CancerNCT04255030
An Adaptive Dyadic Self-directed Coping and Self-management Skills Training Intervention for Caregivers of Individuals With Cancer
A study testing Coping Together Booklets and Workbook, Lay telephone coaching and Motivational Interviewing in people with Cancer and Anxiety, run by St. Mary's Research Center, Canada at 1 site in Canada.
Trial summary
High-quality cancer care in Canada relies on family caregivers. Since cancer treatment is provided more and more in outpatient clinics, family caregivers now provide most of the support and care patients need when they return home. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
- What is being tested?
- Coping Together Booklets and Workbook, Lay telephone coaching and Motivational Interviewing
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 87 participants
- Where
- 1 siteCanada
- Study dates
- 1 Nov 2019to 18 Aug 2022
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Stages I-III primary breast, prostate, or colorectal cancer diagnosis within the past 6 months
- receiving/planning to receive treatment (including surgery, radiotherapy, chemotherapy, and/or hormone therapy)
- nominates a caregiver (spouse, partner, or other family member) willing to participate
- patient and or caregiver with low-moderate anxiety at recruitment
- regular access to a computer with internet and e-mail capabilities,
Who cannot join
- caregiver receiving treatment for cancer
- patient or caregiver is hospitalized
- or has suicidal intent,
- or is receiving psychological treatment
- or has in the past 6 months participated in a coping or self-management program
- or has severe anxiety
- or has moderate-severe cognitive impairment
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: An Adaptive Dyadic Self-directed Coping and Self-management Skills Training Intervention for Caregivers of Individuals With Cancer: A Pilot Sequential Multiple Assignment Randomized Trial (SMART) Design
High-quality cancer care in Canada relies on family caregivers. Since cancer treatment is provided more and more in outpatient clinics, family caregivers now provide most of the support and care patients need when they return home. The problem is that caregivers often do not feel they have the knowledge and skills to fulfill this role, especially as caregivers often confront tasks once performed by health care professionals. As a result, caregivers experience high levels of burden and need more help to handle the demands of their role. Programs that enhance caregivers' knowledge and prepare them for their role can have positive effects on their well-being. However, these programs are not available in routine cancer care. They just take too much time and personnel and are too expensive. This limited access to resources reduces caregivers' ability to cope and affects their quality of life. If the ultimate goal is to integrate these programs in cancer care, cost-effective service delivery models are needed. One approach that rises to this challenge and is effective is the self-directed format. A self-directed format requires less support from clinicians and is available to individuals when it is most convenient to them. The research team recently developed and evaluated the first self-directed coping skills training intervention for cancer caregivers called Coping-Together. Although self-directed interventions offer the scalability needed for public health interventions, up to 60% of caregivers do not improve after receiving this type of intervention. These caregivers require more support. This innovative trial design will help determine whether changing the type and level of support provided can increase the number of caregivers who improve after receiving Coping-Together. This type of innovative trial design is more and more popular, but has never been used to enhance the feasibility, acceptability, and efficacy of caregiver interventions.
Read the detailed description
BACKGROUND: Despite improvements in detection and treatment, a cancer diagnosis is appraised as a negative event not only by the person diagnosed, but also by their family caregivers. Cancer is the second most common condition in Canada requiring assistance from caregivers, and caregivers are now taking on more than ever complex illness management roles traditionally performed by health care professionals (HCPs). This is in part attributed to the cost containment climate of the current health care system; there is an increased reliance on community-based care to manage the burden of cancer care on formal care settings. Caregivers' support reduces demands on the formal health care system and positively impacts on patients' adjustment. However, caregivers often take on their roles with little formal support. This results in high anxiety and low quality of life (QOL). In recognition of this, numerous interventions have been developed and found to be efficacious in reducing caregivers' anxiety and increasing their QOL. Unfortunately, these interventions are often time- and resource-intensive, making them too costly for integration in routine care. As more sustainable modes of intervention delivery are required, one format that holds promise is to use a self-directed format (i.e., low-intensity intervention). However, previous research by the team has shown that up to 60% of caregivers do not respond to these types of interventions alone and require additional support. An innovative trial design to developing time-varying, adaptive interventions to maximize clinical effectiveness is the Sequential multiple assignment randomized trials (SMARTs). However, despite increasing popularity, SMARTs remain relatively new to intervention researchers.
