StrokeNCT04223180
Rehabilomics Study in Stroke Patients After Robotic Rehabilitation
An observational study of Stroke, run by Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi ETS at 1 site in Italy.
Trial summary
Stroke is associated with disability and impaired quality of life. Persistent motor impairment is common with incomplete recovery of motor function after rehabilitation, mainly in the upper limbs (UL). Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 55 to 85 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Stroke
- What is being tested?
- Robotic assisted intervention
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- How many people
- 50 participants
- Where
- 1 siteItaly
- Study dates
- 20 Jan 2020to 31 Jan 2021
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 55 to 85 years
- All sexes
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: The investigators will enroll both inpatients and outpatients admitted to their rehabilitation facility with an upper limb impairment due to neurologic or orthopedic disorders.
Who may be able to join
- sub-acute patients, with ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke, documented by MRI or CT;
- age between 55 and 85 years;
- patients able to perform a rehabilitation treatment focused on the UL, for at least 45 min/day, for 5 days/week;
- time latency since stroke ranging from 2 weeks to 6 months,
- cognitive and language abilities sufficient to understand the experiments and follow instructions.
Who cannot join
- a previous stroke;
- behavioral and cognitive disorders and/or reduced compliance interfering with active therapy;
- fixed contraction deformity in the affected limb interfering with active therapy (ankylosis, Modified Ashworth Scale = 4);
- severe deficits in visual acuity;
- upper extremity Fugl-Meyer score >58.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Stroke Rehabilomics Study: Epigenetics and Genetics Characterization of the BDNF and SLC6A4 Genes in Patients Undergoing Robotic Rehabilitation Treatment
Stroke is associated with disability and impaired quality of life. Persistent motor impairment is common with incomplete recovery of motor function after rehabilitation, mainly in the upper limbs (UL). Robot-mediated therapy (RMT) has been proposed as a viable approach for the rehabilitation of the UL, but more rigorous studies are needed to tailor rehabilitation and to better address the treatment. Brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) and the serotonin transporter gene (SLC6A4) have been shown to play an important role in post-stroke recovery. After ischemic stroke, disruption and subsequent reorganization of functional brain connections occur both locally and far from the lesion, with the latter possibly contributing to function recovery.
This project aims to assess whether epigenetic and genetic variations of BDNF and SLC6A4 can occur in stroke patients after robotic rehabilitation treatment.
This study will allow to identify potential genetic and epigenetic biomarkers in post-stroke rehabilitation that could be used to predict the response to a specific rehabilitation treatment and to choose the optimal treatment for the patient (Rehabilomics).
Read the detailed description
Epigenetic and single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in genes may influence an individual's capacity for use-dependent plasticity, and hence their responsiveness to post-stroke rehabilitation. Understanding genetic variation gives clinicians a biological signal that could be used to predict who is most likely to recover from neural injury, to choose the optimal treatment for a patient, or to supplement rehabilitation therapy.
Robotics demonstrated to be an effective rehabilitation treatment for functional and motor recovery after stroke and, on the basis of investigators' preliminary results, it seems to be an useful therapy to improve some cognitive functions. The identification of individual characteristics is crucial factor to better address this treatment and to develop more tailored patients' rehabilitation program.
The characterization of the link between personal biology and rehabilitation treatment response will allow to define a model of Rehabilomics research as a translational framework for programs of precision rehabilitation and intervention research.
In order to identify potential diagnostic and prognostic genetic biomarkers in post-stroke rehabilitation, the investigators will analyze the promoter methylation of BDNF and SLC6A4, two genes implicated in sub-acute stroke recovery. Moreover, the investigators will also detect BDNF rs6265 and SLC6A4 5-HTTLPR polymorphisms.
Subjects will be evaluated at baseline (T0), after 30 sessions of rehabilitation treatment (T1) and, if possible, after other 30 sessions of rehabilitation treatment from T1 (T2).
All patients will perform a robotic treatment of the upper limb (30 sessions, 5 times a week) using a set of robotic devices. Where possible, some patients will undergo further 30 robotic rehabilitation sessions after T1.
Peripheral blood (6ml) will be taken from all subjects at three time points (T0, T1 and T2) during the rehabilitation treatment.
