Airway DiseaseLACENCT04264052
Characterisation of Large Airway Collapse During Exercise (LACE)
An observational study of Airway Disease, run by Imperial College London at 1 site in United Kingdom.
Trial summary
The large central airways (i.e. trachea and bronchi) act as a conduit to enable lower airway ventilation but also facilitate airway clearance during dynamic manoeuvres, such as coughing. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 20 to 60 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Airway Disease
- What is being tested?
- CBE & MRI
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- How many people
- 40 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited Kingdom
- Study dates
- 1 Feb 2020to Nov 2024
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 20 to 60 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult
Study population: Subjects will be healthy and ≥ 20 to 60 years old. The total sample size will be 40 subjects. 10 for each age group (20-30; 30-40; 40-50; 50-60 years).
Who may be able to join
- Subjects will need to be within the age range of 20-60 years old
- have no known respiratory disease and normal spirometry
- be able to exercise without medical reason for limitation.
Who cannot join
- Subjects who have a significant comorbidity that prohibit exercise
- have had a respiratory infection within the last month
- known respiratory disease
- current smokers or are pregnant.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United Kingdom1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Royal Brompton Hospital
London, SW3 6NP
Zanders Williams, 02073518029, z.williams@rbht.nhs.uk
James Hull, 02073528121, j.hull@rbht.nhs.uk
About this study
Official title: The Feasibility of Continuous Bronchoscopy During Exercise in Healthy Adults in Assessing Large Airways Collapse
The large central airways (i.e. trachea and bronchi) act as a conduit to enable lower airway ventilation but also facilitate airway clearance during dynamic manoeuvres, such as coughing. It is becoming increasingly well recognised however, that in a significant proportion of individuals with chronic airway disease (e.g. chronic obstructive pulmonary disease-COPD or chronic asthma) and in those with an elevated body mass index (BMI), that the large airways may exhibit a tendency to excessive closure or narrowing. This large airway collapse (LAC) can be associated with exertional breathlessness and difficulty clearing airway secretions. A variety of terms have been used to describe LAC including excessive dynamic airway collapse (EDAC) or if the cartilaginous structures are involved then tracheobronchomalacia (TBM).
One clear limitation of the current approach to diagnosis is the fact that many of the 'diagnostic' tests employed, utilise static, supine measures +/- forced manoeuvres. These are somewhat physiologically flawed and differ markedly from the reality of the heightened state of airflow that develops during exertion. i.e. forced manoeuvres likely induce very different turbulent and thoracic pressure changes, in contrast to the hyperpnoea of real-life physical activity (i.e. walking or cycling). A current unanswered question is therefore, what happens to the large airway dynamic movement of healthy individuals (and ultimately patients) during real-life exercise and how does this compare with the measures taken during a forced manoeuvre, either during a bronchoscopy or during an imaging study such as CT or MRI scan.
The key aim of this study is therefore to evaluate and characterise large airway movement in a cohort of healthy adults during a real-life exercise challenge and to compare this with findings from a dynamic expiratory MRI. In order to achieve this, the investigators proposes to develop and test the feasibility of an exercise-bronchoscopy protocol.
Read the detailed description
The large central airways (i.e. trachea and bronchi) act as a conduit to enable lower airway ventilation but also facilitate airway clearance during dynamic manoeuvres, such as coughing. It is becoming increasingly well recognised however, that in a significant proportion of individuals with chronic airway disease (e.g. chronic obstructive pulmonary disease or chronic asthma) and in those with an elevated body mass index (BMI), that the large airways may exhibit a tendency to excessive closure or narrowing. This large airway collapse (LAC) can be associated with exertional breathlessness and difficulty clearing airway secretions. A variety of terms have been used to describe LAC including excessive dynamic airway collapse (EDAC) or if the cartilaginous structures are involved then tracheobronchomalacia (TBM).
