AzTrials
AzTrials

COPDNCT04258982

The Copmparison of Accuracy of PtcCO2 and in PetCO2 in COPD Patients With NIV Treatment

An observational study of COPD, run by Zhenfeng He at 1 site in China.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients with type II respiratory failure always needs PaCO2 test to monitor the changes of disease. Method used mostly nowadays to detect PaCO2 is arterial puncture which is accurate but is invasive, painful and non-dynamic. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 20 to 100 years
Conditions the study is for
COPD
How many people
10 participants
Where
1 siteChina
Study dates
8 Feb 2019to 31 Dec 2021
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 20 to 100 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: AECOPD patients with type II respiratory failure who need NIV treatment

Who may be able to join

  • AECOPD patients with type II respiratory failure who need NIV treatment

Who cannot join

  • hemodynamics is unstable;
  • any other lung disease despite COPD;
  • other diseases influencing experiments: Cognitive impairment disease mouth and nose trauma.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Shanshan Zha, master contact

15013023031

zhass2011@163.com

China1 site, 1 recruiting
  • The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University.

    Guangzhou, Guangdong

    Zhenfeng He, MD, 8602083062882, zfHe_2019@163.com

    Recruiting

Other trials in China

About this study

The chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients with type II respiratory failure always needs PaCO2 test to monitor the changes of disease. Method used mostly nowadays to detect PaCO2 is arterial puncture which is accurate but is invasive, painful and non-dynamic. Noninvasive measurement methods includes end-tidal CO2 (PetCO2), transcutaneous CO2 (PtcCO2) which can monitor the PaCO2 dynamically and noninvasively, but their accuracy is in controversy. Common PetCO2 is especially inaccurate in COPD patients while our team find that the accuracy can be improved by prolong expiration method (PetCO2 (P)).So the investigators want to compare the accuracy of PtcCO2 and PetCO2(P) in AECOPD patients during noninvasive ventilation(NIV).

Conditions
COPD
Being tested
no intervention
Medical subject headings
Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • no interventionOther

    no intervention

Study groups in NCT04258982
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
AECOPD groupThe study incruit AECOPD patients with type II respiratory failure who need the NIV treatment.
Receives: Other: no intervention

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. partial arterial pressure of end-tidal CO2 measured by prolong expiration method [PetCO2(P)]

    PetCO2(P) will be measured before and after NIV treatment.

    Measured: 2 hours

  2. partial arterial pressure of transcutaneous CO2 (PtcCO2)

    PtcCO2 will be measured before and after NIV treatment.

    Measured: 2 hours

  3. partial arterial pressure of carbon dioxide (PaCO2)

    PaCO2 will be measured before and after NIV treatment.

    Measured: 2 hours

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted6 Feb 2020
  2. Study start8 Feb 2019
  3. Primary completion31 Dec 2021 (estimated)
  4. Study completion31 Dec 2021 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Other
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
10 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04258982
Sponsor's protocol ID
GIRH-201927
Status last verified
Feb 2021
First submitted
2 Feb 2020
Last updated
23 Feb 2021
Results posted
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Undecided

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of COPD, run by Zhenfeng He at 1 site in China.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 23 Feb 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Shanshan Zha, master (15013023031, zhass2011@163.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

partial arterial pressure of end-tidal CO2 measured by prolong expiration method [PetCO2(P)] (time frame: 2 hours). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 23 Feb 2021; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 8 Nov 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in