AzTrials
AzTrials

Type 2 DiabetesNCT04226027

Dynamically Tailored Behavioral Interventions in Diabetes

A study testing T2.coach in people with Type 2 Diabetes, run by Columbia University at 2 sites in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

In this project, the investigators will evaluate the efficacy of a novel approach to personalizing behavioral interventions for self-management of type 2 diabetes (T2DM) to individuals' behavioral and glycemic profiles discovered using computational learning and self-monitoring data. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 65 years
Conditions the study is for
Type 2 Diabetes
What is being tested?
T2.coach
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
300 participants
Where
2 sitesUnited States
Study dates
17 Jan 2020to 30 Mar 2025
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 65 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Patient of the health center for ≥ 6 months and a diagnosis of T2DM
  • HbA1c ≥ 8.0,
  • Aged 18 to 65 years
  • Attends diabetes education program at the health center
  • Owns a basic mobile phone
  • Proficient in either English or Spanish

Who cannot join

  • Pregnant
  • Presence of severe cognitive impairment (recorded in patient chart),
  • Existence of other serious illnesses (e.g. cancer diagnosis with active treatment, advanced stage heart failure, dialysis, multiple sclerosis, advanced retinopathy, recorded in patient chart),
  • Plans for leaving the FQHC in the next 12 months,
  • Participation in the previous trial of diabetes self-management technologies

Trial locations and contacts

2 sites in 1 country.

United States2 sites
  • Clinical Directors Network

    New York, New York, 10018

  • Columbia University Irving Medical Center

    New York, New York, 10032

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Dynamically Tailoring Interventions for Problem-Solving in Diabetes Self-Management Using Self-Monitoring Data - a Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT)

In this project, the investigators will evaluate the efficacy of a novel approach to personalizing behavioral interventions for self-management of type 2 diabetes (T2DM) to individuals' behavioral and glycemic profiles discovered using computational learning and self-monitoring data. This study is a two-arm randomized controlled trial with n=280 participants recruited from the participating Federally Qualified Health Centers (FQHCs). The participants will be randomly assigned to the intervention group and the usual care (control) group with 1-1 allocation ratio. Half of the participants (n=140) will be randomly assigned to a usual care (control) group. Both groups will receive standard diabetes education at their respective FQHC site. In addition, the experimental group will receive instructions to use T2.coach for a minimum of 6 months.

Read the detailed description

One of the main difficulties in managing diabetes is that each affected individual requires personally tailored combination of diet, exercise, and medication to effectively control their blood sugar. Rather than strictly following a doctor's prescription, individuals need to carefully examine their lifestyle choices and their impact on their health. Independent learning, experimentation and problem solving become of great importance. However, they can be challenging for individuals with diabetes. In this project, the investigators will refine and evaluate a novel intervention for diabetes self-management that uses computational analysis of self-monitoring data to help individuals with type 2 diabetes identify what daily activities, including consumption of meals, physical activity, and sleep, have impact on blood glucose levels, and suggest modifications to these daily activities to improve blood glucose levels.

Growing evidence highlights significant differences in glycemic function and cultural, social, and economical circumstances of individuals with type 2 diabetes (T2DM) that impact their self-management. Precision medicine strives to personalize medical treatment to an individual's genetic makeup, computationally discovered clinical phenotypes and lifestyle. Studies showed the benefits of tailoring not only medical treatment, but also behavioral interventions. Yet, currently, personalization of self-management in T2DM requires each individual to engage in discovery, reflection, and problem-solving-critical but cognitively demanding activities-or to rely on their healthcare providers. Both of these may present considerable barriers to individuals from medically under-served low income communities. Mobile health (mHealth) solutions in T2DM bring promise of reaching wider populations in need of self-management; however, few such solutions provide assistance with personalizing self-management behaviors. Ongoing efforts on personalizing behavioral interventions outside of T2DM focus on tailoring behavior modification techniques to individuals' psycho-social characteristics, such as self-efficacy ), and tailoring delivery of intervention to individuals' context rather than on personalizing self-management strategies.

