LiposarcomaESPACENCT04224064
Identification of a New Blood Biomarker for the Diagnosis and Prognosis of Liposarcomas
A study testing Blood sampling in people with Liposarcoma and Atypical Lipomatous Tumor, run by Institut du Cancer de Montpellier - Val d'Aurelle at 1 site in France.
Trial summary
The main objective of this project is to identify a new non-invasive biological test for the diagnosis of LPS by measuring circulating serine levels. The current gold standard is the detection of Mdm2 amplification by the FISH. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Liposarcoma, Atypical Lipomatous Tumor
- What is being tested?
- Blood sampling
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 158 participants
- Where
- 1 siteFrance
- Study dates
- 26 Aug 2020to Dec 2029
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Men/women older than 18 years old,
- Surgery for :
- Localized WD-LPS and DD-LPS, and/or
- WD-LPS or DD-LPS local relapse, and/or
- WD-LPS or DD-LPS distant relapse and/or
- Deep adipocytic tumor greater than 5 cms, suggestive of atypical lipomatous tumor Patient accepting blood sample, Patient who signed informed consent
- Men/women older than 18 years old, Accepting blood sample, Who signed informed consent Matching on sex and age on LPS patient cohort
Who cannot join
- Presence of NeoAdjuvant Treatment for the present cancer, Unaffiliated patient to French Social Protection System, Patient whose follow up is impossible for psychologic, social, geographic, familial reasons Psychiatric illness that would prevent the patient from giving informed consent or being compliant with the study procedures Patient who have another cancer within the 5 years of the inclusion except in situ breast carcinoma, in situ, basocellular carcinoma.
- Pregnancy and/or feeding
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
France1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Institut du Cancer de Montpellier - Val d'Aurelle
Montpellier, 34298
Marc YCHOU, MD, PhD, +33467613102, marc.ychou@icm.unicancer.fr
About this study
The main objective of this project is to identify a new non-invasive biological test for the diagnosis of LPS by measuring circulating serine levels. The current gold standard is the detection of Mdm2 amplification by the FISH.
Read the detailed description
Sarcomas are rare diseases, accounting for less than 1% of all malignant diseases in adults¹. Their incidence is about 6 new cases per 100,000 in inhabitants per year, ie 4,000 to 5,000 new cases estimated per year in France.
Liposarcoma (LPS) is the most common soft tissue sarcoma subtype, accounting for approximately 15% of all sarcomas.
The OMS classification distinguishes 5 categories of LPS: myxoid, pleomorphe, round-cell liposarcomas, dedifferentiated (DD-LPS) and well-differentiated (WD-LPS). Research team is interested by the last two in this study.
The diagnosis is suspected on the imaging examinations (MRI for limb tumors and CT for retro-peritoneal LPS) which should lead to a discussion at a multidisciplinary tumor board in an expert center to validate the biopsy for definitive diagnosis and define the best biopsy route to avoid the risk of spread. In France, the management of patients with sarcoma is organized around the network of 24 "NETSARC" centers.
WD-LPS and DD-LPS, may be difficult to distinguish from benign adipose tumors and undifferentiated sarcomas, respectively. Molecular analyze, based on the detection of Mdm2 gene amplification by Fluorescence in situ Hybridization (FISH) is currently the "gold standard". It is performed on a tumor biopsy. The biopsy is a radiologic biopsy as it is recommended in the guidelines to reduce the risk of disease spread. The material allowing the diagnosis is thus limited complicating the realization of morphology, immunohistochemistry and molecular biology on the same sample. The other limitation is that this tumor fragment does not always reflect intra-tumor heterogeneity.
The treatment is surgical with monobloc resection by a surgeon specialized in sarcomas. Despite surgical excision, the risk of local and distant recurrence is approximately 26% for well-differentiated liposarcomas⁵ and up to 59% for dedifferentiated retroperitoneal liposarcomas. Prognostic factors for recurrence are the quality of excision, tumor size, grade, and retroperitoneal / limb localization. The problematic concerning these 2 types of liposarcomas is not the same. In WD-LPS, the question is to know the risk of recurrence in case of unplanned R1 resection (representing approximately 50% of initial surgeries). Indeed a systematic surgical revision of all these cases is expensive and morbid whereas in 50% of cases no tumor residue will be found on the surgical recovery. For the DD-LPS the problem is different because the surgical revision must be systematic in case of non-R0 surgery, but it is the risk of local recurrence despite adequate surgery and the metastatic risk that must be evaluated in order to propose an adjuvant treatment (chemotherapy and / or radiotherapy) to patients with a high risk of recurrence also making it essential to identify a biological factor of prognosis to select patients with a high risk of relapse.
