OsteoarthritisGARM-MSK-ALDNCT04238143
Adipose-Derived Biocellular Regenerative Therapy for Osteoarthritis
A study testing Tissue Stromal Vascular Fraction (tSVF) Arm 1, PRP Concentrate Arm 1 and Tissue Stromal Vascular Fraction (tSVF) Arm 2 in people with Osteoarthritis and Osteo Arthritis Knee, run by Healeon Medical Inc at 2 sites in United States.
Trial summary
Use of Biocellular and cellular approaches to treatment of Osteoarthritis (OA), musculoskeletal aging processes, pain, and degenerative changes are to be studied with minimally invasive protocols, and non-pharmaceutical means to relieve OA and its associated issues. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 90 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Osteoarthritis, Osteo Arthritis Knee, Osteo Arthritis Shoulders
- What is being tested?
- Tissue Stromal Vascular Fraction (tSVF) Arm 1, PRP Concentrate Arm 1 and Tissue Stromal Vascular Fraction (tSVF) Arm 2
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion, Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 100 participants
- Where
- 2 sitesUnited States
- Study dates
- 10 Jan 2020to 30 Sep 2027
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 90 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Documented osteoarthritic inflammatory and/or degenerative changes in the joint or connective tissues of the knee, hip, shoulder, Achilles tendon, Sacroiliac Joint, wrist/hand, foot/ankle, or Plantar Fasciitis (PR);
- No systemic disorders which, in opinion of principal investigator, would disqualify from safely being able to undergo the determined procedures;
- Have the ability to understand and accept all items in Informed Consent Document;
- Have adequate perivascular and extracellular matrix donor tissues available;
- Mature enough to tolerate determined procedures and follow up instructions and complete post-treatment tracking responsibilities
Who cannot join
- Systemic or psychological impairment which would preclude patient tolerance and understanding nature and extent of procedures and follow up tracking;
- Known active cancer, chemotherapy, or radiation therapy;
- Pregnancy;
- Active infections which would increase risk of patient to undergo treatment;
- High dose steroid users, or recipients of corticosteroids with a six month period before treatment date;
- Medication or Opiate addition, or in active treatment for drug rehabilitation;
- History of documented severe traumatic brain injuries;
- In the opinion of the principal investigator/provider, the patient's condition or medical issues which would not allow the individual to fully accomplish or complete the study requirements
Trial locations and contacts
2 sites in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
United States2 sites, 2 recruiting
- Not yet recruiting
Regenevita LLC
Stevensville, Montana, 59870
Glenn C Terry, MD, 706-566-9141, corky3444@gmail.com
Heather Terry, 17065669141, info@garm.com.hn
- Recruiting
Hemwall Center for Orthopedic Regenerative Medicine
Valencia, California, 91355
Kelly Cirricone, BS, 661-295-1110, hemwallcenter@gmail.com
About this study
Official title: Adipose-Derived Biocellular Regenerative Therapy in Treatment of Osteoarthritis (OA) and Associated Connective Tissue Degeneration and Pain
Use of Biocellular and cellular approaches to treatment of Osteoarthritis (OA), musculoskeletal aging processes, pain, and degenerative changes are to be studied with minimally invasive protocols, and non-pharmaceutical means to relieve OA and its associated issues. Traditional surgical interventions have not yielded convincing long-term outcomes, including total joint replacement surgeries and medical management of the supportive structures.
This study is to use a person's own stem/stromal Cells (autologous) plus HD-PRP (important healing growth factors and signal molecules) in such cases of OA for long-term minimally invasive treatments. Baseline (existing) findings are documented, and thence tracked as to progress deemed to be result of the intervention.
