Breast Neoplasm FemaleNCT04251507
VR Ultrasound Guided Breast Localization
A study testing Oculus Go Virtual Reality Goggles in people with Breast Neoplasm Female, run by Prisma Health-Upstate at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
To determine if a virtual reality simulation will reduce pain and anxiety in patients undergoing an ultrasound guided breast localization procedure (traditional wire, savi scout or a radiofrequency identification tag). Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older, women only
- Conditions the study is for
- Breast Neoplasm Female
- What is being tested?
- Oculus Go Virtual Reality Goggles
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 60 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 13 Jan 2021to 7 Jan 2022
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- Women only
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Informed consent is obtained from the patient
- Females ≥ 18 years of age
- Patient is schedule for preoperative ultrasound guided breast localization procedure
Who cannot join
- Patient is scheduled for or switched to a stereotactic localization procedure
- The patient has motion sickness
- The patient has severe cognitive disabilities or language barriers that inhibit study form completion in English
- Refusal of patient to sign consent
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: The Use of Virtual Reality During Breast Localization Procedures
To determine if a virtual reality simulation will reduce pain and anxiety in patients undergoing an ultrasound guided breast localization procedure (traditional wire, savi scout or a radiofrequency identification tag).
Read the detailed description
Needle localizations for breast cancer surgery are required to identify cancerous tissue before surgery. Currently this procedure is done with or without a local anesthetic. Patients report anxiety regarding cancer and cancer-related procedures. Different types of needle localization may have different pain and anxiety based on their duration, complexity, and invasiveness. This research is designed to determine if VR simulated environment can reduce pain and anxiety.
Our aim is to study the efficacy of a virtual environment in reducing pain and procedural anxiety. It is intended for patients undergoing an ultrasound guided breast localization procedure that have had an abnormal breast biopsy. The overall aim is to discover an efficacious nonpharmacologic method to lower pain and anxiety during a standard of care procedure.
- Conditions
- Breast Neoplasm Female
- Being tested
- Oculus Go Virtual Reality Goggles
- Keywords
- Virtual Reality, Pain, Anxiety, Ultrasound Guided Needle Localization
- Medical subject headings
- Pain, Anxiety Disorders
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Oculus Go Virtual Reality GogglesDevice
Oculus Go is a standalone portable Virtual Reality device that enables the user to immerse in different virtual environments.Non pharmacological technique to reduce pain and anxiety during a procedure.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Virtual Reality Goggles | Experimental | Patients randomized to the intervention group will undergo their procedure as standard of care but will wear the Oculus Go Goggles and experience a virtual reality simulation. The simulation is a non-interactive polar theme video. Receives: Device: Oculus Go Virtual Reality Goggles |
| Control | No intervention | Patients randomized to the control group will undergo their procedure as standard of care without the use of virtual reality goggles. |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Subjective Pain Assessment: Visual Analog Scale
Pain Measured with the Visual Analog Scale. Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) is a measurement instrument that tries to measure a characteristic or attitude that is believed to range across a continuum of values and cannot easily be directly measured. The individual will score their pain level by circling a number 0 - 10 at baseline, pre-operative, and post-operatively. The scale range includes 0-10 scales, with < 2 =well controlled, 2 - 5: partly controlled, > 5: uncontrolled.
Measured: Immediate post-procedure
Secondary outcomes (2)
State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI: Y-6 item)
The State-Trait Anxiety Inventory uses a 4 point Likert scale to assess how much worry, tension or apprehension the subject experiences in his or her present circumstances (state anxiety) and how much anxiety represent a personality characteristic (trait anxiety). Items emphasize the frequency of particular symptoms (ranging from 1 = not at all to 4 = very much). The range of possible scores for form Y of the STAI varies from a minimum score of 20 to a maximum score of 80 on both the STAI-T and STAI-S subscales. STAI scores are commonly classified as "no or low anxiety" (20-37), "moderate anxiety" (38-44), and "high anxiety" (45-80).
