HIV/AIDSNICENCT04263441
Navigating Insurance Coverage Expansion (NICE)
A study testing NICE Intervention in people with HIV/AIDS, run by University of Chicago at 3 sites in United States.
Trial summary
The purpose of this research is to measure the effectiveness of an in-person assistance intervention on successful insurance enrollment, types of insurance coverage, rates of linkage to and retention in HIV-related health care, referrals to other HIV-associated health services, and health outcomes. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older, men onlyHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- HIV/AIDS
- What is being tested?
- NICE Intervention
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 630 participants
- Where
- 3 sitesUnited States
- Study dates
- 18 Oct 2018to 14 May 2021
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- Men only
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Black or Hispanic men who have sex with men (MSM) or transgender persons
- 18 or older
Who cannot join
- Cisgender women
- Cisgender men who have not had anal or oral sex with a man in last 2 years
Trial locations and contacts
3 sites in 1 country.
United States3 sites
Howard Brown Health
Chicago, Illinois, 60613
Chicago House and Social Service Agency, Inc.
Chicago, Illinois, 60614
University of Chicago Medical Center
Chicago, Illinois, 60637
About this study
Official title: Navigating Insurance Coverage Expansion (NICE): A Collaboration to Increase Access to Care for Black and Hispanic Men Who Have Sex With Men and Transgender Persons
The purpose of this research is to measure the effectiveness of an in-person assistance intervention on successful insurance enrollment, types of insurance coverage, rates of linkage to and retention in HIV-related health care, referrals to other HIV-associated health services, and health outcomes. The study population is Black and Hispanic men who have sex with men (MSM) and transgender persons who are at higher risk for HIV.
The study team will be testing the hypotheses that in-person health insurance enrollment assistance results in positive outcomes with regard to linkage to and retention in HIV-related health care. Analyses will be used to assess the efficacy of the intervention as an emerging practice.
Read the detailed description
The overall goal of this study is to test whether providing in-person assistance in enrolling in private health insurance or Medicaid for the first time, changing to a different insurance plan, or understanding how to use current insurance policies following HIV testing will (1) increase the proportion of participants who obtain health insurance; (2) result in better health outcomes among participants; (3) improve the linkage and retention rates of participants, especially those diagnosed with HIV; and (4) increase linkage and retention rates sufficiently to justify the cost of implementing the intervention (cost-benefit analysis).
- Conditions
- HIV/AIDS
- Being tested
- NICE Intervention
- Keywords
- Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP)
- Medical subject headings
- Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
NICE InterventionBehavioural
Subjects enrolled in the intervention arm will be offered assistance in enrolling in healthcare coverage and provided assistance on where they can go for care immediately. Subjects will be followed for 1 year and information including lab tests and insurance coverage status will be collected. This information will be collected from medical record review.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| NICE Intervention | Experimental | The proposed intervention will engage clients in the health care enrollment and navigation process in-person, at the time of the HIV testing event. Subjects will be asked to share thoughts on the satisfaction survey. Receives: Behavioral: NICE Intervention |
| Control Intervention | No intervention | Subjects will be offered a handout on how to enroll in healthcare coverage This group will be provided with the site's standard healthcare enrollment and linkage to care, which is specific to the health care clinic they are visiting. Subjects will be followed for 1 year and information including lab tests and insurance coverage status will be collected. This information will be collected from medical record review. Subjects will be asked to share thoughts on the satisfaction survey. |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Linkage
Proportion of participants who completed at least one HIV-related medical visit within 30 days after their baseline HIV test was performed
Measured: 30 days
Delayed Linkage
Proportion of participants who completed at least one HIV-related medical visit within 90 days after their baseline HIV test was performed
Measured: 90 days
Retention
Proportion of HIV positive participants who completed at least 2 HIV-related medical visits within 12 months after their baseline HIV test was performed. Visits must be separated by at least 3 months.
Measured: 365 days
Early Retention
Proportion of HIV negative participants who completed at least 2 medical visits within 6 months after their baseline HIV test was performed, regardless of whether they enrolled in PrEP.
Measured: 183 days
Secondary outcomes (10)
Linkage
Median length of time between baseline HIV test and first completed HIV-related care visit
Measured: 365 Days
Retention
Median length of time between first completed HIV-related care visit and subsequent HIV-related care visits during the 12-month follow-up period
Measured: 365 Days
Viral Load Reduction
Proportion of HIV positive participants who are retained and achieved reduced viral load at their first visit at least 3 months post-linkage. Reduced viral load is considered to be fewer RNA copies/mL than the participant's viral load test result on their previous medical care visit.
