AzTrials
AzTrials

OsteoporosisTEOBASONCT04253340

Study of a Bone Assessment Technique, Bone Mineral Analyser, Concerning the Prediction of Improvement in Bone Status After an Infusion of Zoledronic Acid in Osteoporotic Women

A study testing Bone mineral analyser in people with Osteoporosis, run by University Hospital, Rouen.

Withdrawn

Withdrawn. The study stopped before anyone enrolled.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Collection of epidemiological data Biological assessment as part of routine care. Measurement of the Hurst coefficient at D0 Measurement of bone density and TBS on D0 Zoledronic acid infusion the month following inclusion phone call at 1 month (observance of zoledronic acid) Measurement of bone density, calculation of… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 85 years, women only
Conditions the study is for
Osteoporosis
What is being tested?
Bone mineral analyser
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
0 participants
Where
No sites listed yet
Study dates
1 Mar 2020to 1 Mar 2023
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 85 years
  • Women only
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Women < 85 years old
  • Postmenopausal women (amenorrhea for more than 12 months), a confirmation diagnosis should be obtained (amenorrhea for at least 12 months before the inclusion visit).
  • Post-menopausal osteoporosis with one or more severe fractures (upper end of the humerus, femur, or tibia; 3 adjacent ribs; lower end of the femur; thoracic or lumbar spine; pelvis), or T score <-3 which justifies setting up a bisphosphonate treatment
  • Affiliated to social security

Who cannot join

  • Contraindication to zoledronic acid (allergy to the product, creatinine clearance <35 ml / min, hypocalcemia, open and unhealed lesions of the soft tissues of the mouth)
  • Hormone replacement therapy taken in the last 12 months
  • Osteoprotective treatment (bisphosphonates, teriparatide, raloxifene, strontium ralenate or denosumab) taken in the last 12 months
  • Secondary osteoporosis: hyperthyroidism, hyperparathyroidism, long-term corticosteroid therapy, hypercorticism, hypogonadism, treatment with anti aromatases / LHRH analogues, neoplastic pathology (solid or hemopathy)
  • History of bilateral wrist or femur fracture
  • Person deprived of liberty by an administrative or judicial decision or person placed under the protection of justice / guardianship or curatorship
  • Patient participating in another trial / having participated in another trial within 6 months

About this study

  • Collection of epidemiological data
  • Biological assessment as part of routine care.
  • Measurement of the Hurst coefficient at D0
  • Measurement of bone density and TBS on D0
  • Zoledronic acid infusion the month following inclusion
  • phone call at 1 month (observance of zoledronic acid)
  • Measurement of bone density, calculation of the Hurst coefficient at M12
Conditions
Osteoporosis
Being tested
Bone mineral analyser
Medical subject headings
Osteoporosis

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Bone mineral analyserDiagnostic test

    high resolution digital radiology (200 µm): D0 + M12 Trabecular Bone Score:D0 + M12 DXA scan:D0 + M12

Study groups in NCT04253340
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Bone mineral analyserExperimentalDiagnostic Test: Bone mineral analyser high resolution digital radiology (200 µm): D0 + M12 Trabecular Bone Score:D0 + M12 DXA scan:D0 + M12
Receives: Diagnostic Test: Bone mineral analyser

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Hurst coefficient

    measured by the BMA

    Measured: Day 0

Secondary outcomes (5)
  1. Hurst coefficient

    measured by the BMA

    Measured: Month 12

  2. bone texture parameters

    bone texture parameters measured by Trabecular Bone Score

    Measured: Day 0

  3. bone texture parameters

    bone texture parameters measured by Trabecular Bone Score

    Measured: Month 12

  4. Bone mineral density

    Bone mineral density measured by DXA scan

    Measured: Day 0

  5. Bone mineral density

    Bone mineral density measured by DXA scan

    Measured: Month12

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted5 Feb 2020
  2. Study start1 Mar 2020 (estimated)
  3. Primary completion1 Mar 2023 (estimated)
  4. Study completion1 Mar 2023 (estimated)

Why it stopped: Non-functional BMA machine.

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
0 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04253340
Sponsor's protocol ID
2017/183/HP
Acronym
TEOBASO
Status last verified
Feb 2026
First submitted
29 Jan 2020
Last updated
5 Jun 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Bone mineral analyser in people with Osteoporosis, run by University Hospital, Rouen.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: withdrawn, as of the sponsor's last update on 5 Jun 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study was withdrawn before enrolling participants, so there are no results.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Hurst coefficient (time frame: Day 0). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 5 Jun 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in