Spine MetastasesPhase 2NCT04218617
Single- vs. Two-Fraction Spine Stereotactic Radiosurgery for the Treatment of Vertebral Metastases
A Phase 2 study testing Diagnostic MRI, Planning MRI and Simulation CT in people with Spine Metastases and Spine Stereotactic Radiosurgery (sSRS), run by Case Comprehensive Cancer Center at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
Spine radiosurgery (SRS) utilizes advanced treatment planning with focused x-rays to deliver one to four high dose treatments to the spine to help relieve pain and/or neurologic symptoms. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Spine Metastases, Spine Stereotactic Radiosurgery (sSRS)
- What is being tested?
- Diagnostic MRI, Planning MRI and Simulation CT
- Type of treatment
- Medical device, Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 130 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 7 Feb 2020to Oct 2026
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) ≥ 70
- RPA class 1 (KPS >70 AND controlled systemic disease) or RPA Class 2 (KPS >70, uncontrolled systemic disease OR KPS ≤70, age ≥54, no visceral metastases)44 (see Appendix II)
- Vertebral metastases from C3 to L5 based on bone scan, CT, PET, or MRI.
- Vertebral metastases must be (1) solitary, (2) at two contiguous levels, or (3) a maximum of three separate sites, with a maximum of two contiguous levels.
- Radioresistant metastases are permitted (including sarcomas, melanomas, and renal cell carcinomas).
- Patients with epidural disease are permitted so long as there is no cord compression.
Show all 14Show fewer
- Paraspinal extension is permitted, so long as the paraspinal component is ≤5 cm
- Multiple small metastatic lesions (<20% vertebral body involvement) of no clinical correlate are permitted, and not included in the irradiated segments as per RTOG 0631
- History and physical within four weeks of registration.
- Negative pregnancy test within four weeks of registration for women of childbearing potential.
- Diagnostic spine MRI with and without contrast within four weeks of registration
- Neurological exam within four weeks of registration to rule out rapid neurological decline. Mild to moderate neurological deficits are acceptable, as long as distance between lesion and spinal cord is ≥3 mm
- Patients may have prior EBRT at the index site.
- Informed consent of the participant.
Who cannot join
- Lesions at C1-2 or S1-Coccyx.
- Hematologic malignancies including lymphoma and myeloma.
- Multiple primary cancers.
- Primary neoplasms of the spine
- Prior corpectomy, kyphoplasty/vertebroplasty, or instrumentation at the site of planned sSRS.
- Spinal cord compression.
Show all 19Show fewer
- Paraspinal mass >5 cm.
- Patients with rapid neurologic decline.
- Bony retropulsion resulting in neurologic deficit.
- Patients with contraindications to MRI.
- Patients allergic to intravenous contrast for MRI or CT.
- Patients with emergent spinal cord compression.
- Patients with mechanical instability of the spine.
- Patients with active connective tissue disease.
- Patients who previously underwent sSRS to the vertebrae of interest.
- Patients with diffuse or multilevel metastatic spinal disease with >20% involvement of vertebral bodies, defined as involvement of >5 vertebral levels.
- Inability to participate in study activities due to physical or mental limitations.
- Inability or unwillingness to return for all required follow-up visits and imaging.
- Inability to deliver sSRS, either 18 Gy in one fraction, or 24 Gy in two fractions.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
United States1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer institute, Case Comprehensive Cancer Center
Cleveland, Ohio, 44195
Samuel T. Chao, MD, 866-223-8100, TaussigResearch@ccf.org
About this study
Spine radiosurgery (SRS) utilizes advanced treatment planning with focused x-rays to deliver one to four high dose treatments to the spine to help relieve pain and/or neurologic symptoms. Spine SRS uses special equipment to position the participant and guide the focused beams toward the area to be treated and away from normal tissue.
One of the side effects of spine SRS is the development of vertebral compression fractures, many of which are not painful. The goal of this study is to compare the effects, good and/or bad, of spine SRS given in 1 or 2 treatments. Our main goal is to find out which approach will reduce the chances of developing vertebral compression fractures.
Read the detailed description
The primary objective of this study is to establish the non-inferiority in vertebral compression fracture (VCF) incidence at 6 months between single-fraction and two-fraction sSRS.
