AzTrials
AzTrials

Head and Neck CancerPhase 1/2INSIGHT-2NCT04242459

Optimising Radiation Therapy in Head and Neck Cancers Using Functional Image-Guided Radiotherapy and Novel Biomarkers

A Phase 1/2 study testing Adaptive Radiotherapy in people with Head and Neck Cancer, run by Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust at 1 site in United Kingdom.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This is a non-randomised study to develop personalised treatment approaches in participants with Locally Advanced Head and Neck Cancer (HNC) of the oropharynx and base of skull by integrating the use of MR-guided Adaptive Radiotherapy (MRgRT) and functional image-guided radiotherapy (FIgRT). Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 70 years
Conditions the study is for
Head and Neck Cancer
What is being tested?
Adaptive Radiotherapy
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
73 participants
Where
1 siteUnited Kingdom
Study dates
23 Oct 2019to 1 May 2024
Phase
Phase 1/2
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 70 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Feasibility study and Main Study:
  • Participants with stage III/IV ((American Joint Committee (AJC) Tumour, Nodes, Metastasis (TMN) on Cancer Version 7)) head and neck cancer planned for primary radical chemo-radiotherapy OR induction chemotherapy followed by chemoradiotherapy with concomitant platinum-based chemotherapy.
  • Age between 18 and 70 years.
  • Participant can provide informed consent.
  • World Health Organisation (WHO) performance status 0 - 1.
  • Creatinine Clearance >50ml/minute
Show all 29Show fewer
  • Absolute Neutrophil Count ≥1.5 x10^9/L
  • Platelets ≥100 x10^9/L
  • Haemoglobin ≥90g/L
  • Feasibility Study:
  • Participants with either HPV associated OPC, HPV negative OPC or Base of Skull HNC.
  • Low Risk HPV associated OPC:
  • T1-3, N0-2c (AJCC 7th Edition, stage III and above)
  • Participants with histologically proven squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck
  • p16 positive (defined as >70% cells staining positive)
  • <10 year pack smoking history
  • HPV Associated OPC:
  • Patients with histologically proven squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck
  • T1-3,N0-2c (AJCC 7th Edition, stage III and above) with ≥10 pack/ year smoking history
  • p16 positive
  • Any T4 and/or N3 regardless of smoking history
  • Primary tumour size </=5cm
  • HPV negative OPC, hypopharyngeal or laryngeal cancer:
  • Patients with histologically proven squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck
  • T1-4,N0-3 (AJCC 7th edition, stage III and above)
  • p16 negative (if OPC)
  • Primary tumour size </=5cm
  • Base of skull Head and Neck Cancer:
  • Participants with histologically proven squamous cell carcinoma or undifferentiated carcinoma of the head and neck (sinonasal and nasopharynx)

Who cannot join

  • WHO performance status >=2.
  • Participants with any previous malignancy except non-melanoma skin cancer.
  • Participants with prior radiotherapy to the head and neck region
  • Participants with contraindications to MRI scan.
  • Participants with contraindications to IV contrast agents.
  • Participants with renal failure

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United Kingdom1 site, 1 recruiting
  • Head and Neck Unit, Royal Marsden Hospital

    Sutton, Surrey, SM2 5PT

    Abi Temple, 0208 661 3561 ext. 4020, abigail.temple@rmh.nhs.uk

    Amy Scott, 0208 661 3561 ext. 4020, amy.scott@rmh.nhs.uk

    Recruiting

Other trials in United Kingdom

About this study

This is a non-randomised study to develop personalised treatment approaches in participants with Locally Advanced Head and Neck Cancer (HNC) of the oropharynx and base of skull by integrating the use of MR-guided Adaptive Radiotherapy (MRgRT) and functional image-guided radiotherapy (FIgRT).

