AzTrials
AzTrials

Atrial FibrillationPLEANCT04216667

Posterior Wall And Left Atrial Appendage Empiric Electrical Isolation for Non-Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation

A study testing Catheter ablation in people with Atrial Fibrillation, run by Montefiore Medical Center at 16 sites in 7 countries.

Terminated

Stopped early. The study ended before it was planned to and will not resume.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of empirical posterior wall isolation (PWI), left atrial appendage electrical isolation (LAAEI) and coronary sinus isolation (CSI) when compared to pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) alone: PVI alone, PVI + PWI, PVI + PWI + LAAEI, PVI + PWI + LAAEI +… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 99 years
Conditions the study is for
Atrial Fibrillation
What is being tested?
Catheter ablation
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
124 participants
Where
16 sitesin 7 countries
Study dates
16 Jan 2020to 30 Jun 2023
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 99 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Provision of signed and dated informed consent form
  • Stated willingness to comply with all study procedures and availability for the duration of the study
  • Male or female, aged 18 or greater
  • In good general health as evidenced by medical history and diagnosed with symptomatic persistent AF or long-standing persistent AF.
  • Persistent AF will be defined as a sustained episode lasting > 7 days and less than 1 year.
  • Long-standing persistent AF will be defined as a sustained episode lasting more than 1 year and less than 10 years.
Show all 9Show fewer
  • Symptoms may include, but are not restricted to, palpitations, shortness of breath, chest pain, fatigue, left ventricular dysfunction, or other symptoms, or any combination of the above.
  • At least one episode of persistent AF must have been documented by ECG, Holter, loop recorder, ziopatch, telemetry, trans telephonic monitoring (TTM), or implantable device within last 10 years of enrollment in this investigation.
  • Patients undergoing first time procedure for AF.

Who cannot join

  • Patients with paroxysmal AF.
  • Paroxysmal AF will be defined as a sustained episode lasting < 7 days (either terminated spontaneously or with pharmacological or electrical cardioversion.
  • Reversible causes of AF.
  • Patients with contraindications to systemic anticoagulation with heparin or coumadin, direct thrombin inhibitor or factor Xa inhibitors.
  • Patients with left atrial size ≥ 75 mm (2D echocardiography, parasternal long axis view)
  • Left atrial or LAA thrombus
Show all 10Show fewer
  • Patients with severe valvular heart disease or after mitral valve replacement (bioprosthetic or mechanical).
  • Patients with a life expectancy ≤ 24 months
  • CHA2DS2Vasc score of 0 for men and CHA2DS2Vasc score of 1 for women.
  • Patients who are pregnant.

Trial locations and contacts

16 sites in 7 countries.

16 sites in 7 countries

United States10 sites
  • Texas Cardiac Arrhythmia Institute

    Austin, Texas, 78705

  • Grandview Medical Center

    Birmingham, Alabama, 35243

  • Indiana University

    Bloomington, Indiana, 47405

  • University of Colorado

    Boulder, Colorado, 80309

  • Baylor Heart Clinic

    Houston, Texas, 77030

  • MarinHealth Medical Center

    Larkspur, California, 94904

  • Miami Cardiac & Vascular Institute

    Miami, Florida, 33176

  • University of Pennsylvania

    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19104

  • WakedMed Heart & Vascular

    Raleigh, North Carolina, 27610

  • Montefiore Medical Center

    The Bronx, New York, 10467

Other trials in United States

Argentina1 site
  • Instituto Cardiovascular Adventista

    Buenos Aires

Other trials in Argentina

Brazil1 site
  • Incor - HCFMUSP

    São Paulo

Other trials in Brazil

Colombia1 site
  • University CES

    Medellín, Antioquia

Other trials in Colombia

Germany1 site
  • Cardioangiologisches Centrum Bethanien

    Frankfurt

Other trials in Germany

Portugal1 site
  • Hospital Santa Cruz

    Lisbon

Other trials in Portugal

Turkey (Türkiye)1 site
  • Hacettepe University

    Ankara

Other trials in Turkey (Türkiye)