OBJECTIVES: The goal of this pilot SMART is to inform the planning of a subsequent larger SMART to evaluate an adaptive dyadic coping and self-management skill training intervention that follows a stepped-care model for caregivers of individuals with cancer. The primary objective of this pilot SMART is to examine the (a) feasibility of the trial procedures and of offering different levels and types of support alongside a self-directed coping and self-management skills training intervention and (b) acceptability of the combinations of the intervention according to patients and their caregivers. The secondary objective is to estimate the clinical significance of adapting the type and level of support provided on the primary and secondary outcomes.
METHODOLOGY: Study activities will be coordinated out of St Mary's Research Centre in Montreal. Weekly, at the McGill University Health Centre (MUHC), St. Mary's Hospital Center, and Ottawa Hospital, a research assistant (RA), along with the treating clinician, will screen new patient records and identify those who meet the medical inclusion criteria. At the time of their scheduled appointment, clinicians will introduce the study to eligible patients and obtain permission for a RA to approach them. The RA will then either complete the screening interview with patients and their caregivers on site, or follow up by telephone to complete the interview. Those eligible will be emailed the link to the consent form and baseline (T0) questionnaire. At BC Cancer Agency and Princess Margaret Cancer Care Centre, posters will be displayed and patients/caregivers will be informed of the study by the Patient and Family Counseling Services team and other health care team members. Patients will be invited to self-refer by calling the RA directly using the toll free number provided. Community-based recruitment will include advertising the study through social media. This strategy will be led by the Environics Research Group who recruited participants for a previous CIHR team grant.
Investigators aim to recruit 56 patients with a primary breast, prostate, or colorectal cancer diagnosis in the previous 6 months.
Inclusion criteria are:
- receiving/planning to receive treatment,
- having a caregiver willing to participate
- access to the internet,
- patient or caregiver screening positive for anxiety.
Patient-caregiver dyads returning their consent forms and baseline questionnaires (T0) will be randomized by the study coordinator to either: (a) Coping-Together - a 6-week self-directed, dyadic coping and self-management skills training intervention or (b) Coping-Together plus brief, weekly lay telephone coaching. At the end of 6 weeks, intervention response will be assessed by the RA (T1) based on the change in patients' and caregivers' anxiety (primary tailoring variable). Across both groups, non-responders will then be randomized a second time to either (a) continue with their first stage intervention or (b) begin telephone-based self-management counseling for another 6 weeks (either with a lay coach if self-directed for the first six weeks or with a health professional if coached for the first six weeks). Responders will continue with usual care. All participants will then complete their follow-up questionnaire (T2) to examine changes in anxiety and QOL (primary outcomes), depression, self-management skills, illness appraisal, and coping (secondary outcomes). Acceptability will also be assessed in this questionnaire and further explored during an exit interview with dyads. Feasibility measures will focus on the characteristics of the dyads reached, protocol fidelity, percent of missing data, and recruitment and retention rates.
SIGNIFICANCE: The ability of caregivers to maintain their QOL despite the stressors they face is undermined by limited access to the support needed. This study will develop and evaluate the first adaptive interventions for this population, and address a significant research gap by documenting its acceptability, feasibility, and clinical significance. Despite advocacy for caregiver support, no other Canadian study has examined how potentially cost-effective interventions can be combined to meet caregivers' needs. Collaboration with six cancer centers will accelerate the uptake of findings.
- Being tested
- Coping Together Booklets and Workbook, Lay telephone coaching, Motivational Interviewing
- Keywords
- Caregiver, Self-directed interventions, Coping, Self-management, Stepped care, Psychosocial oncology, Cancer, Sequential Multiple Assignment Randomized Trial (SMART)
- Medical subject headings
- Neoplasms, Anxiety Disorders
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Coping Together Booklets and WorkbookBehavioural
Dyads in this group will complete Coping-Together, a 6-week, booklet-based, self-directed coping and self-management skills training intervention. This intervention addresses key psychosocial challenges by offering evidence-based practical skills to: (a) manage symptoms, (b) cope with anxiety, (c) collaborate with the health care team, (d) engage in shared decision-making, (e) communicate with partner and family, and/or (f) obtain the community resources needed. A relaxation CD is also included, in addition to a workbook that accompanies the Coping-Together booklet-based intervention. The workbook aims at helping dyads choose a booklet relevant to their cancer-related challenges faced, find coping skills that best meet these challenges, and make a plan to use one of the coping skills successfully.
