AzTrials
AzTrials

Dental CariesPULPROTECTNCT04250142

Pulp Protection in Selective Carious Tissue Removal

A study testing Self-etching Adhesive and Glass Ionomer in people with Dental Caries, run by University of Talca at 1 site in Chile.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Although selective removal of carious tissue to soft dentin (SRCT-S) has been proposed as the standard of care for the management of deep dentin caries, it is unclear whether a cavity liner is necessary. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 6 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Dental Caries
What is being tested?
Self-etching Adhesive and Glass Ionomer
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
142 participants
Where
1 siteChile
Study dates
13 Mar 2019to 18 Mar 2022
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 6 years and older
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Patients with a permanent molar or premolar with a deep caries lesion that compromises from the inner half of the dentin (determined by radiographic examination).
  • Tooth restorable by a direct resin restoration.
  • Absence of pulp sensibility verified by cold test
  • Absence of a history of spontaneous pain or vertical and horizontal percussion.
  • Absence of periapical lesion, verified through periapical radiographs.
  • Primary injury.

Who cannot join

  • Systemic conditions with poor control or uncompensated.
  • Cervical margin of the cavity in dentin or root cement.
  • Tooth already restored or with secondary caries.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Chile1 site
  • Faculty of Health Sciences

    Talca, No State, 3460000

Other trials in Chile

About this study

Official title: Effect of Pulp Protection After Selective Carious Tissue Removal in Permanent Teeth, a Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial

Although selective removal of carious tissue to soft dentin (SRCT-S) has been proposed as the standard of care for the management of deep dentin caries, it is unclear whether a cavity liner is necessary. This double blinded randomized controlled clinical trial aims to analyze the behavior of a resin restoration performed after SRCT-S for deep dentin caries, treated either with a Glass Ionomer or only with a Self-Etching Adhesive, in permanent teeth. The study will include 142 restorations allocated to either experimental arm. After 12 and 24 months, restoration survival, pulp response and radiographic lesion progression will be assessed.

Read the detailed description

Introduction: Minimally invasive dentistry has been proposed as an conceptual framework for the conservative management of caries lesions. This approach allows reducing potential adverse effects derived from the conventional treatment, including the loss of pulp vitality. Complete removal carious tissues compromising deep dentin significantly increases the risk of pulp exposure and post-operative symptoms, leading in many cases, to the need for endodontic treatment, with the subsequent high costs and low coverage for the population. In this context, a new technique for the management of deep caries lesions has been introduced called selective removal of carious tissue to soft dentin (SRCT-S), which partially removes only the outer layer of the affected tissue, leaving carious tissue in the pulpal wall, but not on the lateral walls of the operatory cavity. This procedure has been reported in several studies, with lower clinical time, cheaper cost and lower discomfort for the patient. The SRCT-S aims to preserve pulp vitality, prevent access of nutrients to carious tissue, stopping the caries process and preserving a greater amount of dental structure. Although the SRCT-S technique has proven effective compared to conventional treatments, it is unclear and with insufficient evidence about how to manage the remaining carious tissue and whether a cavity lining agent is needed. This decision may have important clinical implications, but there is no general consensus, strongly suggesting further research. Objective: To analyze the behavior of a resin restoration performed after SRCT-S for deep dentin caries, treated either with a Glass Ionomer or only with a Self-Etching Adhesive, in permanent teeth. Methodology: A double blinded randomized controlled clinical trial was devised. Trained dentists will treat the 142 restorations included in deep dentin carious lesions of permanent molars, at the dental clinics of the University of Talca. After recruiting, patients will be randomly assigned to the experimental groups: Group 1: (n=71) no cavity lining, treating carious tissue with self-conditioning adhesive followed by composite resin restoration and Group 2: (n=71) remaining carious tissue covered with a conventional glass ionomer followed by composite resin restoration. The dependent variables (outcomes) will be; a. clinical: restoration survival and pulp response and b. radiographic: lesion progression. Clinical and radiographic outcomes will be monitored annually at 12 and 24 months. The analysis of the restorations and the pulp response will be performed with Weibull regression. The Friedman test will be applied for the analysis of the data regarding radiographic subtraction, (p≤0.05). Given the lack of studies on the subject with longitudinal evaluations, this project is expected to contribute relevant evidence that impacts the generation of novel guidelines for the management of deep dentin caries. Additionally, the results will contribute evidence to increase the support to a more conservative clinical behavior.

Conditions
Dental Caries
Being tested
Self-etching Adhesive, Glass Ionomer
Keywords
Dental caries, Selective Caries Removal, Self-etching adhesive, Composite Resin, Glass ionomer, Cavity lining, Minimally invasive dentistry, Deep caries lesions
Medical subject headings
Dental Caries

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Self-etching AdhesiveDevice

    Also called Self-conditioning Adhesive, Self-etching primer, Single Bond Universal (3M)

    A Self-etching adhesive will be used to cover deep carious dentin after a selective removal of caries lesion to soft dentin procedure.