About this study

Official title: Posterior Wall And Left Atrial Appendage Empiric Electrical Isolation for Non-Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation (The PLEA Trial)

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of empirical posterior wall isolation (PWI), left atrial appendage electrical isolation (LAAEI) and coronary sinus isolation (CSI) when compared to pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) alone:

  • PVI alone,
  • PVI + PWI,
  • PVI + PWI + LAAEI,
  • PVI + PWI + LAAEI + CSI.
Read the detailed description

The Posterior Wall and/or Left Atrial Appendage Empiric Electrical Isolation for Non-Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation (The PLEA Trial) is a prospective multicenter randomized controlled study that has the overall goal of establishing the efficacy and safety of different ablation techniques for patients with persistent and long-standing persistent atrial fibrillation. The PLEA trial is designed to test the hypothesis whether posterior wall isolation (PWI) with pulmonary vein isolation (PVI), PWI plus left atrial appendage electrical isolation (LAAEI) with PVI and PWI plus LAAEI plus coronary sinus isolation (CSI) with PVI is superior to the standard approach alone (i.e. PVI alone) in decreasing the incidence of the composite endpoint of all-cause mortality and all-atrial arrhythmia recurrences.

Being tested
Catheter ablation
Keywords
Catheter Ablation, Arrhythmia Recurrence, Embolic Stroke, Mortality
Medical subject headings
Atrial Fibrillation, Embolic Stroke

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Catheter ablationProcedure or surgery

    Catheter ablation

Study groups in NCT04216667
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
PVIActive comparatorPulmonary vein isolation alone will be performed using radiofrequency energy
Receives: Procedure: Catheter ablation
PVI + PWIExperimentalPulmonary vein isolation plus posterior wall isolation will be performed using radiofrequency energy
Receives: Procedure: Catheter ablation
PVI + PWI + LAAEIExperimentalPulmonary vein isolation plus posterior wall isolation plus left atrial appendage electrical isolation will be performed using radiofrequency energy
Receives: Procedure: Catheter ablation
PVI + PWI + LAAEI + CSIExperimentalPulmonary vein isolation plus posterior wall isolation plus left atrial appendage electrical isolation plus coronary sinus isolation will be performed using radiofrequency energy
Receives: Procedure: Catheter ablation

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Freedom from documented AF/AT/AFL episodes and all-cause mortality after initial procedure

    The primary effectiveness endpoint is defined as the freedom from documented AF/AT/AFL episodes (> 30 seconds) and all-cause mortality within 12 months after one ablation procedure without antiarrhythmic medications after blanking period (3 months after ablation) as adjudicated by the independent Core Laboratory.

    Atrial Fibrillation (AF) Atrial Tachycardia (AT) Atrial Flutter (AFL)

    Measured: 12 months

  2. A composite of thromboembolic events, myocardial perforation, pulmonary vein stenosis, atrioesophageal fistula, left and right phrenic nerve paralysis, and other serious adverse events within 12 months post-procedure.

    The primary safety endpoint is defined as a composite of thromboembolic events, myocardial perforation, pulmonary vein stenosis, atrioesophageal fistula, left and right phrenic nerve paralysis, and other serious adverse events within 12 months post-procedure.

    Measured: 12 months

Secondary outcomes (11)
  1. Incidence of peri-procedural and 12-month post procedural complications.

    These complications include: ischemic stroke, pulmonary veins (PVs) stenosis, cardiac perforation, esophageal injury, phrenic nerve paralysis, rehospitalization, and death.

    Measured: 12, 24 and 60 months

  2. AF/AT/AFL Burden

    Atrial fibrillation (AF), atrial tachycardia (AT) and/or atrial flutter (AFL) burden at 12 months after single and redo procedures

    Measured: 12, 24 and 60 months

  3. All-cause mortality

    Death from all causes will be assessed

    Measured: 12, 24 and 60 months

  4. Atrial contractility

    Myocardial strain will be used to assess atrial contractility after catheter ablation

    Measured: 6 months

  5. Heart failure analysis

    Primary outcome will be assessed base on left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF)

    Measured: 12, 24 and 60 months

  6. Cardiovascular hospitalizations

    Cardiovascular hospitalization was characterized by the site principal investigator (PI) and reported as part of the hospitalization case report form.