Genomic DNA, obtained from peripheral blood will be analyzed to evaluate promoter methylation of BDNF and SLC6A4 using pyrosequencing analysis with PyroMark Q24 (Qiagen, Germany).
Moreover, BDNF rs6265 polymorphism will be analyzed using HpyCH4IV restriction enzyme which identifies homozygous Valine/Valine, heterozygous Valine/Methionine and homozygous Methionine/Methionine.
For the SLC6A4 5-HTTLPR polymorphism, the investigators will follow a specific protocol that identifies gene polymorphisms according to the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) fragment sizes: short [S; 486 base pairs (bp), 14 repeats], long [L; 529bp, 16 repeats], or extra long [XL; 612 or 654bp, 20 or 22 repeats].
Genetic and epigenetic results will be correlated with:
- the effects of the robotic rehabilitation on the upper limb function and disability measured with the following clinical scales: Fugl-Meyer Assessment for Upper Extremity (FMA), to evaluate motor function; the Motricity Index (MI), to evaluate muscle strength; the Modified Barthel Index (mBI), to evaluate activities of daily living (ADL) and mobility. ii) the effects on cognitive functions measured with following cognitive tests: 1) Digit Span (attention/short-term memory involving strings/series of digits of varying length); 2) Tower of London (planning and problem solving); 3) STROOP test (Stroop Color and Word Test); 4) Symbol Digit Modalities Test (processing speed of visual stimuli); 5) Rey-Osterrieth Complex Figure Test (ROCF) (visuomotor integration).
- Conditions
- Stroke
- Being tested
- Robotic assisted intervention
- Keywords
- Rehabilitation, Upper Limb, Methylation, Single nucleotide polymorphism, BDNF, SLC6A4, Rehabilomics
- Medical subject headings
- Stroke
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Robotic assisted interventionDevice
Robotic treatment of the upper limb (30 sessions, 5 times a week) using a set of 4 robotic devices: Motore (Humanware); Amadeo, Diego, Pablo (Tyromotion). The training will include motor-cognitive exercises specifically selected to train spatial attention, vision and working memory, praxis, executive function, and speed of processing.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Stroke patients | Inpatients and outpatients admitted to the investigators' rehabilitation facility with an upper limb impairment due to neurologic or orthopedic disorders. Receives: Device: Robotic assisted intervention |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Presence/absence of rs6265 in the BDNF
BDNF rs6265 polymorphism will be analyzed using HpyCH4IV restriction enzyme which identifies homozygous Valine/Valine, heterozygous Valine/Methionine and homozygous Methionine/Methionine
Measured: Baseline (T0)
Presence/absence of 5-HTTLPR in the SLC6A4
SLC6A4 5-HTTLPR polymorphism will be analyzed by a specific protocol that identifies gene polymorphisms according to the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) fragment sizes: short [S; 486 base pairs (bp), 14 repeats], long [L; 529bp, 16 repeats], or extra-long [XL; 612 or 654bp, 20 or 22 repeats].
Measured: Baseline (T0)
Secondary outcomes (2)
Change in promoter methylation levels of BDNF gene
Promoter methylation of BDNF using pyrosequencing analysis with PyroMark Q24 (Qiagen, Germany).
Measured: Baseline [T0], First Treatment (6 weeks and 30 rehabilitation session) [T1], Second treatment (other 6 weeks and other 30 rehabilitation session) [T2]
Change in promoter methylation levels of SLC6A4 gene
Promoter methylation of SLC6A4 using pyrosequencing analysis with PyroMark Q24 (Qiagen, Germany).
Measured: Baseline [T0], First Treatment (6 weeks and 30 rehabilitation session) [T1], Second treatment (other 6 weeks and other 30 rehabilitation session) [T2]
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted10 Jan 2020
- Study start20 Jan 2020
- Primary completion31 Jan 2021
- Study completion31 Jan 2021
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (12)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for StrokeStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi ETSThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 50 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi ETS
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Irene Aprile, MD, PhD, Principal investigator, IRCCS Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04223180
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- FDG_EPIGEN_2019
- Status last verified
- Dec 2019
- First submitted
- 20 Dec 2019
- Last updated
- 23 Feb 2021
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Krakauer JW. Arm function after stroke: from physiology to recovery. Semin Neurol. 2005 Dec;25(4):384-95. doi: 10.1055/s-2005-923533.