Read the detailed description
Osteoarthritis (OA) is one of the most common chronic health conditions and a leading cause of pain and disability in the world, with a substantial proportion of adults affected. It is estimated that symptomatic OA affects one in eight men and women in the US (27-31 million), In a global study of health conditions, osteoarthritis and musculoskeletal pain ranked in the top 4 percent of worldwide disabilities. OA is a complex, multifactorial disease, with much still to learn regarding mechanisms and progression. . The most commonly affected joints include the hip , knee , hand and foot , and spine. although OA can affect any joint. OA is linked to substantial economic costs estimated in developed countries to be between 1% and 2.5% of GDP. With the rise in life expectancy, the prevalence of osteoarthritis is projected to increase further, resulting in a greater healthcare burden.
Diagnosis is commonly accomplished via clinical examinations and subjective symptoms coupled with a variety of imaging protocols. These are an intrinsic portion of the protocols of this Trial, measuring both the safety and outcomes resulting from three basic approaches to provide both cellular and biocellular therapeutic approaches.
The Trial consists of three separate approaches: 1). Use of guided biocellular therapy (tSVF + Platelet Rich Plasma); 2). Use of guided biocellular and cellular therapy (tSVF + Platelet Rich Plasma + cSVF concentrates); and, 3). Use of cSVF only via systemic deployment suspended in sterile Normal Saline IV solution. Patient's will be enrolled based on the approach considered the most likely to safely attain clinical improvement and compared to others of similar findings in the same musculoskeletal indications.
Follow up and tracking to be extended over a two year period (minimum) following each treatment delivery. Those who do more than one site, or have a repeat treatment, will be followed on separate tracks to maintain the outcomes resulting from single versus double treatments. Management and voluntary enrollment will follow existing HIPPA (confidentiality) rules and regulations in place.
Participants will be requested to report any and all Adverse Events or Severe Adverse Events (complications not anticipated within parameters of usual and customary side effects resulting from such therapies) as may potentially result from any treatment provided (not including the normal "sequelae" of procedures utilized.
Cartilage loss remains the main pathologic features of OA, however OA is recognized to involve aging, inflammation and degenerative changes within the musculoskeletal joint, components, including pathologic changes in the bone, cartilage, and supportive soft tissues, As a natural process within aging and mechanical stresses, the ability of our homeostatic system to maintain a fully functional, pain free system, Weight bearing and repetitive trauma contribute to the demand for attempted repairs after use, it is common for OA to be found in multiple joints within the same individual over time and use.
Another aspect of OA is that it has been shown to be present in multiple joints in the same individual, suggesting a systemic bone response to mechanical stresses. When OA is severe, the bone involvement can be detected on plain radiographs, but radiographs may not detect milder cases. And while radiographs remain the standard means of diagnosing OA severity , these provide no information about the non-bone aspects of OA pathophysiology. Studies demonstrate that diagnostic musculoskeletal ultrasound as a complementary imaging tool, along with radiography, may enable more accurate diagnostics for osteoarthritis.
Treatments consist of harvesting (with microcannula) a small volume of tSVF to provide the needed stem/stromal cells found in large numbers around the small capillaries and blood vessels (needs typically 5-15 teaspoons). This tSVF is mixed with the patient's own concentrated platelets and guided for placement with use of a high resolution ultrasound for accurate placement. These elements are what are normally used in our bodies for maintaining (homeostasis) and repair (regenerative healing), with the advantage of accurate placement into the bone, soft tissues and joints involved in inflammatory or degenerative breakdown with pain and loss of function.
Each patient will be carefully followed to measure progress and imaging which documents structural changes that may be realized with these treatments. Of most note, the avoidance or postponement of invasive and often difficult rehabilitation is realized.
These procedures have been safely and successfully provided for approximately 15 years, however, without a large series and tracking over a period of years. We are seeking validation of the processes and elements which have been performed and reported in case reporting or small case series.
