AzTrials
AzTrials

Outpatient SurgeryPhase 2/3NCT04254679

Pilot Trial: Postoperative Opioid-free Analgesia

A Phase 2/3 study testing Opioid analgesics and Non-opioid analgesics in people with Outpatient Surgery and Abdominal Surgery, run by McGill University Health Centre/Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre at 1 site in Canada.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

North America is facing an opioid epidemic fueled by surgeons, who are the second largest subgroup of physicians involved in opioid prescribing. Surgery often serves as the initial event for opioid-naïve patients to obtain a prescription for opioids and spiral into misuse and addiction. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
What is being tested?
Opioid analgesics and Non-opioid analgesics
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
81 participants
Where
1 siteCanada
Study dates
29 Jan 2020to 3 Dec 2020
Phase
Phase 2/3
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Adult patients (>18 yo) undergoing outpatient surgery
  • Abdominal surgery (i.e. cholecystectomies, hernia repairs, ovarian cystectomies, salpingectomies)
  • Breast surgery (i.e. lumpectomies, partial and complete mastectomies, axillary node dissections)

Who cannot join

  • All patients
  • Intraoperative or early postoperative complications (i.e. diagnosed in the Post-Anesthesia Care Unit (PACU)) that require postoperative hospital stay
  • Contraindications to any of the drugs used in the trial
  • Difficult to be reached after surgery
  • Inability to provide written informed consent

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Canada1 site
  • McGill University Health Centre

    Montreal, Quebec, H3G 1A4

Other trials in Canada

About this study

Official title: Opioid-free Analgesia After Outpatient General Surgery: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial

North America is facing an opioid epidemic fueled by surgeons, who are the second largest subgroup of physicians involved in opioid prescribing. Surgery often serves as the initial event for opioid-naïve patients to obtain a prescription for opioids and spiral into misuse and addiction. From the perspective of perioperative care clinicians, the answer to the opioid crisis may be using opioid-free analgesia. However, the number of comparative studies in this field is limited and existing small trials do not reflect current standards of care in North America. Lack of evidence means that the decision to prescribe opioids after outpatient surgery largely depends on surgeon preference and healthcare culture. Hence, there is an urgent need for a robust randomized controlled trial (RCT) to guide clinical decision-making. The feasibility and optimal design of this RCT should be informed by a pilot trial. The overarching goal of this pilot RCT is to investigate the feasibility of conducting a full-scale RCT to assess the comparative-effectiveness of opioid versus opioid-free analgesia after outpatient general surgery.

Read the detailed description

This study will be a pragmatic, parallel, two-group, assessor-blind, pilot RCT. The investigators aim to recruit 80 adult patients at two tertiary hospitals in Montreal. Eligibility criteria will span outpatient procedures in abdominal and breast surgery. Patients are randomized on a 1:1 ratio to treatment with either opioid (standard care) or without opioid (only non-opioid analgesics). Patients will be followed up for 3 months after surgery; postoperative day (POD) 1 to POD 7 and at 2, 3 and 4 weeks after surgery, and at 3 months. Assessments will include postoperative pain, physical and mental function, adverse drug events, prolonged opioid use and opioid misuse. Feasibility outcomes will include the number of patients screened, consented and randomized, adherence with treatment and completion of follow-up. Data from this pilot study will inform the calculation of sample size requirements for the full-scale RCT. An embedded qualitative study will be conducted to help optimize trial design based on clinicians' and patients' perspective.

Being tested
Opioid analgesics, Non-opioid analgesics
Keywords
Opioids, Surgery, Postoperative Period, Postoperative Pain, Analgesia, Pain Management
Medical subject headings
Pain, Postoperative, Agnosia

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Opioid analgesicsDrug

    Current standard of care in the participating centers Prescription of around-the-clock non-opioid analgesics (acetaminophen and/or NSAIDs/COX-2) and a supply of opioids to be used as a rescue in case of breakthrough pain.

    The specific round-the-clock analgesia and rescue opioid regimens will be determined by the patient's primary surgeon considering the surgical procedure, comorbidities and patient's preference.

  • Non-opioid analgesicsDrug

    Prescription of around-the-clock non-opioid analgesics (acetaminophen alone or combined with NSAIDs/COX-2).

    The specific non-opioid analgesia regimens will be determined by the patient's primary surgeon considering the surgical procedure, comorbidities and patient's preference.

Study groups in NCT04254679
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Opioid analgesiaExperimentalNot described
Receives: Drug: Opioid analgesics
Opioid-free analgesiaActive comparatorNot described
Receives: Drug: Non-opioid analgesics

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Percentage of Screened Participants Who Were Eligible to Participate in the Study

    At least 70% of patients undergoing the outpatient general surgery procedures of interest (screened participants) are eligible to be randomized.

    Measured: 4 months

  2. Percentage of Surgeons Agreeing and Adhering to Patient Randomization

    At least 90% of the surgeons who agreed to have their patients randomized comply with the agreement (i.e. not change their minds).

    Measured: 4 months

  3. Percentage of Eligible Patients Agreeing to Participate

    At least 50% of eligible patients agree to participate in the study and are randomized.

    Measured: 4 months

  4. Percentage of Randomized Patients Complying With Allocated Treatment

    At least 80% of the randomized patients comply with their allocated treatment (i.e. will take their pain medications as prescribed).

    Measured: 4 months

  5. Percentage of Randomized Patients Completing the 30-day Postoperative Outcome Assessment

    At least 80% of the randomized patients complete outcome assessment at 30 days after surgery.