The study is made up of two parts:

  1. Feasibility planning study consisting of a total of 13 patients. This will include patients with either Human papilomavirus-associated (HPV-associated) oropharyngeal cancer (OPC), Human papilomavirus-negative (HPV-negative) OPC or Base of Skull HNC.
  2. Single centre prospective interventional phase I/II study (main study) made up of 3 independent arms (on the condition of success of the feasibility stage).
  3. Cohort 1: HPV-associated OPC consisting of 25 participants
  4. Cohort 2: HPV-negative OPC consisting of a minimum of 10 patients and a maximum of 53 participants
  5. Cohort 3: Base of Skull HNC consisting of 25 participants
Read the detailed description

This study is looking at improving radiotherapy treatment for head and neck cancers by:

  1. Repeating the radiotherapy planning scan at weeks 2 and 4 of treatment so that investigators can adapt the radiotherapy to changes to the shape of the cancer and the patient's body. These changes can affect the accuracy and the radiotherapy doses delivered.
  2. Using a MR (magnetic resonance) scans to view and target the cancer with more precision.
  3. Identifying HPV negative oropharyngeal cancer who are non-responders and increasing the radiotherapy dose.

The 3 groups of patients are:

  1. Cancers of the oropharynx (middle of the throat) that test positive for HPV (human papilloma virus). If HPV is present, the cancer responds better to treatment and there is a higher chance of cure. In this group, the investigators aim is to reduce radiotherapy associated long-term side effects by sparing healthy tissue from high doses.
  2. If the oropharyngeal cancers test negative for HPV, they are less likely to respond well to treatment. The investigator's department has shown that investigators can predict which patients will respond to treatment using a special type of MR scan. Investigators will increase the dose of radiotherapy to HPV negative patients who are predicted to be non-responders with the aim of improving the chance of cure.
  3. Cancers that located at the base of the skull are not seen very well on CT scan. By using MR imaging, investigators can visualize the surrounding normal organs and the cancer better, target the cancer with more precision and adapt to changes to the healthy organs and tumour.

Investigators will also test if they can predict response to treatment by checking blood for fragments of the cancer and using a special MRI.

The study will be conducted at the Royal Marsden in Sutton only and will be followed up for 2 years.

Being tested
Adaptive Radiotherapy
Keywords
Cancer, Oropharynx, HPV, Base of Skull
Medical subject headings
Head and Neck Neoplasms, Neoplasms

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Adaptive RadiotherapyRadiation

    Determining the radiotherapy dose delivered to organs at risk (OAR) or to the target volume (dependent on what arm the participant is assigned to) through adaptive radiotherapy volume adaption planning

Study groups in NCT04242459
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Feasibility StudyNo interventionThis is a radiotherapy planning study to evaluate the feasibility to acquire longitudinal MRI scans during radiotherapy (prior to the main study) thus, participants will receive standard-of-care chemoradiation therapy (CRT) as per departmental protocol without any treatment adaptation.
HPV associated OPC ParticipantsExperimentalParticipants will be treated initially with the standard radiotherapy dose of: * 65 grays (Gy) in 30 fractions (2.17Gy per fraction) over 6 weeks to the primary and nodal tumour. * 54Gy in 30 fractions (1.8Gy per fraction) over 6 weeks to the nodal areas at risk of harbouring microscopic disease In the 2nd week and 4th week of treatment, the participants will undergo Adaptive Radiotherapy to account for anatomical changes.
Receives: Radiation: Adaptive Radiotherapy
HPV negative OPC Participants - Radiotherapy dose escalationExperimentalParticipants will be treated initially with the standard radiotherapy dose of: * 65Gy in 30 fractions (2.17Gy per fraction) over 6 weeks to the primary and nodal tumour. * 54Gy in 30 fractions (1.8Gy per fraction) over 6 weeks to the nodal areas at risk of harbouring microscopic disease After 10 fractions the participants will be stratified into either "responders" or "non-responders" categories based on Apparent Diffusion Coefficients (ADC) response at week 2 of CRT. Participants classified as "responders" will complete treatment without any radiotherapy dose changes. Their radiotherapy treatment target volumes will be adapted at weeks 2 and 4 of CRT to account for volume changes to the tumour. The "non-responders" will undergo an increase in dose per fraction to Clinical Target Volume-1 (CTV-1) primary for fractions 11 to 30.
Receives: Radiation: Adaptive Radiotherapy
Base of Skull HNC ParticipantsExperimentalParticipants will be treated initially with the standard radiotherapy dose of: * 65Gy in 30 fractions (2.17Gy per fraction) over 6 weeks to the primary and nodal tumour. * 54Gy in 30 fractions (1.8Gy per fraction) over 6 weeks to the nodal areas at risk of harbouring microscopic disease Participants will undergo standard treatment with 3 cycles of induction chemotherapy followed by chemo-radiotherapy dose. Their radiotherapy treatment will be adapted at weeks 2 and 4 of CRT to account for volume changes to the tumour.
Receives: Radiation: Adaptive Radiotherapy

