. Participants who achieved initial control of disease activity after rescue treatment use were considered to not have achieved control of disease activity before week 36. Participants whose response status could not be determined due to missing data were considered to not have achieved control of disease activity before week 36.

    Measured: Up to Week 36

  8. Percent of Participants Who Relapsed After Achieving Control of Disease Activity Up to Week 36

    Relapse was defined as the appearance of 3 or more new lesions a month (blisters, eczematous lesions, or urticarial plaques) or at least 1 large (>10 centimeters [cm] diameter) eczematous lesion or urticarial plaque that does not heal within 1 week. Control of disease activity was defined as absence of new lesions and existing lesions beginning to heal. Participants who used rescue treatment were considered to have relapsed after achieving control of disease activity. Participants whose response status could not be determined due to missing data were considered to have relapsed after achieving control of disease activity.

    Measured: Up to Week 36

  9. Percent of Participants Who Did Not Achieve Complete Remission Before Week 36

    Complete remission was defined as absence of new lesions and epithelialization of old lesions. Participants who achieved initial complete remission after rescue treatment use were considered to not have achieved complete remission before week 36. Participants whose response status could not be determined due to missing data were considered to not have achieved complete remission before week 36.

    Measured: Up to Week 36

  10. Percent of Participants Achieving a Reduction in BPDAI Activity Score of ≥50% From Baseline to Week 36

    BPDAI activity score is the arithmetic sum of 3 subcomponents: cutaneous blisters/erosions, cutaneous urticaria/erythema, and mucosal blisters/erosions. Scores can range from 0 to 360 for BPDAI total activity (maximum 240 for total skin activity and 120 for mucosal activity), with higher scores indicating greater disease activity. Participants were required to have a BPDAI activity score of ≥24 at the screening and baseline visits for eligibility. Participants were considered non-responders after rescue treatment use. Participants with missing values caused by discontinuation from the study before week 36 due to lack of efficacy, treatment-related AE, or death were considered non-responders. Missing values due to other reasons were imputed using multiple imputation of the continuous data of the BPDAI activity score.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 36

  11. Percent of Participants Achieving a Reduction in BPDAI Activity Score of ≥75% From Baseline to Week 36

    BPDAI activity score is the arithmetic sum of 3 subcomponents: cutaneous blisters/erosions, cutaneous urticaria/erythema, and mucosal blisters/erosions. Scores can range from 0 to 360 for BPDAI total activity (maximum 240 for total skin activity and 120 for mucosal activity), with higher scores indicating greater disease activity. Participants were required to have a BPDAI activity score of ≥24 at the screening and baseline visits for eligibility. Participants were considered non-responders after rescue treatment use. Participants with missing values caused by discontinuation from the study before week 36 due to lack of efficacy, treatment-related AE, or death were considered non-responders. Missing values due to other reasons were imputed using multiple imputation of the continuous data of the BPDAI activity score.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 36

  12. Percent of Participants Achieving a Reduction in BPDAI Activity Score of ≥90% From Baseline to Week 36

    BPDAI activity score is the arithmetic sum of 3 subcomponents: cutaneous blisters/erosions, cutaneous urticaria/erythema, and mucosal blisters/erosions. Scores can range from 0 to 360 for BPDAI total activity (maximum 240 for total skin activity and 120 for mucosal activity), with higher scores indicating greater disease activity. Participants were required to have a BPDAI activity score of ≥24 at the screening and baseline visits for eligibility. Participants were considered non-responders after rescue treatment use. Participants with missing values caused by discontinuation from the study before week 36 due to lack of efficacy, treatment-related AE, or death were considered non-responders. Missing values due to other reasons were imputed using multiple imputation of the continuous data of the BPDAI activity score.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 36

