VentilationNCT04241653
Impact of Different Modes of Ventilation With Laryngeal Mask Airway on Pediatric Cataract Surgery
A study testing Pressure Support Ventilation, Laryngeal Mask Airway and Sevoflurane in people with Ventilation and Laryngeal Mask Airway, run by Sameh Fathy at 1 site in Egypt.
Trial summary
This study will be conducted to evaluate effects of different modes of ventilation on pediatric cataract surgery aiming to a peri-operative stable anesthesia, better surgical satisfaction and post operative recovery. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 1 year to 5 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Ventilation, Laryngeal Mask Airway, Cataract Surgery
- What is being tested?
- Pressure Support Ventilation, Laryngeal Mask Airway and Sevoflurane
- Type of treatment
- Medical device, Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 150 participants
- Where
- 1 siteEgypt
- Study dates
- 20 Jan 2020to 9 Feb 2021
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 1 year to 5 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child
Who may be able to join
- American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) I and II patients.
- Scheduled for elective cataract surgery.
Who cannot join
- Parental refusal of consent.
- Contraindication to use of supraglottic airway device as gastroesophageal reflux and oropharyngeal pathology.
- Hyperactive airway disease or respiratory diseases.
- Children with developmental delays, mental or neurological disorders.
- Bleeding or coagulation diathesis.
- History of known sensitivity to the used anesthetics.
- Previous surgery in the same eye.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Egypt1 site
Department of Anesthesia, Mansoura University Hospitals
Al Mansurah, Dakahlia Governorate, 35511
About this study
This study will be conducted to evaluate effects of different modes of ventilation on pediatric cataract surgery aiming to a peri-operative stable anesthesia, better surgical satisfaction and post operative recovery. It is hypothesized that controlled ventilation without muscle relaxation will be advantageous to other modes in providing adequate surgical satisfaction with considerable depth of anesthesia and better recovery profile.
Read the detailed description
Anesthetic management in pediatric cataract surgery constitutes a special challenge. Any eye movements can lead to an unsatisfactory surgical field and increase the risk of ophthalmological complications. Achieving adequate ventilation of children is considered another challenge due to huge variability in size and lung maturity. Spontaneous breathing is a popular mode of ventilation with several beneficial effects. Controlled ventilation without muscle relaxation using laryngeal mask airway is attractive option because the side effects of muscle relaxants are avoided. Therefore, this study will be conducted to evaluate effects of different modes of ventilation on pediatric cataract surgery aiming to a peri-operative stable anesthesia, better surgical satisfaction and post-operative recovery. This prospective, randomized, comparative clinical study will include 150 children who will be scheduled for elective cataract surgery under general anesthesia in Mansoura ophthalmology center over one year. Informed written consent will be obtained from parents of all subjects in the study after ensuring confidentiality.The study protocol will be explained to parents of all patients in the study who will be kept fasting prior to surgery. Patients will be randomly assigned to three equal groups according to computer-generated table of random numbers using the permuted block randomization method. In the first group, spontaneous ventilation will be maintained with pressure support; while in the two other groups, mechanical ventilation will be applied with pressure controlled modes. The collected data will be coded, processed, and analyzed using SPSS program. All data will be considered statistically significant if P value is ≤ 0.05.
- Conditions
- Ventilation, Laryngeal Mask Airway, Cataract Surgery
- Being tested
- Pressure Support Ventilation, Unparalyzed Pressure Control Ventilation, Paralyzed Pressure Control Ventilation, Laryngeal Mask Airway, Sevoflurane
- Medical subject headings
- Respiratory Aspiration
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Pressure Support VentilationProcedure or surgery
Also called Assisted Ventilation
Ventilator will be adjusted to administer pressure at 10 cmH2O.
Unparalyzed Pressure Control VentilationProcedure or surgery
Also called Positive pressure Ventilation
Pressure controlled ventilation mode will be applied to obtain a volume of 8 ml/kg up to 20 cmH2O. The set respiratory rate will be 15 breaths/min then it is adjusted to achieve the end tidal CO2 levels between 35 and 40 mmHg as measured by capnography.
