OsteoarthritisNCT04251442
TKR With and Without the Use of Intra-operative Sensing
A study testing OrthoSensor Verasense Technology in people with Osteoarthritis, run by Hospital for Special Surgery, New York at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
The purpose of this study is to determine if there is a difference in clinical outcomes after total knee replacement (TKR) performed with traditional ligament balancing compared to use of intraoperative sensing technology (IOS) to balance ligaments. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 40 to 100 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Osteoarthritis
- What is being tested?
- OrthoSensor Verasense Technology
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 0 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 31 Oct 2019to 30 Oct 2020
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 40 to 100 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Patients who meet the indications for use for primary TKR using IOS
- Subject must be diagnosed with osteoarthritis
- Subject is likely to be available for all study visits
- Subject is able and willing to sign the informed consent and follow study procedures
Who cannot join
- Revision total knee arthroplasty
- Patient is receiving treatment for any of the following conditions:
- Avascular Necrosis
- Inflammatory arthritis
- Post-traumatic arthritis
- Any knee surgery other than meniscectomy (can be arthroscopic or open)
Show all 13Show fewer
- Ligament insufficiencies, prior surgeries such as anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) or posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) reconstructions, posterolateral reconstructions, osteotomies, tibia plateau fractures
- Ipsilateral foot/ankle and hip arthritis
- Range of motion less than 90°
- Subject has a mental condition that may interfere with the subject's ability to give an informed consent or willingness to fulfill the study requirements (i.e. severe mental retardation such that the Subject cannot understand the informed consent process, global dementia, prior strokes that interfere with the Subject's cognitive abilities, senile dementia, and Alzheimer's Disease)
- Any subjects meeting any contraindication criteria as identified in the locally approved labeling for the device should be excluded from this study.
- Patient out-of-state with medication prescription not registered in iStop database
- Patients with severe contralateral osteoarthritis requiring subsequent knee replacement or with a flexion contracture greater than 10 degrees.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
Hospital for Special Surgery
New York, New York, 10021
About this study
Official title: Randomized Controlled Trial of Patients Undergoing a Total Knee Arthroplasty With and Without the Use of Intraoperative Sensing Technology
The purpose of this study is to determine if there is a difference in clinical outcomes after total knee replacement (TKR) performed with traditional ligament balancing compared to use of intraoperative sensing technology (IOS) to balance ligaments. IOS is used to send real time information to a monitor within the operating room that assists your surgeon in making decisions about the balance of the ligaments in your knee and the proper insertion of implants. A total of 150 subjects will participate in this study at Hospital for Special Surgery.
The hypotheses are that the use of IOS technology will be associated with:
- Better soft tissue balance during TKR than by manual balancing alone.
- Higher patient reported clinical outcome measures (PROMs) following surgery.
Read the detailed description
Participation in this study will involve a knee replacement performed with IOS. Patients will be randomized into one of two groups:The study group will have soft tissue balance performed with the use of IOS. Control group patients will have soft tissue balance performed manually, with final soft tissue balance values measured using IOS, while the surgeon will remain blinded to those values. Intra-operative compartment loads will be measured in 10, 45, and 90 degrees of flexion.
Additionally, long leg limb alignment, passive range of motion, use of opioids, daily activity, and PROMS will be evaluated post-operatively to determine which group has better outcomes.
- Conditions
- Osteoarthritis
- Being tested
- OrthoSensor Verasense Technology
- Keywords
- Osteoarthritis, Total knee repalcement
- Medical subject headings
- Osteoarthritis
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
OrthoSensor Verasense TechnologyDevice
IOS is used to send real time information to a monitor within the operating room that assists your surgeon in making decisions about the balance of the ligaments in your knee and the proper insertion of implants.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Study Group | Experimental | The study group will have soft tissue balance performed with the use of IOS. Receives: Device: OrthoSensor Verasense Technology |
| Control Group | No intervention | Control group patients will have soft tissue balance performed manually, with final soft tissue balance values measured using IOS, while the surgeon will remain blinded to those values. |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Knee Society Score
The primary outcome will be the difference in Knee Society Score (KSS) between baseline and 4 months post-operatively. The Knee Society Score is out of 100 points, with a higher score meaning a patient had a better outcome.