  13. Change in Autoimmune Bullous Disease Quality of Life (ABQOL) Score From Baseline to Week 36

    ABQOL questionnaire consists of 17 items, which encompass physical burden of the disease, psychiatric effects, and effects on daily life functioning. Each question ranges from 0 to 3 points, with higher scores indicating poorer quality of life. The maximum ABQOL score is 51. Values after first rescue treatment were set to missing and were imputed with the worst value from the closest visit on or prior to rescue medication use and afterwards up to and including week 36. Missing values caused by discontinuation from the study due to lack of efficacy, treatment-related AE, or death were imputed by the WOCF method. Missing values due to other reasons were imputed by multiple imputation.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 36

  14. Change in Percent Body Surface Area (BSA) of BP Involvement From Baseline to Week 36

    Values after first rescue treatment were set to missing and were imputed with the worst value from the closest visit on or prior to rescue medication use and afterwards up to and including week 36. Missing values caused by discontinuation from the study due to lack of efficacy, treatment-related AE, or death were imputed by the WOCF method. Missing values due to other reasons were imputed by multiple imputation.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 36

  15. Change in BP180 Immunoglobulin G (IgG) Autoantibody Titer From Baseline to Week 36

    Values after first rescue treatment were set to missing and were imputed with the worst value from the closest visit on or prior to rescue medication use and afterwards up to and including week 36. Missing values caused by discontinuation from the study due to lack of efficacy, treatment-related AE, or death were imputed by the WOCF method. Missing values due to other reasons were imputed by multiple imputation.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 36

  16. Change in BP230 IgG Autoantibody Titer From Baseline to Week 36

    Values after first rescue treatment were set to missing and were imputed with the worst value from the closest visit on or prior to rescue medication use and afterwards up to and including week 36. Missing values caused by discontinuation from the study due to lack of efficacy, treatment-related AE, or death were imputed by the WOCF method. Missing values due to other reasons were imputed by multiple imputation.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 36

  17. Percent of Participants Achieving Sustained Remission at Week 52

    Sustained remission at week 52, defined as: (1) Complete remission (absence of new lesions \& epithelialization of old lesions) \& off OCS no later than week 16 \& (2) Absence of disease relapse (appearance of ≥3 new lesions a month [blisters, eczematous lesions, or urticarial plaques] or at least 1 large eczematous lesion or urticarial plaque that does not heal within 1 week) after completion of OCS taper, no later than week 16, to week 52 \& (3) Absence of need for rescue therapy during 52 weeks (rescue therapy includes increase of OCS dose during the taper, re-initiation of OCS after completion of the OCS taper, or initiation of any BP-directed therapy). Participants with missing sustained remission data at week 52 due to discontinuation due to lack of efficacy, treatment-related AE, or death were considered non-responders \& those with missing data due to other reasons were handled using multiple imputation.

    Measured: At Week 52

  18. Total Cumulative Dose of OCS From Baseline to Week 52

    All participants in both treatment groups were started on OCS at randomization (day 1) with taper beginning no later than week 6 with the objective to taper off by week 16. OCS could be used as rescue treatment for loss of disease control/ disease relapse during the study. Days after non-OCS systemic rescue treatment use were imputed by the WOCF method (i.e., the highest daily OCS dose prior to any non-OCS systemic rescue treatment use). Missing data after study discontinuation were imputed with the average daily OCS dose among week 52 completers in each treatment group.

    Measured: Week 52

  19. Duration of Complete Remission While Not Requiring OCS Up to Week 52

    Complete remission was defined as absence of new lesions and epithelialization of old lesions. Participants were considered as not achieving complete remission after rescue treatment use. Participants with missing assessment of complete remission caused by discontinuation from the study before week 52 due to lack of efficacy, treatment-related AE, or death were considered as not achieving complete remission. Participants with missing assessment of complete remission due to other reasons were imputed using multiple imputation.