Paralyzed Pressure Control VentilationProcedure or surgery
Also called Positive pressure Ventilation
Pressure controlled ventilation mode will be applied to obtain a volume of 8 ml/kg up to 20 cmH2O. The set respiratory rate will be 15 breaths/min then it is adjusted to achieve the end tidal CO2 levels between 35 and 40 mmHg as measured by capnography. Also, neuromuscular blockade will be achieved.
Laryngeal Mask AirwayDevice
Also called Supraglottic Airway Device
Capnography connected to laryngeal mask airway is introduced after adequate jaw relaxation; its size is chosen according to the body weight of the child.
SevofluraneDrug
Also called Inhalational Anesthesia
Sevoflurane in air/oxygen mixture of 40% will be titrated to achieve adequate depth of anesthesia to maintain immobilization of the eye.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Spontaneous Ventilation | Active comparator | Patients will spontaneously ventilated. Laryngeal mask airway will be inserted and anesthesia is maintained with sevoflurane. Receives: Procedure: Pressure Support Ventilation; Device: Laryngeal Mask Airway; Drug: Sevoflurane |
| Unparalyzed Controlled Ventilation | Active comparator | Patients will be mechanically ventilated without muscle relaxation.Laryngeal mask airway will be inserted and anesthesia is maintained with sevoflurane. Receives: Procedure: Unparalyzed Pressure Control Ventilation; Device: Laryngeal Mask Airway; Drug: Sevoflurane |
| Paralyzed Controlled Ventilation | Active comparator | Patients will be mechanically ventilated with muscle relaxation.Laryngeal mask airway will be inserted and anesthesia is maintained with sevoflurane. Receives: Procedure: Paralyzed Pressure Control Ventilation; Device: Laryngeal Mask Airway; Drug: Sevoflurane |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Incidence of eye movements
Incidence any upward or downward deviation of the vision axis during surgery will be recorded
Measured: Up to the end of the surgery
Secondary outcomes (8)
Changes in intraocular pressure
Intraocular pressure will be measured (mmHg) in the non-operative eye using Schioetz-Tonometer
Measured: Up to the end of the surgery
Changes in bispectral index
Bispectral index values (0-100) will be recorded every five minutes until the end of the surgery
Measured: Up to the end of the surgery
Amount of consumption of sevoflurane
Sevoflurane consumption in milliliters will be measured and recorded
Measured: Up to the end of the surgery
Changes in dynamic compliance
Dynamic compliance (ml /cm H2O) will be recorded after stabilization of ventilation and at the end of surgery
Measured: Up to the end of the surgery
Changes in heart rate
Heart rate (beat/min) will be recorded at five-minute intervals until the end of the surgery
Measured: Up to the end of the surgery
Changes in mean arterial blood pressure
Blood pressure (mmHg) will be recorded at five-minute intervals until the end of the surgery
Measured: Up to the end of the surgery
Value of surgeon satisfaction from the procedure
The ophthalmogist will be investigated postoperatively for the quality of surgical field (0-8; 0=None, 8=total satisfaction)
Measured: After the end of the surgery
Improvement in postoperative emergence agitation scale
Agitation will be assessed using the 5- step Cravero scale (1-5) every five minutes from awakening and for 30 minutes. (1:Obtunded with no response to stimulation, 2:Asleep but responsive to movement or stimulation, 3:Awake and responsive, 4:Crying, 5:Thrashing behaviour that requires restraint)
Measured: Up to 30 minutes after surgery
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted27 Jan 2020
- Study start20 Jan 2020
- Primary completion10 Jan 2021
- Study completion9 Feb 2021
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (7)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for VentilationStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 150 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Sameh Fathy
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor-investigator, Sameh Fathy, Mansoura University
- Investigators
- Sameh M El-Sherbiny, MD, Study director, Mansoura Faculty of Medicine
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04241653
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- Ventilation with LMA
- Status last verified
- Jun 2021
- First submitted
- 23 Jan 2020
- Last updated
- 10 Jun 2021
- Results posted
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Dias R, Dave N, Agrawal B, Baghele A. Correlation between bispectral index, end-tidal anaesthetic gas concentration and difference in inspired-end-tidal oxygen concentration as measures of anaesthetic depth in paediatric patients posted for short surgical procedures. Indian J Anaesth. 2019 Apr;63(4):277-283. doi: 10.4103/ija.IJA_653_18.