Clinicians propose to identify a new blood test that would indicate the presence of the disease. It would then serve for the diagnosis but also prognosis allowing us to evaluate the residual disease after surgery of excision. Due to the complexity of sarcomas, identifying an effective and reliable biomarker for WD-LPS and DD-LPS with non-invasive methods is a challenge, but clinicians hope that their project will provide a more efficient and patient-friendly method for the detection of the disease. Our project relies on the complementary expertise provided by clinicians, researchers and biostatisticians in close collaboration.
Clinicians have recently characterized a novel function of the p53 independent Mdm2 protein in serine metabolism, which could play a fundamental role in the development of LPS. Through pan-genome approaches clinicians have characterized a novel transcriptional activity of Mdm2 and demonstrated its role in the metabolism of cancer cells. These data indicate that the presence of Mdm2 at chromatin makes it possible to control the transcription of genes involved in the metabolism and transport of certain amino acids such as serine.
The endogenous serine pool is maintained by a balance between auxotrophy and de novo synthesis, that are strongly deregulated during cell transformation to support the anabolic needs of cancer cells. Mdm2 is recruited via transcription factors of the ATF family on target genes involved in de novo synthesis and serine transport.
Clinicians propose to identify a biological test for the prognosis and diagnosis of LPS that does not require invasive biopsy. Patients included in the study will be patients with WD-LPS or DD-LPS, with the goal of including 100 patients over 2 years.
Based on recent data showing that LPS growth is mediated by Mdm2-mediated regulation of serine metabolism, clinicians propose to measure serine blood levels as a surrogate marker for LPS development. To maintain the intracellular level of serine, Mdm2 controls both de novo serine synthesis (a metabolic pathway that uses the glycolytic intermediate 3-Phospho-Glycerate to generate serine in cells) and the entry of the serine in the cell by auxotrophy. Given the size of LPS, which can often reach several tens of centimeters, clinicians hypothesized that LPS may result in significant demand for serine that could be produced by the microenvironment and transmitted to the tumor by circulating pools of serine and glycine (which can be inter-converted to serine by cells). The profiling of plasma amino acids is of great clinical interest since they are easy to measure by liquid chromatography (HPLC). Clinicians have already validated an HPLC method to measure different amino acids, including serine and glycine, in the serum. Our preliminary data are in line with our hypothesis since the serum serine level is higher in the xenografted mice with patient tumor compared to serum levels measured in the control mice. In addition, in response to treatment with an Mdm2 inhibitor, which induces a drastic reduction in tumor growth, a decrease in circulating serine can be observed.
Clinicians will use an HPLC coupled with mass spectrometry already developed to measure amino acids from Agilent technology. The quantitative analysis of amino acids combines speed and sensitivity with the reliability of the derivation reaction and the analytical technique. These goals are achieved by automated and online derivatization using o-phthalaldehyde (OPA) for primary amino acids and 9-fluorenylmethyl chloroformate (FMOC) for secondary amino acids. Automated derivation is then integrated into robust HPLC analysis. The complete procedure is fast, accurate, sensitive and reproducible using Agilent 1190 HPLC.
The main objective of this project is to identify a new non-invasive biological test for the diagnosis of LPS by measuring circulating serine levels. The current gold standard is the detection of Mdm2 amplification by the FISH.