At the current time, there is considerable debate regarding the definition of LAC. Typically the 'excessive' collapse underpinning a 'diagnosis' of EDAC is defined as excessive bulging of the posterior tracheal membrane into the airway lumen during expiration without associated collapse of the cartilaginous rings, however the degree to which the trachea closes, to constitute EDAC is debated, with literature varying from >50% to >90%. Moreover, partial expiratory airways collapse (up to 50% reduction in airways cross-sectional area) can be identified in 70-80% of healthy individuals during dynamic computed tomography (CT).
One clear limitation of the current approach to diagnosis is the fact that many of the 'diagnostic' tests employed, utilise static, supine measures +/- forced manoeuvres. These are somewhat physiologically flawed and differ markedly from the reality of the heightened state of airflow that develops during exertion. i.e. forced manoeuvres likely induce very different turbulent and thoracic pressure changes, in contrast to the hyperpnoea of real-life physical activity (i.e. walking or cycling). A current unanswered question is therefore, what happens to the large airway dynamic movement of healthy individuals (and ultimately patients) during real-life exercise and how does this compare with the measures taken during a forced manoeuvre, either during a bronchoscopy or during an imaging study such as CT or MRI scan.
The key aim of this study is therefore to evaluate and characterize large airway movement in a cohort of healthy adults during a real-life exercise challenge and to compare this with findings from a dynamic expiratory MRI and MRI during exercise. In order to achieve this, the investigators propose to develop and test the feasibility of an exercise-bronchoscopy protocol.
As a clinical service, the investigators have extensive experience of evaluating movement of the upper airway and larynx during strenuous exercise. The Principal Investigator currently performs over 100 continuous laryngoscopy during exercise (CLE) tests per year, whereby a small laryngoscope is placed in the upper airway and is secured on a headgear to allow visualisation of the laryngeal and subglottic movement during exercise. i.e. whilst a subject performs running exercise. This test has an established role in patient evaluation and a proven safety record in the assessment of laryngeal closure during exercise. The research team has performed approximately 500 CLE tests in the Royal Brompton Hospital, with no serious adverse outcome.
The investigators thus now propose to utilise a similar exercise technique but to advance the scope (using a bronchoscope because this is needed to evaluate the lower airways) slightly more distally to allow visualisation of the large airways during an exercise challenge. Others have also utilised a similar approach. Specifically, a study evaluated military personal with symptoms of exertional dyspnoea. As part of this study the research team performed dynamic bronchoscopy with real-time observation on a bicycle ergometer.
Therefore, the investigators recommend the application of a similar approach, termed continuous bronchoscopy during exercise (CBE) to evaluate large airway movement during exercise and to report the feasibility and tolerability of the technique and to compare findings with imaging techniques (i.e. as is often used to diagnose EDAC) using MRI. In this initial study however, the investigators propose to study only healthy subjects to assess feasibility and provide comparator data for later work. i.e. to use this data to provide pilot feasibility work and thus to utilise results to inform and power later work, as indicated.
Study Rationale The investigators hypothesise that exercise bronchoscopy is feasible to perform for the investigation of EDAC. It is also hypothesised that findings on dynamic static manoeuvres (i.e. when subjects are asked to perform a forced dynamic breath out) with both a bronchoscope in situ and also during MRI will exaggerate a tendency to closure and not relate to the real-life physiological airway stress encountered during exercise.
STUDY OBJECTIVES
The primary objective of this study is to investigate the feasibility and safety of continuous bronchoscopy during exercise.
The following hypothesis will be tested:
- Continuous bronchoscopy during exercise is feasible
- Continuous bronchoscopy during exercise is well-tolerated
- Continuous bronchoscopy during exercise provides stable large airway images; to enable reliable assessment of any propensity to large airway collapse.
Secondary objectives include:
- To evaluate the degree of LAC apparent in normal subjects during exercise and to compare this with static forced expiratory manoeuvres in MRI.
- To evaluate the degree of LAC from MRI in normal subjects during forced expiratory manoeuvres.