PubMed 16341995Kelly-Hayes M, Beiser A, Kase CS, Scaramucci A, D'Agostino RB, Wolf PA. The influence of gender and age on disability following ischemic stroke: the Framingham study. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2003 May-Jun;12(3):119-26. doi: 10.1016/S1052-3057(03)00042-9.
PubMed 17903915Prabhakaran S, Zarahn E, Riley C, Speizer A, Chong JY, Lazar RM, Marshall RS, Krakauer JW. Inter-individual variability in the capacity for motor recovery after ischemic stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2008 Jan-Feb;22(1):64-71. doi: 10.1177/1545968307305302. Epub 2007 Aug 8.
PubMed 17687024Pearson-Fuhrhop KM, Burke E, Cramer SC. The influence of genetic factors on brain plasticity and recovery after neural injury. Curr Opin Neurol. 2012 Dec;25(6):682-8. doi: 10.1097/WCO.0b013e32835a360a.
PubMed 23044515Lindgren A. Stroke genetics: a review and update. J Stroke. 2014 Sep;16(3):114-23. doi: 10.5853/jos.2014.16.3.114. Epub 2014 Sep 30.
PubMed 25328870Shiner CT, Pierce KD, Thompson-Butel AG, Trinh T, Schofield PR, McNulty PA. BDNF Genotype Interacts with Motor Function to Influence Rehabilitation Responsiveness Poststroke. Front Neurol. 2016 May 17;7:69. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2016.00069. eCollection 2016.
PubMed 27242654Stanne TM, Tjarnlund-Wolf A, Olsson S, Jood K, Blomstrand C, Jern C. Genetic variation at the BDNF locus: evidence for association with long-term outcome after ischemic stroke. PLoS One. 2014 Dec 3;9(12):e114156. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0114156. eCollection 2014.
PubMed 25470006Kim JM, Stewart R, Kang HJ, Kim SW, Shin IS, Kim HR, Shin MG, Kim JT, Park MS, Cho KH, Yoon JS. A longitudinal study of SLC6A4 DNA promoter methylation and poststroke depression. J Psychiatr Res. 2013 Sep;47(9):1222-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2013.04.010. Epub 2013 May 20.
PubMed 23702251Santoro M, Fontana L, Masciullo M, Bianchi ML, Rossi S, Leoncini E, Novelli G, Botta A, Silvestri G. Expansion size and presence of CCG/CTC/CGG sequence interruptions in the expanded CTG array are independently associated to hypermethylation at the DMPK locus in myotonic dystrophy type 1 (DM1). Biochim Biophys Acta. 2015 Dec;1852(12):2645-52. doi: 10.1016/j.bbadis.2015.09.007. Epub 2015 Sep 21. No abstract available.
PubMed 26391753Nociti V, Santoro M, Quaranta D, Losavio FA, De Fino C, Giordano R, Palomba NP, Rossini PM, Guerini FR, Clerici M, Caputo D, Mirabella M. BDNF rs6265 polymorphism methylation in Multiple Sclerosis: A possible marker of disease progression. PLoS One. 2018 Oct 23;13(10):e0206140. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0206140. eCollection 2018.
PubMed 30352103Aprile I, Germanotta M, Cruciani A, Loreti S, Pecchioli C, Cecchi F, Montesano A, Galeri S, Diverio M, Falsini C, Speranza G, Langone E, Papadopoulou D, Padua L, Carrozza MC; FDG Robotic Rehabilitation Group. Upper Limb Robotic Rehabilitation After Stroke: A Multicenter, Randomized Clinical Trial. J Neurol Phys Ther. 2020 Jan;44(1):3-14. doi: 10.1097/NPT.0000000000000295.