Measured: Immediate post-procedure
Patient Satisfaction
Patients in both groups will be asked to rate their satisfaction with their procedures using a five point likert scale (ranging from 1 = definitely disagree to 5 = definitely agree).
Measured: Immediate post-procedure
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted5 Feb 2020
- Study start13 Jan 2021
- Primary completion7 Jan 2022
- Study completion7 Jan 2022
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (11)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Breast Neoplasm FemaleStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 60 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Prisma Health-Upstate
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Clemson University
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Andrea Nisonson, MD, Principal investigator, Prisma Health-Upstate
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04251507
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- Pro00092817
- Status last verified
- Apr 2022
- First submitted
- 29 Jan 2020
- Last updated
- 24 Sep 2024
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Breivik H, Borchgrevink PC, Allen SM, Rosseland LA, Romundstad L, Hals EK, Kvarstein G, Stubhaug A. Assessment of pain. Br J Anaesth. 2008 Jul;101(1):17-24. doi: 10.1093/bja/aen103. Epub 2008 May 16.
PubMed 18487245Chirico A, Lucidi F, De Laurentiis M, Milanese C, Napoli A, Giordano A. Virtual Reality in Health System: Beyond Entertainment. A Mini-Review on the Efficacy of VR During Cancer Treatment. J Cell Physiol. 2016 Feb;231(2):275-87. doi: 10.1002/jcp.25117.
PubMed 26238976Hornblow AR, Kidson MA. The visual analogue scale for anxiety: a validation study. Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 1976 Dec;10(4):339-41. doi: 10.3109/00048677609159523. No abstract available.
PubMed 1071419Mahrer NE, Gold JI. The use of virtual reality for pain control: a review. Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2009 Apr;13(2):100-9. doi: 10.1007/s11916-009-0019-8.
PubMed 19272275Malloy KM, Milling LS. The effectiveness of virtual reality distraction for pain reduction: a systematic review. Clin Psychol Rev. 2010 Dec;30(8):1011-8. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2010.07.001. Epub 2010 Jul 13.
PubMed 20691523Bloomquist EV, Ajkay N, Patil S, Collett AE, Frazier TG, Barrio AV. A Randomized Prospective Comparison of Patient-Assessed Satisfaction and Clinical Outcomes with Radioactive Seed Localization versus Wire Localization. Breast J. 2016 Mar-Apr;22(2):151-7. doi: 10.1111/tbj.12564. Epub 2015 Dec 23.
PubMed 26696461Costa WA, Monteiro MN, Queiroz JF, Goncalves AK. Pain and quality of life in breast cancer patients. Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2017 Dec;72(12):758-763. doi: 10.6061/clinics/2017(12)07.
PubMed 29319722Price DD, McGrath PA, Rafii A, Buckingham B. The validation of visual analogue scales as ratio scale measures for chronic and experimental pain. Pain. 1983 Sep;17(1):45-56. doi: 10.1016/0304-3959(83)90126-4.
PubMed 6226917Ratcliff CG, Prinsloo S, Chaoul A, Zepeda SG, Cannon R, Spelman A, Yang WT, Cohen L. A Randomized Controlled Trial of Brief Mindfulness Meditation for Women Undergoing Stereotactic Breast Biopsy. J Am Coll Radiol. 2019 May;16(5):691-699. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2018.09.009. Epub 2018 Oct 12.
PubMed 30322793Walker MR, Kallingal GJ, Musser JE, Folen R, Stetz MC, Clark JY. Treatment efficacy of virtual reality distraction in the reduction of pain and anxiety during cystoscopy. Mil Med. 2014 Aug;179(8):891-6. doi: 10.7205/MILMED-D-13-00343.
PubMed 25102532Wiederhold MD, Gao K, Wiederhold BK. Clinical use of virtual reality distraction system to reduce anxiety and pain in dental procedures. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2014 Jun;17(6):359-65. doi: 10.1089/cyber.2014.0203.