Measured: 91 days
Viral Suppression
Proportion of HIV positive participants who are retained and achieved viral suppression (<200 RNA copies/mL) at their last visit within 12 months after enrollment
Measured: 365 days
Maintained Status
Proportion of HIV negative participants who are retained and remained HIV negative at their last visit within 12 months after enrollment, regardless of whether they enrolled in PrEP.
Measured: 365 days
Enrolled in Insurance
Proportion of intervention arm participants who are successfully enrolled in health insurance
Measured: At study enrollment
Changed Insurance
Proportion of currently insured intervention arm participants who change their insurance plan and reasons why
Measured: At study enrollment
Medicaid Enrollment
Proportion of newly enrolled intervention arm participants who enroll in Medicaid
Measured: At study enrollment
Private Insurance Enrollment
Proportion of newly enrolled intervention arm participants who enroll in private health insurance
Measured: At study enrollment
Market place enrollment
Proportion of intervention arm participants who enroll in the bronze level of coverage, who enroll in the silver level of coverage, and who enroll in gold or platinum levels of coverage
Measured: At study enrollment
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted10 Feb 2020
- Study start18 Oct 2018
- Primary completion16 Mar 2020
- Study completion14 May 2021
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (10)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for HIV/AIDSStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University of ChicagoThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Health services research
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 630 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Chicago
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Howard Brown Health Center, Chicago House and Social Service Agency, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04263441
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- IRB16-1260
- Other IDs
- CDC
- Acronym
- NICE
- Status last verified
- Nov 2022
- First submitted
- 4 Feb 2020
- Last updated
- 16 Nov 2022
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Herbst JH, Jacobs ED, Finlayson TJ, McKleroy VS, Neumann MS, Crepaz N; HIV/AIDS Prevention Research Synthesis Team. Estimating HIV prevalence and risk behaviors of transgender persons in the United States: a systematic review. AIDS Behav. 2008 Jan;12(1):1-17. doi: 10.1007/s10461-007-9299-3. Epub 2007 Aug 13.
PubMed 17694429Millett GA, Peterson JL, Flores SA, Hart TA, Jeffries WL 4th, Wilson PA, Rourke SB, Heilig CM, Elford J, Fenton KA, Remis RS. Comparisons of disparities and risks of HIV infection in black and other men who have sex with men in Canada, UK, and USA: a meta-analysis. Lancet. 2012 Jul 28;380(9839):341-8. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60899-X. Epub 2012 Jul 20.
PubMed 22819656Sullivan PS, Rosenberg ES, Sanchez TH, Kelley CF, Luisi N, Cooper HL, Diclemente RJ, Wingood GM, Frew PM, Salazar LF, Del Rio C, Mulligan MJ, Peterson JL. Explaining racial disparities in HIV incidence in black and white men who have sex with men in Atlanta, GA: a prospective observational cohort study. Ann Epidemiol. 2015 Jun;25(6):445-54. doi: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2015.03.006. Epub 2015 Mar 24.
PubMed 25911980Khan L. Transgender health at the crossroads: legal norms, insurance markets, and the threat of healthcare reform. Yale J Health Policy Law Ethics. 2011 Summer;11(2):375-418. No abstract available.
PubMed 22136012Hall G, Li K, Wilton L, Wheeler D, Fogel J, Wang L, Koblin B. A Comparison of Referred Sexual Partners to Their Community Recruited Counterparts in The BROTHERS Project (HPTN 061). AIDS Behav. 2015 Dec;19(12):2214-23. doi: 10.1007/s10461-015-1005-2.
PubMed 25874753Matts JP, Lachin JM. Properties of permuted-block randomization in clinical trials. Control Clin Trials. 1988 Dec;9(4):327-44. doi: 10.1016/0197-2456(88)90047-5.
PubMed 3203524Farnham PG, Sansom SL, Hutchinson AB. How much should we pay for a new HIV diagnosis? A mathematical model of HIV screening in US clinical settings. Med Decis Making. 2012 May-Jun;32(3):459-69. doi: 10.1177/0272989X11431609. Epub 2012 Jan 12.
PubMed 22247422Gebo KA, Fleishman JA, Conviser R, Hellinger J, Hellinger FJ, Josephs JS, Keiser P, Gaist P, Moore RD; HIV Research Network. Contemporary costs of HIV healthcare in the HAART era. AIDS. 2010 Nov 13;24(17):2705-15. doi: 10.1097/QAD.0b013e32833f3c14.
PubMed 20859193Horberg M, Raymond B. Financial policy issues for HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis: cost and access to insurance. Am J Prev Med. 2013 Jan;44(1 Suppl 2):S125-8. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2012.09.039. No abstract available.