Lay telephone coachingBehavioural
Dyads will receive Coping-Together support via weekly telephone calls from a lay coach. Sessions will range between 10-15 minutes. The goal of coaching will be to provide information on how to use the workbook and booklets. Although no formal therapy will be provided, the coach will maintain a positive and encouraging attitude when interacting with participants regardless of their adherence to the intervention recommendations. The sessions will start with the coach setting a predetermined agenda based on the section of the workbook to review that week that week. Then, coaches will ask about the use of the booklets over the previous week, and ask participants about any required support or clarification in using the booklets. Sessions conclude with setting a goal related to the workbook, booklets and/or coping technique to focus on over the coming week.
Motivational InterviewingBehavioural
Six, 45-60 minute weekly telephone-based sessions with a trained Motivational Interviewing Specialist to progress toward goals. Here, dyads are given one-on-one guidance from a HCP Motivational Interviewing Specialist to practice the skills they need. Calls will focus on problem-solving principles and core components of self-management (70), including: (a) identifying dyads' concerns, (b) reviewing management efforts, (c) identifying goals, (d) identifying skills needed to achieve goals, and (e) addressing barriers to applying skills to current situations, including level of self-efficacy. At each meeting, progress, subsequent goals, and corresponding plans will be discussed.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| First stage: Self-directed Coping Together | Experimental | Not described Receives: Behavioral: Coping Together Booklets and Workbook |
| First stage: Minimally guided telephone support (lay coaching) | Experimental | Not described Receives: Behavioral: Coping Together Booklets and Workbook; Behavioral: Lay telephone coaching |
| Second stage: High intensity Motivational Interviewing (MI) | Experimental | Not described Receives: Behavioral: Coping Together Booklets and Workbook; Behavioral: Motivational Interviewing |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Consent and follow-up rates
Number of consenting dyads per week over the recruitment period, with report on refusal and drop-out rates and reasons.
Measured: From recruitment launch to completion of follow-up (9 months)
Data completion rate
Investigators will report on rates of missing data from pilot baseline and follow-up questionnaires.
Measured: At T2: 13 weeks
Fidelity of intervention delivery
Checklists will be used to assess if the interventions are delivered as per protocol
Measured: At T2: 13 weeks
Adherence to intervention
Rate of tool use and participation in the support sessions.
Measured: At T2: 13 weeks
Satisfaction with the intervention
Using a modified satisfaction questionnaire
Measured: At T2: 13 weeks
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted5 Feb 2020
- Study start1 Nov 2019
- Primary completion18 Aug 2022
- Study completion18 Aug 2022
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (2)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for CancerStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Sequential
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Investigator
- Enrolment
- 87 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- St. Mary's Research Center, Canada
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- McGill University
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Sylvie Lambert, St. Mary's Research Center, Canada
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04255030
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- SMHC 17 10
- Status last verified
- Oct 2022
- First submitted
- 1 Nov 2019
- Last updated
- 26 Oct 2022
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Wiesenfeld S, Lambert S, Laizner AM. A stepped-care approach to self-management: a qualitative study among individuals with cancer and their caregivers using the Coping-Together program. Support Care Cancer. 2025 Feb 10;33(3):170. doi: 10.1007/s00520-025-09175-5.
PubMed 39928172Lambert S, Moodie EEM, McCusker J, Lokhorst M, Harris C, Langmuir T, Belzile E, Laizner AM, Brahim LO, Wasserman S, Chehayeb S, Vickers M, Duncan L, Esplen MJ, Maheu C, Howell D, de Raad M. Translating Evidence-Based Self-Management Interventions Using a Stepped-Care Approach for Patients With Cancer and Their Caregivers: A Pilot Sequential Multiple Assignment Randomized Trial Design. Psychooncology. 2025 Jan;34(1):e70043. doi: 10.1002/pon.70043.