To compare findings between modalities and to compare all findings with simple baseline physiological measures, such as lung function.
- Conditions
- Airway Disease
- Being tested
- CBE & MRI
- Keywords
- excessive dynamic airway collapse, tracheobronchomalacia, large airways collapse
- Medical subject headings
- Tracheobronchomalacia
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
CBE & MRIDiagnostic test
The diagnostic tests will be consisted by two visits.
In the first visit participants will undergo a medical history assessment and they will complete questionnaires related to the lung function (MRC Dyspnoea score, Dyspnoea-12 questionnaire, and Visual Analogue Scale). A spirometry will be performed to assess the lung function. Bronchoscopy will be performed at rest in a semi-supine position (on a reclined bed) and then during exercise on a treadmill.
In the second visit, spirometry and questionnaires will be performed prior to resting and during exercise measurements on a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan.
Rest: Structural imaging of the neck and chest will be performed followed by dynamic imaging of the airways during several inspiratory and expiratory manoeuvres. No IV contrast media will be used.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| CBE & MRI | Forty healthy volunteers split in different age ranges (20-30 years n=10, 30-40 years n=10, 40-50 years n=10 and 50-60 years n=10) will undergo two airway assessments at rest and during exercise. The exercise assessments will be a continuous bronchoscopy during exercise (CBE-1st visit) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI-2nd visit) separated by at least three days to ensure for a sufficient cardiorespiratory and musculoskeletal recovery. Receives: Diagnostic Test: CBE & MRI |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Feasibility of continuous bronchoscopy during exercise (CBE): questionnaire
Primary outcome will be the feasibility of continuous bronchoscopy during continuous exercise in healthy adults. Feasibility will be assessed via a post CBE tolerability questionnaire.
The post exercise tolerability questionnaire aims to evaluate the upper airways function during exercise and the discomfort that the participant might experience during the test. It consists of 5 questions (Part A) where the score ranges from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree), and 2 questions (Part B) where the score ranges from 1 (None at all) to 10 (Unbearable amount).
The total score that will confirm the feasibility of CBE should be < 3 or < 5, for Part A and B, respectively.
The questions relate to the tolerability of the CBE test (e.g., Exercise with the camera in place cause discomfort, 1 (strongly agree) to 5 (strongly disagree).
Measured: 12 months
Secondary outcomes (3)
Diagnostic capacity of CBE and MRIE
To evaluate the degree of large airway collapse (LAC) apparent in normal subjects via continuous bronchoscopy during exercise (CBE) and to compare this with static forced expiratory manoeuvres in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and MRI during exercise (MRIE).
Flexible bronchoscopy and MRI at rest will be performed using dynamic inspiratory and expiratory manoeuvres.
CBE will be performed on a treadmill utilising a linear individualised ramp protocol. Heart rate and electrocardiogram will be monitored throughout the test.
The degree of LAC will be estimated in percentage reduction of the airway lumen in several sites of the trachea and main bronchi. In bronchoscopy the reduction will be classified as 0 to 50% / 50 to 75% / 75 to 100% / 100% airway closure. In MRI LAC will be diagnosed as >50% airway closure.
Measured: 12 months
Comparing dynamic versus physical exertion large airway collapse in CBE and MRIE
To estimate the percentage of LAC from MRI in normal subjects during forced expiratory manoeuvres at rest and during exercise for both modalities.
More specifically, the reduction (%) of LAC will be estimated in bronchoscopy at rest and will be compared with CBE to evaluate whether physical exertion can induce the similar response to dynamic expiratory manoeuvres. Similarly, percentage of LAC will be estimated in MRI at rest.
Comparisons will be performed using statistical tests (e.g., Paired sample T-tests).
Measured: 12 months
Exploring the diagnostic capacity of different exercise modalities to assess LAC
To compare findings between modalities (treadmill vs dynamic MRI images.
The percentages of LAC between CBE and MRI will be compared (via statistical tests such as t-tests and Pearson's correlation tests.