- Conditions
- Osteoarthritis, Osteo Arthritis Knee, Osteo Arthritis Shoulders, Osteoarthritis of Multiple Joints, Osteoarthritis, Hip, Osteoarthritis - Ankle/Foot
- Being tested
- Tissue Stromal Vascular Fraction (tSVF) Arm 1, PRP Concentrate Arm 1, Tissue Stromal Vascular Fraction (tSVF) Arm 2, PRP Concentrate Arm 2, Cellular Stromal Vascular Fraction (cSVF) Arm 2
- Keywords
- Arthritis, Degenerative, Joint Disease, Rheumatoid Arthritis
- Medical subject headings
- Osteoarthritis, Osteoarthritis, Hip, Arthritis, Joint Diseases, Arthritis, Rheumatoid
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Tissue Stromal Vascular Fraction (tSVF) Arm 1Procedure or surgery
Harvesting subcutaneous tSVF with sterile, disposable microcannula system
PRP Concentrate Arm 1Biological
Preparation of PRP Concentrate via sterile Terumo-Harvest System
Tissue Stromal Vascular Fraction (tSVF) Arm 2Procedure or surgery
Harvesting subcutaneous tSVF with sterile, disposable microcannula system
PRP Concentrate Arm 2Biological
Preparation of PRP Concentrate via sterile Terumo-Harvest System
Cellular Stromal Vascular Fraction (cSVF) Arm 2Procedure or surgery
Isolation-Concentration of cSVF via sterile enzymatic digestion (Liberase TM, Sterile Roche)
Cellular Stromal Vascular Fraction (cSVF) Arm 3Procedure or surgery
Isolation-Concentration of cSVF via sterile enzymatic digestion (Liberase TM, Sterile Roche)
Sterile Normal Saline (IV Solution)Drug
Suspension of cSVF in 500 cc Sterile Normal Saline (IV Solution)
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| tSVF + PRP Arm1 | Experimental | Tissue Stromal Vascular Fraction (tSVF) + Platelet-Rich Plasma (PRP) Concentrate Receives: Procedure: Tissue Stromal Vascular Fraction (tSVF) Arm 1; Biological: PRP Concentrate Arm 1 |
| tSVF + PRP + cSVF Arm 2 | Experimental | Tissue Stromal Vascular Fraction (tSVF) + Platelet-Rich Plasma (PRP) Concentrate + Cellular Stromal Vascular Fraction (cSVF) Receives: Procedure: Tissue Stromal Vascular Fraction (tSVF) Arm 2; Biological: PRP Concentrate Arm 2; Procedure: Cellular Stromal Vascular Fraction (cSVF) Arm 2 |
| Normal Saline IV + cSVF Arm 3 | Experimental | Cellular Stromal Vascular Fraction (cSVF); Sterile Normal Saline Intravenous (IV) Introduction Receives: Procedure: Cellular Stromal Vascular Fraction (cSVF) Arm 3; Drug: Sterile Normal Saline (IV Solution) |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Participant with Complications
Adverse and Severe Adverse Events
Measured: 6 Months
Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS)
Subjective Pain Rating
Measured: 6 months
Changes from Baseline visual analog pain scale (VAS)
Patient Reported Pain (1-10)
Measured: Baseline, 1 month, 6 months, 1 year
Changes in Ultrasound Images from Baseline Condition
High Definition Ultrasonography Soft and Hard Tissues of Musculoskeletal Areas To Be Treated
Measured: Baseline, 6 months, 1 year
Secondary outcomes (7)
Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS)
Measure Knee and OA Status for Pain and OA
Measured: Baseline; 6 Month; 1 year
Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC)
Measure Change from Baseline of Pain and Arthritis In Knee and Hip
Measured: Baseline; 6 Month; 1 Year
Hip Disability and OA Outcomes Survey (HOOS)
Measure Change from Baseline of Pain \& Function of Hip
Measured: Baseline; 6 Month; 1 Year
Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand Score (DASH)
Measure Change from Baseline of Pain, Range of Motion and Function All Areas
Measured: Baseline; 6 Month; 1 Year
Roland-Morris Back Pain Questionnaire (RMBPQ)
Measure Change from Baseline of Pain, Function and Range of Motion
Measured: Baseline; 6 months; 1 year
Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM)
Measure Change from Baseline Pain, Function, Range of Motion
Measured: Baseline; 6 Month; 1 Year
Foot and Ankle Disability Index (FADI)
Measure Change in Disability From Baseline Pain, Function, Range of Motion
Measured: Baseline; 6 Month; 1 Year
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted23 Jan 2020
- Study start10 Jan 2020
- Primary completion30 Sep 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion30 Sep 2027 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (18)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for OsteoarthritisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 100 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Healeon Medical Inc
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Collaborators
- Donna Alderman, DO, Alexander, Robert W., M.D.
