AzTrials
AzTrials

Patellofemoral DislocationNCT04242732

Patellar Stability After MPFL Reconstruction With Fascia Lata Allograft: Conventional CT vs Under Weight-bearing CT

A study testing CT scan of the knee under weight-bearing with the Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) scanner system. and Conventional CT scan in people with Patellofemoral Dislocation, run by Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli at 1 site in Italy.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The objective of the present study is to compare the stability and alignment of the patella in patients with previous recurrent dislocation treated with medial patellar femoral ligament reconstruction with fascia lata allograft, 5 years after surgery by conventional CT and by CT under weight-bearing. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Any age
Conditions the study is for
Patellofemoral Dislocation
What is being tested?
CT scan of the knee under weight-bearing with the Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) scanner system. and Conventional CT scan
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
20 participants
Where
1 siteItaly
Study dates
26 Feb 2019to 26 Feb 2020
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages Any age
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Who is able to provide informed consent and who agrees to sign the Informed Consent Form approved by the Ethics Committee (EC).
  • Subject who underwent reconstruction of the MPFL using a minimally invasive technique using a fascia fascia allograft, performed at the Rizzoli Orthopedic Institute between 2012 and 2013 by the team of Prof. Zaffagnini.

Who cannot join

  • patients with severe morphostructural deformities or other pathologies affecting the knee and lower limb
  • patients with serious systemic vascular and neurological pathologies
  • patients unable to perform a CT scan under weight-bearing
  • State of pregnancy.
  • Obese or with body mass index BMI> 30 kg / m2.
  • Association of Trocleoplasty (intervention that produces degenerative changes of the joint in high percentage)

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Italy1 site
  • IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli

    Bologna, 40136

Other trials in Italy

About this study

Official title: Assessment of Patellar Stability in Patients Who Underwent Reconstruction of the Medium Patello-femoral Ligament With Fascia Lata Allograft: Comparison Between Conventional CT and Under Weight-bearing CT

The objective of the present study is to compare the stability and alignment of the patella in patients with previous recurrent dislocation treated with medial patellar femoral ligament reconstruction with fascia lata allograft, 5 years after surgery by conventional CT and by CT under weight-bearing.

Conventional CT will be performed with the patient supine, the knee fully extended and with the muscles of the thigh and leg completely relaxed. On the same day, the patient will undergo a CT scan of the knee under weight-bearing with the Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) scanner system.

Read more

The CT images will be viewed through the PACS system by two independently expert radiologists who will measure the tilt, congruence angles and the TT-TG with the methodical notes described in the literature.

The use of a CT under weight-bearing allows for the first time to evaluate in a realistic way the stability and tracking of the patella, with the knee flexed and therefore with the activation of the quadriceps muscle.

Read the detailed description

Patellofemoral disorders make up about 20% of all knee pathologies and are often a source of diagnostic and therapeutic doubts for the orthopedic surgeon. The incidence of patella dislocation is estimated to be 5.8 cases per 100,000 people, with values that become five times higher in patients aged between 10 and 17 years. Conservative treatment is preferable in the first case of acute dislocation, however the recurrence of this episode occurs in a percentage equal to 15 - 44% in these subjects.

Many surgical interventions have been described to correct the various factors that predispose to patellofemoral instability, with variable success rates (72% with the Hauser technique and 93% with the Roux-Goldthwait technique, 73% with that of Fielding and 78% with that of Trillat after a long follow-up.

The medial patello-femoral ligament (MPFL) is one of the main stabilizers of the patella in its movement on the femur; numerous studies have recently shown that this ligament is damaged in almost all cases, thus recognizing the role of the structure that most limits the patella in its lateral dislocation to the MPFL. Following these studies, the reconstruction of the MPFL as an elective treatment for relapsing patella dislocation has been recently proposed with countless surgical techniques that use various types of grafts: autologous tendons (the first in 1990 by Suganuma et al), tendons from donor (allograft) and synthetic ligaments.

Our team recently developed a minimally invasive MPFL reconstruction technique using an allograft tendon of the fascia lata with the aim of stabilizing the patella and limiting the patellofemoral arthritic degeneration in the medium to long term.