PubMed 31834217Aprile I, Cruciani A, Germanotta M, Gower V, Pecchioli C, Cattaneo D, Vannetti F, Padua L, Gramatica F. Upper Limb Robotics in Rehabilitation: An Approach to Select the Devices, Based on Rehabilitation Aims, and Their Evaluation in a Feasibility Study. Applied Sciences 9(18): 3920; 2019. https://doi.org/10.3390/app9183920
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 23 Feb 2021. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Stroke Rehabilomics Study: Epigenetics and Genetics Characterization of the BDNF and SLC6A4 Genes in Patients Undergoing Robotic Rehabilitation Treatment
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04223180
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- FDG_EPIGEN_2019
- Conditions
- Stroke
- Keywords
- Rehabilitation, Upper Limb, Methylation, Single nucleotide polymorphism, BDNF, SLC6A4, Rehabilomics
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 50 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi ETSUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 20 Jan 2020 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 31 Jan 2021 (actual)
- Study completion
- 31 Jan 2021 (actual)
- First posted
- 10 Jan 2020 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Stroke is associated with disability and impaired quality of life. Persistent motor impairment is common with incomplete recovery of motor function after rehabilitation, mainly in the upper limbs (UL). Robot-mediated therapy (RMT) has been proposed as a viable approach for the rehabilitation of the UL, but more rigorous studies are needed to tailor rehabilitation and to better address the treatment. Brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) and the serotonin transporter gene (SLC6A4) have been shown to play an important role in post-stroke recovery. After ischemic stroke, disruption and subsequent reorganization of functional brain connections occur both locally and far from the lesion, with the latter possibly contributing to function recovery.
This project aims to assess whether epigenetic and genetic variations of BDNF and SLC6A4 can occur in stroke patients after robotic rehabilitation treatment.
This study will allow to identify potential genetic and epigenetic biomarkers in post-stroke rehabilitation that could be used to predict the response to a specific rehabilitation treatment and to choose the optimal treatment for the patient (Rehabilomics).
Detailed description
Epigenetic and single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in genes may influence an individual's capacity for use-dependent plasticity, and hence their responsiveness to post-stroke rehabilitation. Understanding genetic variation gives clinicians a biological signal that could be used to predict who is most likely to recover from neural injury, to choose the optimal treatment for a patient, or to supplement rehabilitation therapy.
Robotics demonstrated to be an effective rehabilitation treatment for functional and motor recovery after stroke and, on the basis of investigators' preliminary results, it seems to be an useful therapy to improve some cognitive functions. The identification of individual characteristics is crucial factor to better address this treatment and to develop more tailored patients' rehabilitation program.
The characterization of the link between personal biology and rehabilitation treatment response will allow to define a model of Rehabilomics research as a translational framework for programs of precision rehabilitation and intervention research.
In order to identify potential diagnostic and prognostic genetic biomarkers in post-stroke rehabilitation, the investigators will analyze the promoter methylation of BDNF and SLC6A4, two genes implicated in sub-acute stroke recovery. Moreover, the investigators will also detect BDNF rs6265 and SLC6A4 5-HTTLPR polymorphisms.
Subjects will be evaluated at baseline (T0), after 30 sessions of rehabilitation treatment (T1) and, if possible, after other 30 sessions of rehabilitation treatment from T1 (T2).
All patients will perform a robotic treatment of the upper limb (30 sessions, 5 times a week) using a set of robotic devices. Where possible, some patients will undergo further 30 robotic rehabilitation sessions after T1.
Peripheral blood (6ml) will be taken from all subjects at three time points (T0, T1 and T2) during the rehabilitation treatment.
Genomic DNA, obtained from peripheral blood will be analyzed to evaluate promoter methylation of BDNF and SLC6A4 using pyrosequencing analysis with PyroMark Q24 (Qiagen, Germany).
Moreover, BDNF rs6265 polymorphism will be analyzed using HpyCH4IV restriction enzyme which identifies homozygous Valine/Valine, heterozygous Valine/Methionine and homozygous Methionine/Methionine.
For the SLC6A4 5-HTTLPR polymorphism, the investigators will follow a specific protocol that identifies gene polymorphisms according to the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) fragment sizes: short [S; 486 base pairs (bp), 14 repeats], long [L; 529bp, 16 repeats], or extra long [XL; 612 or 654bp, 20 or 22 repeats].
Genetic and epigenetic results will be correlated with:
- the effects of the robotic rehabilitation on the upper limb function and disability measured with the following clinical scales: Fugl-Meyer Assessment for Upper Extremity (FMA), to evaluate motor function; the Motricity Index (MI), to evaluate muscle strength; the Modified Barthel Index (mBI), to evaluate activities of daily living (ADL) and mobility. ii) the effects on cognitive functions measured with following cognitive tests: 1) Digit Span (attention/short-term memory involving strings/series of digits of varying length); 2) Tower of London (planning and problem solving); 3) STROOP test (Stroop Color and Word Test); 4) Symbol Digit Modalities Test (processing speed of visual stimuli); 5) Rey-Osterrieth Complex Figure Test (ROCF) (visuomotor integration).