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04238143
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- GARM-MSK-ALD
- Acronym
- GARM-MSK-ALD
- Status last verified
- Sep 2024
- First submitted
- 13 Jan 2020
- Last updated
- 1 Oct 2024
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- Yes
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Oliver, K., Alexander, RW. Combination of Autologous Adipose-Derived Tissue Stromal Vascular Fraction Plus High Density Platelet-Rich Plasma or Bone Marrow Concentrates in Achilles Tendon Tears. J. Prolotherapy; 5:e895-912, 2013.
Alexander RW, Harrell DB. Autologous fat grafting: use of closed syringe microcannula system for enhanced autologous structural grafting. Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol. 2013 Apr 8;6:91-102. doi: 10.2147/CCID.S40575. Print 2013.
PubMed 23630430Albano JJ, Alexander RW. Autologous fat grafting as a mesenchymal stem cell source and living bioscaffold in a patellar tendon tear. Clin J Sport Med. 2011 Jul;21(4):359-61. doi: 10.1097/JSM.0b013e31821d0864. No abstract available.
PubMed 21562415Lin, K., Short Review on the advancement of osteoarthritis treatment with cell therapy. J. Regen Biol Med. (2020), 2(1): 1-7.
Mehranfar S, Abdi Rad I, Mostafav E, Akbarzadeh A. The use of stromal vascular fraction (SVF), platelet-rich plasma (PRP) and stem cells in the treatment of osteoarthritis: an overview of clinical trials. Artif Cells Nanomed Biotechnol. 2019 Dec;47(1):882-890. doi: 10.1080/21691401.2019.1576710.
PubMed 30887856Hong Z, Chen J, Zhang S, Zhao C, Bi M, Chen X, Bi Q. Intra-articular injection of autologous adipose-derived stromal vascular fractions for knee osteoarthritis: a double-blind randomized self-controlled trial. Int Orthop. 2019 May;43(5):1123-1134. doi: 10.1007/s00264-018-4099-0. Epub 2018 Aug 14.
PubMed 30109404Alderman, D. Regenerative injection therapies for pain: traditional, platelet-rich plasma, and biocellular prolotherapy. text, 345, 2016.
Alexander RW. Biocellular Regenerative Medicine: Use of Adipose-Derived Stem/Stromal Cells and It's Native Bioactive Matrix. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am. 2016 Nov;27(4):871-891. doi: 10.1016/j.pmr.2016.06.005.
PubMed 27788905Nelson AE, Allen KD, Golightly YM, Goode AP, Jordan JM. A systematic review of recommendations and guidelines for the management of osteoarthritis: The chronic osteoarthritis management initiative of the U.S. bone and joint initiative. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2014 Jun;43(6):701-12. doi: 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2013.11.012. Epub 2013 Dec 4.
PubMed 24387819Alderman, D, Alexander, RW, Stem Cell Prolotherapy In Regenerative Medicine: Background, Theory, and Protocols. J. Prolo 3(3): 689-708, 2011.
Alexander, RW, Overview of Cellular Stromal Vascular Fraction (cSVF) & Biocellular Uses of Stem/Stromal Cells & Matrix (tSVF + HD-PRP) in Regenerative Medicine, Aesthetic Medicine, and Plastic Surgery. J Stem Cell Res Ther; S1003, 2019.
Burdett N, McNeil JD. Difficulties with assessing the benefit of glucosamine sulphate as a treatment for osteoarthritis. Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2012 Sep;10(3):222-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-1609.2012.00279.x.