    Measured: Up to Week 52

  20. Percent of Participants Who Did Not Achieve Control of Disease Activity Before Week 52

    Control of disease activity was defined as absence of new lesions and existing lesions beginning to heal. Participants who achieved initial control of disease activity after rescue treatment use were considered to not have achieved control of disease activity before week 52. Participants whose response status could not be determined due to missing data were considered to not have achieved control of disease activity before week 52.

    Measured: Up to Week 52

  21. Percent of Participants Who Relapsed After Achieving Control of Disease Activity Up to Week 52

    Relapse was defined as the appearance of 3 or more new lesions a month (blisters, eczematous lesions, or urticarial plaques) or at least 1 large (>10 cm diameter) eczematous lesion or urticarial plaque that does not heal within 1 week. Control of disease activity was defined as absence of new lesions and existing lesions beginning to heal. Participants who used rescue treatment were considered to have relapsed after achieving control of disease activity. Participants whose response status could not be determined due to missing data were considered to have relapsed after achieving control of disease activity.

    Measured: Up to Week 52

  22. Percent of Participants Who Did Not Achieve Complete Remission Before Week 52

    Complete remission was defined as absence of new lesions and epithelialization of old lesions. Participants who achieved initial complete remission after rescue treatment use were considered to not have achieved complete remission before week 52. Participants whose response status could not be determined due to missing data were considered to not have achieved complete remission before week 52.

    Measured: Up to Week 52

  23. Percent Change in Weekly Average of Daily Peak Pruritus NRS From Baseline to Week 52

    Peak pruritus NRS was used by participants to rate the intensity of pruritus during the past 24 hours, with 0 indicating no itch and 10 indicating worst itch possible. Participants were required to have a baseline peak pruritus NRS maximum intensity average of ≥4 during the 7 days prior to randomization for eligibility. Values after first rescue treatment were set to missing and were imputed with the worst value from the closest visit on or prior to rescue medication use and afterwards up to and including week 52. Missing values caused by discontinuation from the study due to lack of efficacy, treatment-related AE, or death were imputed by the WOCF method. Missing values due to other reasons were imputed by multiple imputation.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 52

  24. Percent of Participants With Improvement (Reduction) of Weekly Average of Daily Peak Pruritus NRS ≥4 From Baseline to Week 52

    Peak pruritus NRS was used by participants to rate the intensity of pruritus during the past 24 hours, with 0 indicating no itch and 10 indicating worst itch possible. Participants were required to have a baseline peak pruritus NRS maximum intensity average of ≥4 during the 7 days prior to randomization for eligibility. Participants were considered non-responders after rescue treatment use. Participants with missing values caused by discontinuation from the study before week 52 due to lack of efficacy, treatment-related AE, or death were considered non-responders. Missing values due to other reasons were imputed using multiple imputation of the continuous data of the weekly average of daily peak pruritus NRS.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 52

  25. Percent Change in BPDAI Activity Score From Baseline to Week 52

    BPDAI activity score is the arithmetic sum of 3 subcomponents: cutaneous blisters/erosions, cutaneous urticaria/erythema, and mucosal blisters/erosions. Scores can range from 0 to 360 for BPDAI total activity (maximum 240 for total skin activity and 120 for mucosal activity), with higher scores indicating greater disease activity. Participants were required to have a BPDAI activity score of ≥24 at the screening and baseline visits for eligibility. Values after first rescue treatment were set to missing and were imputed with the worst value from the closest visit on or prior to rescue medication use and afterwards up to and including week 52. Missing values caused by discontinuation from the study due to lack of efficacy, treatment-related AE, or death were imputed by the WOCF method. Missing values due to other reasons were imputed by multiple imputation.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 52