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Stroke patients | – | Device: Robotic assisted interventionInpatients and outpatients admitted to the investigators' rehabilitation facility with an upper limb impairment due to neurologic or orthopedic disorders. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 55 to 85 years
- Sex
- All
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- The investigators will enroll both inpatients and outpatients admitted to their rehabilitation facility with an upper limb impairment due to neurologic or orthopedic disorders.
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- sub-acute patients, with ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke, documented by MRI or CT;
- age between 55 and 85 years;
- patients able to perform a rehabilitation treatment focused on the UL, for at least 45 min/day, for 5 days/week;
- time latency since stroke ranging from 2 weeks to 6 months,
- cognitive and language abilities sufficient to understand the experiments and follow instructions.
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- a previous stroke;
- behavioral and cognitive disorders and/or reduced compliance interfering with active therapy;
- fixed contraction deformity in the affected limb interfering with active therapy (ankylosis, Modified Ashworth Scale = 4);
- severe deficits in visual acuity;
- upper extremity Fugl-Meyer score >58.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Robotic assisted interventionRobotic treatment of the upper limb (30 sessions, 5 times a week) using a set of 4 robotic devices: Motore (Humanware); Amadeo, Diego, Pablo (Tyromotion). The training will include motor-cognitive exercises specifically selected to train spatial attention, vision and working memory, praxis, executive function, and speed of processing. | Device | Stroke patients |
Primary outcome
Presence/absence of rs6265 in the BDNF
Time frame: Baseline (T0)
BDNF rs6265 polymorphism will be analyzed using HpyCH4IV restriction enzyme which identifies homozygous Valine/Valine, heterozygous Valine/Methionine and homozygous Methionine/Methionine
Presence/absence of 5-HTTLPR in the SLC6A4
Time frame: Baseline (T0)
SLC6A4 5-HTTLPR polymorphism will be analyzed by a specific protocol that identifies gene polymorphisms according to the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) fragment sizes: short [S; 486 base pairs (bp), 14 repeats], long [L; 529bp, 16 repeats], or extra-long [XL; 612 or 654bp, 20 or 22 repeats].
2 secondary outcomes
Change in promoter methylation levels of BDNF gene
Time frame: Baseline [T0], First Treatment (6 weeks and 30 rehabilitation session) [T1], Second treatment (other 6 weeks and other 30 rehabilitation session) [T2]
Change in promoter methylation levels of SLC6A4 gene
Time frame: Baseline [T0], First Treatment (6 weeks and 30 rehabilitation session) [T1], Second treatment (other 6 weeks and other 30 rehabilitation session) [T2]
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 23 Feb 2021.
- Background: PubMed 16341995Krakauer JW. Arm function after stroke: from physiology to recovery. Semin Neurol. 2005 Dec;25(4):384-95. doi: 10.1055/s-2005-923533.
- Background: PubMed 17903915Kelly-Hayes M, Beiser A, Kase CS, Scaramucci A, D'Agostino RB, Wolf PA. The influence of gender and age on disability following ischemic stroke: the Framingham study. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2003 May-Jun;12(3):119-26. doi: 10.1016/S1052-3057(03)00042-9.
- Background: PubMed 17687024Prabhakaran S, Zarahn E, Riley C, Speizer A, Chong JY, Lazar RM, Marshall RS, Krakauer JW. Inter-individual variability in the capacity for motor recovery after ischemic stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2008 Jan-Feb;22(1):64-71. doi: 10.1177/1545968307305302. Epub 2007 Aug 8.
- Background: PubMed 23044515Pearson-Fuhrhop KM, Burke E, Cramer SC. The influence of genetic factors on brain plasticity and recovery after neural injury. Curr Opin Neurol. 2012 Dec;25(6):682-8. doi: 10.1097/WCO.0b013e32835a360a.