    Measured: 12, 24 and 60 months

  7. Procedure duration and fluoroscopy time

    These times will be compared amongst groups

    Measured: Day of Procedure

  8. Number of repeat procedures

    Number of repeat procedures within 12 months after the first ablation procedure

    Measured: 12 months

  9. Cost-effectiveness analysis

    The CEA will examine the cost of health care resources and health outcomes from the ablation procedure to 1-year postoperatively. The costs will include all health care utilization during this time. Health care utilization, and associated costs, related to the patients' condition, the procedure and adverse events will be the basis of a sensitivity analysis.

    Measured: 12 months

  10. Long-term follow-up at 24 and 60 months to evaluate freedom of documented AF/AT/AFL episodes (>30 seconds) and all-cause mortality adjudicated by the Core Laboratory

    Freedom from documented AF/AT/AFL episodes (> 30 seconds) and all-cause mortality within 24 and 60 months after one ablation procedure without antiarrhythmic medications after blanking period (3 months after ablation) as adjudicated by the independent Core Laboratory.

    Atrial Fibrillation (AF) Atrial Tachycardia (AT) Atrial Flutter (AFL)

    Measured: 24 and 60 months

  11. Freedom from documented AF/AT/AFL episodes (>30 seconds) and all-cause mortality within 12 months after redo ablation procedure.

    Freedom from all-atrial arrhythmias recurrence (AF/atrial flutter [AFL]/atrial tachycardia [AT]) (episodes >30 seconds on 12-lead ECG, event monitor, Zio patch, Holter or device interrogation) and all-cause mortality (patients who die before the 12-month assessment or who are too ill to undergo assessment of AF are considered not to have response to treatment) during the evaluation period at 12 months after redo-ablation procedures as adjudicated by the independent Core Laboratory.

    Measured: 12 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted3 Jan 2020
  2. Study start16 Jan 2020
  3. Primary completion30 Jun 2023
  4. Study completion30 Jun 2023

Why it stopped: Insufficient enrollment

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
A total of 932 patients will be randomized with equal allocation to one of four treatment groups. This sample size provides 90% power to detect pairwise differences in response rates between groups ranging from 0.12 to 0.15 based on two-tailed 0.05 level intention to treat chi-squared tests. Specifically, the response rates under the alternative upon which sample size is determined are 0.45, 0.60, 0.75, 0.87 for PVI alone, PVI + PWI, PVI + PWI + LAAEI and PVI + PWI + LAAEI + CSI respectively.
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Participant, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
124 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04216667
Sponsor's protocol ID
2019-10714
Other IDs
2019
Acronym
PLEA
Status last verified
Aug 2023
First submitted
31 Dec 2019
Last updated
31 Aug 2023
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Romero J, Michaud GF, Avendano R, Briceno DF, Kumar S, Carlos Diaz J, Mohanty S, Trivedi C, Gianni C, Della Rocca D, Proietti R, Perrotta L, Bordignon S, Chun JKR, Schmidt B, Garcia M, Natale A, Di Biase L. Benefit of left atrial appendage electrical isolation for persistent and long-standing persistent atrial fibrillation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Europace. 2018 Aug 1;20(8):1268-1278. doi: 10.1093/europace/eux372.

