Language DisordersNCT04260815
The Effect of Non-invasive Brian Stimulation on Language Production in Healthy Older Adults
A study testing Transcranial direct-current stimulation (tDCS) in people with Language Disorders and Aphasia, run by King's College London at 1 site in United Kingdom.
Trial summary
The use of non-invasive brain stimulation techniques like transcranial direct-current stimulation (tDCS) for rehabilitation of language is a growing field that needs further studies to determine how best it can be used to enhance treatment outcomes. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 65 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Language Disorders, Aphasia, Stroke
- What is being tested?
- Transcranial direct-current stimulation (tDCS)
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 14 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited Kingdom
- Study dates
- 2 Oct 2018to 22 Aug 2019
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 65 years and older
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Older adult
Who may be able to join
- At least 65 years of age
- Native English speakers
- Right handed
- Normal aided or unaided visual acuity
- At least secondary school level of education
Who cannot join
- History of neurological disease or cognitive impairment
- Any contraindication of tDCS (i.e. history of seizures, metal implants)
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: The Effect of Transcranial Direct-current Stimulation on Discourse Production in Healthy Older Adults
The use of non-invasive brain stimulation techniques like transcranial direct-current stimulation (tDCS) for rehabilitation of language is a growing field that needs further studies to determine how best it can be used to enhance treatment outcomes. It has been shown that tDCS can improve language performance in healthy and brain-injured individuals such as increased naming accuracy.
However, at present, it is not known what effect tDCS has on higher-level language skills like discourse production (i.e. story telling, giving instructions) in healthy, older speakers. Therefore, the aim of this study is to investigate in healthy older adults, the effect of tDCS on discourse production as well as the ideal tDCS electrode placement for improving language at the discourse level. It is hypothesised that tDCS will result in greater language changes and improvements during discourse production compared to no stimulation.
- Conditions
- Language Disorders, Aphasia, Stroke
- Being tested
- Transcranial direct-current stimulation (tDCS)
- Medical subject headings
- Language Disorders, Aphasia, Stroke
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Transcranial direct-current stimulation (tDCS)Device
Transcranial direct-current stimulation is a non-invasive brain stimulation method that can modify spontaneous cortical activity in targeted brain regions. Anodal tDCS delivered through a positively charged electrode has been found to increase cortical excitability in a targeted brain region. Application of tDCS has been found to improve language production in healthy and brain-injured speakers.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| anodal tDCS on the left inferior frontal gyrus (IFG) | Experimental | Not described Receives: Device: Transcranial direct-current stimulation (tDCS) |
| anodal tDCS on the right IFG | Experimental | Not described Receives: Device: Transcranial direct-current stimulation (tDCS) |
| sham tDCS | Sham comparator | Not described Receives: Device: Transcranial direct-current stimulation (tDCS) |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change in word total
total number of words in a language sample
Measured: pre-intervention and immediately after the intervention
Change in verb total
total number of verbs in a language sample
Measured: pre-intervention and immediately after the intervention
Change in utterance total
total number of utterances (complete sentences including a predicate and argument) in a language sample
Measured: pre-intervention and immediately after the intervention
Change in percent of Correct Information Units
The percent of accurately produced words that provide information relevant to the language task
Measured: pre-intervention and immediately after the intervention
Secondary outcomes (3)
Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)
HADS is a 14-item scale which assesses non-somatic anxiety and depression symptoms experienced in the past week. Scores range from 0 to 21 for each sub-scale with a score ≥8 proposed for the identification of caseness, for both depression and anxiety.
Measured: 7 days
EPIC Physical Activity Questionnaire (EPAQ2)
The EPAQ2 is a self completed questionnaire which collects information on a person's physical activity levels at home, work and recreation. Based on total activity hours in the last 12 months, the physical activity index categorises levels of physical activity into 'active', 'moderately inactive', 'moderately active' or 'active'.
Measured: 12 months
The Keele Assessment of Participation (KAP)
The KAP is a short questionnaire that measures participation levels in various activities such as activities of daily living, social activities and work in the last 4 weeks. A score of 0 indicates no restriction in participation whereas scores from 1-11 indicate a restriction in participation in at least one activity ( the higher the score the greater the restriction).
Measured: 4 weeks
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted7 Feb 2020
- Study start2 Oct 2018
- Primary completion19 Dec 2018
- Study completion22 Aug 2019
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (9)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Language DisordersStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by King's College LondonThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Participant
- Enrolment
- 14 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- King's College London
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04260815
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- HR-19/20-6391
- Status last verified
- Jan 2020
- First submitted
- 29 Jan 2020
- Last updated
- 11 Feb 2020
- Results posted
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No: All information collected will be kept confidential and stored anonymously on password protected computers used only by research staff who are part of the study. Data will be stored securely in accordance with the Data Protection Act (1998) and the General Data Protection Regulations (May 2018). Stored, anonymised data may be used for future medical and health-related studies. Anonymised data will be retained for 10 years.
