AzTrials
AzTrials

Head and Neck CancerPhase 2NCT04220749

Radiotherapy vs. Trans-Oral Surgery for HPV-Negative Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma

A Phase 2 study testing Radiation and Trans-Oral Surgery (TOS) + Neck Dissection in people with Head and Neck Cancer and Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma, run by London Health Sciences Centre Research Institute OR Lawson Research Institute of St. Joseph's at 1 site in Canada.

Recruiting

Looking for participants now. Contact the study team or a site below to ask about taking part.

Sites and contacts
Official record

Search all trials

Trial summary

The goal of this randomized phase II study is a formal comparison of radiotherapy versus trans-oral surgery as the primary treatment of HPV-negative patients with early-stage oropharyngeal carcinoma. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
What is being tested?
Radiation and Trans-Oral Surgery (TOS) + Neck Dissection
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
68 participants
Where
1 siteCanada
Study dates
25 Jun 2020to Feb 2028
Phase
Phase 2

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Age 18 years or older
  • Willing to provide informed consent
  • ECOG performance status 0-2
  • Histologically confirmed squamous cell carcinoma
  • HPV-negative tumor, as determined by: negative p16 status, real time PCR or in-situ hybridization. Central confirmation is not required prior to randomization. Equivocal/uncertain HPV status will be allowed on trial.
  • Primary tumor site in the oropharynx (includes tonsil, soft palate, base of tongue, walls of oropharynx)
Show all 11Show fewer
  • Tumor stage: T1 or T2, with likely negative resection margins at surgery
  • Nodal stage: N0-3. Patients with positive nodal disease and extranodal extension on imaging may be included at the surgeon's discretion, if the nodal disease is deemed resectable by the operating surgeon.
  • Eligible for curative intent treatment, with likely negative resection margins at surgery. For patients where adequate transoral access is in question, they will first undergo an examination under anesthesia prior to randomization to ensure adequate exposure can be obtained.
  • Blood work obtained within 4 weeks prior to randomization, with adequate bone marrow function, hepatic, and renal function, as determined by the investigator.
  • Patient assessed by a radiation oncologist and surgeon and presented at multidisciplinary tumor board prior to randomization. If not feasible, case can be discussed with study Principal Investigator.

Who cannot join

  • Serious medical comorbidities or other contraindications to radiotherapy, chemotherapy or surgery
  • Prior history of head and neck cancer within 5 years
  • Prior head and neck radiation at any time
  • Metastatic disease
  • Inability to attend full course of radiotherapy or follow-up visits
  • Prior invasive malignant disease unless disease-free for at least 5 years or more, with the exception of non-melanoma skin cancer
  • Unable or unwilling to complete QOL questionnaires
  • Pregnant or lactating women

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.

Canada1 site, 1 recruiting
  • London Regional Cancer Program

    London, Ontario, N6A 5W9

    Danielle MacNeil, MD, 519-658-8600, Danielle.Macneil@lhsc.on.ca

    Recruiting

Other trials in Canada

About this study

Official title: A Phase II Randomized Trial for HPV-Negative Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Radiotherapy vs. Trans-Oral Surgery (ORATOR)

The goal of this randomized phase II study is a formal comparison of radiotherapy versus trans-oral surgery as the primary treatment of HPV-negative patients with early-stage oropharyngeal carcinoma.