PubMed 23253752Umutoni V, Eavou R, Almirol E, Neumann MS, Rivera J, Schneider JA. A Community Located Insurance Navigation Intervention to Link Sexual and Gender Minorities in Status Neutral Care: Results From the Navigating Insurance Coverage Expansion Randomized Controlled Trial. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2026 Jul 1;101(7):709-716. doi: 10.1097/QAI.0000000000003788.
PubMed 41181883
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 16 Nov 2022. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Navigating Insurance Coverage Expansion (NICE): A Collaboration to Increase Access to Care for Black and Hispanic Men Who Have Sex With Men and Transgender Persons
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04263441
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- NICE / IRB16-1260
- Conditions
- HIV/AIDS
- Keywords
- Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP)
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 630 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University of ChicagoUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Howard Brown Health Center, Chicago House and Social Service Agency, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
- Study start
- 18 Oct 2018 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 16 Mar 2020 (actual)
- Study completion
- 14 May 2021 (actual)
- First posted
- 10 Feb 2020 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this research is to measure the effectiveness of an in-person assistance intervention on successful insurance enrollment, types of insurance coverage, rates of linkage to and retention in HIV-related health care, referrals to other HIV-associated health services, and health outcomes. The study population is Black and Hispanic men who have sex with men (MSM) and transgender persons who are at higher risk for HIV.
The study team will be testing the hypotheses that in-person health insurance enrollment assistance results in positive outcomes with regard to linkage to and retention in HIV-related health care. Analyses will be used to assess the efficacy of the intervention as an emerging practice.
Detailed description
The overall goal of this study is to test whether providing in-person assistance in enrolling in private health insurance or Medicaid for the first time, changing to a different insurance plan, or understanding how to use current insurance policies following HIV testing will (1) increase the proportion of participants who obtain health insurance; (2) result in better health outcomes among participants; (3) improve the linkage and retention rates of participants, especially those diagnosed with HIV; and (4) increase linkage and retention rates sufficiently to justify the cost of implementing the intervention (cost-benefit analysis).
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Health services research
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| NICE Intervention | Experimental | Behavioral: NICE InterventionThe proposed intervention will engage clients in the health care enrollment and navigation process in-person, at the time of the HIV testing event. Subjects will be asked to share thoughts on the satisfaction survey. |
| Control Intervention | No intervention | –Subjects will be offered a handout on how to enroll in healthcare coverage This group will be provided with the site's standard healthcare enrollment and linkage to care, which is specific to the health care clinic they are visiting. Subjects will be followed for 1 year and information including lab tests and insurance coverage status will be collected. This information will be collected from medical record review. Subjects will be asked to share thoughts on the satisfaction survey. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- Male only
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Black or Hispanic men who have sex with men (MSM) or transgender persons
- 18 or older
Key exclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Cisgender women
- Cisgender men who have not had anal or oral sex with a man in last 2 years
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| NICE InterventionSubjects enrolled in the intervention arm will be offered assistance in enrolling in healthcare coverage and provided assistance on where they can go for care immediately. Subjects will be followed for 1 year and information including lab tests and insurance coverage status will be collected. This information will be collected from medical record review. | Behavioural | NICE Intervention |
Primary outcome
Linkage
Time frame: 30 days
Proportion of participants who completed at least one HIV-related medical visit within 30 days after their baseline HIV test was performed
Delayed Linkage
Time frame: 90 days
Proportion of participants who completed at least one HIV-related medical visit within 90 days after their baseline HIV test was performed
Retention
Time frame: 365 days
Proportion of HIV positive participants who completed at least 2 HIV-related medical visits within 12 months after their baseline HIV test was performed. Visits must be separated by at least 3 months.
Early Retention
Time frame: 183 days
Proportion of HIV negative participants who completed at least 2 medical visits within 6 months after their baseline HIV test was performed, regardless of whether they enrolled in PrEP.
10 secondary outcomes
Linkage
Time frame: 365 Days
Retention
Time frame: 365 Days
Viral Load Reduction
Time frame: 91 days
Viral Suppression
Time frame: 365 days
Maintained Status
Time frame: 365 days
Enrolled in Insurance
Time frame: At study enrollment
Changed Insurance
Time frame: At study enrollment
Medicaid Enrollment
Time frame: At study enrollment
Private Insurance Enrollment
Time frame: At study enrollment
Market place enrollment
Time frame: At study enrollment
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 16 Nov 2022.
- Background: PubMed 17694429Herbst JH, Jacobs ED, Finlayson TJ, McKleroy VS, Neumann MS, Crepaz N; HIV/AIDS Prevention Research Synthesis Team. Estimating HIV prevalence and risk behaviors of transgender persons in the United States: a systematic review. AIDS Behav. 2008 Jan;12(1):1-17. doi: 10.1007/s10461-007-9299-3. Epub 2007 Aug 13.