Publications
Nitsche MA, Paulus W. Excitability changes induced in the human motor cortex by weak transcranial direct current stimulation. J Physiol. 2000 Sep 15;527 Pt 3(Pt 3):633-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7793.2000.t01-1-00633.x.
PubMed 10990547Thair H, Holloway AL, Newport R, Smith AD. Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS): A Beginner's Guide for Design and Implementation. Front Neurosci. 2017 Nov 22;11:641. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2017.00641. eCollection 2017.
PubMed 29213226Cattaneo Z, Pisoni A, Papagno C. Transcranial direct current stimulation over Broca's region improves phonemic and semantic fluency in healthy individuals. Neuroscience. 2011 Jun 2;183:64-70. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2011.03.058. Epub 2011 Apr 6.
PubMed 21477637Saffran EM, Berndt RS, Schwartz MF. The quantitative analysis of agrammatic production: procedure and data. Brain Lang. 1989 Oct;37(3):440-79. doi: 10.1016/0093-934x(89)90030-8.
PubMed 2804622Monti A, Ferrucci R, Fumagalli M, Mameli F, Cogiamanian F, Ardolino G, Priori A. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) and language. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2013 Aug;84(8):832-42. doi: 10.1136/jnnp-2012-302825. Epub 2012 Nov 8.
PubMed 23138766Nicholas LE, Brookshire RH. A system for quantifying the informativeness and efficiency of the connected speech of adults with aphasia. J Speech Hear Res. 1993 Apr;36(2):338-50. doi: 10.1044/jshr.3602.338.
PubMed 8487525Wilkie R, Peat G, Thomas E, Hooper H, Croft PR. The Keele Assessment of Participation: a new instrument to measure participation restriction in population studies. Combined qualitative and quantitative examination of its psychometric properties. Qual Life Res. 2005 Oct;14(8):1889-99. doi: 10.1007/s11136-005-4325-2.
PubMed 16155776Zigmond AS, Snaith RP. The hospital anxiety and depression scale. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1983 Jun;67(6):361-70. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.1983.tb09716.x.
PubMed 6880820Wareham NJ, Jakes RW, Rennie KL, Mitchell J, Hennings S, Day NE. Validity and repeatability of the EPIC-Norfolk Physical Activity Questionnaire. Int J Epidemiol. 2002 Feb;31(1):168-74. doi: 10.1093/ije/31.1.168.
PubMed 11914316
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 11 Feb 2020. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- The Effect of Transcranial Direct-current Stimulation on Discourse Production in Healthy Older Adults
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04260815
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- HR-19/20-6391
- Conditions
- Language Disorders, Aphasia, Stroke
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 14 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- King's College LondonUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 2 Oct 2018 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 19 Dec 2018 (actual)
- Study completion
- 22 Aug 2019 (actual)
- First posted
- 7 Feb 2020 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The use of non-invasive brain stimulation techniques like transcranial direct-current stimulation (tDCS) for rehabilitation of language is a growing field that needs further studies to determine how best it can be used to enhance treatment outcomes. It has been shown that tDCS can improve language performance in healthy and brain-injured individuals such as increased naming accuracy.
However, at present, it is not known what effect tDCS has on higher-level language skills like discourse production (i.e. story telling, giving instructions) in healthy, older speakers. Therefore, the aim of this study is to investigate in healthy older adults, the effect of tDCS on discourse production as well as the ideal tDCS electrode placement for improving language at the discourse level. It is hypothesised that tDCS will result in greater language changes and improvements during discourse production compared to no stimulation.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Masking
- Single blind (participant)
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| anodal tDCS on the left inferior frontal gyrus (IFG) | Experimental | Device: Transcranial direct-current stimulation (tDCS) |
| anodal tDCS on the right IFG | Experimental | Device: Transcranial direct-current stimulation (tDCS) |
| sham tDCS | Sham comparator | Device: Transcranial direct-current stimulation (tDCS) |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 65 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- At least 65 years of age
- Native English speakers
- Right handed
- Normal aided or unaided visual acuity
- At least secondary school level of education
Key exclusion criteria (2 listed)
- History of neurological disease or cognitive impairment
- Any contraindication of tDCS (i.e. history of seizures, metal implants)
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Transcranial direct-current stimulation (tDCS)Transcranial direct-current stimulation is a non-invasive brain stimulation method that can modify spontaneous cortical activity in targeted brain regions. Anodal tDCS delivered through a positively charged electrode has been found to increase cortical excitability in a targeted brain region. Application of tDCS has been found to improve language production in healthy and brain-injured speakers. | Device | anodal tDCS on the left inferior frontal gyrus (IFG), anodal tDCS on the right IFG, sham tDCS |
Primary outcome
Change in word total
Time frame: pre-intervention and immediately after the intervention
total number of words in a language sample
Change in verb total
Time frame: pre-intervention and immediately after the intervention
total number of verbs in a language sample
Change in utterance total
Time frame: pre-intervention and immediately after the intervention
total number of utterances (complete sentences including a predicate and argument) in a language sample
Change in percent of Correct Information Units
Time frame: pre-intervention and immediately after the intervention
The percent of accurately produced words that provide information relevant to the language task
3 secondary outcomes
Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)
Time frame: 7 days
EPIC Physical Activity Questionnaire (EPAQ2)
Time frame: 12 months
The Keele Assessment of Participation (KAP)
Time frame: 4 weeks
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 11 Feb 2020.