PubMed 22925619Thorlund JB, Juhl CB, Roos EM, Lohmander LS. Arthroscopic surgery for degenerative knee: systematic review and meta-analysis of benefits and harms. BMJ. 2015 Jun 16;350:h2747. doi: 10.1136/bmj.h2747.
PubMed 26080045Katz JN, Brownlee SA, Jones MH. The role of arthroscopy in the management of knee osteoarthritis. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2014 Feb;28(1):143-56. doi: 10.1016/j.berh.2014.01.008.
PubMed 24792949Alderman, D, Alexander, RW. Advances In Regenerative Medicine: High Density Platelet-Rich Plasma and Stem Cell Prolotherapy. J. Prac Pain Management, Oct: 49-60, 2011.
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 1 Oct 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Adipose-Derived Biocellular Regenerative Therapy in Treatment of Osteoarthritis (OA) and Associated Connective Tissue Degeneration and Pain
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04238143
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- GARM-MSK-ALD / GARM-MSK-ALD
- Conditions
- Osteoarthritis, Osteo Arthritis Knee, Osteo Arthritis Shoulders, Osteoarthritis of Multiple Joints, Osteoarthritis, Hip, Osteoarthritis - Ankle/Foot
- Keywords
- Arthritis, Degenerative, Joint Disease, Rheumatoid Arthritis
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Recruiting
- Enrolment
- 100 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Healeon Medical IncIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Collaborators
- Donna Alderman, DO, Alexander, Robert W., M.D.
- Study start
- 10 Jan 2020 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 30 Sep 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 30 Sep 2027 (estimated)
- First posted
- 23 Jan 2020 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Use of Biocellular and cellular approaches to treatment of Osteoarthritis (OA), musculoskeletal aging processes, pain, and degenerative changes are to be studied with minimally invasive protocols, and non-pharmaceutical means to relieve OA and its associated issues. Traditional surgical interventions have not yielded convincing long-term outcomes, including total joint replacement surgeries and medical management of the supportive structures.
This study is to use a person's own stem/stromal Cells (autologous) plus HD-PRP (important healing growth factors and signal molecules) in such cases of OA for long-term minimally invasive treatments. Baseline (existing) findings are documented, and thence tracked as to progress deemed to be result of the intervention.
Detailed description
Osteoarthritis (OA) is one of the most common chronic health conditions and a leading cause of pain and disability in the world, with a substantial proportion of adults affected. It is estimated that symptomatic OA affects one in eight men and women in the US (27-31 million), In a global study of health conditions, osteoarthritis and musculoskeletal pain ranked in the top 4 percent of worldwide disabilities. OA is a complex, multifactorial disease, with much still to learn regarding mechanisms and progression. . The most commonly affected joints include the hip , knee , hand and foot , and spine. although OA can affect any joint. OA is linked to substantial economic costs estimated in developed countries to be between 1% and 2.5% of GDP. With the rise in life expectancy, the prevalence of osteoarthritis is projected to increase further, resulting in a greater healthcare burden.
Diagnosis is commonly accomplished via clinical examinations and subjective symptoms coupled with a variety of imaging protocols. These are an intrinsic portion of the protocols of this Trial, measuring both the safety and outcomes resulting from three basic approaches to provide both cellular and biocellular therapeutic approaches.
The Trial consists of three separate approaches: 1). Use of guided biocellular therapy (tSVF + Platelet Rich Plasma); 2). Use of guided biocellular and cellular therapy (tSVF + Platelet Rich Plasma + cSVF concentrates); and, 3). Use of cSVF only via systemic deployment suspended in sterile Normal Saline IV solution. Patient's will be enrolled based on the approach considered the most likely to safely attain clinical improvement and compared to others of similar findings in the same musculoskeletal indications.
