AzTrials
AzTrials

Evaluation of the Value of Mammaprint Test Gene Variation in the Prediction of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Breast CancerCMTNCMBNCT04264468

Correlation Between Molecular Typing and Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Breast Cancer Patients Based on Mammaprint/Blueprint Test

An observational study of Evaluation of the Value of Mammaprint Test Gene Variation in the Prediction of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Breast Cancer, run by Zhejiang Cancer Hospital at 1 site in China.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This study prospectively included 150 breast cancer patients (30 patients in the first stage and 120 patients in the second stage) who were treated with the commonly used neoadjuvant chemotherapy recommended by NCCN, received surgical treatment after neoadjuvant chemotherapy, and evaluated the efficacy according to… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 25 to 80 years, women only
What is being tested?
neoadjuvant chemotherapy
How many people
150 participants
Where
1 siteChina
Study dates
14 May 2019to 1 Mar 2021
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 25 to 80 years
  • Women only
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: * Pathologically confirmed new breast cancer (invasive cancer) * Clinical stage II-III * women * Aged 25-80

Who may be able to join

  • Pathologically confirmed new breast cancer (invasive cancer)
  • Clinical stage II-III
  • women
  • Aged 25-80
  • At least 6 months of follow-up data, clinical diagnosis and treatment information and personal information available for follow-up are complete
  • Complete biological samples required for the study: fresh/frozen tissues/white tablets/wax blocks meeting the requirements of the experiment (before neoadjuvant chemotherapy)
  • Tumor markers and imaging data were complete
  • Neoadjuvant chemotherapy is commonly recommended by the standard NCCN guidelines

Who cannot join

  • Subjects refuse to participate
  • First diagnosis of stage I or IV breast cancer
  • Pathological diagnosis of concurrent (or previous) other malignant tumors
  • Prehistory breast cancer
  • Younger than 25 or older than 80
  • Clinical diagnosis and treatment information or biological samples required by the research institute do not meet the needs of the experiment

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Xing fei Yu, doctoral degree contact

+86-13588164600

yuxf1177@zjcc.org.cn

China1 site, 1 recruiting
  • Zhejiang Cancer Hospital

    Hangzhou, Zhejiang, 310000

    Jingjie Li, master, +86-17310738793, li.jingjie@genecast.com.cn

    Recruiting

Other trials in China

About this study

This study prospectively included 150 breast cancer patients (30 patients in the first stage and 120 patients in the second stage) who were treated with the commonly used neoadjuvant chemotherapy recommended by NCCN, received surgical treatment after neoadjuvant chemotherapy, and evaluated the efficacy according to the surgical pathological response.Based on the technical analysis of Mammaprint in patients with pathologic complete response (pCR), partial response and no response, we analyzed the characteristic genes related to breast cancer in tumor tissues and evaluated the accuracy and sensitivity of Mammaprint test in the efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy.A new model for predicting NCT effect of breast cancer with combined risk genes and clinical parameters was established based on the clinical characteristic parameters of patients to study the accuracy and sensitivity of Mammaprint monitoring for prognosis determination of breast cancer patients.

Being tested
neoadjuvant chemotherapy
Keywords
neoadjuvant chemotherapy, Mammaprint, blueprint, prognosis

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • neoadjuvant chemotherapyCombination product

    This study prospectively included 150 breast cancer patients (30 patients in the first stage and 120 patients in the second stage) who were treated with the commonly used neoadjuvant chemotherapy recommended by NCCN, received surgical treatment after neoadjuvant chemotherapy, and evaluated the efficacy according to the surgical pathological response.Based on the Mammaprint technology analysis of patients with pathologic complete response (pCR), partial response and no response, we analyzed the characteristic genes related to breast cancer in the tumor tissues and evaluated the accuracy and sensitivity of the Mammaprint test for the efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy

Study groups in NCT04264468
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
response group and the non-response groupReceived neoadjuvant chemotherapy according to the routine clinical diagnosis and treatment, and evaluated the clinical efficacy once every two cycles of chemotherapy. According to the clinical efficacy, the patients were divided into the neoadjuvant chemotherapy response group and the non-response group (evaluation standard RECIST1.1).
Receives: Combination Product: neoadjuvant chemotherapy

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Recurrence Score variation after neoadjuvant chemotherapy

    The recurrence score of each subtype

    Measured: 6 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted11 Feb 2020
  2. Study start14 May 2019
  3. Primary completion31 Mar 2020 (estimated)
  4. Study completion1 Mar 2021 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Other
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrolment
150 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04264468
Sponsor's protocol ID
CMTNCMB
Acronym
CMTNCMB
Status last verified
Feb 2020
First submitted
29 Jan 2020
Last updated
11 Feb 2020
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Evaluation of the Value of Mammaprint Test Gene Variation in the Prediction of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Breast Cancer, run by Zhejiang Cancer Hospital at 1 site in China.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 8 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 11 Feb 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Xing fei Yu, doctoral degree (+86-13588164600, yuxf1177@zjcc.org.cn), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Recurrence Score variation after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (time frame: 6 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 11 Feb 2020.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in