PubMed 39763142
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 26 Oct 2022. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- An Adaptive Dyadic Self-directed Coping and Self-management Skills Training Intervention for Caregivers of Individuals With Cancer: A Pilot Sequential Multiple Assignment Randomized Trial (SMART) Design
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04255030
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- SMHC 17 10
- Keywords
- Caregiver, Self-directed interventions, Coping, Self-management, Stepped care, Psychosocial oncology, Cancer, Sequential Multiple Assignment Randomized Trial (SMART)
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 87 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- St. Mary's Research Center, CanadaUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- McGill University
- Study start
- 1 Nov 2019 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 18 Aug 2022 (actual)
- Study completion
- 18 Aug 2022 (actual)
- First posted
- 5 Feb 2020 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
High-quality cancer care in Canada relies on family caregivers. Since cancer treatment is provided more and more in outpatient clinics, family caregivers now provide most of the support and care patients need when they return home. The problem is that caregivers often do not feel they have the knowledge and skills to fulfill this role, especially as caregivers often confront tasks once performed by health care professionals. As a result, caregivers experience high levels of burden and need more help to handle the demands of their role. Programs that enhance caregivers' knowledge and prepare them for their role can have positive effects on their well-being. However, these programs are not available in routine cancer care. They just take too much time and personnel and are too expensive. This limited access to resources reduces caregivers' ability to cope and affects their quality of life. If the ultimate goal is to integrate these programs in cancer care, cost-effective service delivery models are needed. One approach that rises to this challenge and is effective is the self-directed format. A self-directed format requires less support from clinicians and is available to individuals when it is most convenient to them. The research team recently developed and evaluated the first self-directed coping skills training intervention for cancer caregivers called Coping-Together. Although self-directed interventions offer the scalability needed for public health interventions, up to 60% of caregivers do not improve after receiving this type of intervention. These caregivers require more support. This innovative trial design will help determine whether changing the type and level of support provided can increase the number of caregivers who improve after receiving Coping-Together. This type of innovative trial design is more and more popular, but has never been used to enhance the feasibility, acceptability, and efficacy of caregiver interventions.
Detailed description
BACKGROUND: Despite improvements in detection and treatment, a cancer diagnosis is appraised as a negative event not only by the person diagnosed, but also by their family caregivers. Cancer is the second most common condition in Canada requiring assistance from caregivers, and caregivers are now taking on more than ever complex illness management roles traditionally performed by health care professionals (HCPs). This is in part attributed to the cost containment climate of the current health care system; there is an increased reliance on community-based care to manage the burden of cancer care on formal care settings. Caregivers' support reduces demands on the formal health care system and positively impacts on patients' adjustment. However, caregivers often take on their roles with little formal support. This results in high anxiety and low quality of life (QOL). In recognition of this, numerous interventions have been developed and found to be efficacious in reducing caregivers' anxiety and increasing their QOL. Unfortunately, these interventions are often time- and resource-intensive, making them too costly for integration in routine care. As more sustainable modes of intervention delivery are required, one format that holds promise is to use a self-directed format (i.e., low-intensity intervention). However, previous research by the team has shown that up to 60% of caregivers do not respond to these types of interventions alone and require additional support. An innovative trial design to developing time-varying, adaptive interventions to maximize clinical effectiveness is the Sequential multiple assignment randomized trials (SMARTs). However, despite increasing popularity, SMARTs remain relatively new to intervention researchers.
OBJECTIVES: The goal of this pilot SMART is to inform the planning of a subsequent larger SMART to evaluate an adaptive dyadic coping and self-management skill training intervention that follows a stepped-care model for caregivers of individuals with cancer. The primary objective of this pilot SMART is to examine the (a) feasibility of the trial procedures and of offering different levels and types of support alongside a self-directed coping and self-management skills training intervention and (b) acceptability of the combinations of the intervention according to patients and their caregivers. The secondary objective is to estimate the clinical significance of adapting the type and level of support provided on the primary and secondary outcomes.
