Bacteremia Caused by Gram-Negative BacteriaPhase 3MERINO IIINCT04238390
Ceftolozane-tazobactam Versus Meropenem for ESBL and AmpC-producing Enterobacterales Bloodstream Infection
A Phase 3 study testing Ceftolozane-Tazobactam and Meropenem in people with Bacteremia Caused by Gram-Negative Bacteria, run by The University of Queensland at 29 sites in 5 countries.
Trial summary
The purpose of this study is to determine whether ceftolozane-tazobactam is as effective as meropenem with respect to 30 day mortality in the treatment of bloodstream infection due to third-generation cephalosporin non-susceptible Enterobacterales or a known chromosomal AmpC-producing Enterobacterales (Enterobacter… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Bacteremia Caused by Gram-Negative Bacteria
- What is being tested?
- Ceftolozane-Tazobactam and Meropenem
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 0 participants
- Where
- 29 sitesin 5 countries
- Study dates
- Jan 2022to Dec 2024
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Bloodstream infection defined as presence in at least one peripheral blood culture draw demonstrating Enterobacterales with proven non-susceptibility to third generation cephalosporins or cephalosporin susceptible species known to harbour chromosomal AmpC-beta-lactamases (Enterobacter spp., Klebsiella aerogenes, Citrobacter freundii, Morganella morganii, Providencia spp. or Serratia marcescens) during hospitalisation
- Patient is aged 18 years and over (21 and over in Singapore)
- The patient or approved proxy is able to provide informed consent
- ≤72 hours has elapsed since the first positive qualifying (index) blood culture collection
- Expected to receive IV therapy for ≥5 days
Who cannot join
- Known hypersensitivity to a cephalosporin or a carbapenem, or anaphylaxis to beta-lactam antibiotics
- Participant with significant polymicrobial bloodstream infection (i.e. not a contaminant)
- Treatment is not with the intent to cure the infection (i.e. palliative intent) or the expected survival is ≤4 days
- Participant is pregnant or breast-feeding (tested for in women of child-bearing age only)
- Use of concomitant antimicrobials with known activity against Gram-negative bacilli (except trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole for Pneumocystis prophylaxis and when adding metronidazole for suspected IAI) in the first 5 days post-randomisation
- Participant with CrCl <15 mL/minute or on renal replacement therapy (in addition, participants will be withdrawn from the study if CrCl reaches this level)
- Previously randomised in the MERINO-3 trial or concurrently enrolled in another therapeutic antibiotic clinical trial
- Blood culture isolate with in-vitro resistance to either meropenem or ceftolozane-tazobactam (known either at time of enrolment or during the course of study treatment, in which case the participant will be withdrawn)
Trial locations and contacts
29 sites in 5 countries.
29 sites in 5 countries
Australia13 sites
Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital
Brisbane, Queensland, 4029
Princess Alexandra Hospital
Brisbane, Queensland, 4102
Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre
Melbourne, Victoria, 3000
Alfred Hospital
Melbourne, Victoria, 3004
Monash Medical Centre
Melbourne, Victoria, 3168
Dandenong Hospital
Melbourne, Victoria, 3175
John Hunter Hospital
Newcastle, New South Wales, 2305
Royal Perth Hospital
Perth, Western Australia, 6000
Sir Charles Gairdner
Perth, Western Australia, 6009
Fiona Stanley Hospital
Perth, Western Australia, 6150
Royal Prince Alfred
Sydney, New South Wales, 2050
Westmead Hospital
Sydney, New South Wales, 2145
Woolongong Hospital
Wollongong, New South Wales, 2500
Italy5 sites
Policlinico Sant'Orsola Malpighi
Bologna
Dipartimento di Scienze Biomediche e Cliniche
Milan
Università di Pisa
Pisa
Policlinico Umberto
Roma
Sanremo Hospital
Sanremo
Spain5 sites
Bellvitge University Hospital
Barcelona
Hospital Clinic de Barcelona
Barcelona
Hospital del Mar
Barcelona
Hospital Sant Pau
Barcelona
Mutua Terrassa University Hospital
Barcelona
Saudi Arabia3 sites
King Fahad Specialist Hospital
Dammam
King Abdulaziz Medical City - Jeddah
Jeddah
King Abdulaziz Medical City
Riyadh, 14611
Singapore3 sites
National University Hospital
Singapore, 119074
Singapore General Hospital
Singapore, 169608
Tan Tock Seng Hospital
Singapore, 308433
About this study
Official title: A Multicentre, Parallel Group Open-label Randomised Controlled Non-Inferiority Phase 3 Trial, of Ceftolozane-tazobactam Versus Meropenem for Definitive Treatment of Bloodstream Infection Due to Extended-Spectrum Beta-Lactamase (ESBL) and AmpC-producing Enterobacterales
The purpose of this study is to determine whether ceftolozane-tazobactam is as effective as meropenem with respect to 30 day mortality in the treatment of bloodstream infection due to third-generation cephalosporin non-susceptible Enterobacterales or a known chromosomal AmpC-producing Enterobacterales (Enterobacter spp., Citrobacter freundii, Morganella morganii, Providencia spp. or Serratia marcescens).
