AzTrials
AzTrials

Peritoneal DialysisNCT04238338

Association of MLR With Risk of Death and Cardiovascular Events in PD Patients

An observational study of Peritoneal Dialysis and Inflammation, run by Zhujiang Hospital at 1 site in China.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The current incidence of chronic kidney disease (CKD) in China is approximately 10.8%, with approximately 119 million patients. Among them, patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) are about 200-250 cases per million population. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Peritoneal Dialysis, Inflammation
What is being tested?
monocyte / lymphocyte ratio
How many people
266 participants
Where
1 siteChina
Study dates
1 Jun 2020to 1 Jun 2022
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: Patients who underwent continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis in the Department of Nephrology of Southern Medical University Zhujiang Hospital,and voluntarily signed informed consent to join the study.

Who may be able to join

  • Patients who underwent continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis for at least 3 months.

Who cannot join

  • Age <18 years, with acute or chronic infections such as lung infection,peritoneal dialysis-related peritonitis, urinary system infection, etc .
  • With history of malignant tumor or blood disease.
  • With rheumatic immune diseases, such as systemic lupus erythematosus, vasculitis , Sjögren's syndrome, etc .
  • Used immunosuppressants, such as glucocorticoids, calcineurin inhibitors, etc .
  • Women during pregnancy.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Jun Zhang, Doctor contact

13538786006

gzh_zj@qq.com

Xun Tang, Doctor contact

13538792873

1847672118@qq.com

China1 site, 1 recruiting
  • Zhujiang Hospital, Southern Medical University

    Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510282

    Jun Zhang, Doctor, 13538786006, gzh_zj@qq.com

    Xun Tang, Doctor, 13538792873, 1847672118@qq.com

    Recruiting

Other trials in China

About this study

Official title: Association of Monocyte / Lymphocyte Ratio With Risk of Death and Cardiovascular Events in Peritoneal Dialysis Patients

The current incidence of chronic kidney disease (CKD) in China is approximately 10.8%, with approximately 119 million patients. Among them, patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) are about 200-250 cases per million population. At present, the main renal replacement therapy is: hemodialysis (HD) or peritoneal dialysis (PD). Compared with HD, PD is easy to operate, better preserves residual renal function, has early survival advantages, and is more cost-effective. Despite this, the prognosis of PD patients is still not ideal, and cardiovascular disease (CVD) remains the leading cause of death in PD patients. Persistent inflammatory states are critical in the pathogenesis of CVD such as atherosclerosis and vascular calcification, and lead to protein energy expenditure and premature death outcomes in patients with CKD. Therefore, screening for markers that predict the risk of CVD in dialysis patients is essential. Some novel inflammatory markers have been shown to have diagnostic and prognostic value in ESRD patients in terms of inflammation, malnutrition, cardiovascular calcification, all-cause, and risk of CVD death. Among them, blood cell related parameters such as neutrophil / lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and monocyte / lymphocyte ratio (MLR)can reflect both inflammation and immune deficiency. NLR, MLR has been proposed as a new inflammatory biomarker and a potential predictor of cardiovascular risk. Studies have reported that MLR is associated with cardiovascular death and all-cause death risk in hemodialysis patients, and is superior to NLR. However, the relationship between MLR and the prognosis of patients with peritoneal dialysis is rarely reported. Therefore, in this study, we aimed to evaluate the association of MLR with risk of death and cardiovascular events in PD patients.

Read the detailed description

The epidemiological survey of chronic kidney disease in China shows that the current incidence of chronic kidney disease (CKD) in China is about 10.8%, with about 119 million patients. About 2% of patients will enter the stage of end-stage renal disease (ESRD) and require dialysis or kidney transplantation to support life. Currently the main renal replacement therapy is: hemodialysis (HD) or peritoneal dialysis (PD). Among them, PD patients are increasing year by year. As of 2016, more than 900,000 people in Asia are undergoing maintenance dialysis (218 cases per million population). Statistics from the CNRDS system show that as of the end of 2017, the number of PD patients in China has reached 86264. Compared with HD, PD is easy to operate, better preserves residual renal function, has early survival advantages, and is more cost-effective. In spite of this, the prognosis of PD patients is still unsatisfactory. At present, the main causes of death in PD patients are cardiovascular disease, peritoneal dialysis-related peritonitis, gastrointestinal bleeding, and tumors. Among them, cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the most important, accounting for about 50% of the deaths of PD patients. Among all CVD events, coronary heart disease, heart failure, and stroke are the most common. CVD risk factors for dialysis patients can be divided into traditional and non-traditional categories. Traditional Framingham risk factors can only explain some of the CVD risks of PD patients. Non-traditional risk factors, especially persistent inflammatory states, are essential in the pathogenesis of CVD such as atherosclerosis and vascular calcification, and lead to protein energy expenditure and premature death outcomes in patients with CKD.