Measured: 4 months
Secondary outcomes (6)
Intra-operative Compartment Loads
Intra-operative compartment loads (medial and lateral component loads) will be measured between the groups at 10, 45, and 90 degrees of flexion during trial reduction and after cementation, using IOS technology.
Measured: Intra-operative
Long Leg Limb Alignment
Long leg limb alignment will be measured on post-operative standard of care (SOC) radiographs at patients' 6 week follow-ups.
Measured: 6 weeks
Passive Range of Motion
Passive range of motion will be measured pre-operatively, 6 weeks post-operatively, and 4 months post-operatively at all scheduled SOC appointments.
Measured: 4 months
Opioid Use
Use of opioids will be tracked using the Internet System for Tracking Over Prescribing (I-STOP) database and a daily pain diary maintained by patient for first 6 weeks post-operatively. The I-STOP database can be accessed by the prescribing physician to track how many opioid refills a patient has procured.
Measured: 6 weeks
Function and Activity
Function and activity will be monitored using Fitness Trackers. The device will be given to each patient in hospital and is to be worn for 6 weeks post-operatively. It will monitor a patient's daily and weekly steps while the patient is wearing it.
Measured: 6 weeks
Pain Level
Daily pain levels will also be measured using the fitness tracker. The tracker will ask the patient to rate their pain on a scale from 0-10, with 0 meaning they have no pain, and 10 being the worst pain imaginable.
Measured: 6 weeks
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted5 Feb 2020
- Study start31 Oct 2019
- Primary completion30 Oct 2020
- Study completion30 Oct 2020
Why it stopped: Per funding institution
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (2)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for OsteoarthritisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Hospital for Special Surgery, New YorkThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Investigator
- Enrolment
- 0 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Hospital for Special Surgery, New York
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Orthosensor, Inc.
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Alejandro Gonzalez Della Valle, MD, Principal investigator, Hospital for Special Surgery, New YorkKate Shanaghan, Study director, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04251442
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 2019-0144
- Status last verified
- Apr 2022
- First submitted
- 29 Jan 2020
- Last updated
- 26 Apr 2022
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- Yes
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Cho KJ, Seon JK, Jang WY, Park CG, Song EK. Objective quantification of ligament balancing using VERASENSE in measured resection and modified gap balance total knee arthroplasty. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2018 Jul 27;19(1):266. doi: 10.1186/s12891-018-2190-8.
PubMed 30053812Nodzo SR, Franceschini V, Gonzalez Della Valle A. Intraoperative Load-Sensing Variability During Cemented, Posterior-Stabilized Total Knee Arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2017 Jan;32(1):66-70. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2016.06.029. Epub 2016 Jun 22.
PubMed 27436499
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 26 Apr 2022. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Randomized Controlled Trial of Patients Undergoing a Total Knee Arthroplasty With and Without the Use of Intraoperative Sensing Technology
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04251442
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 2019-0144
- Conditions
- Osteoarthritis
- Keywords
- Osteoarthritis, Total knee repalcement
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- WithdrawnReason stopped: Per funding institution
- Enrolment
- 0 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Hospital for Special Surgery, New YorkUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Orthosensor, Inc.
- Study start
- 31 Oct 2019 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 30 Oct 2020 (actual)
- Study completion
- 30 Oct 2020 (actual)
- First posted
- 5 Feb 2020 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this study is to determine if there is a difference in clinical outcomes after total knee replacement (TKR) performed with traditional ligament balancing compared to use of intraoperative sensing technology (IOS) to balance ligaments. IOS is used to send real time information to a monitor within the operating room that assists your surgeon in making decisions about the balance of the ligaments in your knee and the proper insertion of implants. A total of 150 subjects will participate in this study at Hospital for Special Surgery.
The hypotheses are that the use of IOS technology will be associated with:
- Better soft tissue balance during TKR than by manual balancing alone.
- Higher patient reported clinical outcome measures (PROMs) following surgery.