Follow up and tracking to be extended over a two year period (minimum) following each treatment delivery. Those who do more than one site, or have a repeat treatment, will be followed on separate tracks to maintain the outcomes resulting from single versus double treatments. Management and voluntary enrollment will follow existing HIPPA (confidentiality) rules and regulations in place.
Participants will be requested to report any and all Adverse Events or Severe Adverse Events (complications not anticipated within parameters of usual and customary side effects resulting from such therapies) as may potentially result from any treatment provided (not including the normal "sequelae" of procedures utilized.
Cartilage loss remains the main pathologic features of OA, however OA is recognized to involve aging, inflammation and degenerative changes within the musculoskeletal joint, components, including pathologic changes in the bone, cartilage, and supportive soft tissues, As a natural process within aging and mechanical stresses, the ability of our homeostatic system to maintain a fully functional, pain free system, Weight bearing and repetitive trauma contribute to the demand for attempted repairs after use, it is common for OA to be found in multiple joints within the same individual over time and use.
Another aspect of OA is that it has been shown to be present in multiple joints in the same individual, suggesting a systemic bone response to mechanical stresses. When OA is severe, the bone involvement can be detected on plain radiographs, but radiographs may not detect milder cases. And while radiographs remain the standard means of diagnosing OA severity , these provide no information about the non-bone aspects of OA pathophysiology. Studies demonstrate that diagnostic musculoskeletal ultrasound as a complementary imaging tool, along with radiography, may enable more accurate diagnostics for osteoarthritis.
Treatments consist of harvesting (with microcannula) a small volume of tSVF to provide the needed stem/stromal cells found in large numbers around the small capillaries and blood vessels (needs typically 5-15 teaspoons). This tSVF is mixed with the patient's own concentrated platelets and guided for placement with use of a high resolution ultrasound for accurate placement. These elements are what are normally used in our bodies for maintaining (homeostasis) and repair (regenerative healing), with the advantage of accurate placement into the bone, soft tissues and joints involved in inflammatory or degenerative breakdown with pain and loss of function.
Each patient will be carefully followed to measure progress and imaging which documents structural changes that may be realized with these treatments. Of most note, the avoidance or postponement of invasive and often difficult rehabilitation is realized.
These procedures have been safely and successfully provided for approximately 15 years, however, without a large series and tracking over a period of years. We are seeking validation of the processes and elements which have been performed and reported in case reporting or small case series.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| tSVF + PRP Arm1 | Experimental | Procedure: Tissue Stromal Vascular Fraction (tSVF) Arm 1, Biological: PRP Concentrate Arm 1Tissue Stromal Vascular Fraction (tSVF) + Platelet-Rich Plasma (PRP) Concentrate |
| tSVF + PRP + cSVF Arm 2 | Experimental | Procedure: Tissue Stromal Vascular Fraction (tSVF) Arm 2, Biological: PRP Concentrate Arm 2, Procedure: Cellular Stromal Vascular Fraction (cSVF) Arm 2Tissue Stromal Vascular Fraction (tSVF) + Platelet-Rich Plasma (PRP) Concentrate + Cellular Stromal Vascular Fraction (cSVF) |
| Normal Saline IV + cSVF Arm 3 | Experimental | Procedure: Cellular Stromal Vascular Fraction (cSVF) Arm 3, Drug: Sterile Normal Saline (IV Solution)Cellular Stromal Vascular Fraction (cSVF); Sterile Normal Saline Intravenous (IV) Introduction |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 90 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Documented osteoarthritic inflammatory and/or degenerative changes in the joint or connective tissues of the knee, hip, shoulder, Achilles tendon, Sacroiliac Joint, wrist/hand, foot/ankle, or Plantar Fasciitis (PR);