The imaging evaluation of instability and correct alignment of the patella, both in the pre-operative and in the post-surgery, is normally performed using magnetic resonance imaging or conventional CT. The CT offers the advantage of being able to make a very accurate morphological evaluation and therefore to be able to calculate with great precision the degrees of the tilt angle of the patella, the subluxation and the distance between the tibial tuberosity and the center of the trochlear sulcus (TT-TG ). The big limit of this method is that the patient is acquired supine, with the knee extended and with the muscles of the leg relaxed while it is well known how the knee flexion and the contraction of the quadriceps muscle possible in load, significantly affect the tracking of the patella on the trochlea. In literature, numerous studies show that the acquisition of the lying patient removes these determining factors (Callaghan; Draper; Tanaka) by altering the assessment of instability and malalignment. In a recent study by Marzo et al. it has been shown that in subjects suffering from instability of the patella, the evaluation under weight-bearing and with knee flexed by CT (CBCT Carestream) shows lower tilt angles, congruence and TT-TG than the evaluation in load and therefore the evaluation under load of the patellar alignment is more adequate to evaluate with precision these parameters.

The objective of the present study is to compare the stability and alignment of the patella in patients with previous relapsing dislocation treated with reconstruction surgery by means of a medial patellar ligament with lata band allograft 5 years after surgery by conventional CT and by CT under weight-bearing.

The assessments are carried out in a group of 20 patients with previous recurrent patella dislocation who underwent reconstruction surgery between 2012 and 2013 via a medial patello-femoral ligament with fascia lata allograft at the Orthopedic and Traumatologic Clinic 2nd of the Rizzoli Orthopedic Institute. The patients will be contacted by phone and a follow-up visit will be scheduled which is normally carried out 5 years after the operation to evaluate the stability of the patella and therefore the patient's clinical condition. The patient will undergo a clinical examination and radiological control with conventional CT at the Rizzoli Orthopedic Institute. Conventional CT will be performed with the patient supine, the knee fully extended and with the muscles of the thigh and leg completely relaxed. On the same day, the patient will undergo a CT scan of the knee under weight-bearing with the Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) scanner system.The CT images will be viewed through the PACS system by two independently expert radiologists who will measure the tilt, congruence angles and the TT-TG with the methodical notes described in the literature.

The use of a CT under weight-bearing allows for the first time to evaluate in a realistic way the stability and tracking of the patella, with the knee flexed and therefore with the activation of the quadriceps muscle.

Being tested
CT scan of the knee under weight-bearing with the Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) scanner system., Conventional CT scan
Keywords
Patello femoral dislocation, Medial patello-femoral ligament, Sport trauma

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • CT scan of the knee under weight-bearing with the Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) scanner system.Diagnostic test

    The patient will be evaluated under weight-bearing, with knee flexed at 30 ° and therefore with contracted thigh muscles. The measurement and maintenance of the 30 ° of flexion will be controlled by a goniometer applied laterally to the knee and fixed by means of an elastic band.

  • Conventional CT scanDiagnostic test

    The patient will be evaluated in supine position, with the muscles relaxed and the knee in full extension by conventional CT scan

Study groups in NCT04242732
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
MPFL reconstructedExperimental20 patients with previous recurrent patella dislocation who underwent MPFL reconstruction surgery with fascia lata allograft between 2012 and 2013
Receives: Diagnostic Test: CT scan of the knee under weight-bearing with the Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) scanner system.; Diagnostic Test: Conventional CT scan

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Patellar Tilt Angle

    The tilt angle is defined as the angle subtended by a line joining the medial and lateral edges of the patella and the horizontal plane on the axial plane, measured both by conventional CT scan with the knee extended and by CT scan under weight bearing conditions with the knee flexed at 30°.

    Measured: 24 months

  2. Patellar Congruence Angle

    Angle made by a line parallel to the posterior condyles and the line joining the edges of the patella on the axial plane, measured under weight-bearing with knee flexed at 30° and supine with knee extended.

    Measured: 24 months

  3. Tibial tuberosity-trochlear groove distance

    Radiographic parameter measured by CT scan both under weight-bearing with knee flexed at 30° and supine with knee extended.

    Measured: 24 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted27 Jan 2020
  2. Study start26 Feb 2019
  3. Primary completion26 May 2019
  4. Study completion26 Feb 2020

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Diagnosis
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
20 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04242732
Sponsor's protocol ID
CBCT-MPFL
Status last verified
May 2024
First submitted
20 Jan 2020
Last updated
29 May 2024
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Arnbjornsson A, Egund N, Rydling O, Stockerup R, Ryd L. The natural history of recurrent dislocation of the patella. Long-term results of conservative and operative treatment. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1992 Jan;74(1):140-2. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.74B1.1732244.

