AzTrials
AzTrials

Prostate CancerPhase 2/3LOBSTERNCT04242017

Long-term Better Than Short-term ADT With Salvage RT

A Phase 2/3 study testing Triptoreline in people with Prostate Cancer, run by Universitaire Ziekenhuizen KU Leuven at 3 sites in Belgium.

Recruiting

Looking for participants now. Contact the study team or a site below to ask about taking part.

Sites and contacts
Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

A randomized, multicenter, prospective PHASE II trial to assess the effect of short- versus long-term adjuvant ADT with high dose salvage radiotherapy on distant metastasis free survival in case of biochemical relapse (BR) after radical prostatectomy. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Any age, men only
Conditions the study is for
Prostate Cancer
What is being tested?
Triptoreline
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
394 participants
Where
3 sitesBelgium
Study dates
7 Jul 2020to 1 Feb 2031
Phase
Phase 2/3
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages Any age
  • Men only
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • History of histologically proven prostate cancer, treated with RP and ePLND. All patients have to be pN0. The minimal template for ePLND is defined as the removal of the external iliac, internal iliac and obturator nodes (standard template). Removal of the presacral and common iliac nodes is left at the discretion of the treating urologist.
  • Asymptomatic PSA-rise post-RP, defined as a value equal to or more than 0.2µg/l and at least confirmed once (interval ≥2 weeks, confirmation PSA level should be higher). In case of Gleason 8-10, pT3b or R1 resection, an asymptomatic PSA-rise post-RP starting from ≥0.15 µg/l is allowed for inclusion. If the PSA-level is less than 0.4 ng/ml, no additional staging for distant metastasis is required before inclusion in the trial. The patient will be offered the opportunity to participate in a diagnostic sub-study with investigational imaging with 18F PSMA PET CT. However in case of PSA-level >0.4 ng/ml, biological imaging using 18F-PSMA or 68Ga-PSMA is mandatory as this is not considered investigational anymore. Therefore the patient cannot anymore take part in the diagnostic sub-study and (un-blinded) PET-CT is obligatory to rule out lymph node (N) and /or distant metastasis (M1a-c) before inclusion.
  • Testosterone levels within above 150 ng/dl.
  • ECOG 0-1
  • Life expectancy more than 5 years
  • Signed informed consent

Who cannot join

  • Presence of pN1 disease at original surgical specimen.
  • Presence of distant metastasis at time of referral (M1a-c). If PSA more than 0.4 ng/ml, imaging with PET-CT is required to rule out distant metastasis (see above). Other additional imaging modalities (CT scan, bone scintigraphy...) are allowed but left at the discretion of the treating centre.
  • Undetectable PSA (less than 0.2 ng/ml) at time of referral.
  • Previous RT making new RT impossible (overlapping treatment fields).
  • Known contraindications to irradiation (Ulcerative Colitis, Crohn Disease, Ataxia Teleangiectasia…)
  • Active treatment with ADT or PSA modulating drugs (finasteride, dutasteride, high-dose corticoids…)
  • Not able understanding treatment protocol or signing informed consent.

Trial locations and contacts

3 sites in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.

Belgium3 sites, 3 recruiting
  • AZ Maria Middelares

    Ghent

    Filip Ameye

    Recruiting
  • UZ Gent

    Ghent

    Valérie Fonteyne

    Recruiting
  • UZ Leuven

    Leuven

    UZ Leuven, gert.demeerleer@uzleuven.be

    Recruiting

Other trials in Belgium

About this study

Official title: A Randomized, Multicenter, Prospective Phase II Trial to Assess the Effect of Short- Versus Long-term Adjuvant ADT With High Dose Salvage Radiotherapy on Distant Metastasis Free Survival in Patients With Biochemical Relapse After Radical Prostatectomy

A randomized, multicenter, prospective PHASE II trial to assess the effect of short- versus long-term adjuvant ADT with high dose salvage radiotherapy on distant metastasis free survival in case of biochemical relapse (BR) after radical prostatectomy.

Read the detailed description

Radical prostatectomy (RP) is one of the standard treatment options for localized and locally advanced prostate cancer. RP should be combined with an extended pelvic lymph node dissection (ePLND) when the risk of pelvic involvement becomes substantial, at least 7%. In case of node-negative disease (pN0), adverse pathological features at examination of the RP-specimen such as extra-capsular extension (ECE), seminal vesicle invasion (SVI) and positive surgical margins (PSM) increase the risk of biochemical relapse (BR) and/or isolated local relapse (LR). Both a BR and LR, if not adequately treated, can finally result in the development of distant metastasis.

In case of BR and/or LR, salvage radiotherapy (SRT) is the only treatment option with curative intent. Several factors play a significant role in predicting the outcome after SRT: Gleason score, pre-SRT PSA, pre-SRT doubling time, SVI, SRT dose and duration of adjuvant androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) associated with SRT. The 2 latter variables have never been tested in a randomized controlled trial. The GETUG-AFU 16 trial randomized between no vs. 6 months ADT while patients received 66 Gy to the prostate bed and 46 Gy to the pelvis. Moreover, the pN0 status was not needed for inclusion. Also the RADICALS trial is currently running this comparison with a radiation dose of 66 Gy to the prostate bed and also no information on pN status is needed to be included in this study. In the LOBSTER study, the pN0 status is obligatory and the prescription dose is set at 70 Gy to the prostate bed and seminal vesicles. These conditions make this study unique compared to other already conducted and currently running trials.