METHODOLOGY: Study activities will be coordinated out of St Mary's Research Centre in Montreal. Weekly, at the McGill University Health Centre (MUHC), St. Mary's Hospital Center, and Ottawa Hospital, a research assistant (RA), along with the treating clinician, will screen new patient records and identify those who meet the medical inclusion criteria. At the time of their scheduled appointment, clinicians will introduce the study to eligible patients and obtain permission for a RA to approach them. The RA will then either complete the screening interview with patients and their caregivers on site, or follow up by telephone to complete the interview. Those eligible will be emailed the link to the consent form and baseline (T0) questionnaire. At BC Cancer Agency and Princess Margaret Cancer Care Centre, posters will be displayed and patients/caregivers will be informed of the study by the Patient and Family Counseling Services team and other health care team members. Patients will be invited to self-refer by calling the RA directly using the toll free number provided. Community-based recruitment will include advertising the study through social media. This strategy will be led by the Environics Research Group who recruited participants for a previous CIHR team grant.
Investigators aim to recruit 56 patients with a primary breast, prostate, or colorectal cancer diagnosis in the previous 6 months.
Inclusion criteria are:
- receiving/planning to receive treatment,
- having a caregiver willing to participate
- access to the internet,
- patient or caregiver screening positive for anxiety.
Patient-caregiver dyads returning their consent forms and baseline questionnaires (T0) will be randomized by the study coordinator to either: (a) Coping-Together - a 6-week self-directed, dyadic coping and self-management skills training intervention or (b) Coping-Together plus brief, weekly lay telephone coaching. At the end of 6 weeks, intervention response will be assessed by the RA (T1) based on the change in patients' and caregivers' anxiety (primary tailoring variable). Across both groups, non-responders will then be randomized a second time to either (a) continue with their first stage intervention or (b) begin telephone-based self-management counseling for another 6 weeks (either with a lay coach if self-directed for the first six weeks or with a health professional if coached for the first six weeks). Responders will continue with usual care. All participants will then complete their follow-up questionnaire (T2) to examine changes in anxiety and QOL (primary outcomes), depression, self-management skills, illness appraisal, and coping (secondary outcomes). Acceptability will also be assessed in this questionnaire and further explored during an exit interview with dyads. Feasibility measures will focus on the characteristics of the dyads reached, protocol fidelity, percent of missing data, and recruitment and retention rates.
SIGNIFICANCE: The ability of caregivers to maintain their QOL despite the stressors they face is undermined by limited access to the support needed. This study will develop and evaluate the first adaptive interventions for this population, and address a significant research gap by documenting its acceptability, feasibility, and clinical significance. Despite advocacy for caregiver support, no other Canadian study has examined how potentially cost-effective interventions can be combined to meet caregivers' needs. Collaboration with six cancer centers will accelerate the uptake of findings.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Sequential
- Masking
- Single blind (investigator)
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| First stage: Self-directed Coping Together | Experimental | Behavioral: Coping Together Booklets and Workbook |
| First stage: Minimally guided telephone support (lay coaching) | Experimental | Behavioral: Coping Together Booklets and Workbook, Behavioral: Lay telephone coaching |
| Second stage: High intensity Motivational Interviewing (MI) | Experimental | Behavioral: Coping Together Booklets and Workbook, Behavioral: Motivational Interviewing |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Stages I-III primary breast, prostate, or colorectal cancer diagnosis within the past 6 months
- receiving/planning to receive treatment (including surgery, radiotherapy, chemotherapy, and/or hormone therapy)
- nominates a caregiver (spouse, partner, or other family member) willing to participate
- patient and or caregiver with low-moderate anxiety at recruitment
- regular access to a computer with internet and e-mail capabilities,
Key exclusion criteria (7 listed)
- caregiver receiving treatment for cancer
- patient or caregiver is hospitalized
- or has suicidal intent,
- or is receiving psychological treatment
- or has in the past 6 months participated in a coping or self-management program
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Coping Together Booklets and WorkbookDyads in this group will complete Coping-Together, a 6-week, booklet-based, self-directed coping and self-management skills training intervention. This intervention addresses key psychosocial challenges by offering evidence-based practical skills to: (a) manage symptoms, (b) cope with anxiety, (c) collaborate with the health care team, (d) engage in shared decision-making, (e) communicate with partner and family, and/or (f) obtain the community resources needed. A relaxation CD is also included, in addition to a workbook that accompanies the Coping-Together booklet-based intervention. The workbook aims at helping dyads choose a booklet relevant to their cancer-related challenges faced, find coping skills that best meet these challenges, and make a plan to use one of the coping skills successfully. | Behavioural | First stage: Minimally guided telephone support (lay coaching), First stage: Self-directed Coping Together, Second stage: High intensity Motivational Interviewing (MI) |