Other objectives are to to evaluate the 12-month impact of single- and two-fraction sSRS on local control (LC), pain control (PC), quality of life (QOL), and toxicity (specifically, pain flare, radiation esophagitis/laryngitis/pharyngitis, and radiation myelitis)
This study is planned as a two-arm randomized phase II trial to establish non-inferiority of single fraction sSRS compared to two-fraction sSRS. Approximately 130 participants will be enrolled in this trial; 65 participants in each arm:
- Group 1: If you are assigned to this group, you will undergo spine radiosurgery in a single (1) session.
- Group 2: If you are assigned to this group, you will undergo spine radiosurgery in two (2) sessions.
- Being tested
- Diagnostic MRI, Planning MRI, Simulation CT, QOL assessment, Brief pain inventory (BPI)
- Keywords
- C79.40, C79.49, C79.51, C79.52
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Diagnostic MRIDevice
Diagnostic MRI
Planning MRIDevice
Planning MRI: high definition (HD) MRI of the region of interest (1 vertebral level above and below the level(s) being treated)
Simulation CTOther
Simulation CT is obtained (1.5 mm slice thickness)
QOL assessmentOther
QOL assessment
Brief pain inventory (BPI)Other
Brief pain inventory (BPI), including narcotic assessment
sSRS in 1 fractionRadiation
sSRS 18 Gy in 1 fraction
sSRS in 2 fractionRadiation
sSRS 24 Gy in 2 fractions to be delivered either on consecutive days or one day apart.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Arm 1 - Single fraction | Experimental | sSRS 18 Gy in 1 fraction Receives: Device: Diagnostic MRI; Device: Planning MRI; Other: Simulation CT; Other: QOL assessment; Other: Brief pain inventory (BPI); Radiation: sSRS in 1 fraction |
| Arm 2 - Two fraction | Active comparator | sSRS 24 Gy in 2 fractions Receives: Device: Diagnostic MRI; Device: Planning MRI; Other: Simulation CT; Other: QOL assessment; Other: Brief pain inventory (BPI); Radiation: sSRS in 2 fraction |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
6-month cumulative incidence of Vertebral Compression Fracture (VCF) associated with single- and two-fraction sSRS
6-month cumulative incidence of Vertebral Compression Fracture (VCF) associated with single- and two-fraction sSRS
Each treated vertebra will be assessed individually for VCF during radiologic follow-up
Measured: At baseline and for each subsequent follow-up MRI (at 1 month, 3 months, 6 months and 12 months after treatment)
Secondary outcomes (4)
Local control (LC) as defined as absence of local progression of disease In the event of disease progression, all cases will be reviewed at the multi-disciplinary spine tumor board for a consensus recommendation
LC as defined as absence of local progression of disease, which include the following:
- Gross unequivocal increase in tumor volume or linear dimension.
- Any new or progressive tumor within the epidural space.
- Neurologic deterioration attributable to pre-existing epidural disease with equivocal increased epidural disease dimensions on MRI.
Measured: At baseline and for each subsequent follow-up MRI (at 1 month, 3 months, 6 months and 12 months after treatment)
Pain control (PC) as assessed by the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI)
PC at each treated vertebral level assessed by the BPI [9 item questionnaire (range: 0-10), higher scores = worse pain], then defined by RTOG 0631 as follows:
Complete relief (CR): Pain score of 0 at index site 3 mo post-treatment. CR is requisite of no increase in narcotic analgesics.
Partial relief (PR): Reduction in BPI of ≥ 3 points at index site, provided other treated lesions have increased in pain score and participant did not require increase in narcotic analgesics for site of interest. Participants needing increase in narcotics for site will not be scored as having PR. Those needing increase in narcotics for a distant site will remain eligible for CR/PR.
Stable response (SR): Post-treatment pain score same as or within 2 points of baseline score at index site with no increase in narcotic analgesics for site of interest.
Progressive pain: Post-treatment increase of at least 3 points from baseline pain score at index site or increase in narcotics for site of interest.