- Background: PubMed 25328870Lindgren A. Stroke genetics: a review and update. J Stroke. 2014 Sep;16(3):114-23. doi: 10.5853/jos.2014.16.3.114. Epub 2014 Sep 30.
- Background: PubMed 27242654Shiner CT, Pierce KD, Thompson-Butel AG, Trinh T, Schofield PR, McNulty PA. BDNF Genotype Interacts with Motor Function to Influence Rehabilitation Responsiveness Poststroke. Front Neurol. 2016 May 17;7:69. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2016.00069. eCollection 2016.
- Background: PubMed 25470006Stanne TM, Tjarnlund-Wolf A, Olsson S, Jood K, Blomstrand C, Jern C. Genetic variation at the BDNF locus: evidence for association with long-term outcome after ischemic stroke. PLoS One. 2014 Dec 3;9(12):e114156. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0114156. eCollection 2014.
- Background: PubMed 23702251Kim JM, Stewart R, Kang HJ, Kim SW, Shin IS, Kim HR, Shin MG, Kim JT, Park MS, Cho KH, Yoon JS. A longitudinal study of SLC6A4 DNA promoter methylation and poststroke depression. J Psychiatr Res. 2013 Sep;47(9):1222-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2013.04.010. Epub 2013 May 20.
- Background: PubMed 26391753Santoro M, Fontana L, Masciullo M, Bianchi ML, Rossi S, Leoncini E, Novelli G, Botta A, Silvestri G. Expansion size and presence of CCG/CTC/CGG sequence interruptions in the expanded CTG array are independently associated to hypermethylation at the DMPK locus in myotonic dystrophy type 1 (DM1). Biochim Biophys Acta. 2015 Dec;1852(12):2645-52. doi: 10.1016/j.bbadis.2015.09.007. Epub 2015 Sep 21. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 30352103Nociti V, Santoro M, Quaranta D, Losavio FA, De Fino C, Giordano R, Palomba NP, Rossini PM, Guerini FR, Clerici M, Caputo D, Mirabella M. BDNF rs6265 polymorphism methylation in Multiple Sclerosis: A possible marker of disease progression. PLoS One. 2018 Oct 23;13(10):e0206140. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0206140. eCollection 2018.
- Background: PubMed 31834217Aprile I, Germanotta M, Cruciani A, Loreti S, Pecchioli C, Cecchi F, Montesano A, Galeri S, Diverio M, Falsini C, Speranza G, Langone E, Papadopoulou D, Padua L, Carrozza MC; FDG Robotic Rehabilitation Group. Upper Limb Robotic Rehabilitation After Stroke: A Multicenter, Randomized Clinical Trial. J Neurol Phys Ther. 2020 Jan;44(1):3-14. doi: 10.1097/NPT.0000000000000295.
- BackgroundAprile I, Cruciani A, Germanotta M, Gower V, Pecchioli C, Cattaneo D, Vannetti F, Padua L, Gramatica F. Upper Limb Robotics in Rehabilitation: An Approach to Select the Devices, Based on Rehabilitation Aims, and Their Evaluation in a Feasibility Study. Applied Sciences 9(18): 3920; 2019. https://doi.org/10.3390/app9183920
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Stroke
Not yet recruiting
Temporal Interference Stimulation for Upper-Limb Motor Recovery in Early Subacute Stroke
Acute Ischemic Stroke
RecruitingObservational study
ELATE Study: Evaluating Large-vessel Acute Thrombectomy in Extended Time Window
Acute Ichemic Stroke
Recruiting
Web-Based Tele-Rehabilitation Using Action Observation and Mirror Therapy for Subacute Stroke: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Stroke, Upper Extremity Paresis
Recruiting
Early Motor-Cognitive Integrative Training on Cognitive and Motor Performance in Patients With Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage
Subarachnoid Aneurysm Hemorrhage
Not yet recruiting
Selective Intra-Arterial Hypothermia After Endovascular Treatment for Acute Basilar Artery Occlusion
Acute Ischemic Stroke, Basilar Artery Occlusion
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Irene Aprile, MD, PhD principal investigator
IRCCS Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Stroke, run by Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi ETS at 1 site in Italy.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 23 Feb 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Italy. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Presence/absence of rs6265 in the BDNF (time frame: Baseline (T0)). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04223180, which also lists 12 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 23 Feb 2021.