PubMed 31000891Fudickar A, Gruenewald M, Fudickar B, Hill M, Wallenfang M, Hullemann J, Voss D, Caliebe A, Roider JB, Steinfath M, Treumer F. Immobilization during anesthesia for vitrectomy using a laryngeal mask without neuromuscular blockade versus endotracheal intubation and neuromuscular blockade. Minerva Anestesiol. 2018 Jul;84(7):820-828. doi: 10.23736/S0375-9393.17.12282-0. Epub 2017 Oct 12.
PubMed 29027777Ghabach MB, El Hajj EM, El Dib RD, Rkaiby JM, Matta MS, Helou MR. Ventilation of Nonparalyzed Patients Under Anesthesia with Laryngeal Mask Airway, Comparison of Three Modes of Ventilation: Volume Controlled Ventilation, Pressure Controlled Ventilation, and Pressure Controlled Ventilation-volume Guarantee. Anesth Essays Res. 2017 Jan-Mar;11(1):197-200. doi: 10.4103/0259-1162.200238.
PubMed 28298784Lewis SR, Pritchard MW, Fawcett LJ, Punjasawadwong Y. Bispectral index for improving intraoperative awareness and early postoperative recovery in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Sep 26;9(9):CD003843. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003843.pub4.
PubMed 31557307Waldschmidt B, Gordon N. Anesthesia for pediatric ophthalmologic surgery. J AAPOS. 2019 Jun;23(3):127-131. doi: 10.1016/j.jaapos.2018.10.017. Epub 2019 Apr 14.
PubMed 30995517Singh PM, Trikha A, Sinha R, Borle A. Measurement of consumption of sevoflurane for short pediatric anesthetic procedures: Comparison between Dion's method and Dragger algorithm. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2013 Oct;29(4):516-20. doi: 10.4103/0970-9185.119160.
PubMed 24249990Mason KP. Paediatric emergence delirium: a comprehensive review and interpretation of the literature. Br J Anaesth. 2017 Mar 1;118(3):335-343. doi: 10.1093/bja/aew477.
PubMed 28203739
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 10 Jun 2021. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Impact of Different Modes of Ventilation With Laryngeal Mask Airway on Pediatric Cataract Surgery
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04241653
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- Ventilation with LMA
- Conditions
- Ventilation, Laryngeal Mask Airway, Cataract Surgery
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 150 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Sameh FathyUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 20 Jan 2020 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 10 Jan 2021 (actual)
- Study completion
- 9 Feb 2021 (actual)
- First posted
- 27 Jan 2020 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study will be conducted to evaluate effects of different modes of ventilation on pediatric cataract surgery aiming to a peri-operative stable anesthesia, better surgical satisfaction and post operative recovery. It is hypothesized that controlled ventilation without muscle relaxation will be advantageous to other modes in providing adequate surgical satisfaction with considerable depth of anesthesia and better recovery profile.