The causes of chronic inflammation in patients with peritoneal dialysis are mainly divided into two aspects. Dialysis-related factors include: catheter-related infections, continuous exposure to biologically incompatible PD solutions, peritonitis, increased adipose tissue, and adipose factor balance disorders; associated with low GFR Factors include decreased clearance of pro-inflammatory factors, accumulation of uremic toxins, endotoxin exposure, oxidative stress, increased volume load, oral or other organ infections, and susceptibility to infections. The causes of inflammation in peritoneal dialysis are interconnected, leading to a persistent state of inflammation that ultimately increases the risk of cardiovascular events. Therefore, it is important to screen for markers that predict the risk of CVD in dialysis patients. At present, various inflammatory mediators, such as c-reactive protein(CRP), interleukins(IL)and tumor necrosis factor(TNF), have been studied and proven to independently predict the risk of CVD in dialysis patients. CRP can induce the expression of adhesion molecules in endothelial cells, increase the adhesion of vascular endothelial cells and monocytes; promote the formation of foam cells and atherosclerosis; aggravate vascular endothelial dysfunction; TNF-α can increase the expression and activity of alkaline phosphatase, enhance Isolated vascular wall calcification; aggravates vascular endothelial dysfunction; promotes left ventricular remodeling and aggravates left ventricular dysfunction. IL-6 can stimulate macrophages to secrete monocyte chemotactic protein 1, induce endothelial cell adhesion molecule expression; stimulate vascular smooth muscle cell proliferation and migration; aggravate vascular endothelial dysfunction; and induce cardiac hypertrophy. Although the mechanisms are different, they all increase the risk of CVD death in dialysis patients by aggravating vascular endothelial dysfunction, promoting ventricular remodeling and inducing myocardial hypertrophy. However, such markers are expensive and their detection is not easy to limit their clinical application. This prompted researchers to devote themselves to mining new markers of inflammation. In recent years, experts and scholars have become interested in blood cell parameters. Previous studies have shown that white blood cells and their subgroups (neutrophils, lymphocytes, monocytes) ), Neutrophil / lymphocyte ratio (NLR), monocyte / lymphocyte ratio (MLR), platelet / lymphocyte ratio (PLR) and other indicators have important predictive value for all causes and prognosis of cardiovascular disease in dialysis population . They have the advantages of low cost and easy detection. Among them, MLR has been proven to be an independent predictor of death in cardiovascular diseases such as coronary heart disease and heart failure. Previous research found. Monocytes play a key role in the occurrence and development of atherosclerosis. After the initial injury, endothelial cells are activated and promote monocytes to roll, attach and migrate under the endothelium. Monocytes that migrate to the subendothelium can differentiate into dendritic cells, which are key participants in activating adaptive immunity, or differentiate into macrophages, which secrete pro-inflammatory cytokines, thereby recruiting more immune cells and Promote inflammation. Macrophage phagocytosis of lipoprotein particles can lead to the formation of fatty streaks, the earliest ultrastructural changes in the formation of atherosclerosis. The migration of smooth muscle cells from the medial membrane to the intimal membrane further promotes the atherogenic process. Monocyte-derived cells transform this early lesion into advanced atherosclerotic plaques, which contain lipid-rich and macrophage-rich necrotic cores that eventually cause the plaque to rupture. In addition, previous studies have shown that physiological stress can lead to a significant increase in systemic cortisol production, which has led to a shift in leukocyte differentiation toward a decrease in lymphocytes and an increase in the percentage of granulocytes. Measuring lymphocyte counts can reflect stress levels. In patients with coronary heart disease, studies have shown that a decrease in lymphocyte count is an independent predictor of prognosis in patients with coronary heart disease; there is a phenomenon of lymphocyte apoptosis on the endothelium of atherosclerotic injured blood vessels. Therefore, low lymphocytes can reflect the occurrence and development of atherosclerotic diseases. In patients with end-stage renal disease, there will be changes in the number of immune cells such as increased monocytes and decreased lymphocytes. First, the decline in renal function causes retention of uremic toxins and cytokines, which leads to increased proinflammatory cytokines and oxidative stress. It further stimulates the proliferation of monocytes, and at the same time down-regulates immunity, resulting in a decrease in the number and function of lymphocytes, which in turn promotes inflammation and oxidative stress, and continues a vicious cycle. MLR can integrate pro-inflammatory and anti-inflammatory effects, and simultaneously reflect inflammation and immune deficiency. It may be an important marker of inflammation in patients with end-stage renal disease. In 2017, Xiang F et al. For the first time found in a prospective cohort study of 355 hemodialysis patients that high MLR levels were independent predictors of all-cause and CVD mortality in hemodialysis patients, and exceeded the predictive value of NLR However, there are no reports about MLR and prognosis in patients with peritoneal dialysis at home and abroad. Our previous retrospective analysis showed that the all-cause and cardiovascular disease survival rates of patients in the low MLR group were significantly higher than those in the high MLR group; high MLR levels were associated with all-cause and increased risk of cardiovascular death in patients with peritoneal dialysis. However, because retrospective studies cannot determine causality, there may be problems such as selection bias. Therefore, a prospective, large-sample study is needed to further explore the correlation between MLR and the prognosis of PD patients.