- Background: PubMed 10990547Nitsche MA, Paulus W. Excitability changes induced in the human motor cortex by weak transcranial direct current stimulation. J Physiol. 2000 Sep 15;527 Pt 3(Pt 3):633-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7793.2000.t01-1-00633.x.
- Background: PubMed 29213226Thair H, Holloway AL, Newport R, Smith AD. Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS): A Beginner's Guide for Design and Implementation. Front Neurosci. 2017 Nov 22;11:641. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2017.00641. eCollection 2017.
- Background: PubMed 21477637Cattaneo Z, Pisoni A, Papagno C. Transcranial direct current stimulation over Broca's region improves phonemic and semantic fluency in healthy individuals. Neuroscience. 2011 Jun 2;183:64-70. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2011.03.058. Epub 2011 Apr 6.
- Background: PubMed 2804622Saffran EM, Berndt RS, Schwartz MF. The quantitative analysis of agrammatic production: procedure and data. Brain Lang. 1989 Oct;37(3):440-79. doi: 10.1016/0093-934x(89)90030-8.
- Background: PubMed 23138766Monti A, Ferrucci R, Fumagalli M, Mameli F, Cogiamanian F, Ardolino G, Priori A. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) and language. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2013 Aug;84(8):832-42. doi: 10.1136/jnnp-2012-302825. Epub 2012 Nov 8.
- Background: PubMed 8487525Nicholas LE, Brookshire RH. A system for quantifying the informativeness and efficiency of the connected speech of adults with aphasia. J Speech Hear Res. 1993 Apr;36(2):338-50. doi: 10.1044/jshr.3602.338.
- Background: PubMed 16155776Wilkie R, Peat G, Thomas E, Hooper H, Croft PR. The Keele Assessment of Participation: a new instrument to measure participation restriction in population studies. Combined qualitative and quantitative examination of its psychometric properties. Qual Life Res. 2005 Oct;14(8):1889-99. doi: 10.1007/s11136-005-4325-2.
- Background: PubMed 6880820Zigmond AS, Snaith RP. The hospital anxiety and depression scale. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1983 Jun;67(6):361-70. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.1983.tb09716.x.
- Background: PubMed 11914316Wareham NJ, Jakes RW, Rennie KL, Mitchell J, Hennings S, Day NE. Validity and repeatability of the EPIC-Norfolk Physical Activity Questionnaire. Int J Epidemiol. 2002 Feb;31(1):168-74. doi: 10.1093/ije/31.1.168.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No. All information collected will be kept confidential and stored anonymously on password protected computers used only by research staff who are part of the study. Data will be stored securely in accordance with the Data Protection Act (1998) and the General Data Protection Regulations (May 2018). Stored, anonymised data may be used for future medical and health-related studies. Anonymised data will be retained for 10 years.
Related trials for Language Disorders
Not yet recruiting
BrainGate2: Feasibility Study of an Intracortical Neural Interface System for Persons With Aphasia (BG-Aphasia-01)
Expressive Aphasia, Aphasia Following Cerebral Infarction
Enrolling by invitation
Brain Stimulation Paired With Structured Reading Instruction in Children With Dyslexia
Dyslexia, Reading Disability
Not yet recruiting
Hearing Intervention Effects on Brain and Language Development in Children With Bilateral Mild Hearing Loss
Hearing Loss, Bilateral
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Validation of Uzbek SARC-F and IPAQ-SF Questionnaires in Adults With and Without Hypothyroidism
Hypothyroidism, Psychometrics
Recruiting
Effect of Anomia Rehabilitation Combined With Metacognitive Training in Patients With Chronic Vascular Aphasia
Aphasia, Stroke
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Transcranial direct-current stimulation (tDCS) in people with Language Disorders and Aphasia, run by King's College London at 1 site in United Kingdom.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 11 Feb 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United Kingdom. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change in word total (time frame: pre-intervention and immediately after the intervention). The study lists 4 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04260815, which also lists 9 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 11 Feb 2020.