    PubMed 29342299
  • Benjamin EJ, Blaha MJ, Chiuve SE, Cushman M, Das SR, Deo R, de Ferranti SD, Floyd J, Fornage M, Gillespie C, Isasi CR, Jimenez MC, Jordan LC, Judd SE, Lackland D, Lichtman JH, Lisabeth L, Liu S, Longenecker CT, Mackey RH, Matsushita K, Mozaffarian D, Mussolino ME, Nasir K, Neumar RW, Palaniappan L, Pandey DK, Thiagarajan RR, Reeves MJ, Ritchey M, Rodriguez CJ, Roth GA, Rosamond WD, Sasson C, Towfighi A, Tsao CW, Turner MB, Virani SS, Voeks JH, Willey JZ, Wilkins JT, Wu JH, Alger HM, Wong SS, Muntner P; American Heart Association Statistics Committee and Stroke Statistics Subcommittee. Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics-2017 Update: A Report From the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2017 Mar 7;135(10):e146-e603. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000485. Epub 2017 Jan 25. No abstract available.

    PubMed 28122885
  • Chugh SS, Havmoeller R, Narayanan K, Singh D, Rienstra M, Benjamin EJ, Gillum RF, Kim YH, McAnulty JH Jr, Zheng ZJ, Forouzanfar MH, Naghavi M, Mensah GA, Ezzati M, Murray CJ. Worldwide epidemiology of atrial fibrillation: a Global Burden of Disease 2010 Study. Circulation. 2014 Feb 25;129(8):837-47. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.005119. Epub 2013 Dec 17.

    PubMed 24345399
  • Calkins H, Hindricks G, Cappato R, Kim YH, Saad EB, Aguinaga L, Akar JG, Badhwar V, Brugada J, Camm J, Chen PS, Chen SA, Chung MK, Nielsen JC, Curtis AB, Davies DW, Day JD, d'Avila A, de Groot NMSN, Di Biase L, Duytschaever M, Edgerton JR, Ellenbogen KA, Ellinor PT, Ernst S, Fenelon G, Gerstenfeld EP, Haines DE, Haissaguerre M, Helm RH, Hylek E, Jackman WM, Jalife J, Kalman JM, Kautzner J, Kottkamp H, Kuck KH, Kumagai K, Lee R, Lewalter T, Lindsay BD, Macle L, Mansour M, Marchlinski FE, Michaud GF, Nakagawa H, Natale A, Nattel S, Okumura K, Packer D, Pokushalov E, Reynolds MR, Sanders P, Scanavacca M, Schilling R, Tondo C, Tsao HM, Verma A, Wilber DJ, Yamane T. 2017 HRS/EHRA/ECAS/APHRS/SOLAECE expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation: Executive summary. Europace. 2018 Jan 1;20(1):157-208. doi: 10.1093/europace/eux275. No abstract available.

    PubMed 29016841
  • Di Biase L, Burkhardt JD, Mohanty P, Mohanty S, Sanchez JE, Trivedi C, Gunes M, Gokoglan Y, Gianni C, Horton RP, Themistoclakis S, Gallinghouse GJ, Bailey S, Zagrodzky JD, Hongo RH, Beheiry S, Santangeli P, Casella M, Dello Russo A, Al-Ahmad A, Hranitzky P, Lakkireddy D, Tondo C, Natale A. Left Atrial Appendage Isolation in Patients With Longstanding Persistent AF Undergoing Catheter Ablation: BELIEF Trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016 Nov 1;68(18):1929-1940. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2016.07.770.

    PubMed 27788847
  • Ludka L. [Fasting during childbirth]. Katilolehti. 1988 Sep;93(6):25-8. No abstract available. Finnish.

    PubMed 3210508
  • Allessie MA, de Groot NM, Houben RP, Schotten U, Boersma E, Smeets JL, Crijns HJ. Electropathological substrate of long-standing persistent atrial fibrillation in patients with structural heart disease: longitudinal dissociation. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2010 Dec;3(6):606-15. doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.109.910125. Epub 2010 Aug 18.

    PubMed 20719881
  • Brooks AG, Stiles MK, Laborderie J, Lau DH, Kuklik P, Shipp NJ, Hsu LF, Sanders P. Outcomes of long-standing persistent atrial fibrillation ablation: a systematic review. Heart Rhythm. 2010 Jun;7(6):835-46. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2010.01.017. Epub 2010 Jan 22.