Measured: At baseline and for each subsequent follow-up MRI (at 1 month, 3 months, 6 months and 12 months after treatment)
Quality of life (QOL) assessed by EORTC QLQ-C30 (with BM22)
Quality of life as measured by (EORTC QOL-C30) - 30 items that are grouped into five scales functional (physical, social, emotional functioning, cognitive and role), three scales of symptoms (fatigue, pain, nausea and vomiting), a global scale of health / quality of life and a number of related individual items with the symptoms of the disease and its treatment, as well as an item of economic impact. The answers to the items on the scales refer to "last week," except the patient's physical functioning scale whose time frame is the present. These answers obey a Likert format, which ranges from 1 ("Not at all") and 4 ("A lot")
Measured: At baseline and for each subsequent follow-up MRI (at 1 month, 3 months, 6 months and 12 months after treatment)
Toxicity as assessed by CTCAE V. 5.0
Toxicity as assessed by criteria in the NCI Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 5.0.
Rates of grade 1-5 toxicities will be reported
Measured: At follow-up MRI (1 month, 3 months, 6 months and 12 months after treatment)
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted6 Jan 2020
- Study start7 Feb 2020
- Primary completionOct 2026 (estimated)
- Study completionOct 2026 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Spine MetastasesStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Case Comprehensive Cancer CenterThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 130 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Case Comprehensive Cancer Center
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Samuel Chao, MD, Principal investigator, Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer institute, Case Comprehensive Cancer Center
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04218617
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- CASE3319
- Status last verified
- Aug 2026
- First submitted
- 2 Jan 2020
- Last updated
- 6 Aug 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- Yes
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: All IPD that underlie results in publication, after de-identification
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 6 Aug 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Single- vs. Two-Fraction Spine Stereotactic Radiosurgery for the Treatment of Vertebral Metastases
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04218617
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- CASE3319
- Keywords
- C79.40, C79.49, C79.51, C79.52
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Recruiting
- Enrolment
- 130 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Case Comprehensive Cancer CenterUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 7 Feb 2020 (actual)
- Primary completion
- Oct 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Oct 2026 (estimated)
- First posted
- 6 Jan 2020 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Spine radiosurgery (SRS) utilizes advanced treatment planning with focused x-rays to deliver one to four high dose treatments to the spine to help relieve pain and/or neurologic symptoms. Spine SRS uses special equipment to position the participant and guide the focused beams toward the area to be treated and away from normal tissue.
One of the side effects of spine SRS is the development of vertebral compression fractures, many of which are not painful. The goal of this study is to compare the effects, good and/or bad, of spine SRS given in 1 or 2 treatments. Our main goal is to find out which approach will reduce the chances of developing vertebral compression fractures.
Detailed description
The primary objective of this study is to establish the non-inferiority in vertebral compression fracture (VCF) incidence at 6 months between single-fraction and two-fraction sSRS.
Other objectives are to to evaluate the 12-month impact of single- and two-fraction sSRS on local control (LC), pain control (PC), quality of life (QOL), and toxicity (specifically, pain flare, radiation esophagitis/laryngitis/pharyngitis, and radiation myelitis)
This study is planned as a two-arm randomized phase II trial to establish non-inferiority of single fraction sSRS compared to two-fraction sSRS. Approximately 130 participants will be enrolled in this trial; 65 participants in each arm:
- Group 1: If you are assigned to this group, you will undergo spine radiosurgery in a single (1) session.
- Group 2: If you are assigned to this group, you will undergo spine radiosurgery in two (2) sessions.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Arm 1 - Single fraction | Experimental | Device: Diagnostic MRI, Device: Planning MRI, Other: Simulation CT, Other: QOL assessment, Other: Brief pain inventory (BPI), Radiation: sSRS in 1 fractionsSRS 18 Gy in 1 fraction |
| Arm 2 - Two fraction | Active comparator | Device: Diagnostic MRI, Device: Planning MRI, Other: Simulation CT, Other: QOL assessment, Other: Brief pain inventory (BPI), Radiation: sSRS in 2 fractionsSRS 24 Gy in 2 fractions |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (14 listed)
- Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) ≥ 70
- RPA class 1 (KPS >70 AND controlled systemic disease) or RPA Class 2 (KPS >70, uncontrolled systemic disease OR KPS ≤70, age ≥54, no visceral metastases)44 (see Appendix II)
- Vertebral metastases from C3 to L5 based on bone scan, CT, PET, or MRI.
- Vertebral metastases must be (1) solitary, (2) at two contiguous levels, or (3) a maximum of three separate sites, with a maximum of two contiguous levels.
- Radioresistant metastases are permitted (including sarcomas, melanomas, and renal cell carcinomas).