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Assess the feasibility of participants undergoing MR scan at baseline, week 2 and week 4 and feasibility of producing an adaptive radiotherapy plan

    To calculate the proportion of participants who have successfully undergone the planned MRI scan at baseline and weeks 2 and 4 to determine the feasibility of producing an adaptive radiotherapy plan in the feasibility study.

    Measured: Through feasibility study completion, estimated 6 months.

  2. Compare the mean cumulative radiotherapy doses Main Study, Cohort 1: Compare the mean cumulative radiotherapy doses received by the parotid gland in an adaptive plan at weeks 3 and 5 to a non-adaptive plan

    To determine the radiotherapy dose delivered to the parotid gland through adaptive radiotherapy volume adaptation planning compared to a non-adaptive radiotherapy approach in the main study, cohort 1.

    Measured: Through main study treatment period, estimated 5 years.

  3. Assess the safety of radiotherapy dose escalation by measuring the grades of acute radiation induced toxicities using NCI CTCAE v5.0 scores at 3 months

    To assess the safety of radiotherapy dose escalation by measuring the grades of acute radiation induced toxicities which will be assessed using the NCI CTCAE v5.0 scores at 3 months in the main study, cohort 2.

    Measured: Through main study treatment period, estimated 5 years.

  4. Determine the Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD) of the escalated radiotherapy dose as per the dose escalation criteria and stopping rules set out in the protocol

    To determine the MTD of the escalated radiotherapy dose in the main study as per the dose escalation criteria and stopping rules as outlined in the protocol in the main study, cohort 2.

    Measured: Through main study treatment period, estimated 5 years.

  5. Compare the radiotherapy doses to the parotid glands calculated and recorded at baseline with doses from the adaptive plan at weeks 3 and 5

    To calculate and record radiotherapy doses to the parotid glands at baseline and compare these to doses from the adaptive plan at weeks 3 and 5 in the main study, cohort 3.

    Measured: Through main study treatment period, estimated 5 years.

Secondary outcomes (10)
  1. Calculate the proportion of patients who investigators can successfully produce an adaptive radiotherapy plan at weeks 3 and 5 within 1 week of their rescan to account for anatomical changes.

    To calculate the proportion of patients who investigators can successfully produce an adaptive radiotherapy plan at weeks 3 and 5 within 1 week of their rescan to account for anatomical changes.

    To calculate whether investigators can create an adaptive radiotherapy plan at weeks 3 and 5.

    Measured: Through feasibility study completion, estimated 6 months.

  2. Calculate participants complete response rate at 3 months which is defined as no clinically visible, palpable or measurable disease on imaging or no residual tumour on neck dissection or directed biopsy

    To calculate the complete response rate of participants at 3 months in the main study, cohorts 1-3. Response rate is defined as no clinically visible, palpable or measurable disease on imaging (PET-CT and/or MRI) or no residual tumour on neck dissection or directed biopsy.

    Measured: Through main study treatment period, estimated 5 years.

  3. Calculate the progression free survival which is defined as the time from entry into the study until disease progression or death (days)

    To calculate the progression free survival which is defined as the time from entry into the study until disease progression or death in the main study, cohorts 1-3. This will be measured in whole days.

    Measured: Through main study treatment period, estimated 5 years.

  4. Calculate the disease specific survival which is defined as the time from entry into the study until death from any cause (days)

    Calculate the disease specific survival which is defined as the time from entry into the study until death from any cause in the main study, cohorts 1-3. This will be measured in whole days.

    Measured: Through main study treatment period, estimated 5 years.