Being tested
monocyte / lymphocyte ratio
Keywords
monocyte / lymphocyte ratio, peritoneal dialysis, cardiovascular disease, Inflammation, death
Medical subject headings
Inflammation, Cardiovascular Diseases, Death

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • monocyte / lymphocyte ratioOther

    The lymphocyte / monocyte ratio should be tested every 3-6months after the start of the study, and the final value is the average

Study groups in NCT04238338
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
high MLR groupDivided into high MLR group and low MLR group according to the median of monocyte / lymphocyte ratio(MLR). Patients undergo peritoneal dialysis 3, 4 or 5 times per day, with a daily peritoneal dialysate dose of approximately 6000-10000 ml. The glucose concentration of peritoneal dialysate varies depending on the specific requirements of the individual patient for ultrafiltration volume. Three concentrations of glucose peritoneal dialysis solution are available for peritoneal dialysis patients. The low concentration is 1.5% or 2.5% and the high concentration is 4.25%. In principle, a 1.5% glucose peritoneal dialysis solution is first applied, or a high concentration of 4.25% glucose peritoneal dialysis solution can be appropriately applied according to the actual situation. Other drugs continued to be used in patients with other diseases.
Receives: Other: monocyte / lymphocyte ratio
low MLR groupDivided into high MLR group and low MLR group according to the median of monocyte / lymphocyte ratio(MLR). Patients undergo peritoneal dialysis 3, 4 or 5 times per day, with a daily peritoneal dialysate dose of approximately 6000-10000 ml. The glucose concentration of peritoneal dialysate varies depending on the specific requirements of the individual patient for ultrafiltration volume. Three concentrations of glucose peritoneal dialysis solution are available for peritoneal dialysis patients. The low concentration is 1.5% or 2.5% and the high concentration is 4.25%. In principle, a 1.5% glucose peritoneal dialysis solution is first applied, or a high concentration of 4.25% glucose peritoneal dialysis solution can be appropriately applied according to the actual situation. Other drugs continued to be used in patients with other diseases.
Receives: Other: monocyte / lymphocyte ratio

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. All-cause mortality and cardiovascular mortality

    Proportion of all-cause and cardiovascular deaths during follow-up

    Measured: 12 months

Secondary outcomes (2)
  1. The Incidence of cardiovascular events

    Cardiovascular events during follow-up (including acute heart failure, angina, acute myocardial infarction, arrhythmias requiring treatment, transient ischemic attack (TIA), cerebral infarction or cerebral hemorrhage, peripheral vascular disease)

    Measured: 12 months

  2. The Incidence of peritoneal dialysis-associated peritonitis

    Peritoneal dialysis-related peritonitis refers to the complications of peritonitis such as abdominal pain, fever, or turbid dialysate during peritoneal dialysis.

    Measured: 12 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted23 Jan 2020
  2. Study start1 Jun 2020
  3. Primary completion1 Jun 2022 (estimated)
  4. Study completion1 Jun 2022 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
266 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04238338
Sponsor's protocol ID
Jun Zhang
Status last verified
Aug 2021
First submitted
20 Jan 2020
Last updated
1 Apr 2022
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
Individual data sharing
No: The individual participant data (IPD) is not available.

Publications

  • Lameire N, Van Biesen W. Epidemiology of peritoneal dialysis: a story of believers and nonbelievers. Nat Rev Nephrol. 2010 Feb;6(2):75-82. doi: 10.1038/nrneph.2009.210. Epub 2009 Dec 15.