  26. Percent of Participants Achieving a Reduction in BPDAI Activity Score of ≥50% From Baseline to Week 52

    BPDAI activity score is the arithmetic sum of 3 subcomponents: cutaneous blisters/erosions, cutaneous urticaria/erythema, and mucosal blisters/erosions. Scores can range from 0 to 360 for BPDAI total activity (maximum 240 for total skin activity and 120 for mucosal activity), with higher scores indicating greater disease activity. Participants were required to have a BPDAI activity score of ≥24 at the screening and baseline visits for eligibility. Participants were considered non-responders after rescue treatment use. Participants with missing values caused by discontinuation from the study before week 52 due to lack of efficacy, treatment-related AE, or death were considered non-responders. Missing values due to other reasons were imputed using multiple imputation of the continuous data of the BPDAI activity score.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 52

  27. Percent of Participants Achieving a Reduction in BPDAI Activity Score of ≥75% From Baseline to Week 52

    BPDAI activity score is the arithmetic sum of 3 subcomponents: cutaneous blisters/erosions, cutaneous urticaria/erythema, and mucosal blisters/erosions. Scores can range from 0 to 360 for BPDAI total activity (maximum 240 for total skin activity and 120 for mucosal activity), with higher scores indicating greater disease activity. Participants were required to have a BPDAI activity score of ≥24 at the screening and baseline visits for eligibility. Participants were considered non-responders after rescue treatment use. Participants with missing values caused by discontinuation from the study before week 52 due to lack of efficacy, treatment-related AE, or death were considered non-responders. Missing values due to other reasons were imputed using multiple imputation of the continuous data of the BPDAI activity score.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 52

  28. Percent of Participants Achieving a Reduction in BPDAI Activity Score of ≥90% From Baseline to Week 52

    BPDAI activity score is the arithmetic sum of 3 subcomponents: cutaneous blisters/erosions, cutaneous urticaria/erythema, and mucosal blisters/erosions. Scores can range from 0 to 360 for BPDAI total activity (maximum 240 for total skin activity and 120 for mucosal activity), with higher scores indicating greater disease activity. Participants were required to have a BPDAI activity score of ≥24 at the screening and baseline visits for eligibility. Participants were considered non-responders after rescue treatment use. Participants with missing values caused by discontinuation from the study before week 52 due to lack of efficacy, treatment-related AE, or death were considered non-responders. Missing values due to other reasons were imputed using multiple imputation of the continuous data of the BPDAI activity score.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 52

  29. Change in ABQOL Score From Baseline to Week 52

    ABQOL questionnaire consists of 17 items, which encompass physical burden of the disease, psychiatric effects, and effects on daily life functioning. Each question ranges from 0 to 3 points, with higher scores indicating poorer quality of life. The maximum ABQOL score is 51. Values after first rescue treatment were set to missing and were imputed with the worst value from the closest visit on or prior to rescue medication use and afterwards up to and including week 52. Missing values caused by discontinuation from the study due to lack of efficacy, treatment-related AE, or death were imputed by the WOCF method. Missing values due to other reasons were imputed by multiple imputation.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 52

  30. Change in Percent BSA of BP Involvement From Baseline to Week 52

    Values after first rescue treatment were set to missing and were imputed with the worst value from the closest visit on or prior to rescue medication use and afterwards up to and including week 52. Missing values caused by discontinuation from the study due to lack of efficacy, treatment-related AE, or death were imputed by the WOCF method. Missing values due to other reasons were imputed by multiple imputation.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 52

  31. Change in BP180 IgG Autoantibody Titer From Baseline to Week 52

    Values after first rescue treatment were set to missing and were imputed with the worst value from the closest visit on or prior to rescue medication use and afterwards up to and including week 52. Missing values caused by discontinuation from the study due to lack of efficacy, treatment-related AE, or death were imputed by the WOCF method. Missing values due to other reasons were imputed by multiple imputation.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 52

  32. Change in BP230 IgG Autoantibody Titer From Baseline to Week 52

    Values after first rescue treatment were set to missing and were imputed with the worst value from the closest visit on or prior to rescue medication use and afterwards up to and including week 52. Missing values caused by discontinuation from the study due to lack of efficacy, treatment-related AE, or death were imputed by the WOCF method. Missing values due to other reasons were imputed by multiple imputation.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 52

  33. Percent of Participants in Complete Remission and Off OCS No Later Than Week 16

    Complete remission was defined as absence of new lesions and epithelialization of old lesions. Participants were considered non-responders after rescue treatment use. Participants with missing assessment of complete remission caused by discontinuation from the study before week 16 due to lack of efficacy, treatment-related AE, or death were considered non-responders. Participants with missing assessment of complete remission before week 16 due to other reasons were imputed using multiple imputation.