In previous work, it has been demonstrated that ADT, added for 6 months to SRT, significantly improved biochemical relapse free survival at 5 years. Added to this, there is recent evidence that using a longer schedule of adjuvant ADT might be beneficial when compared to a 6-months schedule. Unfortunately, none of these suggestions are based on evidence coming from a randomized controlled trial.

Therefore, this randomized phase 2 trial 'LOBSTER' is conducted, comparing 6 versus 24 months of adjuvant ADT together with high-dose SRT in case of BR after RP in pN0 prostate cancer patients

Conditions
Prostate Cancer
Being tested
Triptoreline
Keywords
pN0, biochemical recurrence, salvage radiation therapy, hormonal treatment
Medical subject headings
Prostatic Neoplasms

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • TriptorelineDrug

    Comparison of the duration of ADT (Triptoreline)

Study groups in NCT04242017
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
salvage RT + 6 months ADTActive comparator70 Gy to the prostate bed (2 Gy/fraction) + 6 months ADT
Receives: Drug: Triptoreline
salvage RT + 24 months ADTExperimental70 Gy to the prostate bed (2 Gy/fraction) + 24 months ADT
Receives: Drug: Triptoreline

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Metastasis-free survival

    Time to appearance of M1a-b-c disease. In order to assess the absence/presence of M1a-M1c disease as early as possible, top-of-the-line imaging will be conducted in case of BR during follow-up after SRT and after agreement of the multidisciplinary uro-oncology team. Time point zero is the last day of radiotherapy (also applies for secondary endpoints). Top of the line imaging includes: CT thorax abdomen and bone scintigraphy (standard). PSMA PET-CT is allowed but not obligatory. Patients who are also included in the diagnostic imaging study are required to receive a PSMA PET-CT. Whole body MRI is allowed but not obligatory. BR is defined as any rise in PSA above the level of 0.2 ng/ml after a postradiotherapy nadir or a continued rise in the serum PSA despite salvage treatment (3). In case a BR is not accompanied by metastatic progression, PSMA PET/CT will be repeated every 6 months or earlier in case of prostate cancer-related symptoms.

    Measured: 5 years

Secondary outcomes (11)
  1. Pelvic recurrence-free survival

    time to appearance of local recurrence (prostate bed) and/or N1 disease (positive lymph node(s) below the aortic bifurcation) using PSMA PET/CT and triggered by biochemical relapse.

    Measured: up to 10 years after randomization

  2. Clinical progression-free survival

    time to appearance of any recurrence (local recurrence, N1 (positive lymph node(s) below the aortic bifurcation), M1a-c disease) and triggered by biochemical relapse.

    Measured: up to 10 years after randomization

  3. (Palliative) Systemic therapy-free survival

    time to the start of palliative ADT

    Measured: up to 20 years (or more) after randomization

  4. Time to CRPC

    time to biochemical and/or clinical progression at castrate testosterone levels (<50 ng/dl). Progression is defined as three consecutive PSA rises (1 week interval), of which at least 2 rises with a PSA level of > 2 ng/ml and a rise of 50% of the nadir PSA level, progression of bone lesions (2 or more new bone lesions detected on bone scan), progression of soft tissue lesions according to RECIST criteria or the appearance of one or more new visceral or soft tissue (inclusive lymph node) metastasis.

    Measured: up to 20 years (or more) after randomization

  5. Cause-specific survival (CSS)

    freedom from dying from prostate cancer (K-M statistics)

    Measured: up to 20 years (or more) after randomization

  6. Overall survival (OS)

    freedom from dying from any cause (K-M statistics)

    Measured: up to 20 years (or more) after randomization

  7. Acute toxicity

    adverse effects according to the CTCAE version 4.0

    Measured: during RT, up to three months after radiation therapy

  8. Late toxicity

    adverse effects according to the CTCAE version 4.0

    Measured: starting from more than three months after radiation therapy, up to 5 years after radiotherapy

  9. Quality of life assessment

    EORTC QLQ-C30

    Measured: up to 5 years after randomization

  10. Quality of life assessment

    EORTC QLQ-PR25

    Measured: up to 5 years after randomization

  11. Quality of life assessment

    EQ-5D-5L

    Measured: up to 5 years after randomization

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted27 Jan 2020
  2. Study start7 Jul 2020
  3. Primary completion1 Feb 2026 (estimated)
  4. Study completion1 Feb 2031 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 2/3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
randomized controlled trial
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
394 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04242017
Sponsor's protocol ID
S61996
Acronym
LOBSTER
Status last verified
Dec 2023
First submitted
21 Jan 2020
Last updated
13 Dec 2023
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Berghen C, Joniau S, Laenen A, Devos G, Rans K, Goffin K, Haustermans K, Meerleer G. Long- versus short-term androgen deprivation therapy with high-dose radiotherapy for biochemical failure after radical prostatectomy: a randomized controlled trial. Future Oncol. 2020 Sep;16(27):2035-2044. doi: 10.2217/fon-2020-0390. Epub 2020 Jul 15.

    PubMed 32666822

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 2/3 study testing Triptoreline in people with Prostate Cancer, run by Universitaire Ziekenhuizen KU Leuven at 3 sites in Belgium.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 13 Dec 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 3 sites in Belgium. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this combined phase mean?

Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.

Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Charlien Berghen, MD (003216345217 ext. 003216345217, charlien.berghen@uzleuven.be), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Metastasis-free survival (time frame: 5 years). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04242017, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 13 Dec 2023.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in