Umbilical GranulomaPhase 2RCTNCT04248101
Double Ligation and Topical Silver Nitrate
A Phase 2 study testing Double Ligation and Topical Silver Nitrate in people with Umbilical Granuloma, run by Shaheed Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto Medical University.
Trial summary
To study and compare the efficacy and safety of Double Ligation and Topical Silver Nitrate Solution while treating children with Umbilical Granulomas Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages Up to 12 months
- Conditions the study is for
- Umbilical Granuloma
- What is being tested?
- Double Ligation and Topical Silver Nitrate
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 176 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- 1 Jul 2016to 1 Jul 2017
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages Up to 12 months
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child
Who may be able to join
- 1. Patients of Umbilical Granuloma, less than 1 year age
Who cannot join
- Patients who already had any treatment
- Parents refused to give consent for enrollment
- Patients lost in follow up
About this study
Official title: Comparison of Double Ligation and Topical Silver Nitrate for Treatment of Umbilical Granuloma in Children: A Randomized Control Trial
To study and compare the efficacy and safety of Double Ligation and Topical Silver Nitrate Solution while treating children with Umbilical Granulomas
Read the detailed description
The patients underwent one treatment option and then followed up for three weeks and the results noted in terms of success/failure and complications specific to each treatment option and analysed accordingly
- Conditions
- Umbilical Granuloma
- Being tested
- Double Ligation, Topical Silver Nitrate
- Keywords
- Double Ligation, Topical Silver Nitrate
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Double LigationProcedure or surgery
Topical Silver NitrateDrug
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Group 1 | Active comparator | 88 cases of umbilical granulomas who were treated with double ligation Receives: Procedure: Double Ligation |
| Group 2 | Active comparator | 88 cases of umbilical granulomas who were treated with topical silver nitrate Receives: Drug: Topical Silver Nitrate |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Frequency of Success/Failure of treatment
The effect of treatment was noted in a structured proforma on weekly basis for 3 weeks.
Treatment was considered successful if, on local examination the granuloma disappeared completely and did not reappear during the follow up period.
And if the granuloma did not disppear completely during the follow up period after double ligation or application of silver nitrate, treatment was considered to have failed.
These variables were measured as frequency and percentages. The results were compared between the two groups using chi-square test. A significance level of <0.05 was considered significant.
Measured: 3 weeks
Frequency of complications in both groups
The complications were also noted in the above mentioned proforma during the follow up period on weekly basis for 3 weeks.
Complications relevant to the treatment i.e. infection, bleeding, chemical burns and skin discoloration were noted during local examination.
These variables were measured as frequency and percentages. The results were compared between the two groups using chi-square test. A significance level of <0.05 was considered significant
Measured: 3 weeks
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted30 Jan 2020
- Study start1 Jul 2016
- Primary completion30 Jun 2017
- Study completion1 Jul 2017
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Umbilical GranulomaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 176 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Shaheed Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto Medical University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Muhammad Rashid, Shaheed Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto Medical University
- Investigators
- Nadeem Akhtar, MS Paediatric Surgery, Study director, Professor of Paediatric Surgery
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04248101
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- Umbilical Granuloma
- Acronym
- RCT
- Status last verified
- Jan 2020
- First submitted
- 28 Jan 2020
- Last updated
- 30 Jan 2020
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 30 Jan 2020. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Comparison of Double Ligation and Topical Silver Nitrate for Treatment of Umbilical Granuloma in Children: A Randomized Control Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04248101
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- RCT / Umbilical Granuloma
- Conditions
- Umbilical Granuloma
- Keywords
- Double Ligation, Topical Silver Nitrate
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 176 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Shaheed Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto Medical UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Jul 2016 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 30 Jun 2017 (actual)
- Study completion
- 1 Jul 2017 (actual)
- First posted
- 30 Jan 2020 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
To study and compare the efficacy and safety of Double Ligation and Topical Silver Nitrate Solution while treating children with Umbilical Granulomas
Detailed description
The patients underwent one treatment option and then followed up for three weeks and the results noted in terms of success/failure and complications specific to each treatment option and analysed accordingly
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Group 1 | Active comparator | Procedure: Double Ligation88 cases of umbilical granulomas who were treated with double ligation |
| Group 2 | Active comparator | Drug: Topical Silver Nitrate88 cases of umbilical granulomas who were treated with topical silver nitrate |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- Up to 12 months
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- 1. Patients of Umbilical Granuloma, less than 1 year age
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Patients who already had any treatment
- Parents refused to give consent for enrollment
- Patients lost in follow up
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Double Ligation | Procedure or surgery | Group 1 |
| Topical Silver Nitrate | Drug | Group 2 |
Primary outcome
Frequency of Success/Failure of treatment
Time frame: 3 weeks
The effect of treatment was noted in a structured proforma on weekly basis for 3 weeks. Treatment was considered successful if, on local examination the granuloma disappeared completely and did not reappear during the follow up period. And if the granuloma did not disppear completely during the follow up period after double ligation or application of silver nitrate, treatment was considered to have failed. These variables were measured as frequency and percentages. The results were compared between the two groups using chi-square test. A significance level of <0.05 was considered significant.
Frequency of complications in both groups
Time frame: 3 weeks
The complications were also noted in the above mentioned proforma during the follow up period on weekly basis for 3 weeks. Complications relevant to the treatment i.e. infection, bleeding, chemical burns and skin discoloration were noted during local examination. These variables were measured as frequency and percentages. The results were compared between the two groups using chi-square test. A significance level of <0.05 was considered significant
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 30 Jan 2020.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Nadeem Akhtar, MS Paediatric Surgery study director
Professor of Paediatric Surgery
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing Double Ligation and Topical Silver Nitrate in people with Umbilical Granuloma, run by Shaheed Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto Medical University.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 30 Jan 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Frequency of Success/Failure of treatment (time frame: 3 weeks). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 30 Jan 2020.