    PubMed 1732244
  • Chrisman OD, Snook GA, Wilson TC. A long-term prospective study of the Hauser and Roux-Goldthwait procedures for recurrent patellar dislocation. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1979 Oct;(144):27-30.

    PubMed 535237
  • Crosby EB, Insall J. Recurrent dislocation of the patella. Relation of treatment to osteoarthritis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1976 Jan;58(1):9-13.

    PubMed 1249117
  • Dejour H, Walch G, Neyret P, Adeleine P. [Dysplasia of the femoral trochlea]. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot. 1990;76(1):45-54. French.

    PubMed 2140459
  • Desio SM, Burks RT, Bachus KN. Soft tissue restraints to lateral patellar translation in the human knee. Am J Sports Med. 1998 Jan-Feb;26(1):59-65. doi: 10.1177/03635465980260012701.

    PubMed 9474403
  • Fielding JW, Liebler WA, Krishne Urs ND, Wilson SA, Puglisi AS. Tibial tubercle transfer: a long-range follow-up study. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1979 Oct;(144):43-4.

    PubMed 535248
  • Hautamaa PV, Fithian DC, Kaufman KR, Daniel DM, Pohlmeyer AM. Medial soft tissue restraints in lateral patellar instability and repair. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1998 Apr;(349):174-82. doi: 10.1097/00003086-199804000-00021.

    PubMed 9584380
  • Hefti F, Muller W, Jakob RP, Staubli HU. Evaluation of knee ligament injuries with the IKDC form. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 1993;1(3-4):226-34. doi: 10.1007/BF01560215.

    PubMed 8536037
  • Iwano T, Kurosawa H, Tokuyama H, Hoshikawa Y. Roentgenographic and clinical findings of patellofemoral osteoarthrosis. With special reference to its relationship to femorotibial osteoarthrosis and etiologic factors. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1990 Mar;(252):190-7.

    PubMed 2302884
  • Kodraliu G, Mosconi P, Groth N, Carmosino G, Perilli A, Gianicolo EA, Rossi C, Apolone G. Subjective health status assessment: evaluation of the Italian version of the SF-12 Health Survey. Results from the MiOS Project. J Epidemiol Biostat. 2001;6(3):305-16. doi: 10.1080/135952201317080715.

    PubMed 11437095
  • Kujala UM, Jaakkola LH, Koskinen SK, Taimela S, Hurme M, Nelimarkka O. Scoring of patellofemoral disorders. Arthroscopy. 1993;9(2):159-63. doi: 10.1016/s0749-8063(05)80366-4.

    PubMed 8461073
  • Zaffagnini S, Grassi A, Marcheggiani Muccioli GM, Luetzow WF, Vaccari V, Benzi A, Marcacci M. Medial patellotibial ligament (MPTL) reconstruction for patellar instability. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2014 Oct;22(10):2491-8. doi: 10.1007/s00167-013-2751-1. Epub 2013 Nov 7.

    PubMed 24196574
  • Marcacci M, Zaffagnini S, Iacono F, Visani A, Petitto A, Neri NP. Results in the treatment of recurrent dislocation of the patella after 30 years' follow-up. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 1995;3(3):163-6. doi: 10.1007/BF01565476.

    PubMed 8821272
  • Monticone M, Ferrante S, Salvaderi S, Rocca B, Totti V, Foti C, Roi GS. Development of the Italian version of the knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome score for patients with knee injuries: cross-cultural adaptation, dimensionality, reliability, and validity. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2012 Apr;20(4):330-5. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2012.01.001. Epub 2012 Jan 10.

    PubMed 22285738
  • Outerbridge RE. The etiology of chondromalacia patellae. 1961. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2001 Aug;(389):5-8. doi: 10.1097/00003086-200108000-00002. No abstract available.

    PubMed 11501822

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing CT scan of the knee under weight-bearing with the Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) scanner system. and Conventional CT scan in people with Patellofemoral Dislocation, run by Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli at 1 site in Italy.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 29 May 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Italy. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Patellar Tilt Angle (time frame: 24 months). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04242732, which also lists 21 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 29 May 2024; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 7 Nov 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in