Read the detailed description
Enterobacterales are common causes of bacteraemia, and may produce extended-spectrum beta-lactamases (ESBLs) or AmpC beta-lactamases. ESBL or AmpC producers are typically resistant to third generation cephalosporins such as ceftriaxone, but susceptible to carbapenems. In no study has the outcome of treatment for serious infections for ESBL producers been significantly surpassed by carbapenems. Despite the potential advantages of carbapenems for treatment of ceftriaxone non-susceptible organisms, widespread use of carbapenems may cause selection pressure leading to carbapenem-resistant organisms. This is a significant issue since carbapenem-resistant organisms are treated with last-line antibiotics such as colistin.
Ceftolozane-tazobactam is a combination of a new beta-lactam antibiotic with an existing beta-lactamase inhibitor, tazobactam, and is active against ESBL and most AmpC producing organisms. In a large sample of ESBL- and AmpC-producing Enterobacterales isolates from urinary tract and intra-abdominal specimens, ceftolozane-tazobactam was susceptible in over 80%. It has been FDA approved for complicated urinary tract infections (cUTI) and complicated intra-abdominal infections (cIAI), and more recently for hospital-acquired and ventilator-associated pneumonia (HAP/VAP). In addition, a pooled analysis of phase 3 clinical trials has shown favourable clinical cure rates with ceftolozane-tazobactam for cUTI and cIAI caused by ESBL-producing Enterobacterales. Given the issues of carbapenem resistant organisms, there is a need for establishing the efficacy of an alternative to carbapenems for serious infections.
- Being tested
- Ceftolozane-Tazobactam, Meropenem
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Ceftolozane-TazobactamDrug
Ceftolozane-tazobactam 3 grams (comprising ceftolozane 2 grams and tazobactam 1 gram) administered, every 8 hours, three times a day, intravenously over 60 mins. Dose adjusted for renal function.
MeropenemDrug
Meropenem 1 gram, every 8 hours, three times a day, intravenously over 30 mins. Dose adjusted for renal function.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Ceftolozane-tazobactam | Experimental | Participants will receive ceftolozane-tazobactam 3 grams (comprising ceftolozane 2 grams and tazobactam 1 gram) administered, every 8 hours, three times a day, intravenously over 60 mins Receives: Drug: Ceftolozane-Tazobactam |
| Meropenem | Active comparator | Participants will receive meropenem 1 gram, every 8 hours, three times a day, intravenously over 30 mins. Receives: Drug: Meropenem |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Mortality rate at 30 days
To compare the 30-day mortality from day of randomisation of each regimen
Measured: 30 days post randomisation
Secondary outcomes (10)
Mortality rate at 14 days
To compare the 14-day mortality from day of randomisation of each regimen
Measured: 14 days post randomisation
Clinical and microbiological success
Defined as survival PLUS resolution of fever (temperature <38 degrees Celsius) PLUS improved SOFA score (as compared to baseline) PLUS sterilisation of blood cultures at Day 5
Measured: 5 days post randomisation
Functional bacteraemia score (FBS)
To compare the functional bacteraemia score of patients treated with each regimen at baseline and Day 30 (scored 0-7, higher scores equal better outcomes)
Measured: 0 and 30 days post randomisation
Microbiological relapse
To compare the rates of relapse of bloodstream infection (microbiological failure) with each regimen at Day 30
Measured: 30 days post randomisation
Rates of new bloodstream infection
To compare the rates of new bloodstream infection (growth of a new organism from blood cultures - not a contaminant as determined by treating clinician) with each regimen
Measured: 30 days post randomisation
Length of in-patient hospital and ICU stay
To compare lengths of in-patient hospital and ICU stay with each regimen (not including in-patient rehabilitation, long term acute care or hospital in the home)
Measured: 30 days post randomisation
Serious adverse events
To compare the number of treatment emergent serious adverse events with each regimen
Measured: Day 1 to last dose plus 24 hours of treatment:
Clostridioides difficile infection
To compare rates of Clostridioides difficile infection with each regimen
Measured: 30 days post randomisation
Colonisation and/or infection with multi-resistant bacterial organisms
To compare rates of colonisation and/or infection with multi-resistant bacterial organisms (MROs) including those newly acquired
Measured: 30 days post randomisation
Desirability of Outcome Ranking (DOOR) with partial credit
To compare the Desirability of Outcome Ranking (DOOR) with partial credit with each regimen (scored 0-100, higher scores equal better outcomes)
Measured: 30 days post randomisation
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted23 Jan 2020
- Study startJan 2022 (estimated)
- Primary completionJun 2024 (estimated)
- Study completionDec 2024 (estimated)
Why it stopped: The decision to withdraw the study was made due to delayed logistics of the supply chain of ceftolozane-tazobactam along with the immense complexities of conducting clinical research felt because of the COVID-19 pandemic.
