AzTrials
AzTrials

Atrial FibrillationLACLOTNCT04223505

Left Atrial Imaging Prior to Cardioversion: Leveraging Computed Tomography to Rule Out Thrombus

A study testing Contrast enhanced ECG-gated cardiac CT (CCT) and Transesophageal Echocardiography (TEE) in people with Atrial Fibrillation, run by Ottawa Heart Institute Research Corporation at 1 site in Canada.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Evaluating contrast enhanced ECG-gated cardiac CT (CCT) as an alternative to transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) to expedite cardioversion of atrial fibrillation (AF), improve patient care and reduce hospital admissions for AF and atrial flutter. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Atrial Fibrillation
What is being tested?
Contrast enhanced ECG-gated cardiac CT (CCT) and Transesophageal Echocardiography (TEE)
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
102 participants
Where
1 siteCanada
Study dates
26 Jun 2020to 12 Jan 2024
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Admitted patients who require LA imaging prior to cardioversion
  • Age ≥18 years old
  • Able and willing to comply with the study procedures

Who cannot join

  • Indication for acute cardioversion (e.g. hemodynamic instability, acute coronary syndrome (ACS), or pulmonary edema)
  • Unwillingness or inability to provide informed consent
  • Contraindication to Cardiac CT
  • Severe renal insufficiency(GFR< 45ml/min)
  • Allergy to intravenous contrast agents
  • Contraindications to radiation exposure (for example, pregnancy)
Show all 14Show fewer
  • Inability to perform 20-second breath-hold
  • Contraindication to TEE
  • Unrepaired tracheoesophageal fistula
  • Esophageal obstruction or stricture
  • Perforated hollow viscus
  • Poor airway control
  • Severe respiratory depression
  • Uncooperative, unsedated patient

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Canada1 site
  • University of Ottawa Heart Institute

    Ottawa, Ontario, K1Y 4W7

Other trials in Canada

About this study

Evaluating contrast enhanced ECG-gated cardiac CT (CCT) as an alternative to transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) to expedite cardioversion of atrial fibrillation (AF), improve patient care and reduce hospital admissions for AF and atrial flutter.

Being tested
Contrast enhanced ECG-gated cardiac CT (CCT), Transesophageal Echocardiography (TEE)
Medical subject headings
Atrial Fibrillation

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Contrast enhanced ECG-gated cardiac CT (CCT)Diagnostic test

    Contrast enhanced ECG-gated cardiac CT (CCT) is a sensitive, noninvasive alternative method used to exclude of left atrial and LAA thrombus. CCT provides high spatial and good temporal resolution and its ability to detect thrombus has been evaluated. CCT, compared to TEE, for the exclusion of thrombus in the LAA had a sensitivity and specificity of 100% and 99.3%, respectively. A high sensitivity is needed to minimize risk of embolus, and if a thrombus is detected on CT, a confirmatory TEE may be performed or patients may receive anticoagulation. Some argue that the potential benefits of CT and its lower associated procedural risk, the risk:benefit ratio would still favour CT.

  • Transesophageal Echocardiography (TEE)Diagnostic test

    TEE is considered the reference standard to rule-out left atrial (LA) and left atrial appendage (LAA) thrombus prior to cardioversion. Several studies have examined the accuracy of TEE for detecting LAA thrombus. Compared to autopsy and intraoperative findings, TEE has a mean sensitivity of 100% and mean specificity of 99%. Although the gold standard, a TEE-guided therapy is still associated with an embolic rate of 0.8%.

Study groups in NCT04223505
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
TEE armActive comparatorTEE will be performed as per clinical routine using multiple standard tomographic planes to rule-out LA/LAA thrombus. Echocardiographic analysis will include: LAA-emptying velocity, and grading the severity of LAA spontaneous ECHO. The severity of the SEC will be graded on a 4 point scale with 1 = minor homogeneous contrast enhancement, 2 = significant homogeneous contrast enhancement, 3 = significant, dense, and inhomogeneous, slow-moving contrast, and 4 = dense slow-moving contrast.
Receives: Diagnostic Test: Transesophageal Echocardiography (TEE)
CCT armExperimentalAs per local protocol, a non-contrast enhanced prospective ECG-triggered image acquisition will be acquired. This will be followed by a contrast-enhanced prospective ECG-triggered will be acquired using a tri-phasic contrast protocols. Delayed CT images will be acquired 60 seconds after the initial contrast-enhanced CT scan.Cardiac CT image interpretation will be performed as per clinical routine. The LA and LAA will be assess for filling defects and characterized based upon attenuation values. If LA/LAA thrombus cannot be excluded, filling defects will be assessed on the delay images. Increases in attenuation would be consistent with pseudo-thrombus from 'slow flow' and 'incomplete opacification'. Areas where attenuation does not change significantly (persistent filling defect) will be diagnosed as thrombus. It will be recommended that patients with thrombus will undergo TEE.
Receives: Diagnostic Test: Contrast enhanced ECG-gated cardiac CT (CCT); Diagnostic Test: Transesophageal Echocardiography (TEE)

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Time to Imaging

    This outcome was measured by calculating the time between admission and imaging.

    Measured: From admission to imaging/spontaneous cardioversion, up to approximately 30 days.

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. Time to Cardioversion

    This outcome was measured by calculating the time between admission and cardioversion.

    Measured: From admission to cardioversion, up to approximately 30 days

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted10 Jan 2020
  2. Study start26 Jun 2020
  3. Primary completion21 Nov 2023
  4. Study completion12 Jan 2024

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Diagnosis
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
102 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04223505
Sponsor's protocol ID
201900117-01H
Acronym
LACLOT
Status last verified
Sep 2024
First submitted
6 Jan 2020
Last updated
12 Mar 2025
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Contrast enhanced ECG-gated cardiac CT (CCT) and Transesophageal Echocardiography (TEE) in people with Atrial Fibrillation, run by Ottawa Heart Institute Research Corporation at 1 site in Canada.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 14 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 12 Mar 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 12 Mar 2025). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Time to Imaging (time frame: From admission to imaging/spontaneous cardioversion, up to approximately 30 days.). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 12 Mar 2025.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in