Measured: 12 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted11 Feb 2020
- Study start1 Feb 2020
- Primary completionSep 2024 (estimated)
- Study completionNov 2024 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Airway DiseaseStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Imperial College LondonThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 40 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Imperial College London
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Royal Brompton & Harefield NHS Foundation Trust
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- James Hull, Dr, Principal investigator, Royal Brompton Hospital-Imperial College London
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04264052
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 19IC5362
- Acronym
- LACE
- Status last verified
- Feb 2023
- First submitted
- 19 Sep 2019
- Last updated
- 17 Feb 2023
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 17 Feb 2023. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- The Feasibility of Continuous Bronchoscopy During Exercise in Healthy Adults in Assessing Large Airways Collapse
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04264052
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- LACE / 19IC5362
- Conditions
- Airway Disease
- Keywords
- excessive dynamic airway collapse, tracheobronchomalacia, large airways collapse
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 40 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Imperial College LondonUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Royal Brompton & Harefield NHS Foundation Trust
- Study start
- 1 Feb 2020 (actual)
- Primary completion
- Sep 2024 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Nov 2024 (estimated)
- First posted
- 11 Feb 2020 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The large central airways (i.e. trachea and bronchi) act as a conduit to enable lower airway ventilation but also facilitate airway clearance during dynamic manoeuvres, such as coughing. It is becoming increasingly well recognised however, that in a significant proportion of individuals with chronic airway disease (e.g. chronic obstructive pulmonary disease-COPD or chronic asthma) and in those with an elevated body mass index (BMI), that the large airways may exhibit a tendency to excessive closure or narrowing. This large airway collapse (LAC) can be associated with exertional breathlessness and difficulty clearing airway secretions. A variety of terms have been used to describe LAC including excessive dynamic airway collapse (EDAC) or if the cartilaginous structures are involved then tracheobronchomalacia (TBM).
One clear limitation of the current approach to diagnosis is the fact that many of the 'diagnostic' tests employed, utilise static, supine measures +/- forced manoeuvres. These are somewhat physiologically flawed and differ markedly from the reality of the heightened state of airflow that develops during exertion. i.e. forced manoeuvres likely induce very different turbulent and thoracic pressure changes, in contrast to the hyperpnoea of real-life physical activity (i.e. walking or cycling). A current unanswered question is therefore, what happens to the large airway dynamic movement of healthy individuals (and ultimately patients) during real-life exercise and how does this compare with the measures taken during a forced manoeuvre, either during a bronchoscopy or during an imaging study such as CT or MRI scan.
The key aim of this study is therefore to evaluate and characterise large airway movement in a cohort of healthy adults during a real-life exercise challenge and to compare this with findings from a dynamic expiratory MRI. In order to achieve this, the investigators proposes to develop and test the feasibility of an exercise-bronchoscopy protocol.
Detailed description
The large central airways (i.e. trachea and bronchi) act as a conduit to enable lower airway ventilation but also facilitate airway clearance during dynamic manoeuvres, such as coughing. It is becoming increasingly well recognised however, that in a significant proportion of individuals with chronic airway disease (e.g. chronic obstructive pulmonary disease or chronic asthma) and in those with an elevated body mass index (BMI), that the large airways may exhibit a tendency to excessive closure or narrowing. This large airway collapse (LAC) can be associated with exertional breathlessness and difficulty clearing airway secretions. A variety of terms have been used to describe LAC including excessive dynamic airway collapse (EDAC) or if the cartilaginous structures are involved then tracheobronchomalacia (TBM).
At the current time, there is considerable debate regarding the definition of LAC. Typically the 'excessive' collapse underpinning a 'diagnosis' of EDAC is defined as excessive bulging of the posterior tracheal membrane into the airway lumen during expiration without associated collapse of the cartilaginous rings, however the degree to which the trachea closes, to constitute EDAC is debated, with literature varying from >50% to >90%. Moreover, partial expiratory airways collapse (up to 50% reduction in airways cross-sectional area) can be identified in 70-80% of healthy individuals during dynamic computed tomography (CT).