Detailed description
Anesthetic management in pediatric cataract surgery constitutes a special challenge. Any eye movements can lead to an unsatisfactory surgical field and increase the risk of ophthalmological complications. Achieving adequate ventilation of children is considered another challenge due to huge variability in size and lung maturity. Spontaneous breathing is a popular mode of ventilation with several beneficial effects. Controlled ventilation without muscle relaxation using laryngeal mask airway is attractive option because the side effects of muscle relaxants are avoided. Therefore, this study will be conducted to evaluate effects of different modes of ventilation on pediatric cataract surgery aiming to a peri-operative stable anesthesia, better surgical satisfaction and post-operative recovery. This prospective, randomized, comparative clinical study will include 150 children who will be scheduled for elective cataract surgery under general anesthesia in Mansoura ophthalmology center over one year. Informed written consent will be obtained from parents of all subjects in the study after ensuring confidentiality.The study protocol will be explained to parents of all patients in the study who will be kept fasting prior to surgery. Patients will be randomly assigned to three equal groups according to computer-generated table of random numbers using the permuted block randomization method. In the first group, spontaneous ventilation will be maintained with pressure support; while in the two other groups, mechanical ventilation will be applied with pressure controlled modes. The collected data will be coded, processed, and analyzed using SPSS program. All data will be considered statistically significant if P value is ≤ 0.05.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Spontaneous Ventilation | Active comparator | Procedure: Pressure Support Ventilation, Device: Laryngeal Mask Airway, Drug: SevofluranePatients will spontaneously ventilated. Laryngeal mask airway will be inserted and anesthesia is maintained with sevoflurane. |
| Unparalyzed Controlled Ventilation | Active comparator | Procedure: Unparalyzed Pressure Control Ventilation, Device: Laryngeal Mask Airway, Drug: SevofluranePatients will be mechanically ventilated without muscle relaxation.Laryngeal mask airway will be inserted and anesthesia is maintained with sevoflurane. |
| Paralyzed Controlled Ventilation | Active comparator | Procedure: Paralyzed Pressure Control Ventilation, Device: Laryngeal Mask Airway, Drug: SevofluranePatients will be mechanically ventilated with muscle relaxation.Laryngeal mask airway will be inserted and anesthesia is maintained with sevoflurane. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 1 year to 5 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) I and II patients.
- Scheduled for elective cataract surgery.
Key exclusion criteria (7 listed)
- Parental refusal of consent.
- Contraindication to use of supraglottic airway device as gastroesophageal reflux and oropharyngeal pathology.
- Hyperactive airway disease or respiratory diseases.
- Children with developmental delays, mental or neurological disorders.
- Bleeding or coagulation diathesis.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Pressure Support VentilationAlso: Assisted VentilationVentilator will be adjusted to administer pressure at 10 cmH2O. | Procedure or surgery | Spontaneous Ventilation |
| Unparalyzed Pressure Control VentilationAlso: Positive pressure VentilationPressure controlled ventilation mode will be applied to obtain a volume of 8 ml/kg up to 20 cmH2O. The set respiratory rate will be 15 breaths/min then it is adjusted to achieve the end tidal CO2 levels between 35 and 40 mmHg as measured by capnography. | Procedure or surgery | Unparalyzed Controlled Ventilation |
| Paralyzed Pressure Control VentilationAlso: Positive pressure VentilationPressure controlled ventilation mode will be applied to obtain a volume of 8 ml/kg up to 20 cmH2O. The set respiratory rate will be 15 breaths/min then it is adjusted to achieve the end tidal CO2 levels between 35 and 40 mmHg as measured by capnography. Also, neuromuscular blockade will be achieved. | Procedure or surgery | Paralyzed Controlled Ventilation |
| Laryngeal Mask AirwayAlso: Supraglottic Airway DeviceCapnography connected to laryngeal mask airway is introduced after adequate jaw relaxation; its size is chosen according to the body weight of the child. | Device | Paralyzed Controlled Ventilation, Spontaneous Ventilation, Unparalyzed Controlled Ventilation |
| SevofluraneAlso: Inhalational AnesthesiaSevoflurane in air/oxygen mixture of 40% will be titrated to achieve adequate depth of anesthesia to maintain immobilization of the eye. | Drug | Paralyzed Controlled Ventilation, Spontaneous Ventilation, Unparalyzed Controlled Ventilation |
Primary outcome
Incidence of eye movements
Time frame: Up to the end of the surgery
Incidence any upward or downward deviation of the vision axis during surgery will be recorded
8 secondary outcomes
Changes in intraocular pressure
Time frame: Up to the end of the surgery
Changes in bispectral index
Time frame: Up to the end of the surgery
Amount of consumption of sevoflurane
Time frame: Up to the end of the surgery
Changes in dynamic compliance
Time frame: Up to the end of the surgery
Changes in heart rate
Time frame: Up to the end of the surgery
Changes in mean arterial blood pressure
Time frame: Up to the end of the surgery
Value of surgeon satisfaction from the procedure
Time frame: After the end of the surgery
Improvement in postoperative emergence agitation scale
Time frame: Up to 30 minutes after surgery
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 10 Jun 2021.