    Measured: Up to Week 16

  34. Percent Change in BPDAI Activity Score From Baseline to Week 16

    BPDAI activity score is the arithmetic sum of 3 subcomponents: cutaneous blisters/erosions, cutaneous urticaria/erythema, and mucosal blisters/erosions. Scores can range from 0 to 360 for BPDAI total activity (maximum 240 for total skin activity and 120 for mucosal activity), with higher scores indicating greater disease activity. Participants were required to have a BPDAI activity score of ≥24 at the screening and baseline visits for eligibility. Values after first rescue treatment were set to missing and were imputed with the worst value from the closest visit on or prior to rescue medication use and afterwards up to and including week 36. Missing values caused by discontinuation from the study due to lack of efficacy, treatment-related AE, or death were imputed by the WOCF method. Missing values due to other reasons were imputed by multiple imputation.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 16

  35. Percent of Participants Achieving a Reduction in BPDAI Activity Score of ≥50% From Baseline to Week 16

    BPDAI activity score is the arithmetic sum of 3 subcomponents: cutaneous blisters/erosions, cutaneous urticaria/erythema, and mucosal blisters/erosions. Scores can range from 0 to 360 for BPDAI total activity (maximum 240 for total skin activity and 120 for mucosal activity), with higher scores indicating greater disease activity. Participants were required to have a BPDAI activity score of ≥24 at the screening and baseline visits for eligibility. Participants were considered non-responders after rescue treatment use. Participants with missing values caused by discontinuation from the study before week 16 due to lack of efficacy, treatment-related AE, or death were considered non-responders. Missing values due to other reasons were imputed using multiple imputation of the continuous data of the BPDAI activity score.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 16

  36. Percent of Participants Achieving a Reduction in BPDAI Activity Score of ≥75% From Baseline to Week 16

    BPDAI activity score is the arithmetic sum of 3 subcomponents: cutaneous blisters/erosions, cutaneous urticaria/erythema, and mucosal blisters/erosions. Scores can range from 0 to 360 for BPDAI total activity (maximum 240 for total skin activity and 120 for mucosal activity), with higher scores indicating greater disease activity. Participants were required to have a BPDAI activity score of ≥24 at the screening and baseline visits for eligibility. Participants were considered non-responders after rescue treatment use. Participants with missing values caused by discontinuation from the study before week 16 due to lack of efficacy, treatment-related AE, or death were considered non-responders. Missing values due to other reasons were imputed using multiple imputation of the continuous data of the BPDAI activity score.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 16

  37. Percent of Participants Achieving a Reduction in BPDAI Activity Score of ≥90% From Baseline to Week 16

    BPDAI activity score is the arithmetic sum of 3 subcomponents: cutaneous blisters/erosions, cutaneous urticaria/erythema, and mucosal blisters/erosions. Scores can range from 0 to 360 for BPDAI total activity (maximum 240 for total skin activity and 120 for mucosal activity), with higher scores indicating greater disease activity. Participants were required to have a BPDAI activity score of ≥24 at the screening and baseline visits for eligibility. Participants were considered non-responders after rescue treatment use. Participants with missing values caused by discontinuation from the study before week 16 due to lack of efficacy, treatment-related AE, or death were considered non-responders. Missing values due to other reasons were imputed using multiple imputation of the continuous data of the BPDAI activity score.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 16