One clear limitation of the current approach to diagnosis is the fact that many of the 'diagnostic' tests employed, utilise static, supine measures +/- forced manoeuvres. These are somewhat physiologically flawed and differ markedly from the reality of the heightened state of airflow that develops during exertion. i.e. forced manoeuvres likely induce very different turbulent and thoracic pressure changes, in contrast to the hyperpnoea of real-life physical activity (i.e. walking or cycling). A current unanswered question is therefore, what happens to the large airway dynamic movement of healthy individuals (and ultimately patients) during real-life exercise and how does this compare with the measures taken during a forced manoeuvre, either during a bronchoscopy or during an imaging study such as CT or MRI scan.
The key aim of this study is therefore to evaluate and characterize large airway movement in a cohort of healthy adults during a real-life exercise challenge and to compare this with findings from a dynamic expiratory MRI and MRI during exercise. In order to achieve this, the investigators propose to develop and test the feasibility of an exercise-bronchoscopy protocol.
As a clinical service, the investigators have extensive experience of evaluating movement of the upper airway and larynx during strenuous exercise. The Principal Investigator currently performs over 100 continuous laryngoscopy during exercise (CLE) tests per year, whereby a small laryngoscope is placed in the upper airway and is secured on a headgear to allow visualisation of the laryngeal and subglottic movement during exercise. i.e. whilst a subject performs running exercise. This test has an established role in patient evaluation and a proven safety record in the assessment of laryngeal closure during exercise. The research team has performed approximately 500 CLE tests in the Royal Brompton Hospital, with no serious adverse outcome.
The investigators thus now propose to utilise a similar exercise technique but to advance the scope (using a bronchoscope because this is needed to evaluate the lower airways) slightly more distally to allow visualisation of the large airways during an exercise challenge. Others have also utilised a similar approach. Specifically, a study evaluated military personal with symptoms of exertional dyspnoea. As part of this study the research team performed dynamic bronchoscopy with real-time observation on a bicycle ergometer.
Therefore, the investigators recommend the application of a similar approach, termed continuous bronchoscopy during exercise (CBE) to evaluate large airway movement during exercise and to report the feasibility and tolerability of the technique and to compare findings with imaging techniques (i.e. as is often used to diagnose EDAC) using MRI. In this initial study however, the investigators propose to study only healthy subjects to assess feasibility and provide comparator data for later work. i.e. to use this data to provide pilot feasibility work and thus to utilise results to inform and power later work, as indicated.
Study Rationale The investigators hypothesise that exercise bronchoscopy is feasible to perform for the investigation of EDAC. It is also hypothesised that findings on dynamic static manoeuvres (i.e. when subjects are asked to perform a forced dynamic breath out) with both a bronchoscope in situ and also during MRI will exaggerate a tendency to closure and not relate to the real-life physiological airway stress encountered during exercise.
STUDY OBJECTIVES
The primary objective of this study is to investigate the feasibility and safety of continuous bronchoscopy during exercise.
The following hypothesis will be tested:
- Continuous bronchoscopy during exercise is feasible
- Continuous bronchoscopy during exercise is well-tolerated
- Continuous bronchoscopy during exercise provides stable large airway images; to enable reliable assessment of any propensity to large airway collapse.
Secondary objectives include:
- To evaluate the degree of LAC apparent in normal subjects during exercise and to compare this with static forced expiratory manoeuvres in MRI.
- To evaluate the degree of LAC from MRI in normal subjects during forced expiratory manoeuvres.