    Measured: 4 months

  6. Percentage of Missing Data Among All Questionnaires Distributed to Patients Who Completed the Assessments

    Among all questionnaires distributed to patients who complete outcome assessments, the proportion of missing data (i.e. non-response to questionnaires) is less than 10%.

    Measured: 4 months

  7. Percentage of Missing Data Among All Questionnaire Items Distributed to Patients Who Completed the Assessments

    Among patients who complete outcome assessments, the proportion of missing data is less than 10% (i.e. non-response to specific questionnaire items).

    Measured: 4 months

Secondary outcomes (10)
  1. Postoperative Pain

    Measured using the Brief Pain Inventory Short-Form, which addresses pain severity and interference in the last 24 hours. Scores range from 0 to 10; higher scores represent worse pain outcomes.

    Measured: 30 days.

  2. Time to Stopping Pain Medication

    The time to the first report of stopping the use of pain medication.

    Measured: 30 days.

  3. Postoperative Health Status

    Measured using the PROMIS-29 questionnaire, which assesses 7 domains of health (physical function, anxiety, depression, fatigue, sleep disturbance, ability to participate in social roles and activities, and pain interference). Norm-based scores are calculated for each domain, such that a score of 50 represents the mean of the general population (standard deviation=10). Higher scores represent more of the domain being measured.

    Measured: Weeks 1, 2, 3 and 4 after surgery.

  4. Opioid Side-effects

    Measured using the Perioperative Opioid-Related Symptom Distress Scale, which records symptom distress due to common adverse effects experienced by patients who receive opioids to relieve postoperative pain.

    The reported rates indicate the number of reported events per period of evaluation.

    Measured: Postoperative days 1 to 7, weeks 2, 3 and 4 after surgery

  5. Rate of Opioid Misuse

    Measured using the Prescription Opioid Misuse Index, which includes questions regarding excessive dose, frequency of use, need for early refills, feeling high from the medication, taking the medication due to stress and obtaining prescriptions from multiple physicians. Scores range from 0 to 6; an affirmative answer to >1 question indicates the patient exhibits prescription opioid misuse.

    Measured: 4 weeks

  6. Postoperative Complications Classification

    Graded by severity using the Dindo-Clavien classification. This system grades complications according to the therapy needed for treatment (grades I to IV, best to worse).

    Grade I: Any deviation from the normal postoperative course without the need for pharmacological treatment or surgical, endoscopic, and radiological interventions.

    Grade II: Complications requiring drug treatments other than those allowed for Grade I complications; this includes blood transfusion and total parenteral nutrition (TPN) Grade III: Complications requiring surgical, endoscopic or radiological intervention Grade IIIa - intervention not under general anaesthetic Grade IIIb - intervention under general anaesthetic

    Measured: 30 days.

  7. Rate of Unplanned Healthcare Utilization

    Emergency department visits, hospital readmissions.

    Measured: 30 days.

  8. Rate of Adverse Drug Events

    Obtained from spontaneous patient reporting (Trigger question "Did you have any significant medical problem related or unrelated to your surgery since the last study assessment?"). Events were coded using the MedDRA coding dictionary, graded by severity according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) and assessed for potential causality using the WHO/UMC system.

    Measured: 30 days after surgery

  9. Rate of Prolonged Opioid Use

    Filling of opioid prescriptions up to 3 months after surgery.

    Measured: 3 months

  10. Comprehensive Complication Index at 30-day

    Measured using the Comprehensive Complication Index score at 30 after surgery. The score ranges from 0 to 100; higher scores indicate greater severity of complications.

    Measured: 30 days

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted5 Feb 2020
  2. Study start29 Jan 2020
  3. Primary completion20 Sep 2020
  4. Study completion3 Dec 2020

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 2/3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
This study will be a parallel, two-group, assessor-blind, pilot randomized trial.
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
81 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04254679
Sponsor's protocol ID
MUHC REB 2020-5965
Status last verified
Sep 2024
First submitted
30 Jan 2020
Last updated
20 Nov 2024
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Publications

  • Do U, El-Kefraoui C, Pook M, Balvardi S, Barone N, Nguyen-Powanda P, Lee L, Baldini G, Feldman LS, Fiore JF Jr; McGill Better Opioid Prescribing Collaboration; Alhashemi M, Antoun A, Barkun JS, Brecht KM, Chaudhury PK, Deckelbaum D, Di Lena E, Dumitra S, Elhaj H, Fata P, Fleiszer D, Fried GM, Grushka J, Kaneva P, Khwaja K, Lapointe-Gagner M, McKendy KM, Meguerditchian AN, Meterissian SH, Montgomery H, Rajabiyazdi F, Safa N, Touma N, Tremblay F. Feasibility of Prospectively Comparing Opioid Analgesia With Opioid-Free Analgesia After Outpatient General Surgery: A Pilot Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Jul 1;5(7):e2221430. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.21430.

    PubMed 35849399

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 2/3 study testing Opioid analgesics and Non-opioid analgesics in people with Outpatient Surgery and Abdominal Surgery, run by McGill University Health Centre/Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre at 1 site in Canada.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 20 Nov 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this combined phase mean?

Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.

Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 20 Nov 2024). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Percentage of Screened Participants Who Were Eligible to Participate in the Study (time frame: 4 months). The study lists 7 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04254679, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 20 Nov 2024.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in