Detailed description
Participation in this study will involve a knee replacement performed with IOS. Patients will be randomized into one of two groups:The study group will have soft tissue balance performed with the use of IOS. Control group patients will have soft tissue balance performed manually, with final soft tissue balance values measured using IOS, while the surgeon will remain blinded to those values. Intra-operative compartment loads will be measured in 10, 45, and 90 degrees of flexion.
Additionally, long leg limb alignment, passive range of motion, use of opioids, daily activity, and PROMS will be evaluated post-operatively to determine which group has better outcomes.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (investigator)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Study Group | Experimental | Device: OrthoSensor Verasense TechnologyThe study group will have soft tissue balance performed with the use of IOS. |
| Control Group | No intervention | –Control group patients will have soft tissue balance performed manually, with final soft tissue balance values measured using IOS, while the surgeon will remain blinded to those values. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 40 to 100 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Patients who meet the indications for use for primary TKR using IOS
- Subject must be diagnosed with osteoarthritis
- Subject is likely to be available for all study visits
- Subject is able and willing to sign the informed consent and follow study procedures
Key exclusion criteria (13 listed)
- Revision total knee arthroplasty
- Patient is receiving treatment for any of the following conditions:
- Any knee surgery other than meniscectomy (can be arthroscopic or open)
- Ligament insufficiencies, prior surgeries such as anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) or posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) reconstructions, posterolateral reconstructions, osteotomies, tibia plateau fractures
- Ipsilateral foot/ankle and hip arthritis
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| OrthoSensor Verasense TechnologyIOS is used to send real time information to a monitor within the operating room that assists your surgeon in making decisions about the balance of the ligaments in your knee and the proper insertion of implants. | Device | Study Group |
Primary outcome
Knee Society Score
Time frame: 4 months
The primary outcome will be the difference in Knee Society Score (KSS) between baseline and 4 months post-operatively. The Knee Society Score is out of 100 points, with a higher score meaning a patient had a better outcome.
6 secondary outcomes
Intra-operative Compartment Loads
Time frame: Intra-operative
Long Leg Limb Alignment
Time frame: 6 weeks
Passive Range of Motion
Time frame: 4 months
Opioid Use
Time frame: 6 weeks
Function and Activity
Time frame: 6 weeks
Pain Level
Time frame: 6 weeks
Results and safety
The study was withdrawn before enrolling participants, so there are no results.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 26 Apr 2022.
- Results publication: PubMed 30053812Cho KJ, Seon JK, Jang WY, Park CG, Song EK. Objective quantification of ligament balancing using VERASENSE in measured resection and modified gap balance total knee arthroplasty. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2018 Jul 27;19(1):266. doi: 10.1186/s12891-018-2190-8.
- Results publication: PubMed 27436499Nodzo SR, Franceschini V, Gonzalez Della Valle A. Intraoperative Load-Sensing Variability During Cemented, Posterior-Stabilized Total Knee Arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2017 Jan;32(1):66-70. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2016.06.029. Epub 2016 Jun 22.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Osteoarthritis
Not yet recruiting
Holistic Healing for Knee Osteoarthritis
Knee Osteoarthritis (Knee OA)
Active, not recruiting
Effectiveness of Therapeutic Exercises on Spinopelvic Mobility
Osteoarthritis (OA) of the Hip
Recruiting
Effect of Anti-inflammatory Diet in Osteoarthritis
Osteoarthritis, Knee
Active, not recruitingPhase 2/3
Single vs Triple Hyaluronic Acid in Knee Osteoarthritis
Osteoarthritis, Knee
Not yet recruiting
The Feasibility of a Virtual/Home-based OA Treatment Program in Older Adults With OA and Multimorbidity
Osteoarthritis of the Knee
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Alejandro Gonzalez Della Valle, MD principal investigator
Hospital for Special Surgery, New York
Kate Shanaghan study director
Hospital for Special Surgery, New York
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing OrthoSensor Verasense Technology in people with Osteoarthritis, run by Hospital for Special Surgery, New York at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 13 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: withdrawn, as of the sponsor's last update on 26 Apr 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study was withdrawn before enrolling participants, so there are no results.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Knee Society Score (time frame: 4 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04251442, which also lists 2 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 26 Apr 2022.