- Background: PubMed 31000891Dias R, Dave N, Agrawal B, Baghele A. Correlation between bispectral index, end-tidal anaesthetic gas concentration and difference in inspired-end-tidal oxygen concentration as measures of anaesthetic depth in paediatric patients posted for short surgical procedures. Indian J Anaesth. 2019 Apr;63(4):277-283. doi: 10.4103/ija.IJA_653_18.
- Background: PubMed 29027777Fudickar A, Gruenewald M, Fudickar B, Hill M, Wallenfang M, Hullemann J, Voss D, Caliebe A, Roider JB, Steinfath M, Treumer F. Immobilization during anesthesia for vitrectomy using a laryngeal mask without neuromuscular blockade versus endotracheal intubation and neuromuscular blockade. Minerva Anestesiol. 2018 Jul;84(7):820-828. doi: 10.23736/S0375-9393.17.12282-0. Epub 2017 Oct 12.
- Background: PubMed 28298784Ghabach MB, El Hajj EM, El Dib RD, Rkaiby JM, Matta MS, Helou MR. Ventilation of Nonparalyzed Patients Under Anesthesia with Laryngeal Mask Airway, Comparison of Three Modes of Ventilation: Volume Controlled Ventilation, Pressure Controlled Ventilation, and Pressure Controlled Ventilation-volume Guarantee. Anesth Essays Res. 2017 Jan-Mar;11(1):197-200. doi: 10.4103/0259-1162.200238.
- Background: PubMed 31557307Lewis SR, Pritchard MW, Fawcett LJ, Punjasawadwong Y. Bispectral index for improving intraoperative awareness and early postoperative recovery in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Sep 26;9(9):CD003843. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003843.pub4.
- Background: PubMed 30995517Waldschmidt B, Gordon N. Anesthesia for pediatric ophthalmologic surgery. J AAPOS. 2019 Jun;23(3):127-131. doi: 10.1016/j.jaapos.2018.10.017. Epub 2019 Apr 14.
- Background: PubMed 24249990Singh PM, Trikha A, Sinha R, Borle A. Measurement of consumption of sevoflurane for short pediatric anesthetic procedures: Comparison between Dion's method and Dragger algorithm. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2013 Oct;29(4):516-20. doi: 10.4103/0970-9185.119160.
- Background: PubMed 28203739Mason KP. Paediatric emergence delirium: a comprehensive review and interpretation of the literature. Br J Anaesth. 2017 Mar 1;118(3):335-343. doi: 10.1093/bja/aew477.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Ventilation
Active, not recruiting
CT for Personalized Mechanical Ventilation
Ventilator-Induced Lung Injury, Sepsis Syndrome
Active, not recruitingObservational study
DIAPHRAGM STRENGTH AND LUNG VOLUMES
Mechanical Ventilation
Not yet recruiting
Mechanical Ventilator Adjustments and Patient Dyspnea
Respiratory Failure, Dyspnea During Mechanical Ventilation
Recruiting
Development and Preliminary Validation of Intelligent Video Laryngoscope for Emergency Use
Critically Ill Patients Requiring Mechanical Ventilation
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Potential Impact of the Use of the Application VentilO
Mechanical Ventilation Complication
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Sameh M El-Sherbiny, MD study director
Mansoura Faculty of Medicine
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Pressure Support Ventilation, Laryngeal Mask Airway and Sevoflurane in people with Ventilation and Laryngeal Mask Airway, run by Sameh Fathy at 1 site in Egypt.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 10 Jun 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Egypt. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Incidence of eye movements (time frame: Up to the end of the surgery). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04241653, which also lists 7 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 10 Jun 2021; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 8 Nov 2026.