To compare findings between modalities and to compare all findings with simple baseline physiological measures, such as lung function.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| CBE & MRI | – | Diagnostic Test: CBE & MRIForty healthy volunteers split in different age ranges (20-30 years n=10, 30-40 years n=10, 40-50 years n=10 and 50-60 years n=10) will undergo two airway assessments at rest and during exercise. The exercise assessments will be a continuous bronchoscopy during exercise (CBE-1st visit) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI-2nd visit) separated by at least three days to ensure for a sufficient cardiorespiratory and musculoskeletal recovery. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 20 to 60 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
- Study population
- Subjects will be healthy and ≥ 20 to 60 years old. The total sample size will be 40 subjects. 10 for each age group (20-30; 30-40; 40-50; 50-60 years).
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Subjects will need to be within the age range of 20-60 years old
- have no known respiratory disease and normal spirometry
- be able to exercise without medical reason for limitation.
Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Subjects who have a significant comorbidity that prohibit exercise
- have had a respiratory infection within the last month
- known respiratory disease
- current smokers or are pregnant.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| CBE & MRIThe diagnostic tests will be consisted by two visits. In the first visit participants will undergo a medical history assessment and they will complete questionnaires related to the lung function (MRC Dyspnoea score, Dyspnoea-12 questionnaire, and Visual Analogue Scale). A spirometry will be performed to assess the lung function. Bronchoscopy will be performed at rest in a semi-supine position (on a reclined bed) and then during exercise on a treadmill. In the second visit, spirometry and questionnaires will be performed prior to resting and during exercise measurements on a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan. Rest: Structural imaging of the neck and chest will be performed followed by dynamic imaging of the airways during several inspiratory and expiratory manoeuvres. No IV contrast media will be used. | Diagnostic test | CBE & MRI |
Primary outcome
Feasibility of continuous bronchoscopy during exercise (CBE): questionnaire
Time frame: 12 months
Primary outcome will be the feasibility of continuous bronchoscopy during continuous exercise in healthy adults. Feasibility will be assessed via a post CBE tolerability questionnaire. The post exercise tolerability questionnaire aims to evaluate the upper airways function during exercise and the discomfort that the participant might experience during the test. It consists of 5 questions (Part A) where the score ranges from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree), and 2 questions (Part B) where the score ranges from 1 (None at all) to 10 (Unbearable amount). The total score that will confirm the feasibility of CBE should be < 3 or < 5, for Part A and B, respectively. The questions relate to the tolerability of the CBE test (e.g., Exercise with the camera in place cause discomfort, 1 (strongly agree) to 5 (strongly disagree).
3 secondary outcomes
Diagnostic capacity of CBE and MRIE
Time frame: 12 months
Comparing dynamic versus physical exertion large airway collapse in CBE and MRIE
Time frame: 12 months
Exploring the diagnostic capacity of different exercise modalities to assess LAC
Time frame: 12 months
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 17 Feb 2023.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Airway Disease
RecruitingPhase 1
Pilot Study to Identify the Mediators and Inflammatory Cell Surface Receptors Involved in Allergic Airway Inflammation
Asthma
Recruiting
Comparing Surfactant Administration Through Supraglottic Airway and Thin Catheter for Preterm Infants
Surfactant, Respiratory Distress Syndrome (Neonatal)
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study to Learn About the Monthly Dosing Study Medicine Called Berobenatide in Adults With Breathing Problems During Sleep and Overweight or Obesity Who Do Not Use a Breathing Machine (PAP) (VESPER-OSA 2)
Apnea, Sleep Disorders
RecruitingPhase 2
A Study to Learn About the Study Medicine Called PF-07275315 in People With Moderate-To-Severe Asthma
Asthma
Not yet recruiting
Influence of Patient Positioning During Nasal Lavage
Acute Upper Respiratory Tract Infections, Nasal Obstruction
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
James Hull, Dr principal investigator
Royal Brompton Hospital-Imperial College London
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Airway Disease, run by Imperial College London at 1 site in United Kingdom.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 17 Feb 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United Kingdom. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact James Hull, Dr (02073528121, j.hull@rbht.nhs.uk), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Feasibility of continuous bronchoscopy during exercise (CBE): questionnaire (time frame: 12 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 17 Feb 2023.