  38. Percent Change in Weekly Average of Daily Peak Pruritus NRS From Baseline to Week 16

    Peak pruritus NRS was used by participants to rate the intensity of pruritus during the past 24 hours, with 0 indicating no itch and 10 indicating worst itch possible. Participants were required to have a baseline peak pruritus NRS maximum intensity average of ≥4 during the 7 days prior to randomization for eligibility. Values after first rescue treatment were set to missing and were imputed with the worst value from the closest visit on or prior to rescue medication use and afterwards up to and including week 36. Missing values caused by discontinuation from the study due to lack of efficacy, treatment-related AE, or death were imputed by the WOCF method. Missing values due to other reasons were imputed by multiple imputation.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 16

  39. Percent of Participants With Improvement (Reduction) of Weekly Average of Daily Peak Pruritus NRS ≥4 From Baseline to Week 16

    Peak pruritus NRS was used by participants to rate the intensity of pruritus during the past 24 hours, with 0 indicating no itch and 10 indicating worst itch possible. Participants were required to have a baseline peak pruritus NRS maximum intensity average of ≥4 during the 7 days prior to randomization for eligibility. Participants were considered non-responders after rescue treatment use. Participants with missing values caused by discontinuation from the study before week 16 due to lack of efficacy, treatment-related AE, or death were considered non-responders. Missing values due to other reasons were imputed using multiple imputation of the continuous data of the weekly average of daily peak pruritus NRS.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 16

  40. Number of Participants With At Least One Treatment-emergent Adverse Event (TEAE) Through Week 52

    Measured: Through Week 52

  41. Number of Participants With At Least One Serious TEAE Through Week 52

    Measured: Through Week 52

  42. Number of Participants With At Least One TE Adverse Event of Special Interest (AESI) Through Week 52

    Measured: Through Week 52

  43. Number of Participants With At Least One TEAE Through Week 64

    Measured: Week 52 through Week 64

  44. Number of Participants With At Least One Serious TEAE Through Week 64

    Measured: Week 52 through Week 64

  45. Number of Participants With At Least One TE AESI Through Week 64

    Measured: Week 52 through Week 64

  46. Concentrations of Functional Dupilumab in Serum

    Measured: Baseline to Week 64

  47. Number of Participants With TE Anti-drug Antibody (ADA) Response Per Maximum Titer Category

    Measured: Baseline to Week 64

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted20 Dec 2019
  2. Study start28 Oct 2020
  3. Primary completion12 Jul 2024
  4. Study completion5 Jan 2025

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 2/3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Quadruple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
106 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04206553
Sponsor's protocol ID
R668-BP-1902
Other IDs
2019-003520-20, 2024-510745-34-00, 2019
Acronym
LIBERTY-BP
Status last verified
May 2026
First submitted
18 Dec 2019
Last updated
18 Jun 2026
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Yes: All individual patient data (IPD) that underlie publicly available results will be considered for sharing
Expanded access
Available

Publications

  • Murrell DF, Joly P, Werth VP, Ujiie H, Worm M, Mangold AR, Avetisova E, Maloney J, Laws E, Mortensen E, Dubost-Brama A, Shabbir A. Study Design of a Phase 2/3 Randomized Controlled Trial of Dupilumab in Adults with Bullous Pemphigoid: LIBERTY-BP ADEPT. Adv Ther. 2024 Jul;41(7):2991-3002. doi: 10.1007/s12325-024-02810-3. Epub 2024 Mar 5.

    PubMed 38443648

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 2/3 study testing dupilumab and Oral corticosteroids (OCS) in people with Bullous Pemphigoid, run by Regeneron Pharmaceuticals at 53 sites in 9 countries.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 11 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 18 Jun 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 53 sites in United States, Germany, France, Japan, Spain and 4 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this combined phase mean?

Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.

Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 6 Mar 2026). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Percent of Participants Achieving Sustained Remission at Week 36 (time frame: At Week 36). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04206553, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 18 Jun 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in