  5. Assess quality of life using the EORTC Quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ) C30 version 3.0 with the associated Head and Neck module (HN35)

    Assess quality of life using the EORTC Quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ) C30 version 3.0 with the associated Head and Neck module (HN35) in the main study, cohorts 1-3.

    Measured: Through main study treatment period, estimated 5 years.

  6. Assess late radiation induced toxicities which will be recorded using the late effects in normal tissues subjective, objective, management and analytic scales (LENT SOMA) score and NCI CTCAE v5.0 late radiotherapy scoring systems.

    To assess late radiation induced toxicities which will be recorded using the LENT SOMA score and NCI CTCAE v5.0 late radiotherapy scoring systems. The incidence and prevalence (highest grades) of late side effects of radiotherapy will be reported in the main study, cohorts 1-3.

    Measured: Through main study treatment period, estimated 5 years.

  7. Calculate the duration of acute radiation induced toxicities will be assessed using the NCI CTCAE v5.0 score (HPV associated OPC and skull base tumours); All participants will be evaluated assess xerostomia, mucositis, dysphagia and dermatitis

    To calculate the duration of acute radiation induced toxicities will be assessed using the NCI CTCAE v5.0 score (HPV associated OPC and skull base tumours); All participants will be evaluated using the NCI CTCAE v5.0 score to assess xerostomia, mucositis, dysphagia and dermatitis in the main study, cohorts 1-3.

    Measured: Through main study treatment period, estimated 5 years.

  8. Assess the Incidence of feeding tube dependency at one year (HPV negative) which is defined as participant needing supplementation of nutrition by feeding tube.

    To assess the Incidence of feeding tube dependency at one year (HPV negative) which is defined as participant needing supplementation of nutrition by feeding tube In the main study, cohorts 1-3.

    Measured: Through main study treatment period, estimated 5 years.

  9. Calculate the mean radiotherapy doses to the organs at risk (spinal cord, optic chiasm and brainstem) and target volume will be calculated and recorded at baseline and compared to doses from the adaptive plan at weeks 3 and 5.

    To calculate the mean radiotherapy doses to the organs at risk (spinal cord, optic chiasm and brainstem) and target volume will be calculated and recorded at baseline and compared to doses from the adaptive plan at weeks 3 and 5 in the main study, cohort 3.

    Measured: Through main study treatment period, estimated 5 years.

  10. Calculate the mean radiotherapy doses to the organs at risk (salivary gland, spinal cord and brainstem) will be calculated and recorded at baseline and compared to doses from the adaptive plan at weeks 3 and 5.

    To calculate the mean radiotherapy doses to the organs at risk (salivary gland, spinal cord and brainstem) will be calculated and recorded at baseline and compared to doses from the adaptive plan at weeks 3 and 5 in the main study, cohort 1.

    Measured: Through main study treatment period, estimated 5 years.

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted27 Jan 2020
  2. Study start23 Oct 2019
  3. Primary completion1 May 2024 (estimated)
  4. Study completion1 May 2024 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 1/2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Non-randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
The study will commence with a Feasibility Radiotherapy planning CT study consisting of 13 participants, then will recruit to the the main phase I/II interventional study consisting of 3 independent cohorts.
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
73 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04242459
Sponsor's protocol ID
CCR4934
Acronym
INSIGHT-2
Status last verified
Jul 2021
First submitted
8 Nov 2019
Last updated
22 Jul 2021
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 1/2 study testing Adaptive Radiotherapy in people with Head and Neck Cancer, run by Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust at 1 site in United Kingdom.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 29 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 22 Jul 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United Kingdom. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this combined phase mean?

Phase 1 studies test a treatment in a small group of people for the first time or in a new way, mainly to check safety and find the right dose.

Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Abi Temple (020 8661 3561 ext. 4020, abigail.temple@rmh.nhs.uk), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Assess the feasibility of participants undergoing MR scan at baseline, week 2 and week 4 and feasibility of producing an adaptive radiotherapy plan (time frame: Through feasibility study completion, estimated 6 months.). The study lists 5 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 22 Jul 2021; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 29 Oct 2026.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in