| Lay telephone coachingDyads will receive Coping-Together support via weekly telephone calls from a lay coach. Sessions will range between 10-15 minutes. The goal of coaching will be to provide information on how to use the workbook and booklets. Although no formal therapy will be provided, the coach will maintain a positive and encouraging attitude when interacting with participants regardless of their adherence to the intervention recommendations. The sessions will start with the coach setting a predetermined agenda based on the section of the workbook to review that week that week. Then, coaches will ask about the use of the booklets over the previous week, and ask participants about any required support or clarification in using the booklets. Sessions conclude with setting a goal related to the workbook, booklets and/or coping technique to focus on over the coming week. | Behavioural | First stage: Minimally guided telephone support (lay coaching) |
| Motivational InterviewingSix, 45-60 minute weekly telephone-based sessions with a trained Motivational Interviewing Specialist to progress toward goals. Here, dyads are given one-on-one guidance from a HCP Motivational Interviewing Specialist to practice the skills they need. Calls will focus on problem-solving principles and core components of self-management (70), including: (a) identifying dyads' concerns, (b) reviewing management efforts, (c) identifying goals, (d) identifying skills needed to achieve goals, and (e) addressing barriers to applying skills to current situations, including level of self-efficacy. At each meeting, progress, subsequent goals, and corresponding plans will be discussed. | Behavioural | Second stage: High intensity Motivational Interviewing (MI) |
Primary outcome
Consent and follow-up rates
Time frame: From recruitment launch to completion of follow-up (9 months)
Number of consenting dyads per week over the recruitment period, with report on refusal and drop-out rates and reasons.
Data completion rate
Time frame: At T2: 13 weeks
Investigators will report on rates of missing data from pilot baseline and follow-up questionnaires.
Fidelity of intervention delivery
Time frame: At T2: 13 weeks
Checklists will be used to assess if the interventions are delivered as per protocol
Adherence to intervention
Time frame: At T2: 13 weeks
Rate of tool use and participation in the support sessions.
Satisfaction with the intervention
Time frame: At T2: 13 weeks
Using a modified satisfaction questionnaire
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 26 Oct 2022.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 39928172Wiesenfeld S, Lambert S, Laizner AM. A stepped-care approach to self-management: a qualitative study among individuals with cancer and their caregivers using the Coping-Together program. Support Care Cancer. 2025 Feb 10;33(3):170. doi: 10.1007/s00520-025-09175-5.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 39763142Lambert S, Moodie EEM, McCusker J, Lokhorst M, Harris C, Langmuir T, Belzile E, Laizner AM, Brahim LO, Wasserman S, Chehayeb S, Vickers M, Duncan L, Esplen MJ, Maheu C, Howell D, de Raad M. Translating Evidence-Based Self-Management Interventions Using a Stepped-Care Approach for Patients With Cancer and Their Caregivers: A Pilot Sequential Multiple Assignment Randomized Trial Design. Psychooncology. 2025 Jan;34(1):e70043. doi: 10.1002/pon.70043.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Cancer
RecruitingPhase 2
A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy of Cemsidomide + Dexamethasone in Participants With Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma
Multiple Myeloma, Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma
Not yet recruiting
Effect of a Health Belief Model Based Digital Nudge Intervention on Breast Cancer Screening
Breast Cancer Screening, Breast Cancer Awareness
Not yet recruiting
The AYA Oncology Self-care Movement
Acute Lymphobkastic Leukemia, Medication Adherence
Not yet recruitingPhase 1/2
177Lu-DOTA-EB-TATE in Adult Patients With Metastatic, Radioactive Iodine Non-Responsive Oncocytic (Hurthle-Cell) Thyroid Cancer
Thyroid Cancer
RecruitingPhase 2
The COSMYC Trial (COmbined Suppression of MYC)
Metastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Coping Together Booklets and Workbook, Lay telephone coaching and Motivational Interviewing in people with Cancer and Anxiety, run by St. Mary's Research Center, Canada at 1 site in Canada.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 26 Oct 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Consent and follow-up rates (time frame: From recruitment launch to completion of follow-up (9 months)). The study lists 5 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04255030, which also lists 2 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 26 Oct 2022; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 31 Oct 2026.