- Background: PubMed 22819656Millett GA, Peterson JL, Flores SA, Hart TA, Jeffries WL 4th, Wilson PA, Rourke SB, Heilig CM, Elford J, Fenton KA, Remis RS. Comparisons of disparities and risks of HIV infection in black and other men who have sex with men in Canada, UK, and USA: a meta-analysis. Lancet. 2012 Jul 28;380(9839):341-8. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60899-X. Epub 2012 Jul 20.
- Background: PubMed 25911980Sullivan PS, Rosenberg ES, Sanchez TH, Kelley CF, Luisi N, Cooper HL, Diclemente RJ, Wingood GM, Frew PM, Salazar LF, Del Rio C, Mulligan MJ, Peterson JL. Explaining racial disparities in HIV incidence in black and white men who have sex with men in Atlanta, GA: a prospective observational cohort study. Ann Epidemiol. 2015 Jun;25(6):445-54. doi: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2015.03.006. Epub 2015 Mar 24.
- Background: PubMed 22136012Khan L. Transgender health at the crossroads: legal norms, insurance markets, and the threat of healthcare reform. Yale J Health Policy Law Ethics. 2011 Summer;11(2):375-418. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 25874753Hall G, Li K, Wilton L, Wheeler D, Fogel J, Wang L, Koblin B. A Comparison of Referred Sexual Partners to Their Community Recruited Counterparts in The BROTHERS Project (HPTN 061). AIDS Behav. 2015 Dec;19(12):2214-23. doi: 10.1007/s10461-015-1005-2.
- Background: PubMed 3203524Matts JP, Lachin JM. Properties of permuted-block randomization in clinical trials. Control Clin Trials. 1988 Dec;9(4):327-44. doi: 10.1016/0197-2456(88)90047-5.
- Background: PubMed 22247422Farnham PG, Sansom SL, Hutchinson AB. How much should we pay for a new HIV diagnosis? A mathematical model of HIV screening in US clinical settings. Med Decis Making. 2012 May-Jun;32(3):459-69. doi: 10.1177/0272989X11431609. Epub 2012 Jan 12.
- Background: PubMed 20859193Gebo KA, Fleishman JA, Conviser R, Hellinger J, Hellinger FJ, Josephs JS, Keiser P, Gaist P, Moore RD; HIV Research Network. Contemporary costs of HIV healthcare in the HAART era. AIDS. 2010 Nov 13;24(17):2705-15. doi: 10.1097/QAD.0b013e32833f3c14.
- Background: PubMed 23253752Horberg M, Raymond B. Financial policy issues for HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis: cost and access to insurance. Am J Prev Med. 2013 Jan;44(1 Suppl 2):S125-8. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2012.09.039. No abstract available.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 41181883Umutoni V, Eavou R, Almirol E, Neumann MS, Rivera J, Schneider JA. A Community Located Insurance Navigation Intervention to Link Sexual and Gender Minorities in Status Neutral Care: Results From the Navigating Insurance Coverage Expansion Randomized Controlled Trial. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2026 Jul 1;101(7):709-716. doi: 10.1097/QAI.0000000000003788.
- HIV Among Gay and Bisexual MenLink provided by the sponsor.
- The 10 largest Hispanic origin groups: Characteristics, rankings, top CountiesLink provided by the sponsor.
- Injustice at Every Turn: A Report of the National Transgender Discrimination SurveyLink provided by the sponsor.
- Moving Black MSM Along the HIV Care ContinuumLink provided by the sponsor.
- In-Person Assistance in the Health Insurance MarketplacesLink provided by the sponsor.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for HIV/AIDS
RecruitingObservational study
Olfactory Function and Model-Based Behavior in People Living With HIV and SUD
HIV, Substance Use Disorder
RecruitingEarly Phase 1
A Study of Daratumumab and Dose-Adjusted EPOCH in Plasmablastic Lymphoma
Plasmablastic Lymphoma, Ann Arbor Stage I Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma
Active, not recruiting
Suubi4PrEP: Improving PrEP Access and Adherence Among Adolescent Girls and Young Women in Uganda
HIV Prevention
Not yet recruiting
Bwelela Easy Study
HIV, HIV - Human Immunodeficiency Virus
RecruitingPhase 1
AMC 120, Glofitamab Plus Chemoimmunotherapy in Newly Diagnosed HIV-Associated Large B-Cell Lymphoma (The "Glofit-RCHOP Study")
AIDS-Related Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma, Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma, Not Otherwise Specified
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
3 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing NICE Intervention in people with HIV/AIDS, run by University of Chicago at 3 sites in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 16 Nov 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 3 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Linkage (time frame: 30 days). The study lists 4 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04263441, which also lists 10 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 16 Nov 2022.