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Bacteremia Caused by Gram-Negative BacteriaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 0 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- The University of Queensland
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04238390
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- UQCCR-DP-AS-2019-001
- Acronym
- MERINO III
- Status last verified
- Oct 2021
- First submitted
- 16 Dec 2019
- Last updated
- 19 May 2022
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Stewart AG, Harris PNA, Chatfield MD, Littleford R, Paterson DL. Ceftolozane-tazobactam versus meropenem for definitive treatment of bloodstream infection due to extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL) and AmpC-producing Enterobacterales ("MERINO-3"): study protocol for a multicentre, open-label randomised non-inferiority trial. Trials. 2021 Apr 22;22(1):301. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05206-8.
PubMed 33888139
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 19 May 2022. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Multicentre, Parallel Group Open-label Randomised Controlled Non-Inferiority Phase 3 Trial, of Ceftolozane-tazobactam Versus Meropenem for Definitive Treatment of Bloodstream Infection Due to Extended-Spectrum Beta-Lactamase (ESBL) and AmpC-producing Enterobacterales
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04238390
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- MERINO III / UQCCR-DP-AS-2019-001
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- WithdrawnReason stopped: The decision to withdraw the study was made due to delayed logistics of the supply chain of ceftolozane-tazobactam along with the immense complexities of conducting clinical research felt because of the COVID-19 pandemic.
- Enrolment
- 0 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- The University of QueenslandUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC
- Study start
- Jan 2022 (estimated)
- Primary completion
- Jun 2024 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Dec 2024 (estimated)
- First posted
- 23 Jan 2020 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this study is to determine whether ceftolozane-tazobactam is as effective as meropenem with respect to 30 day mortality in the treatment of bloodstream infection due to third-generation cephalosporin non-susceptible Enterobacterales or a known chromosomal AmpC-producing Enterobacterales (Enterobacter spp., Citrobacter freundii, Morganella morganii, Providencia spp. or Serratia marcescens).
Detailed description
Enterobacterales are common causes of bacteraemia, and may produce extended-spectrum beta-lactamases (ESBLs) or AmpC beta-lactamases. ESBL or AmpC producers are typically resistant to third generation cephalosporins such as ceftriaxone, but susceptible to carbapenems. In no study has the outcome of treatment for serious infections for ESBL producers been significantly surpassed by carbapenems. Despite the potential advantages of carbapenems for treatment of ceftriaxone non-susceptible organisms, widespread use of carbapenems may cause selection pressure leading to carbapenem-resistant organisms. This is a significant issue since carbapenem-resistant organisms are treated with last-line antibiotics such as colistin.