- Conditions
- Liposarcoma, Atypical Lipomatous Tumor
- Being tested
- Blood sampling
- Keywords
- Liposarcoma, Cancer, Atypical Lipomatous Tumor, New non-invasive biological test
- Medical subject headings
- Liposarcoma, Neoplasms
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Blood samplingDiagnostic test
Blood samples will be performed in fasted state for the controls and the patients. A single sample will be made in healthy subjects and several samples in patients: one before induction before surgery and then the second 4 weeks after surgery (+/- 1 week), then every 3 months for 18 months.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Healthy subjects cohort | Experimental | A single blood sample will be made in healthy subjects. Receives: Diagnostic Test: Blood sampling |
| Liposarcoma patients cohort | Experimental | Blood samples will be collected at different times: one before induction before surgery and then the second 4 weeks after surgery (+/- 1 week), then every 3 months for 18 months. Receives: Diagnostic Test: Blood sampling |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Sensibility and specificity of circulating serine level for LPS diagnosis
Circulating serine level is a quantitative variable evaluated by its concentration
Measured: At 3 months post surgery
Secondary outcomes (2)
Relapse-free survival (RFS)
defined as the time measured from the date of surgery treatment to the date of the first documented tumor relapse
Measured: Until the study completion: 2 years
Difference in circulating serine level
Measured between the highest and the lowest rates on pre- and post-surgery blood samples
Measured: 18 months after surgery
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted13 Jan 2020
- Study start26 Aug 2020
- Primary completionDec 2027 (estimated)
- Study completionDec 2029 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (3)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for LiposarcomaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Institut du Cancer de Montpellier - Val d'AurelleThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Diagnosis
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 158 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Nelly FIRMIN, MD, Study chair, Institut Régional du Cancer de Montpellier (ICM)
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04224064
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- PROICM 2019-09 ESP
- Acronym
- ESPACE
- Status last verified
- Feb 2025
- First submitted
- 8 Jan 2020
- Last updated
- 12 Feb 2025
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Burningham Z, Hashibe M, Spector L, Schiffman JD. The epidemiology of sarcoma. Clin Sarcoma Res. 2012 Oct 4;2(1):14. doi: 10.1186/2045-3329-2-14.
PubMed 23036164Smolle MA, Tunn PU, Goldenitsch E, Posch F, Szkandera J, Bergovec M, Liegl-Atzwanger B, Leithner A. The Prognostic Impact of Unplanned Excisions in a Cohort of 728 Soft Tissue Sarcoma Patients: A Multicentre Study. Ann Surg Oncol. 2017 Jun;24(6):1596-1605. doi: 10.1245/s10434-017-5776-8. Epub 2017 Jan 20.
PubMed 28108827Chandrasekar CR, Wafa H, Grimer RJ, Carter SR, Tillman RM, Abudu A. The effect of an unplanned excision of a soft-tissue sarcoma on prognosis. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2008 Feb;90(2):203-8. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.90B2.19760.
PubMed 18256089
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 12 Feb 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Identification of a New Blood Biomarker for the Diagnosis and Prognosis of Liposarcomas
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04224064
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- ESPACE / PROICM 2019-09 ESP
- Conditions
- Liposarcoma, Atypical Lipomatous Tumor
- Keywords
- Liposarcoma, Cancer, Atypical Lipomatous Tumor, New non-invasive biological test
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Recruiting
- Enrolment
- 158 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Institut du Cancer de Montpellier - Val d'AurelleUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 26 Aug 2020 (actual)
- Primary completion
- Dec 2027 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Dec 2029 (estimated)
- First posted
- 13 Jan 2020 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The main objective of this project is to identify a new non-invasive biological test for the diagnosis of LPS by measuring circulating serine levels. The current gold standard is the detection of Mdm2 amplification by the FISH.
Detailed description
Sarcomas are rare diseases, accounting for less than 1% of all malignant diseases in adults¹. Their incidence is about 6 new cases per 100,000 in inhabitants per year, ie 4,000 to 5,000 new cases estimated per year in France.
Liposarcoma (LPS) is the most common soft tissue sarcoma subtype, accounting for approximately 15% of all sarcomas.
The OMS classification distinguishes 5 categories of LPS: myxoid, pleomorphe, round-cell liposarcomas, dedifferentiated (DD-LPS) and well-differentiated (WD-LPS). Research team is interested by the last two in this study.
The diagnosis is suspected on the imaging examinations (MRI for limb tumors and CT for retro-peritoneal LPS) which should lead to a discussion at a multidisciplinary tumor board in an expert center to validate the biopsy for definitive diagnosis and define the best biopsy route to avoid the risk of spread. In France, the management of patients with sarcoma is organized around the network of 24 "NETSARC" centers.
WD-LPS and DD-LPS, may be difficult to distinguish from benign adipose tumors and undifferentiated sarcomas, respectively. Molecular analyze, based on the detection of Mdm2 gene amplification by Fluorescence in situ Hybridization (FISH) is currently the "gold standard". It is performed on a tumor biopsy. The biopsy is a radiologic biopsy as it is recommended in the guidelines to reduce the risk of disease spread. The material allowing the diagnosis is thus limited complicating the realization of morphology, immunohistochemistry and molecular biology on the same sample. The other limitation is that this tumor fragment does not always reflect intra-tumor heterogeneity.