PubMed 24892198
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 24 Sep 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- The Use of Virtual Reality During Breast Localization Procedures
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04251507
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- Pro00092817
- Conditions
- Breast Neoplasm Female
- Keywords
- Virtual Reality, Pain, Anxiety, Ultrasound Guided Needle Localization
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 60 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Prisma Health-UpstateUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Clemson University
- Study start
- 13 Jan 2021 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 7 Jan 2022 (actual)
- Study completion
- 7 Jan 2022 (actual)
- First posted
- 5 Feb 2020 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
To determine if a virtual reality simulation will reduce pain and anxiety in patients undergoing an ultrasound guided breast localization procedure (traditional wire, savi scout or a radiofrequency identification tag).
Detailed description
Needle localizations for breast cancer surgery are required to identify cancerous tissue before surgery. Currently this procedure is done with or without a local anesthetic. Patients report anxiety regarding cancer and cancer-related procedures. Different types of needle localization may have different pain and anxiety based on their duration, complexity, and invasiveness. This research is designed to determine if VR simulated environment can reduce pain and anxiety.
Our aim is to study the efficacy of a virtual environment in reducing pain and procedural anxiety. It is intended for patients undergoing an ultrasound guided breast localization procedure that have had an abnormal breast biopsy. The overall aim is to discover an efficacious nonpharmacologic method to lower pain and anxiety during a standard of care procedure.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Virtual Reality Goggles | Experimental | Device: Oculus Go Virtual Reality GogglesPatients randomized to the intervention group will undergo their procedure as standard of care but will wear the Oculus Go Goggles and experience a virtual reality simulation. The simulation is a non-interactive polar theme video. |
| Control | No intervention | –Patients randomized to the control group will undergo their procedure as standard of care without the use of virtual reality goggles. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Informed consent is obtained from the patient
- Females ≥ 18 years of age
- Patient is schedule for preoperative ultrasound guided breast localization procedure
Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Patient is scheduled for or switched to a stereotactic localization procedure
- The patient has motion sickness
- The patient has severe cognitive disabilities or language barriers that inhibit study form completion in English
- Refusal of patient to sign consent
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Oculus Go Virtual Reality GogglesOculus Go is a standalone portable Virtual Reality device that enables the user to immerse in different virtual environments.Non pharmacological technique to reduce pain and anxiety during a procedure. | Device | Virtual Reality Goggles |
Primary outcome
Subjective Pain Assessment: Visual Analog Scale
Time frame: Immediate post-procedure
Pain Measured with the Visual Analog Scale. Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) is a measurement instrument that tries to measure a characteristic or attitude that is believed to range across a continuum of values and cannot easily be directly measured. The individual will score their pain level by circling a number 0 - 10 at baseline, pre-operative, and post-operatively. The scale range includes 0-10 scales, with < 2 =well controlled, 2 - 5: partly controlled, > 5: uncontrolled.
2 secondary outcomes
State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI: Y-6 item)
Time frame: Immediate post-procedure
Patient Satisfaction
Time frame: Immediate post-procedure
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 24 Sep 2024.
- Background: PubMed 18487245Breivik H, Borchgrevink PC, Allen SM, Rosseland LA, Romundstad L, Hals EK, Kvarstein G, Stubhaug A. Assessment of pain. Br J Anaesth. 2008 Jul;101(1):17-24. doi: 10.1093/bja/aen103. Epub 2008 May 16.
- Background: PubMed 26238976Chirico A, Lucidi F, De Laurentiis M, Milanese C, Napoli A, Giordano A. Virtual Reality in Health System: Beyond Entertainment. A Mini-Review on the Efficacy of VR During Cancer Treatment. J Cell Physiol. 2016 Feb;231(2):275-87. doi: 10.1002/jcp.25117.