- No systemic disorders which, in opinion of principal investigator, would disqualify from safely being able to undergo the determined procedures;
- Have the ability to understand and accept all items in Informed Consent Document;
- Have adequate perivascular and extracellular matrix donor tissues available;
- Mature enough to tolerate determined procedures and follow up instructions and complete post-treatment tracking responsibilities
Key exclusion criteria (8 listed)
- Systemic or psychological impairment which would preclude patient tolerance and understanding nature and extent of procedures and follow up tracking;
- Known active cancer, chemotherapy, or radiation therapy;
- Pregnancy;
- Active infections which would increase risk of patient to undergo treatment;
- High dose steroid users, or recipients of corticosteroids with a six month period before treatment date;
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Tissue Stromal Vascular Fraction (tSVF) Arm 1Harvesting subcutaneous tSVF with sterile, disposable microcannula system | Procedure or surgery | tSVF + PRP Arm1 |
| PRP Concentrate Arm 1Preparation of PRP Concentrate via sterile Terumo-Harvest System | Biological | tSVF + PRP Arm1 |
| Tissue Stromal Vascular Fraction (tSVF) Arm 2Harvesting subcutaneous tSVF with sterile, disposable microcannula system | Procedure or surgery | tSVF + PRP + cSVF Arm 2 |
| PRP Concentrate Arm 2Preparation of PRP Concentrate via sterile Terumo-Harvest System | Biological | tSVF + PRP + cSVF Arm 2 |
| Cellular Stromal Vascular Fraction (cSVF) Arm 2Isolation-Concentration of cSVF via sterile enzymatic digestion (Liberase TM, Sterile Roche) | Procedure or surgery | tSVF + PRP + cSVF Arm 2 |
| Cellular Stromal Vascular Fraction (cSVF) Arm 3Isolation-Concentration of cSVF via sterile enzymatic digestion (Liberase TM, Sterile Roche) | Procedure or surgery | Normal Saline IV + cSVF Arm 3 |
| Sterile Normal Saline (IV Solution)Suspension of cSVF in 500 cc Sterile Normal Saline (IV Solution) | Drug | Normal Saline IV + cSVF Arm 3 |
Primary outcome
Participant with Complications
Time frame: 6 Months
Adverse and Severe Adverse Events
Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS)
Time frame: 6 months
Subjective Pain Rating
Changes from Baseline visual analog pain scale (VAS)
Time frame: Baseline, 1 month, 6 months, 1 year
Patient Reported Pain (1-10)
Changes in Ultrasound Images from Baseline Condition
Time frame: Baseline, 6 months, 1 year
High Definition Ultrasonography Soft and Hard Tissues of Musculoskeletal Areas To Be Treated
7 secondary outcomes
Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS)
Time frame: Baseline; 6 Month; 1 year
Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC)
Time frame: Baseline; 6 Month; 1 Year
Hip Disability and OA Outcomes Survey (HOOS)
Time frame: Baseline; 6 Month; 1 Year
Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand Score (DASH)
Time frame: Baseline; 6 Month; 1 Year
Roland-Morris Back Pain Questionnaire (RMBPQ)
Time frame: Baseline; 6 months; 1 year
Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM)
Time frame: Baseline; 6 Month; 1 Year
Foot and Ankle Disability Index (FADI)
Time frame: Baseline; 6 Month; 1 Year
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 1 Oct 2024.
- BackgroundOliver, K., Alexander, RW. Combination of Autologous Adipose-Derived Tissue Stromal Vascular Fraction Plus High Density Platelet-Rich Plasma or Bone Marrow Concentrates in Achilles Tendon Tears. J. Prolotherapy; 5:e895-912, 2013.
- Background: PubMed 23630430Alexander RW, Harrell DB. Autologous fat grafting: use of closed syringe microcannula system for enhanced autologous structural grafting. Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol. 2013 Apr 8;6:91-102. doi: 10.2147/CCID.S40575. Print 2013.
- Background: PubMed 21562415Albano JJ, Alexander RW. Autologous fat grafting as a mesenchymal stem cell source and living bioscaffold in a patellar tendon tear. Clin J Sport Med. 2011 Jul;21(4):359-61. doi: 10.1097/JSM.0b013e31821d0864. No abstract available.