    PubMed 20206320
  • Kuck KH, Brugada J, Furnkranz A, Metzner A, Ouyang F, Chun KR, Elvan A, Arentz T, Bestehorn K, Pocock SJ, Albenque JP, Tondo C; FIRE AND ICE Investigators. Cryoballoon or Radiofrequency Ablation for Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation. N Engl J Med. 2016 Jun 9;374(23):2235-45. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1602014. Epub 2016 Apr 4.

    PubMed 27042964
  • Verma A, Jiang CY, Betts TR, Chen J, Deisenhofer I, Mantovan R, Macle L, Morillo CA, Haverkamp W, Weerasooriya R, Albenque JP, Nardi S, Menardi E, Novak P, Sanders P; STAR AF II Investigators. Approaches to catheter ablation for persistent atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med. 2015 May 7;372(19):1812-22. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1408288.

    PubMed 25946280
  • Lim HS, Hocini M, Dubois R, Denis A, Derval N, Zellerhoff S, Yamashita S, Berte B, Mahida S, Komatsu Y, Daly M, Jesel L, Pomier C, Meillet V, Amraoui S, Shah AJ, Cochet H, Sacher F, Jais P, Haissaguerre M. Complexity and Distribution of Drivers in Relation to Duration of Persistent Atrial Fibrillation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017 Mar 14;69(10):1257-1269. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2017.01.014.

    PubMed 28279292
  • Bai R, Di Biase L, Mohanty P, Trivedi C, Dello Russo A, Themistoclakis S, Casella M, Santarelli P, Fassini G, Santangeli P, Mohanty S, Rossillo A, Pelargonio G, Horton R, Sanchez J, Gallinghouse J, Burkhardt JD, Ma CS, Tondo C, Natale A. Proven isolation of the pulmonary vein antrum with or without left atrial posterior wall isolation in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation. Heart Rhythm. 2016 Jan;13(1):132-40. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2015.08.019. Epub 2015 Aug 13.

    PubMed 26277862
  • Tamborero D, Mont L, Berruezo A, Matiello M, Benito B, Sitges M, Vidal B, de Caralt TM, Perea RJ, Vatasescu R, Brugada J. Left atrial posterior wall isolation does not improve the outcome of circumferential pulmonary vein ablation for atrial fibrillation: a prospective randomized study. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2009 Feb;2(1):35-40. doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.108.797944. Epub 2008 Dec 3.

    PubMed 19808442
  • Lim TW, Koay CH, See VA, McCall R, Chik W, Zecchin R, Byth K, Seow SC, Thomas L, Ross DL, Thomas SP. Single-ring posterior left atrial (box) isolation results in a different mode of recurrence compared with wide antral pulmonary vein isolation on long-term follow-up: longer atrial fibrillation-free survival time but similar survival time free of any atrial arrhythmia. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2012 Oct;5(5):968-77. doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.111.970293. Epub 2012 Sep 12.

    PubMed 22972873
  • Aryana A, Baker JH, Espinosa Ginic MA, Pujara DK, Bowers MR, O'Neill PG, Ellenbogen KA, Di Biase L, d'Avila A, Natale A. Posterior wall isolation using the cryoballoon in conjunction with pulmonary vein ablation is superior to pulmonary vein isolation alone in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation: A multicenter experience. Heart Rhythm. 2018 Aug;15(8):1121-1129. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2018.05.014.

    PubMed 30060879

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Catheter ablation in people with Atrial Fibrillation, run by Montefiore Medical Center at 16 sites in 7 countries.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 9 inclusion and 10 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 31 Aug 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 16 sites in United States, Argentina, Brazil, Colombia, Germany and 2 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study was stopped early (reason given: Insufficient enrollment). Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Freedom from documented AF/AT/AFL episodes and all-cause mortality after initial procedure (time frame: 12 months). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04216667, which also lists 24 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 31 Aug 2023.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in