Key exclusion criteria (19 listed)
- Lesions at C1-2 or S1-Coccyx.
- Hematologic malignancies including lymphoma and myeloma.
- Multiple primary cancers.
- Primary neoplasms of the spine
- Prior corpectomy, kyphoplasty/vertebroplasty, or instrumentation at the site of planned sSRS.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Diagnostic MRIDiagnostic MRI | Device | Arm 1 - Single fraction, Arm 2 - Two fraction |
| Planning MRIPlanning MRI: high definition (HD) MRI of the region of interest (1 vertebral level above and below the level(s) being treated) | Device | Arm 1 - Single fraction, Arm 2 - Two fraction |
| Simulation CTSimulation CT is obtained (1.5 mm slice thickness) | Other | Arm 1 - Single fraction, Arm 2 - Two fraction |
| QOL assessmentQOL assessment | Other | Arm 1 - Single fraction, Arm 2 - Two fraction |
| Brief pain inventory (BPI)Brief pain inventory (BPI), including narcotic assessment | Other | Arm 1 - Single fraction, Arm 2 - Two fraction |
| sSRS in 1 fractionsSRS 18 Gy in 1 fraction | Radiation | Arm 1 - Single fraction |
| sSRS in 2 fractionsSRS 24 Gy in 2 fractions to be delivered either on consecutive days or one day apart. | Radiation | Arm 2 - Two fraction |
Primary outcome
6-month cumulative incidence of Vertebral Compression Fracture (VCF) associated with single- and two-fraction sSRS
Time frame: At baseline and for each subsequent follow-up MRI (at 1 month, 3 months, 6 months and 12 months after treatment)
6-month cumulative incidence of Vertebral Compression Fracture (VCF) associated with single- and two-fraction sSRS Each treated vertebra will be assessed individually for VCF during radiologic follow-up
4 secondary outcomes
Local control (LC) as defined as absence of local progression of disease In the event of disease progression, all cases will be reviewed at the multi-disciplinary spine tumor board for a consensus recommendation
Time frame: At baseline and for each subsequent follow-up MRI (at 1 month, 3 months, 6 months and 12 months after treatment)
Pain control (PC) as assessed by the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI)
Time frame: At baseline and for each subsequent follow-up MRI (at 1 month, 3 months, 6 months and 12 months after treatment)
Quality of life (QOL) assessed by EORTC QLQ-C30 (with BM22)
Time frame: At baseline and for each subsequent follow-up MRI (at 1 month, 3 months, 6 months and 12 months after treatment)
Toxicity as assessed by CTCAE V. 5.0
Time frame: At follow-up MRI (1 month, 3 months, 6 months and 12 months after treatment)
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 6 Aug 2026.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. All IPD that underlie results in publication, after de-identification
Related trials for Spine Metastases
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
Trial of Combined Radiotherapy and Vertebroplasty for Patients With Painful Metastatic Spinal Lesions
Spinal Metastases
Recruiting
Tumor Treating Fields for the Treatment of Leptomeningeal Metastases of the Spine in Patients With Breast or Lung Cancer
Anatomic Stage IV Breast Cancer AJCC v8, Metastatic Breast Carcinoma
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
Efficacy of Dose Intensified Radiotherapy of Spinal Metastases by Hypofractionated Radiation and IGRT hfSRT Mediated Boost
Spinal Metastases
RecruitingPhase 3
Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy vs Conventional Palliative Radiotherapy for Painful Non-Spine Bone Metastases
Cancer Metastatic
RecruitingPhase 1/2
Prophylactic Radiotherapy of MInimally Symptomatic Spinal Disease
Spine Metastases
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
Samuel Chao, MD principal investigator
Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer institute, Case Comprehensive Cancer Center
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing Diagnostic MRI, Planning MRI and Simulation CT in people with Spine Metastases and Spine Stereotactic Radiosurgery (sSRS), run by Case Comprehensive Cancer Center at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 14 inclusion and 19 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 6 Aug 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Samuel T Chao, MD (1-866-223-8100, TaussigResearch@ccf.org), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
6-month cumulative incidence of Vertebral Compression Fracture (VCF) associated with single- and two-fraction sSRS (time frame: At baseline and for each subsequent follow-up MRI (at 1 month, 3 months, 6 months and 12 months after treatment)). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 6 Aug 2026.