- Background: PubMed 1071419Hornblow AR, Kidson MA. The visual analogue scale for anxiety: a validation study. Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 1976 Dec;10(4):339-41. doi: 10.3109/00048677609159523. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 19272275Mahrer NE, Gold JI. The use of virtual reality for pain control: a review. Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2009 Apr;13(2):100-9. doi: 10.1007/s11916-009-0019-8.
- Background: PubMed 20691523Malloy KM, Milling LS. The effectiveness of virtual reality distraction for pain reduction: a systematic review. Clin Psychol Rev. 2010 Dec;30(8):1011-8. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2010.07.001. Epub 2010 Jul 13.
- Results publication: PubMed 26696461Bloomquist EV, Ajkay N, Patil S, Collett AE, Frazier TG, Barrio AV. A Randomized Prospective Comparison of Patient-Assessed Satisfaction and Clinical Outcomes with Radioactive Seed Localization versus Wire Localization. Breast J. 2016 Mar-Apr;22(2):151-7. doi: 10.1111/tbj.12564. Epub 2015 Dec 23.
- Results publication: PubMed 29319722Costa WA, Monteiro MN, Queiroz JF, Goncalves AK. Pain and quality of life in breast cancer patients. Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2017 Dec;72(12):758-763. doi: 10.6061/clinics/2017(12)07.
- Results publication: PubMed 6226917Price DD, McGrath PA, Rafii A, Buckingham B. The validation of visual analogue scales as ratio scale measures for chronic and experimental pain. Pain. 1983 Sep;17(1):45-56. doi: 10.1016/0304-3959(83)90126-4.
- Results publication: PubMed 30322793Ratcliff CG, Prinsloo S, Chaoul A, Zepeda SG, Cannon R, Spelman A, Yang WT, Cohen L. A Randomized Controlled Trial of Brief Mindfulness Meditation for Women Undergoing Stereotactic Breast Biopsy. J Am Coll Radiol. 2019 May;16(5):691-699. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2018.09.009. Epub 2018 Oct 12.
- Results publication: PubMed 25102532Walker MR, Kallingal GJ, Musser JE, Folen R, Stetz MC, Clark JY. Treatment efficacy of virtual reality distraction in the reduction of pain and anxiety during cystoscopy. Mil Med. 2014 Aug;179(8):891-6. doi: 10.7205/MILMED-D-13-00343.
- Results publication: PubMed 24892198Wiederhold MD, Gao K, Wiederhold BK. Clinical use of virtual reality distraction system to reduce anxiety and pain in dental procedures. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2014 Jun;17(6):359-65. doi: 10.1089/cyber.2014.0203.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Breast Neoplasm Female
Active, not recruitingPhase 1/2
A Beta-only IL-2 ImmunoTherapY Study
Advanced Solid Tumor, Unresectable Solid Tumor
RecruitingPhase 2
Targeted Therapy Directed by Genetic Testing in Treating Patients With Locally Advanced or Advanced Solid Tumors, The ComboMATCH Screening Trial
Advanced Malignant Solid Neoplasm, Anatomic Stage III Breast Cancer AJCC v8
Recruiting
Mainstreaming Genetics: Evaluation of a Digital Application to Scale and Spread Oncologist-initiated Genetic Testing
Cancer, Breast Cancer
RecruitingObservational study
Real World Treatment Experience of Patients With Breast, Lung, Ovarian, Multiple Myeloma, or Acute Myelogenous Leukemia Using Remote Symptom Monitoring
Breast Cancer, Lung Cancer
RecruitingPhase 2
Administration of Autologous T-Cells Genetically Engineered to Express T-Cell Receptors Reactive Against Neoantigens in People With Metastatic Cancer
Endocrine Tumors, Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Andrea Nisonson, MD principal investigator
Prisma Health-Upstate
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Oculus Go Virtual Reality Goggles in people with Breast Neoplasm Female, run by Prisma Health-Upstate at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 24 Sep 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Subjective Pain Assessment: Visual Analog Scale (time frame: Immediate post-procedure). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04251507, which also lists 11 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 24 Sep 2024.