  • Glass IonomerDevice

    Also called Conventional Glass Ionomer, Ketac Molar (3M)

    A conventional glass ionomer will be used to cover deep carious dentin after a selective removal of caries lesion to soft dentin procedure.

Study groups in NCT04250142
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Conventional Glass IonomerActive comparatorSelective removal of carious tissue to soft dentin. Deep carious dentin will be lined by a conventional glass ionomer, followed by a composite resin restoration.
Receives: Device: Glass Ionomer
Self-etching AdhesiveExperimentalSelective removal of carious tissue to soft dentin. Deep carious dentin will not be lined and a self-etching adhesive will cover the tissue, followed by a composite resin restoration.
Receives: Device: Self-etching Adhesive

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Restoration integrity

    The FDI Criteria will be used for the direct clinical evaluation of restorations.

    Measured: 2 years

  2. Pulp vitality

    Pulp vitality will be evaluated by means of symptoms reported by the patient, normal response upon thermal tests, no pain upon percussion, absence of periapical lesions (periapical radiography) and absence of infectious processes such as fistula.

    Measured: 2 years

Secondary outcomes (2)
  1. Radiographic progression

    Lesion progression at the x-ray will be monitored through qualitative analysis with the technique of digital subtraction of the radiographic images (radiolucent area under restorations) over time.

    Measured: 2 years

  2. Changes in pulp chamber morphology

    For the qualitative analysis of the depth of the lesion and the deposition of tertiary dentin, the pairs of radiographic images (baseline radiographs versus control radiographs) will be assessed and compared.

    Measured: 2 years

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted31 Jan 2020
  2. Study start13 Mar 2019
  3. Primary completion23 Dec 2021
  4. Study completion18 Mar 2022

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
A double blinded randomized controlled clinical trial
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Participant, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
142 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04250142
Sponsor's protocol ID
CM-11/2018
Acronym
PULPROTECT
Status last verified
Dec 2022
First submitted
29 Jan 2020
Last updated
28 Dec 2022
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Maltz M, Alves LS, Jardim JJ, Moura Mdos S, de Oliveira EF. Incomplete caries removal in deep lesions: a 10-year prospective study. Am J Dent. 2011 Aug;24(4):211-4.

    PubMed 22016914
  • Maltz M, Koppe B, Jardim JJ, Alves LS, de Paula LM, Yamaguti PM, Almeida JCF, Moura MS, Mestrinho HD. Partial caries removal in deep caries lesions: a 5-year multicenter randomized controlled trial. Clin Oral Investig. 2018 Apr;22(3):1337-1343. doi: 10.1007/s00784-017-2221-0. Epub 2017 Oct 8.

    PubMed 28988345
  • Bjorndal L, Reit C, Bruun G, Markvart M, Kjaeldgaard M, Nasman P, Thordrup M, Dige I, Nyvad B, Fransson H, Lager A, Ericson D, Petersson K, Olsson J, Santimano EM, Wennstrom A, Winkel P, Gluud C. Treatment of deep caries lesions in adults: randomized clinical trials comparing stepwise vs. direct complete excavation, and direct pulp capping vs. partial pulpotomy. Eur J Oral Sci. 2010 Jun;118(3):290-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0722.2010.00731.x.

    PubMed 20572864
  • Bjorndal L, Fransson H, Bruun G, Markvart M, Kjaeldgaard M, Nasman P, Hedenbjork-Lager A, Dige I, Thordrup M. Randomized Clinical Trials on Deep Carious Lesions: 5-Year Follow-up. J Dent Res. 2017 Jul;96(7):747-753. doi: 10.1177/0022034517702620. Epub 2017 Apr 14.

    PubMed 28410008
  • Hickel R, Peschke A, Tyas M, Mjor I, Bayne S, Peters M, Hiller KA, Randall R, Vanherle G, Heintze SD. FDI World Dental Federation: clinical criteria for the evaluation of direct and indirect restorations-update and clinical examples. Clin Oral Investig. 2010 Aug;14(4):349-66. doi: 10.1007/s00784-010-0432-8. Epub 2010 Jul 14.

    PubMed 20628774

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Self-etching Adhesive and Glass Ionomer in people with Dental Caries, run by University of Talca at 1 site in Chile.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 28 Dec 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Chile. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Restoration integrity (time frame: 2 years). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04250142, which also lists 5 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 28 Dec 2022.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in
Pulp Protection in Selective Carious Tissue Removal | AzTrials