    PubMed 20010897
  • Li PK, Chow KM, Van de Luijtgaarden MW, Johnson DW, Jager KJ, Mehrotra R, Naicker S, Pecoits-Filho R, Yu XQ, Lameire N. Changes in the worldwide epidemiology of peritoneal dialysis. Nat Rev Nephrol. 2017 Feb;13(2):90-103. doi: 10.1038/nrneph.2016.181. Epub 2016 Dec 28.

    PubMed 28029154
  • Saran R, Steffick D, Bragg-Gresham J. The China Kidney Disease Network (CK-NET): "Big Data-Big Dreams". Am J Kidney Dis. 2017 Jun;69(6):713-716. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2017.04.008. No abstract available.

    PubMed 28532632
  • Cho Y, Hawley CM, Johnson DW. Clinical causes of inflammation in peritoneal dialysis patients. Int J Nephrol. 2014;2014:909373. doi: 10.1155/2014/909373. Epub 2014 May 6.

    PubMed 24895536
  • Akchurin OM, Kaskel F. Update on inflammation in chronic kidney disease. Blood Purif. 2015;39(1-3):84-92. doi: 10.1159/000368940. Epub 2015 Jan 20.

    PubMed 25662331
  • Miyamoto T, Carrero JJ, Stenvinkel P. Inflammation as a risk factor and target for therapy in chronic kidney disease. Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens. 2011 Nov;20(6):662-8. doi: 10.1097/MNH.0b013e32834ad504.

    PubMed 21825982
  • Li PK, Ng JK, Mcintyre CW. Inflammation and Peritoneal Dialysis. Semin Nephrol. 2017 Jan;37(1):54-65. doi: 10.1016/j.semnephrol.2016.10.007.

    PubMed 28153195
  • Carrero JJ, Stenvinkel P. Inflammation in end-stage renal disease--what have we learned in 10 years? Semin Dial. 2010 Sep-Oct;23(5):498-509. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-139X.2010.00784.x.

    PubMed 21039875
  • Miller LM, Sood MM, Sood AR, Reslerova M, Komenda P, Rigatto C, Bueti J. Cardiovascular disease in end-stage renal disease: the challenge of assessing and managing cardiac disease in dialysis patients. Int Urol Nephrol. 2010 Dec;42(4):1007-14. doi: 10.1007/s11255-010-9857-x. Epub 2010 Oct 20.

    PubMed 20960231
  • Jegatheesan D, Cho Y, Johnson DW. Clinical Studies of Interventions to Mitigate Cardiovascular Risk in Peritoneal Dialysis Patients. Semin Nephrol. 2018 May;38(3):277-290. doi: 10.1016/j.semnephrol.2018.02.007.

    PubMed 29753403
  • Wang AY, Brimble KS, Brunier G, Holt SG, Jha V, Johnson DW, Kang SW, Kooman JP, Lambie M, McIntyre C, Mehrotra R, Pecoits-Filho R. ISPD Cardiovascular and Metabolic Guidelines in Adult Peritoneal Dialysis Patients Part I - Assessment and Management of Various Cardiovascular Risk Factors. Perit Dial Int. 2015 Jul-Aug;35(4):379-87. doi: 10.3747/pdi.2014.00279.

    PubMed 26228782
  • Liakopoulos V, Roumeliotis S, Gorny X, Eleftheriadis T, Mertens PR. Oxidative Stress in Patients Undergoing Peritoneal Dialysis: A Current Review of the Literature. Oxid Med Cell Longev. 2017 Dec 27;2017:3494867. doi: 10.1155/2017/3494867. eCollection 2017.

    PubMed 29750088
  • Saxena AB. Recent advances in the management of peritoneal dialysis patients. F1000Prime Rep. 2015 May 1;7:57. doi: 10.12703/P7-57. eCollection 2015.

    PubMed 26097730
  • Betjes MG. Immune cell dysfunction and inflammation in end-stage renal disease. Nat Rev Nephrol. 2013 May;9(5):255-65. doi: 10.1038/nrneph.2013.44. Epub 2013 Mar 19.

    PubMed 23507826
  • Ernandez T, Mayadas TN. The Changing Landscape of Renal Inflammation. Trends Mol Med. 2016 Feb;22(2):151-163. doi: 10.1016/j.molmed.2015.12.002. Epub 2016 Jan 7.

    PubMed 26778189

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Peritoneal Dialysis and Inflammation, run by Zhujiang Hospital at 1 site in China.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 1 Apr 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Jun Zhang, Doctor (13538786006, gzh_zj@qq.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

All-cause mortality and cardiovascular mortality (time frame: 12 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04238338, which also lists 32 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 1 Apr 2022.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in