The treatment is surgical with monobloc resection by a surgeon specialized in sarcomas. Despite surgical excision, the risk of local and distant recurrence is approximately 26% for well-differentiated liposarcomas⁵ and up to 59% for dedifferentiated retroperitoneal liposarcomas. Prognostic factors for recurrence are the quality of excision, tumor size, grade, and retroperitoneal / limb localization. The problematic concerning these 2 types of liposarcomas is not the same. In WD-LPS, the question is to know the risk of recurrence in case of unplanned R1 resection (representing approximately 50% of initial surgeries). Indeed a systematic surgical revision of all these cases is expensive and morbid whereas in 50% of cases no tumor residue will be found on the surgical recovery. For the DD-LPS the problem is different because the surgical revision must be systematic in case of non-R0 surgery, but it is the risk of local recurrence despite adequate surgery and the metastatic risk that must be evaluated in order to propose an adjuvant treatment (chemotherapy and / or radiotherapy) to patients with a high risk of recurrence also making it essential to identify a biological factor of prognosis to select patients with a high risk of relapse.
Clinicians propose to identify a new blood test that would indicate the presence of the disease. It would then serve for the diagnosis but also prognosis allowing us to evaluate the residual disease after surgery of excision. Due to the complexity of sarcomas, identifying an effective and reliable biomarker for WD-LPS and DD-LPS with non-invasive methods is a challenge, but clinicians hope that their project will provide a more efficient and patient-friendly method for the detection of the disease. Our project relies on the complementary expertise provided by clinicians, researchers and biostatisticians in close collaboration.
Clinicians have recently characterized a novel function of the p53 independent Mdm2 protein in serine metabolism, which could play a fundamental role in the development of LPS. Through pan-genome approaches clinicians have characterized a novel transcriptional activity of Mdm2 and demonstrated its role in the metabolism of cancer cells. These data indicate that the presence of Mdm2 at chromatin makes it possible to control the transcription of genes involved in the metabolism and transport of certain amino acids such as serine.
The endogenous serine pool is maintained by a balance between auxotrophy and de novo synthesis, that are strongly deregulated during cell transformation to support the anabolic needs of cancer cells. Mdm2 is recruited via transcription factors of the ATF family on target genes involved in de novo synthesis and serine transport.
Clinicians propose to identify a biological test for the prognosis and diagnosis of LPS that does not require invasive biopsy. Patients included in the study will be patients with WD-LPS or DD-LPS, with the goal of including 100 patients over 2 years.
Based on recent data showing that LPS growth is mediated by Mdm2-mediated regulation of serine metabolism, clinicians propose to measure serine blood levels as a surrogate marker for LPS development. To maintain the intracellular level of serine, Mdm2 controls both de novo serine synthesis (a metabolic pathway that uses the glycolytic intermediate 3-Phospho-Glycerate to generate serine in cells) and the entry of the serine in the cell by auxotrophy. Given the size of LPS, which can often reach several tens of centimeters, clinicians hypothesized that LPS may result in significant demand for serine that could be produced by the microenvironment and transmitted to the tumor by circulating pools of serine and glycine (which can be inter-converted to serine by cells). The profiling of plasma amino acids is of great clinical interest since they are easy to measure by liquid chromatography (HPLC). Clinicians have already validated an HPLC method to measure different amino acids, including serine and glycine, in the serum. Our preliminary data are in line with our hypothesis since the serum serine level is higher in the xenografted mice with patient tumor compared to serum levels measured in the control mice. In addition, in response to treatment with an Mdm2 inhibitor, which induces a drastic reduction in tumor growth, a decrease in circulating serine can be observed.
Clinicians will use an HPLC coupled with mass spectrometry already developed to measure amino acids from Agilent technology. The quantitative analysis of amino acids combines speed and sensitivity with the reliability of the derivation reaction and the analytical technique. These goals are achieved by automated and online derivatization using o-phthalaldehyde (OPA) for primary amino acids and 9-fluorenylmethyl chloroformate (FMOC) for secondary amino acids. Automated derivation is then integrated into robust HPLC analysis. The complete procedure is fast, accurate, sensitive and reproducible using Agilent 1190 HPLC.