Ceftolozane-tazobactam is a combination of a new beta-lactam antibiotic with an existing beta-lactamase inhibitor, tazobactam, and is active against ESBL and most AmpC producing organisms. In a large sample of ESBL- and AmpC-producing Enterobacterales isolates from urinary tract and intra-abdominal specimens, ceftolozane-tazobactam was susceptible in over 80%. It has been FDA approved for complicated urinary tract infections (cUTI) and complicated intra-abdominal infections (cIAI), and more recently for hospital-acquired and ventilator-associated pneumonia (HAP/VAP). In addition, a pooled analysis of phase 3 clinical trials has shown favourable clinical cure rates with ceftolozane-tazobactam for cUTI and cIAI caused by ESBL-producing Enterobacterales. Given the issues of carbapenem resistant organisms, there is a need for establishing the efficacy of an alternative to carbapenems for serious infections.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Ceftolozane-tazobactam | Experimental | Drug: Ceftolozane-TazobactamParticipants will receive ceftolozane-tazobactam 3 grams (comprising ceftolozane 2 grams and tazobactam 1 gram) administered, every 8 hours, three times a day, intravenously over 60 mins |
| Meropenem | Active comparator | Drug: MeropenemParticipants will receive meropenem 1 gram, every 8 hours, three times a day, intravenously over 30 mins. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Bloodstream infection defined as presence in at least one peripheral blood culture draw demonstrating Enterobacterales with proven non-susceptibility to third generation cephalosporins or cephalosporin susceptible species known to harbour chromosomal AmpC-beta-lactamases (Enterobacter spp., Klebsiella aerogenes, Citrobacter freundii, Morganella morganii, Providencia spp. or Serratia marcescens) during hospitalisation
- Patient is aged 18 years and over (21 and over in Singapore)
- The patient or approved proxy is able to provide informed consent
- ≤72 hours has elapsed since the first positive qualifying (index) blood culture collection
- Expected to receive IV therapy for ≥5 days
Key exclusion criteria (8 listed)
- Known hypersensitivity to a cephalosporin or a carbapenem, or anaphylaxis to beta-lactam antibiotics
- Participant with significant polymicrobial bloodstream infection (i.e. not a contaminant)
- Treatment is not with the intent to cure the infection (i.e. palliative intent) or the expected survival is ≤4 days
- Participant is pregnant or breast-feeding (tested for in women of child-bearing age only)
- Use of concomitant antimicrobials with known activity against Gram-negative bacilli (except trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole for Pneumocystis prophylaxis and when adding metronidazole for suspected IAI) in the first 5 days post-randomisation
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Ceftolozane-TazobactamCeftolozane-tazobactam 3 grams (comprising ceftolozane 2 grams and tazobactam 1 gram) administered, every 8 hours, three times a day, intravenously over 60 mins. Dose adjusted for renal function. | Drug | Ceftolozane-tazobactam |
| MeropenemMeropenem 1 gram, every 8 hours, three times a day, intravenously over 30 mins. Dose adjusted for renal function. | Drug | Meropenem |
Primary outcome
Mortality rate at 30 days
Time frame: 30 days post randomisation
To compare the 30-day mortality from day of randomisation of each regimen
10 secondary outcomes
Mortality rate at 14 days
Time frame: 14 days post randomisation
Clinical and microbiological success
Time frame: 5 days post randomisation
Functional bacteraemia score (FBS)
Time frame: 0 and 30 days post randomisation
Microbiological relapse
Time frame: 30 days post randomisation
Rates of new bloodstream infection
Time frame: 30 days post randomisation
Length of in-patient hospital and ICU stay
Time frame: 30 days post randomisation
Serious adverse events
Time frame: Day 1 to last dose plus 24 hours of treatment:
Clostridioides difficile infection
Time frame: 30 days post randomisation
Colonisation and/or infection with multi-resistant bacterial organisms
Time frame: 30 days post randomisation
Desirability of Outcome Ranking (DOOR) with partial credit
Time frame: 30 days post randomisation
Results and safety
The study was withdrawn before enrolling participants, so there are no results.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 19 May 2022.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 33888139Stewart AG, Harris PNA, Chatfield MD, Littleford R, Paterson DL. Ceftolozane-tazobactam versus meropenem for definitive treatment of bloodstream infection due to extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL) and AmpC-producing Enterobacterales ("MERINO-3"): study protocol for a multicentre, open-label randomised non-inferiority trial. Trials. 2021 Apr 22;22(1):301. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05206-8.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Bacteremia Caused by Gram-Negative Bacteria
Recruiting
Antibiotic Duration and Outcomes in High-Risk Febrile Neutropenia Patients
Bloodstream Infection, Gram Negative Infections
RecruitingObservational study
A Post-Marketing Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Intravenous Polymyxin B and Colistin Methanesulfonate in Patients With Carbapenem-Resistant Gram-Negative Bacterial Infection
Bacteremia Caused by Gram-Negative Bacteria, Bacterial Pneumonia
RecruitingPhase 2
Clinical Trial to Study the Efficacy and Safety of Fluorothiazinone (N.F. Gamaleya NRCEM) in Prophylaxis of Nosocomial Bacterial Infections With Participation of Patients on MV
Gram Negative Pneumonia, Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
29 sites in 5 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing Ceftolozane-Tazobactam and Meropenem in people with Bacteremia Caused by Gram-Negative Bacteria, run by The University of Queensland at 29 sites in 5 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: withdrawn, as of the sponsor's last update on 19 May 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 29 sites in Australia, Italy, Spain, Saudi Arabia, Singapore. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study was withdrawn before enrolling participants, so there are no results.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Mortality rate at 30 days (time frame: 30 days post randomisation). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04238390, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 19 May 2022.