Read the detailed description

This study is designed as a randomized phase II study. Patients will be randomized between current standard of care treatment (Arm 1) vs. TOS (Arm 2) in a 1:1 ratio. Additionally, patients will be stratified according to T stage (T1 vs. T2); N stage (N0/1 vs. N2/3)

The randomized phase II design is required for three reasons:

  1. The randomization will provide an appropriate control group to serve as a comparator for the experimental arm. Historical or contemporaneous non-randomized controls would not be appropriate due to the multitude of biases that could be introduced by patient selection and other confounders.
  2. A small sample size will allow for adequate power to assess for progression-free survival, and also an assessment of quality of life, overall survival and toxicity.
  3. The results will allow for a decision as to whether a multi-institutional phase III trial is warranted, and inform the design of such a trial.
Being tested
Radiation, Trans-Oral Surgery (TOS) + Neck Dissection
Keywords
Radiotherapy, Trans-Oral Surgery, HPV-Negative, Randomized
Medical subject headings
Head and Neck Neoplasms, Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and Neck

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • RadiationRadiation

    Also called Chemotherapy, if required

    Standard of Care: Radiation +/- Chemotherapy

  • Trans-Oral Surgery (TOS) + Neck DissectionProcedure or surgery

    Also called Radiation, if required

    Trans-Oral Surgery (TOS) + Neck Dissection (plus radiation, if required)

Study groups in NCT04220749
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Arm 1, Radiation +/- ChemotherapyActive comparatorStandard Treatment (Radiation +/- Chemotherapy)
Receives: Radiation: Radiation
Arm 2, TOS + Neck DissectionExperimentalTrans-oral Surgery (TOS) + Neck Dissection (plus radiation is required)
Receives: Procedure: Trans-Oral Surgery (TOS) + Neck Dissection

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Disease-Specific Survival

    Time from randomization to death from cancer

    Measured: 5 years

Secondary outcomes (14)
  1. Overall Survival

    Time from randomization to death from any cause

    Measured: 5 years

  2. Progression-Free Survival

    Defined as time from randomization to death from any cause

    Measured: 5 years

  3. Local-Regional Failure

    Defined as time from randomization to first local-regional failure (analyzed as cumulative incidence function with death as competing event)

    Measured: 5 years

  4. Distant Failure

    Defined as time from randomization to first distant failure or metastasis (analyzed as cumulative incidence function with death as competing event)

    Measured: 5 years

  5. Any Failure

    Defined as time from randomization to first local-regional failure or distant failure, whichever occurs first (analyzed as cumulative incidence function with death as competing event)

    Measured: 5 years

  6. Quality of Life

    Quality of Life using the following questionnaire: MD Anderson Dysphagia Inventory (MDADI)

    Measured: Baseline to 5 years follow up

  7. Quality of Life

    Quality of Life using the following questionnaire: EORTC QLQ-C30

    Measured: Baseline to 5 years follow up

  8. Quality of Life

    Quality of Life using the following questionnaire: H\&N35 scale

    Measured: Baseline to 5 years follow up

  9. Quality of Life

    Quality of Life using the following questionnaire: Voice Handicap Index (VHI-10)

    Measured: Baseline to 5 years follow up

  10. Quality of Life

    Quality of Life using the following questionnaire: Neck Dissection Impairment Index (NDII)

    Measured: Baseline to 5 years follow up

  11. Quality of Life

    Quality of Life using the following questionnaire: Patient Neurotoxicity Questionnaire (PNQ)

    Measured: Baseline to 5 years follow up

  12. Toxicity profile of both study arms using the National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria (NCI-CTC) Version 4

    To determine toxicity profile of both study arms using the National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria (NCI-CTC) Version 4

    Measured: Randomization until 5 years follow up

  13. Feeding tube rate at 1 year

    Measure other functional measurements such as feeding tube rate at 1 year

    Measured: Baseline to 1 year post treatment

  14. CTCAE Dysphagia Grade

    Measure other functional measurements such as CTCAE Dysphagia grade

    Measured: Baseline to 5 years post treatment

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted7 Jan 2020
  2. Study start25 Jun 2020
  3. Primary completionFeb 2028 (estimated)
  4. Study completionFeb 2028 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
2 Arm study randomized in a 1:1 ratio
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
68 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04220749
Sponsor's protocol ID
ORATOR 3
Status last verified
Sep 2020
First submitted
6 Jan 2020
Last updated
4 Sep 2020
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in