AzTrials
AzTrials

Vulvovaginal CandidiasisNCT04208555

Comparison of Boric Acid vs. Terconazole in Treatment of RVVC

A study testing Boric Acid Vaginal Suppository and Terconazole Vaginal Suppository in people with Vulvovaginal Candidiasis, run by Hatem AbuHashim.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Vulvovaginal candidiasis (VVC) caused by Candida species, predominantly C. Albicans is considered one of the most common infections of the lower female genital tract affecting 75% of women at least once in their lifetime. Recurrent VVC (RVVC) is arbitrarily defined as four or more episodes every year. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 50 years, women only
Conditions the study is for
Vulvovaginal Candidiasis
What is being tested?
Boric Acid Vaginal Suppository and Terconazole Vaginal Suppository
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
76 participants
Where
No sites listed yet
Study dates
15 Jan 2020to 31 May 2021
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 50 years
  • Women only
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult

Who may be able to join

  • Diagnosis of RVVC will be defined as four or more episodes of VVC that occurred during the previous 12-month period.
  • Has symptoms and signs of VVC e.g. itching, burning, discharge, and erythema.
  • Documented VVC on high vaginal swabs (HVSs) by the demonstration of blastospores and pseudohyphae in a wet vaginal smear treated with 10% potassium hydroxide, and a positive fungal culture.
  • Age: 18-50 years old and premenopausal.
  • Agree to abstain from sexual intercourse during the treatment period.
  • Agree to abstain from using any other vaginal product during the study period.

Who cannot join

  • Postmenopausal.
  • Pregnancy.
  • Sexually transmitted infection (Chlamydia, gonorrhea, trichomonas).
  • Any antifungal or antibiotic use 14 days prior to treatment.
  • Gynecological conditions requiring treatment e.g. Bartholin's cyst, abscess, PID.
  • Patients receiving corticosteroids or immunosuppressive therapy.
  • Patients expected to menstruate within seven days of the start of treatment.

Trial locations and contacts

No sites are listed yet.

Hatem Abu Hashim, MD.FRCOG.PhD contact

+20502300002

hatem_ah@hotmail.com

About this study

Official title: A Randomized Comparison of Boric Acid Versus Terconazole in Treatment of Recurrent Vulvovaginal Candidiasis

Vulvovaginal candidiasis (VVC) caused by Candida species, predominantly C. Albicans is considered one of the most common infections of the lower female genital tract affecting 75% of women at least once in their lifetime. Recurrent VVC (RVVC) is arbitrarily defined as four or more episodes every year. RVVC is a debilitating, long-term condition that can severely affect the quality of life of women. Several factors have been associated with RVVC such as prolonged use of antibiotics, inadequately treated infection, uncontrolled diabetes, immune mechanisms (e.g. HIV), oral contraceptive use as well as the resistance of non-albicans Candida species (e.g. C glabrata, C krusei) to conventional antifungal agents as azoles.

Fluconazole administered orally is the most commonly used antifungal drug in the case of RVVC. However, in the last decade, fluconazole-resistant C Albicans has been reported in women with RVVC. Terconazole is a broad-spectrum, triazole antifungal treatment agent for both C Albicans and non-albicans. Its use (80 mg vaginal suppository daily for 6 days) was as effective as two doses of oral fluconazole (150 mg) in the treatment of patients with severe VVC and RVVC.

Boric acid or boracic [B(OH)3] is a weak acid with proven antifungal action. In RVVC especially in azole-resistant strains and in non-Candida Albicans, 600 mg of the boric acid vaginal suppository is recommended once daily for 2 weeks. This regimen has a mycologic cure rate varied from 40% to 100%. However, there are no published studies comparing the intravaginal use of boric acid with terconazole for RVVC. Accordingly, a prospective randomized study in patients with RVVC will be conducted to address this important issue.

Being tested
Boric Acid Vaginal Suppository, Terconazole Vaginal Suppository
Medical subject headings
Candidiasis, Vulvovaginal

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Boric Acid Vaginal SuppositoryDrug

    Boric acid vaginal suppository (600 mg/day) for 14 days

  • Terconazole Vaginal SuppositoryDrug

    Terconazole 80 mg vaginal suppository daily for 6 days

Study groups in NCT04208555
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Boric acid vaginal suppositoryExperimentalNot described
Receives: Drug: Boric Acid Vaginal Suppository
Terconazole vaginal suppositoryActive comparatorNot described
Receives: Drug: Terconazole Vaginal Suppository

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Mycological cure rate

    Negative Candida by cultures of high vaginal swabs

    Measured: At day 15 of treatment

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted23 Dec 2019
  2. Study start15 Jan 2020 (estimated)
  3. Primary completion28 Feb 2021 (estimated)
  4. Study completion31 May 2021 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
76 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04208555
Sponsor's protocol ID
MS.19.09.825
Status last verified
Dec 2019
First submitted
19 Dec 2019
Last updated
24 Dec 2019
Results posted
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Publications

  • Iavazzo C, Gkegkes ID, Zarkada IM, Falagas ME. Boric acid for recurrent vulvovaginal candidiasis: the clinical evidence. J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2011 Aug;20(8):1245-55. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2010.2708. Epub 2011 Jul 20.

    PubMed 21774671

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Boric Acid Vaginal Suppository and Terconazole Vaginal Suppository in people with Vulvovaginal Candidiasis, run by Hatem AbuHashim.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 24 Dec 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Hatem Abu Hashim, MD.FRCOG.PhD (+20502300002, hatem_ah@hotmail.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Mycological cure rate (time frame: At day 15 of treatment). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04208555, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 24 Dec 2019.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in