The ongoing focus of this research is on developing informatics interventions for diabetes self-management, with a specific focus on discovery with self-monitoring data and on problem-solving for improving glycemic control. In the proposed research the investigators introduce T2.coach, an mHealth intervention that uses computational analysis of self-monitoring data to identify behavioral patterns associated with poor glycemic control and formulate personalized behavioral goals for changing problematic behaviors. This study will evaluate T2.coach's efficacy in a two-arm RCT with stratified randomization conducted with Clinical Directors Network (CDN), a well-recognized primary care practice-based research network (PBRN) of Federally Qualified Health Centers (FQHCs), and Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ)-designated Center of Excellence (P30) for Practice-based Research and Learning.

Conditions
Type 2 Diabetes
Being tested
T2.coach
Keywords
Mobile health, Mhealth, T2.coach, Smartphone app
Medical subject headings
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • T2.coachBehavioural

    T2.coach is a smartphone app for low-burden capture of diet and blood glucose (BG) levels and for reviewing past records, integrated with FitBit for captured of physical activity and sleep. All captured data are sent to the computational inference engine that uses machine learning methods and expert system to formulate personalized behavioral goals. Examples of behavioral goals include the following: "For high carbohydrate breakfasts, reduce your carbs to be about 1 carb choice. Examples of 1 carb choice are 1 slice of whole wheat toast, 1 cup of oatmeal, or 1 apple." The T2.coach chatbot companion uses text messages to help individuals set goals that are consistent with evidence based guidelines for diabetes self-management, inferences on data captured with T2.coach, and their own preferences, as well as send individuals goal reminders and prompts for reflection on goal achievement.

Study groups in NCT04226027
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
T2.coachExperimentalParticipants receive standard care (diabetes self-management education provided by their Federally Qualified Community Health Center) and are asked to use T2.coach for 6 months.
Receives: Behavioral: T2.coach
ControlNo interventionParticipants receive standard care (diabetes self-management education provided by their Federally Qualified Community Health Center).

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Mean HbA1c Value

    The main outcome is the mean Hemoglobin A1c at 12 months. In the statistical analysis, we examine difference in mean HbA1c between the study arms at baseline, 6 months, and 12 months.

    Measured: Baseline, 6 months, 12 months

Secondary outcomes (3)
  1. SCA-I Score

    Diabetes Self-Care Inventory (SCA-I) is a 15-item 5-point Likert scale (1-never engage; 5-always engage) for measuring different aspects of diabetes self-care. The final score ranges from 1 (lowest) to 5 (highest) with a higher score indicating better self-care (better outcome). To account for missing values, the final score was normalized to a 1-100 scale with a higher score indicating better self-care. All analysis was conducted with normalized scores.

    Measured: Baseline, 6 months, 12 months

  2. DSES Score

    Diabetes Self-Efficacy Scale (DSES) is a 15-item 10-point Likert scale (1-not at all confident; 10-totally confident) that measures the belief that one can self-manage one's own health, adapted to diabetes. Final scores are averaged, and the total score ranges from 1 (lowest) to 10 (highest) with a lower score indicating poor self-efficacy (worse outcome).

    Measured: Baseline, 6 months, 12 months

  3. PAID Score

    Problem Areas in Diabetes (PAID) is a 20-item 5-point Likert scale (0=not a problem; 4=very serious problem) that measures the emotional aspect of living with diabetes. The final score ranges from 0 (lowest) to 80 (highest), with a higher score indicating greater emotional discomfort (worse outcome).

    Measured: Baseline, 6 months, 12 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted13 Jan 2020
  2. Study start17 Jan 2020
  3. Primary completion30 Mar 2025
  4. Study completion30 Mar 2025

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
Two-arm RCT with 1:1 randomization at participant level, with stratified randomization to balance by clinical site, sex, and language, evaluate the efficacy of the T2.coach intervention
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
300 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04226027
Sponsor's protocol ID
AAAS5528
Other IDs
R01DK113189
Status last verified
Apr 2026
First submitted
9 Jan 2020
Last updated
13 May 2026
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No: Due to the sensitive nature of individual participant data (IPD) collected in this study, the dataset will only be made available for other potential users under a data-sharing agreement that provides for: (1) a commitment to using the data only for research purposes and not to identify any individual participant; (2) a commitment to securing the data using appropriate computer technology; and (3) a commitment to destroying or returning the data after analyses are completed.

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing T2.coach in people with Type 2 Diabetes, run by Columbia University at 2 sites in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 13 May 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 2 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 13 May 2026). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Mean HbA1c Value (time frame: Baseline, 6 months, 12 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 13 May 2026.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in
Clinical Trial NCT04226027 | AzTrials