The main objective of this project is to identify a new non-invasive biological test for the diagnosis of LPS by measuring circulating serine levels. The current gold standard is the detection of Mdm2 amplification by the FISH.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Diagnosis
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Healthy subjects cohort | Experimental | Diagnostic Test: Blood samplingA single blood sample will be made in healthy subjects. |
| Liposarcoma patients cohort | Experimental | Diagnostic Test: Blood samplingBlood samples will be collected at different times: one before induction before surgery and then the second 4 weeks after surgery (+/- 1 week), then every 3 months for 18 months. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (7 listed)
- Men/women older than 18 years old,
- Localized WD-LPS and DD-LPS, and/or
- WD-LPS or DD-LPS local relapse, and/or
- WD-LPS or DD-LPS distant relapse and/or
- Deep adipocytic tumor greater than 5 cms, suggestive of atypical lipomatous tumor Patient accepting blood sample, Patient who signed informed consent
Key exclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Presence of NeoAdjuvant Treatment for the present cancer, Unaffiliated patient to French Social Protection System, Patient whose follow up is impossible for psychologic, social, geographic, familial reasons Psychiatric illness that would prevent the patient from giving informed consent or being compliant with the study procedures Patient who have another cancer within the 5 years of the inclusion except in situ breast carcinoma, in situ, basocellular carcinoma.
- Pregnancy and/or feeding
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Blood samplingBlood samples will be performed in fasted state for the controls and the patients. A single sample will be made in healthy subjects and several samples in patients: one before induction before surgery and then the second 4 weeks after surgery (+/- 1 week), then every 3 months for 18 months. | Diagnostic test | Healthy subjects cohort, Liposarcoma patients cohort |
Primary outcome
Sensibility and specificity of circulating serine level for LPS diagnosis
Time frame: At 3 months post surgery
Circulating serine level is a quantitative variable evaluated by its concentration
2 secondary outcomes
Relapse-free survival (RFS)
Time frame: Until the study completion: 2 years
Difference in circulating serine level
Time frame: 18 months after surgery
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 12 Feb 2025.
- Background: PubMed 23036164Burningham Z, Hashibe M, Spector L, Schiffman JD. The epidemiology of sarcoma. Clin Sarcoma Res. 2012 Oct 4;2(1):14. doi: 10.1186/2045-3329-2-14.
- Background: PubMed 28108827Smolle MA, Tunn PU, Goldenitsch E, Posch F, Szkandera J, Bergovec M, Liegl-Atzwanger B, Leithner A. The Prognostic Impact of Unplanned Excisions in a Cohort of 728 Soft Tissue Sarcoma Patients: A Multicentre Study. Ann Surg Oncol. 2017 Jun;24(6):1596-1605. doi: 10.1245/s10434-017-5776-8. Epub 2017 Jan 20.
- Background: PubMed 18256089Chandrasekar CR, Wafa H, Grimer RJ, Carter SR, Tillman RM, Abudu A. The effect of an unplanned excision of a soft-tissue sarcoma on prognosis. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2008 Feb;90(2):203-8. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.90B2.19760.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Liposarcoma
RecruitingPhase 3
Measuring if Immunotherapy Plus Chemotherapy is Better Than Chemotherapy Alone for Patients With Aggressive Poorly Differentiated Sarcomas
Metastatic Dedifferentiated Liposarcoma, Metastatic Undifferentiated Pleomorphic Sarcoma
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
Spearhead 1 Study in Subjects With Advanced Synovial Sarcoma or Myxoid/Round Cell Liposarcoma
Synovial Sarcoma, Myxoid Liposarcoma
RecruitingPhase 1
Testing Low-Dose Common Chemotherapy (Liposomal Doxorubicin) in Combination With an Anti-Cancer Drug, Peposertib, in Advanced Sarcoma
Metastatic Dedifferentiated Liposarcoma, Metastatic Leiomyosarcoma
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
Oleclumab and Durvalumab for the Treatment of Recurrent, Refractory, or Metastatic Sarcoma
Metastatic Angiosarcoma, Metastatic Dedifferentiated Liposarcoma
RecruitingPhase 1/2
Study to Test the Safety and Tolerability of PF-07220060 in Participants With Advance Solid Tumors
Liposarcoma, Prostate Cancer
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
Nelly FIRMIN, MD study chair
Institut Régional du Cancer de Montpellier (ICM)
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Blood sampling in people with Liposarcoma and Atypical Lipomatous Tumor, run by Institut du Cancer de Montpellier - Val d'Aurelle at 1 site in France.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 12 Feb 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Jean-Pierre BLEUSE, MD (0467613102 ext. +33, DRCI-icm105@icm.unicancer.fr), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Sensibility and specificity of circulating serine level for LPS diagnosis (time frame: At 3 months post surgery). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04224064, which also lists 3 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 12 Feb 2025.