- BackgroundLin, K., Short Review on the advancement of osteoarthritis treatment with cell therapy. J. Regen Biol Med. (2020), 2(1): 1-7.
- Background: PubMed 30887856Mehranfar S, Abdi Rad I, Mostafav E, Akbarzadeh A. The use of stromal vascular fraction (SVF), platelet-rich plasma (PRP) and stem cells in the treatment of osteoarthritis: an overview of clinical trials. Artif Cells Nanomed Biotechnol. 2019 Dec;47(1):882-890. doi: 10.1080/21691401.2019.1576710.
- Background: PubMed 30109404Hong Z, Chen J, Zhang S, Zhao C, Bi M, Chen X, Bi Q. Intra-articular injection of autologous adipose-derived stromal vascular fractions for knee osteoarthritis: a double-blind randomized self-controlled trial. Int Orthop. 2019 May;43(5):1123-1134. doi: 10.1007/s00264-018-4099-0. Epub 2018 Aug 14.
- BackgroundAlderman, D. Regenerative injection therapies for pain: traditional, platelet-rich plasma, and biocellular prolotherapy. text, 345, 2016.
- Results publication: PubMed 27788905Alexander RW. Biocellular Regenerative Medicine: Use of Adipose-Derived Stem/Stromal Cells and It's Native Bioactive Matrix. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am. 2016 Nov;27(4):871-891. doi: 10.1016/j.pmr.2016.06.005.
- Results publication: PubMed 24387819Nelson AE, Allen KD, Golightly YM, Goode AP, Jordan JM. A systematic review of recommendations and guidelines for the management of osteoarthritis: The chronic osteoarthritis management initiative of the U.S. bone and joint initiative. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2014 Jun;43(6):701-12. doi: 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2013.11.012. Epub 2013 Dec 4.
- Results publicationAlderman, D, Alexander, RW, Stem Cell Prolotherapy In Regenerative Medicine: Background, Theory, and Protocols. J. Prolo 3(3): 689-708, 2011.
- Results publicationAlexander, RW, Overview of Cellular Stromal Vascular Fraction (cSVF) & Biocellular Uses of Stem/Stromal Cells & Matrix (tSVF + HD-PRP) in Regenerative Medicine, Aesthetic Medicine, and Plastic Surgery. J Stem Cell Res Ther; S1003, 2019.
- Results publication: PubMed 22925619Burdett N, McNeil JD. Difficulties with assessing the benefit of glucosamine sulphate as a treatment for osteoarthritis. Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2012 Sep;10(3):222-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-1609.2012.00279.x.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Osteoarthritis
Recruiting
Outpatient Physiotherapy vs. mHealth Exercise and Self-Management for Knee Osteoarthritis (MOKneeTOR)
Knee Osteoarthristis
Not yet recruiting
Effects of Music During Walking on Pain and Muscle Activation in People With Chronic Pain Due to Knee Osteoarthritis
Knee Osteoarthritis
Recruiting
Radio- KO Radiotherapy for Knee Osteoarthritis Clinical Trial
Osteoarthritis, Knee
Not yet recruiting
Opioid Reduction and Enhanced Recovery in Orthopaedic Surgery (OREOS)-Knee
Knee Arthroplasty, Total, Partial Knee Arthroplasty
Not yet recruiting
Effects of Low-Load Blood Flow Restriction Resistance Training With and Without Hip Abductor Strengthening in Patients With Knee Osteoarthritis.(BFR)
Knee Osteoarthritis
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
2 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Tissue Stromal Vascular Fraction (tSVF) Arm 1, PRP Concentrate Arm 1 and Tissue Stromal Vascular Fraction (tSVF) Arm 2 in people with Osteoarthritis and Osteo Arthritis Knee, run by Healeon Medical Inc at 2 sites in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 1 Oct 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 2 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Donna Alderman, DO (1 661 295 1110, hemwallcenter@prolotherapy.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Participant with Complications (time frame: 6 Months). The study lists 4 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04238143, which also lists 18 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 1 Oct 2024.