AzTrials
AzTrials

Parkinson DiseaseNCT04243304

Synaptic Density and Progression of Parkinson's Disease.

A study testing 11C-UCB-J PET-CT and 18F-PE2I PET-MR in people with Parkinson Disease, run by Universitaire Ziekenhuizen KU Leuven at 1 site in Belgium.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

AIM: To assess synaptic density and to investigate the potential relationship of regional synaptic loss with motor and non-motor symptoms and with disease progression in the human brain in vivo in patients with PD. DESIGN: We will include 30 PD patients and 20 healthy controls. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 30 to 80 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Parkinson Disease
What is being tested?
11C-UCB-J PET-CT and 18F-PE2I PET-MR
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
50 participants
Where
1 siteBelgium
Study dates
1 Oct 2018to 28 Feb 2022
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 30 to 80 years
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • PD diagnosis based on MDS clinical diagnostic criteria for Parkinson's disease
  • Less than 5 years disease duration since motor symptom onset according to the patient
  • Hoehn-Yahr stage 1 or 2 in medication ON state
  • Capacity to understand the informed consent form

Who cannot join

  • Neuropsychiatric diseases other than PD
  • Major internal medical diseases
  • Relevant abnormalities on MR brain
  • History of alcohol or drug abuse
  • Contraindications for MR
  • Pregnancy
  • Previous participation in other research studies involving ionizing radiation with > 1 mSv over past 12 months.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Belgium1 site
  • UZ Leuven

    Leuven, Vlaams-Brabant, 3000

Other trials in Belgium

About this study

Official title: Longitudinal Measurement of Synaptic Density to Monitor Progression of Parkinson's Disease.

AIM: To assess synaptic density and to investigate the potential relationship of regional synaptic loss with motor and non-motor symptoms and with disease progression in the human brain in vivo in patients with PD.

DESIGN: We will include 30 PD patients and 20 healthy controls. All subjects will undergo a clinical examination, with comprehensive assessment of motor and non-motor symptoms, and imaging evaluation consisting of 11C-UCB-J PET-CT and 18F-FE-PE2I PET-MR at baseline and after 2 years.

Being tested
11C-UCB-J PET-CT, 18F-PE2I PET-MR
Keywords
Parkinson Disease, PET, UCB-J, PE2I
Medical subject headings
Parkinson Disease

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • 11C-UCB-J PET-CTOther

    Positron Emission Tomography (PET) of synaptic vesicle protein 2A (SV2A) using the radioligand 11C-UCB-J.

  • 18F-PE2I PET-MROther

    Positron Emission Tomography (PET) of dopamine transporter (DAT) using the radioligand 18F-FE-PE2I, and brain MRI performed simultaneously.

Study groups in NCT04243304
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
PD patientsExperimentalAt baseline and 2-year follow-up
Receives: Other: 11C-UCB-J PET-CT; Other: 18F-PE2I PET-MR
Healthy controlsActive comparatorAt baseline and 2-year follow-up
Receives: Other: 11C-UCB-J PET-CT; Other: 18F-PE2I PET-MR

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Baseline differences in synaptic density.

    Baseline differences (%) in synaptic density between patients and controls.

    Measured: Data analysis wel be done when all subjects have undergone the baseline evaluation.

  2. Correlations between clinical scores and synaptic density.

    Correlations between clinical scores and synaptic density in the patient group.

    Measured: Data analysis wel be done when all subjects have undergone the 2-year follow-up evaluation.

  3. Differences in the rate of decline of synaptic density.

    Differences (%) in the rate of decline of synaptic density between patients and controls.

    Measured: Data analysis wel be done when all subjects have undergone the 2-year follow-up evaluation.

  4. Correlations between progression of the clinical scores and decline of synaptic density.

    Correlations between progression of the clinical scores and decline of synaptic density in the patient group.

    Measured: Data analysis wel be done when all subjects have undergone the 2-year follow-up evaluation.

Secondary outcomes (4)
  1. Baseline differences in DAT levels.

    Baseline differences (%) in DAT levels between patients and controls.

    Measured: Data analysis wel be done when all subjects have undergone the baseline evaluation.

  2. Correlations between clinical scores and DAT levels.

    Correlations between clinical scores and DAT levels in the patient group.

    Measured: Data analysis wel be done when all subjects have undergone the 2-year follow-up evaluation.

  3. Differences in the rate of decline of global and DAT levels.

    Differences (%) in the rate of decline of global and DAT levels between patients and controls.

    Measured: Data analysis wel be done when all subjects have undergone the 2-year follow-up evaluation.

  4. Correlations between progression of the clinical scores and decline of DAT levels.

    Correlations between progression of the clinical scores and decline of DAT levels in the patient group.

    Measured: Data analysis wel be done when all subjects have undergone the 2-year follow-up evaluation.

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted28 Jan 2020
  2. Study start1 Oct 2018
  3. Primary completion28 Feb 2022
  4. Study completion28 Feb 2022

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Diagnosis
Allocation
Non-randomised
Intervention model
Single group
Model description
Longitudinal study design (2 years follow up) where results of SV2A PET/CT, PE2I PET/MR and clinical rating scales are compared between PD patients and healthy controls.
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
50 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04243304
Sponsor's protocol ID
s61477
Status last verified
May 2022
First submitted
10 Jan 2020
Last updated
19 May 2022
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Yes: Needs to be decided.

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing 11C-UCB-J PET-CT and 18F-PE2I PET-MR in people with Parkinson Disease, run by Universitaire Ziekenhuizen KU Leuven at 1 site in Belgium.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 19 May 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Belgium. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Baseline differences in synaptic density. (time frame: Data analysis wel be done when all subjects have undergone the baseline evaluation.). The study lists 4 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 19 May 2022.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in